Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Omallystwin

In order to remain listed at Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 12:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is:, 29 July 2024 (UTC).



Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute
''This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.''

Description
''This user has repeatedly reinserted an entry into that appear to promote two webcomics and their author. Attempts to discuss issue on article talk page and with the user directly have been met with a defiant response.''

Evidence of disputed behavior
(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
 * Insertion of questioned material:, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,.
 * Response to questions about edits:, , ,.

Applicable policies and guidelines
{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}
 * Disruptive editing
 * What Wikipedia is not
 * Neutral point of view
 * Verifiability

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
(provide diffs and links)
 * Talk page discussion: Talk:Alton Brown
 * User talk page discussions:

Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}


 * Allen3 talk 12:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Travisl 06:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Other users who endorse this summary

 * --Falard 14:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * – flamurai (t) 05:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Response
''This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.'' ''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view
''This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.''


 * Hard to read intent here. For one, the user appears to be a Single Purpose Account for the sole purpose of promoting the webcomic in question.  I am going to err on the side of good faith here.  It appears he is genuinely trying to provide a reference to Alton Brown's notability, which is in itself a noble gesture.  From my point of view, he does not understand how to reference correctly, does not understand what he is doing wrong, and is getting frustrated with the actions of the editors who are removing his additions.  On the other side, the editors are RIGHT to remove his edits, but perhaps some help in trying to intergrate the information in an acceptable manner rather than wholesale removal of the information would be good.  This could be a good editor in the future.  We were ALL bad editors when we started, it took some learning to get better.  The difference in most of our cases was help from experienced editors, not simply removal of our work without proper criticism.  --Jayron32 04:16, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Users who endorse this summary:
 * 1) Jayron32 04:16, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Addhoc 18:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.