Wikipedia:Requests for comment/68.18.39.45

In order to remain listed at Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 00:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is:, 29 July 2024 (UTC).



Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute
User displays complete indifference to Wikipedia policy/guidelines, repeatedly restores improper edits and resorts to personal abuse and false allegations of vandalism on Talk page.

Description
This editor inserts unsourced/POV edits in the Contras page and deletes sourced/NPOV edits contributed by others. He/she appears to be treating this entry as a soapbox. When these edits are reverted, the user makes similar edits. After being informed that these edits are in violation of Wikipedia policies/guidelines, this editor displays complete indifference. The editor continues to resort to personal abuse and false allegations of vandalism against another editor.

Contras

 * Abuse of other editors
 * Dismissal of Wikipedia policies/guidelines ("bureaucratic nonsense")
 * False allegation of vandalism; more personal abuse
 * Repeating false allegation; continued dismissal of policy ("He hid behind wikipedia policy")-->

Applicable policies and guidelines

 * Verifiability
 * Neutral point of view
 * Original research
 * Resolving disputes
 * Assume good faith
 * Civility

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

 * Hecht’s attempt
 * Hecht’s attempt
 * Hecht’s attempt
 * Atavi’s attempt
 * Atavi’s attempt
 * Atavi’s attempt

Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}


 * 1) This user seems to think that he/she, alone of all users, is exempt from the rules concerning Verifiability, NPOV, Original research, etc. Even after being alerted to these rules he/she dismisses them as inconsequential and restores edits that violate policy. He/she is extremely abusive to me ("extremely hypocritical," "right-wing blowhards," "dishonest," etc.), falsely accuses me of vandalising the article and the Talk page, and ignores admonitions from a sympathetic editor to stop. Due to unfamiliarity with dispute resolution procedures, I prematurely threatened to have him/her blocked, but I do think that some outside intervention is now warranted. -- Hecht 10:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) I am compelled to certify that User 68.18.39.45 / annonymous has engaged in personal attacks against User:Hecht. I disagree with the allegations about Verifiability and Original Research, and I think I am not in a position to objectively comment on NPOV. User 68.18.39.45 / annonymous jumped to conclusions, in what I think is a browser-cache induced problem, with missing comments on talk pages. I am still confident that User 68.18.39.45 / annonymous can realize he or she is being unreasonable in certain respects and change his or her conduct. I do not believe that User 68.18.39.45 / annonymous acts in bad faith; rather he is carried away by impulsiveness and excessive ardor.--Atavi 12:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Response
''This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections (“Statement of the dispute” and “Outside Views”) should not edit the “Response” section.''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}''

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view
''This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections (“Statement of the dispute” and “Response”) should not edit the “Outside Views” section, except to endorse an outside view.''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page’s discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user’s vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.