Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wellwater Conspiracy

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Wellwater Conspiracy



 * Code letter: D


 * Supporting evidence: In a recent FAC centred on the article, the three named accounts all left comments centred on a revolving theme that the article is "fantastic" or "good" here. The main vote in which they have all participated are now closed. Both sockpuppet accounts were created within 36 hours of each other and display similar editing patterns. Correlations are strongly positive in my opinion, and some comments that these accounts have made may sway the votes of other FACs which are still running. Rudget   (Help?) 18:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: needs investigation, possibly there are others. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 18:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Currently working to find more. Rudget   (Help?) 18:19, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Two more now added after a brief look through their contributions. Rudget   (Help?) 18:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: See also meta:Steward_requests/Checkuser --Kjetil r (talk) 22:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅, also accounts, and .  Regarding the cross-wiki check, I can provide the IPs to a steward via email or the checkuser-L mailing list. Thatcher 04:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * All tagged and blocked. Thank you. Rudget   (Help?) 10:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

This is worth looking at too. Also, User:Alice Mudgardens, although he's acknowledged it. indopug (talk) 11:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC) ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''
 * Note: blocked indefinitely. Holding off from IP due to relative inactivity over the past two months, fairly dynamic I'd say so by now it'll be under new control by another subscriber to the ISP. Thank you for bringing this to our attention, anyway.  Rudget   (Help?) 12:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC)