Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhamed

In order to remain listed at Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC timestamp with }), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 25 Mar 2006 00:40 UTC.


 * (Cool Cat | talk | contributions)

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute
''This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.''


 * I feel the users in question have repetively stayed hostile/incivil towards all parties not suited to their POV. Users have been warned to stay civil by a number of users but I observed no improvement in their behaviour. On ocasions users rained threats (axamples are given below).
 * It could also be said on some occasions users were writing highly biased articles if not pov pushing. In my view users lack the basic understanding of neutrality. On many occasions, users work together in making similar biased edits which could be viewed as systematic bias.

Description
''{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}''

Evidence of disputed behavior
(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)


 * All contribs

Civility

 * 1) *The only "real" response I got to my inqueries regarding the mass taging of articles was "Bozmongols do not have in Wikipedi to searches!!!! I mean you". I am not sure what that supposed to mean, I do not think it was intended to enligten me.
 * 2) *My attempts to comunicate with him ultimately resulted with: "ach siktir Lan". As my language skills in Turkish are less than perfect, I asked the meaning of "ach siktir Lan". I am told "siktir Lan" translates to "Fuck off" in Turkish although people are puzzled on the meaning of "ach".
 * 3) *Explained that he knew no turkish but understood Arab[ic] and Kurdish. And that he leard Siktir Lan (fuck off) from my turkish friends. I can assure anyone reading, he does not know any of my firends.
 * 4) *Another interesting point is where he posted the comment. The instructions clearly indicate that comments not related to endorsement are to be posted in the page. He either didnt see it, but more likely didnt understand it.
 * 5) *Posted same comment again after LukasPietsch removed it for being inaproporate
 * 1) *Explained that he knew no turkish but understood Arab[ic] and Kurdish. And that he leard Siktir Lan (fuck off) from my turkish friends. I can assure anyone reading, he does not know any of my firends.
 * 2) *Another interesting point is where he posted the comment. The instructions clearly indicate that comments not related to endorsement are to be posted in the page. He either didnt see it, but more likely didnt understand it.
 * 3) *Posted same comment again after LukasPietsch removed it for being inaproporate
 * 1) *Posted same comment again after LukasPietsch removed it for being inaproporate

Categories

 * Kurdistan is a contraversial definition of a region of which the boundries are determined by whoever is drawing them.
 * 1) *Just one example of mass tagging of random provinces in Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Iran
 * 2) *Mykonos is a restouran in Berlin, Germany.
 * My attempts to comunicate with him falied as he does not know english.
 * 1) *Mykonos is a restouran in Berlin, Germany.
 * My attempts to comunicate with him falied as he does not know english.

Involvement with my Rfa

 * 1) Voted oppose (which alone is fine as everyone entitled to their opinion) with "I please you Pleas, Cool Cat is an Turkish Nationalis is not got Administrator"
 * 2) Posted a simmilar "comment" on following pages:
 * 3) *English post: Wikipedia talk:Esperanza, User talk:Aranda56 , User talk:Dynamo ace
 * 4) *German post: User talk:Banes, User talk:Dmn
 * In my view this kind of behavior on RfAs is trolling. Again in my view such behaviour should not be tollerated.

Applicable policies
{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}
 * No Personal Attacks
 * Neutral Point of View

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
(provide diffs and links)
 * Muhamed does not know english so communicating with him as expected turned out to be a disaster.
 * The only "real" response I got to my inqueries regarding the mass taging of articles was "Bozmongols do not have in Wikipedi to searches!!!! I mean you". I am not sure what that supposed to mean, I do not think it was intended to enligten me.
 * My attempts to comunicate with him ultimately resulted with: "ach siktir Lan". As my language skills in Turkish are less than perfect, I asked the meaning of "ach siktir Lan". I am told "siktir Lan" translates to "Fuck off" in Turkish although people are puzzled on the meaning of "ach".
 * My attempts to comunicate with him ultimately resulted with: "ach siktir Lan". As my language skills in Turkish are less than perfect, I asked the meaning of "ach siktir Lan". I am told "siktir Lan" translates to "Fuck off" in Turkish although people are puzzled on the meaning of "ach".
 * My attempts to comunicate with him ultimately resulted with: "ach siktir Lan". As my language skills in Turkish are less than perfect, I asked the meaning of "ach siktir Lan". I am told "siktir Lan" translates to "Fuck off" in Turkish although people are puzzled on the meaning of "ach".

Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

(sign with ~ )
 * Cool CatTalk 00:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * FrancisTyers 22:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Other users who endorse this summary
(sign with ~ )

Response
''This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.'' ''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~ ):

Outside view
''This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~ ):

Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.