Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Yogagates

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Yogagates



 * Code letter: A, G


 * Supporting evidence: Both of them work exactly on the same domains, both of them work in tandem in all articles, one is present when the other is not and it looks like a classic case of an office IP and a home IP, both of these accounts adding substantiation and 'weightage' to each other's edits and they seem to have a strikingly similar POV too. Sudharsansn (talk · contribs) 00:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Please provide some evidence of a WP:SOCK violation. Hunches are all well and good, but I'd prefer something more specific. – Luna Santin  (talk) 10:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for looking into this. The | Edit history for this article shows something very, very fishy going on here. In this page listed, both of them never work around the same time. One account makes an edit, and the other account after a few hours 'substantiates' it, both of them pushed exactly the same PoV in this page. User Srkris, the puppetmaster works on pushing the PoV in the relevant articles, while  User Yogagates goes to those articles which need to be defaced for that PoV to work. 'Both' of them are 'complementing' each other's works. While the puppet master, who has been blocked six times, including one just two days ago, goes on writing POV to push an agenda, the puppet is on a defacing agenda in the articles that correspond to the POV ones. To give you an example, one of them goes on to write that Sanskrit came from 'Mars', while the other goes on a rampage against Greek, Tamil, Latin and 'lowers' them so that the POV pushed in the first one can be evident.Sudharsansn (talk · contribs) 01:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * ❌ on tech evidence are unrelated, but reviewing admins should look at behavior. But for other issues here, I'm going to another CU for a second opinion.  — Rlevse •  Talk  • 12:34, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Talked about this with Rlevse a bit, off-wiki. In addition to the above, Yogagates is a ✅ match for: These accounts are a match, but currently have no edits: Recommend no action on the unused accounts, just yet, but worth mentioning in case they turn out to be sleepers. – Luna Santin  (talk) 04:22, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Is Yogagates a ✅ match for Srkris too? -- lucasbfr  [[User talk:Lucasbfr|talk ]] 09:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No, Yogagates and Srkris are ❌ — Rlevse • Talk  • 17:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

I am moving this to the completed section but have taken no action and no tagging per comments of CU JodyBtalk 14:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''