Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names/Fattyfatfatfatty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the username below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the discussion's talk page).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was disallow. Closing per discussion - Alison ☺ 02:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[view]

NOTE: I have blocked this username as an obvious violation of WP:U, this should have seem WP:AIV. —— Eagle 101  Need help? 01:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S. Someone who knows how to properly close (what tags?) can please do so. Thankyou.

Insulting username. Declined by WP:AIV as not quite bad enough. RJASE1 Talk  21:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Disallow. The repeated use of the same term makes it sound like a playground insult. I would allow User:Fatty as mild self-deprecation. PS has the user been informed? Sam Blacketer 21:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, they have now. I was about to and got distracted. RJASE1 Talk  21:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Disallow This username has no other purpose but to insult people. Wooyi Talk, Editor review 21:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Disallow as insulting. Slightly surprised that AIV didn't block it but I suppose it is good to seek consensus. G Donato (talk to me...) 21:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Disallow-repetitive and insultion. --TeckWiz Parlate Contribs@(Lets go Yankees!) 22:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - a different username, was also posted to WP:AIV earlier today. I suggested it be referred here as it seemed reasonably innocuous & it was subsequently removed from AIV by User:Academic Challenger. So now I suspect some strange is going on. This a/c has some newbish edits done. Thoughts? -  Alison ☺ 22:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * FYI, the same admin removed this one from AIV. RJASE1 Talk  22:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Disallow unavoidably insulting to some. Note that the other user User:FattyFattyFatFat has at least contributed. Hopefully they could be approached to change their name also.  I see there is no User:Ghazghkull, for instance.  Please note that they might easily also want "User:Waaagh", also derived from their interests.  Would both of these names be seen as acceptable, even as 'random' as they look? Shenme 23:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * DisallowInsults are not allowed as user names. Agha Nader 23:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Agha Nader
 * Disallow. Insult, and possible confusion with User:FattyFattyFatFat. --Burgercat 23:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Disallow, motion to close, per all, etc.-- Wizardman 00:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)