Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/WIKI-GUY-16

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

WIKI-GUY-16



 * Code letter:G

History of. Lzki took up WIKI-GUY-16's undoing of redirects, adding personal attacks to the mix. Possibly a third party upset at my position, possibly a good reason to block WIKI-GUY-16: no way to tell without a checkuser. Lzki is clearly a sock of someone. &mdash;Kww(talk) 01:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Supporting evidence:
 * 3 edits in a 2h timespan:


 * 23:05, 22 December 2008 WIKI-GUY-16
 * 00:28, 23 December 2008 Lzki
 * 00:48, 23 December 2008 Lzki
 * -- lucasbfr  ho ho ho 04:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I blocked Lzki for his overall behavior (that's definitely not a new user), and guess what? I triggered an autoblock :) -- lucasbfr  ho ho ho 04:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * is ❌ to . The following are confirmed as one user (some of the following have already been blocked as vandalism-only accounts):

The IP (see ) behind all these accounts has been hardblocked. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 04:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. X clamation point  06:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * These have been tagged as socks of but according to the results they are unrelated.  I would correct it but I don't know which should be named as puppeteer as there is no main account for the user. — Snigbrook  12:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

based on the outcome of Sockpuppet investigations/Lzki, I've retagged these as Lzki socks. See notes there.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 01:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''