Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rbjj

In order to remain listed at Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC timestamp with }), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is:, 29 July 2024 (UTC).


 * (Rbj | Rbj | contributions)

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute
''This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.'' has conducted a campaign of harrassment,incivility and defammation towards myself, Phroziac, and others.

Description
''{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}'' Like a long list of rude and combative USENET regulars on Wikipedia, rbj has basically done nothing else over the past few weeks other than going out of his way to try and hurt other users. This is beyond unacceptable on Wikipedia, and if he cannot change, he cannot remain within the Wikipedia community.

Evidence of disputed behavior
(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
 * Longwinded soapbox diatribe on rfar, verging on WP:NPA vio
 * Another near WP:NPA vio on the talk page of
 * Whining to Jimbo, second including an NPA vio.,
 * He literally states that he has a vendetta here.
 * He tries to disrupt an rfar in an attempt to defame me.
 * Complains to Arbitrator
 * More defammation on an article talk page
 * More defammation in 's user space.
 * Complains to Arbitrator ,
 * Tries to gain as an ally in his crusade of hatred towards me.
 * Tries to gain as an ally in his crusade of hatred towards me.
 * Harrassment on 's talk page

Applicable policies and guidelines
{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}
 * WP:CIVIL
 * WP:NPA
 * WP:POINT
 * WP:AGF
 * WP:DICK
 * WP:NOT
 * WP:STALK
 * WP:WQT
 * WP:TPG

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
(provide diffs and links)
 * 
 * 
 * 

Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

(sign with ~ )
 * karmafist 02:15, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Other users who endorse this summary
(sign with ~ )

Response
''This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.'' ''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~ ):

Outside view
''This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~ ):

Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.