Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Sbakuria


 * The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.  

A summary of the debate may be found at the bottom of the page.

In order to remain listed at Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: ~ ), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is:, 29 July 2024 (UTC).



Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute
''This is a summary written by users who are concerned by this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.''

Desired outcome
User discusses opinions on article with others before editing. User also follows Manual of Style.

Description
Sbakuria ignores requests to discuss the changes they make to the article. The user changes to a poorly formatted and promotional version of the article. Several attempts have been made to engage the user in discussion, but all have been completely ignored and the user's reverts continue.

Evidence of disputed behavior
(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
 * Earlier difference between versions http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Mashkevitch&diff=next&oldid=300558950
 * Difference showing same revert behaviour http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Mashkevitch&diff=303583104&oldid=303175290

Applicable policies and guidelines

 * Neutral point of view
 * Manual of Style
 * Consensus
 * Biographies of living persons

Evidence of trying to resolve the dispute
(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
 * Repeated attempts on the user talk page have been unsuccessful

Evidence of failing to resolve the dispute
(Provide diffs to demonstrate that the disputed behavior continued after trying to resolve the dispute.)
 * Difference following repeated attempts to engage in discussion with user http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexander_Mashkevitch&diff=305319772&oldid=305296258

Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}


 * Rtdixon86 (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * PhilKnight (talk) 20:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Bricklayer (talk) 13:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Response
''This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view
''This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Outside view by Abce2
User most likely isn't going to respond to any request to discuss his or her edits. If Sbakuri continues this behavior then a block will probably be effective for the user to look back on his/her edits.

Users who endorse this summary:
 * 1)  Abce2 |  Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  21:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) His preferred version appears to be a copyright violation, so escalating blocks can probably be used from now on. PhilKnight (talk) 20:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Outside view by
Users who endorse this summary:

Reminder to use the talk page for discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.

Summary
indefinitely blocked.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.