Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Taglines for wrestling events and matches

Statement of the dispute
Taglines being on wrestling articles (for events and PPVs) needs to be determined, but one user assumes they aren't notable due to one poll:

Talk:WrestleMania_23/Archive_1. It should be noted: only a handful of people voted there (and there is nothing saying it is now a wrestling project policy because of the poll or anything similar). The discussion about taglines started here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling. A few users have commented saying taglines aren't notable for matches, but other than that: nothing has been decided. The project talk page doesn't have that many people posting on it, so hopefully this RFC provides better results.

To help people understand what a tagline is (if they don't know). It's a line used to help promote something. Movies have them, as do wrestling events and wrestling matches. As of now: most event articles have event taglines, but match taglines are usually removed by a few users due to it being "not notable". RobJ1981 03:05, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It should also be noted: bulletproof's claim of: The result of the proposal was oppose listing a match by what it is billed. Consensus is the same for other event articles under WP:PW (at the vote on the WrestleMania 23 article) isn't backed up by much. Only a handful of people voted: and a majority of the discussion is by TJ+Bulletproof. I don't consider that a wrestling policy change at all. Especially considering many people don't say a thing about all taglines: just the one for a match at WrestleMania 23. Trying to control a project and create guidelines because of one vote: isn't how Wikipedia works. RobJ1981 09:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Desired outcome
It should be all taglines listed in articles or none at all. One or the other isn't acceptable: considering TV and other sources mention both types of taglines just as much. RobJ1981 03:05, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Description
''{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}''

Discussion
Only 1 user is advocating for taglines of individual matches to be included. If taglines were included, it would be unmanageable since hundreds of matches have had taglines. Also, I (and others) don't buy this BS that if we include PPV taglines we HAVE to include match taglines. It is NOT "both or neither". TJ Spyke 03:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not BS at all (and the fact you call it BS isn't acceptable or even good faith). The taglines are equal. Look at any DVD case for the event: a good percent of taglines for events AND matches are listed. Look at the websites: both taglines are listed. Watch the commercials and promos for the matches and events: both are mentioned. Not adding match taglines (because you hate them or whatever the case actually is), isn't acceptable. I'm the only one asking for them now, but I don't think it's an issue to add a few words to articles. Articles can't be expanded, if you aren't willing to add notable content (weather you like the information or not). The taglines are promotional tools that helped the matches and events. By not listing one it's hurting the article. It's like saying "let's not list the manager of this wrestler, because I don't like him". That's not how Wikipedia works. RobJ1981 05:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Damn, I wrote a big reply, and then I got an error. Brief summery: What I called BS was your thinking that you can't have PPV taglines without match taglines. Match taglines are NOT equal and are rarely emphasized or noted. Match taglines are not notable, and leaving them out is not even close to the level of leaving managers out. TJ Spyke 06:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Rarely noted or emphasized? Did you even read what I said above?  I will post it again: Look at any DVD case for the event: a good percent of taglines for events AND matches are listed. Look at the websites: both taglines are listed. Watch the commercials and promos for the matches and events: both are mentioned.  That's far from rarely noted. You speak of "votes" in an edit summary. I would like proof that many exist (other than the Wrestlemania 23) one, then things might be different. RobJ1981 06:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I meant rare in the overall amount of taglines included on the DVD case and/or website. Most of the time they aren't. TJ Spyke 06:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Match taglines are not notable, Period. They do little to help the article and are nothing more than circumlocutions. Calling a match by a tagline such as... "Champions of Champions Triple Threat Match" is an unnecessarily long way of saying it’s just a "Triple Threat Match". Or an "Icon vs. Legend match", which isn't even a type of match, is an indirect way of saying who is involved. Event taglines are different because they don't have the same long, or indirect effect on the article. -- bullet proof  3:16 06:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * To point something out: I could care less if the tagline is in the match listing. Why not a note below the match itself? I don't see any harm in that at all. Articles have "notes" and/or "trivia" sections: it could be there instead of below the match (if needed). I'm anti-trivia sections most of the time.. I admit that. But one tagline or two wont harm things. A good percent of the time: events have a few match taglines, so it wouldn't clutter the article or anything of that sort either. RobJ1981 06:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)