Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Aoso0ck

In order to remain listed at Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: ~ ), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is:, 29 July 2024 (UTC).



Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute
Aoso0ck has been repetitively warned about edit waring and vandalism. They refuse to either source/cite their changes or discuss changes on talk pages. Jwri7474 (talk) 06:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Desired outcome
This user should be blocked for a cooling off period at least. Jwri7474 (talk) 06:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

-->

Description
Aoso0ck has in this case been vandalising the articles Residency (medicine), Specialty (medicine), and General practitioner. This user refuses to discuss any changes on the talk page and refuses to cite/source any changes they wish to make. This user has been warned for their behavior, but continues to simply blank warnings off of their talk page.

Evidence of disputed behavior
(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
 * ,

,,
 * ,
 * ,

,
 * ,

Applicable policies and guidelines
{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

Evidence of trying to resolve the dispute
(provide diffs and links)

Evidence of failing to resolve the dispute
(provide diffs and links to demonstrate that the disputed behavior continued after trying to resolve the dispute)

Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}



Response
''This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.'' ''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view
''This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Outside view by
Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view by
Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.