Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Lumiere

I have asked him not to remove the NPOV tag, however he has done so four times now! (Once, he did so and then put it back).

I put the NPOV tag up because both he and I agree the article is not NPOV.... "I think the article is non-NPOV, but the tag indicates/creates some level of tension which I would prefer not to exhibit."

My hope in putting it up was to bring in some outside editors. Sethie 06:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Once I added this RfC, he added it back, his reason being: "Added POV tag -- it seems that critics are going to change the content significatively." Sethie 16:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I took it out because, as I explained, it does not look good, but I took it out after making significant modifications that followed your suggestions. However, after I saw that the problem is far from being resolved, I appreciated your point: It is a temporary way to bring the attention to the current situation. Amrit 18:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * You act with me like you act with the TM organization. You attack to put me on the defensive, and you ignore the positive work I do. Who read all the papers and web sites that you proposed? I doubt that you read the papers on the benefits of TM. I am doing constructive work, listen to your arguments, etc. but you complain and make a Rfc because of disagreement on the NPOV tag, even when you see that I putted it back!!! Stop this intimedation approach. At the end, it might turn against you. Amrit 18:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

If stating the facts is an attack, then yes, I am attacking you.

I understand that you are feeling sad and frustated, because you are wanting appreciation for the work that you have done.

I placed the RfC before in between your 4th removal of NPOV tag and 2nd replacement Dec 13 5:45 Your fourth removal of NPOV Dec 13 6:01, I place the RfC. Dec 13 15:27, 9 hours later, you put the NPOV tag back. Dec 13 18:19, you come here and say I asked for the RfC after you put it back.

If asking other people to comment on your behavior is intimidation, then I am guilty of intimidation. Sethie 21:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Wow! Sure it is intimidating! How do you think I should feel?  Tell me more. Maybe there is some other implicit rule that I do not know here. Amrit 00:23, 14 December 2005 (UTC)