Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names/MathsIsFun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the username below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the discussion's talk page).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Closing this. Something may have to be done, but this user has been around for a very long time, and doesn't appear to be linkspamming, but just has a promotional userpage that should probably be deleted. I'm going to bring this up on WP:ANI. The username is just one facet of the situation, and not even the most important one. I will subst in this debate there for review; feel free to participate. Mango juice talk 17:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[view]

I feel this is a promotional username - the userpage makes clear that this is the owner of a website called. Much of the user's contributions seem to be additions of links to his site in various math-related articles (I removed over 40 links this morning out of spam and COI concerns). The Wikipedia article on the website is Math Is Fun.RJASE1 Talk  17:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This username per se isn't wrong... but the behavior most certainly is. Is this the correct venue for discussing editor behavior? 17:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Concerning the behavior, I posted notices at WP:COIN and WT:WPSPAM, but I still believe the username violates the "promotional" part of WP:U.RJASE1 Talk  17:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The username seams to be promotional for http://www.mathsisfun.com/, promotional usernames are against WP:U Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 17:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes but if the user did not engage in promotional behavior would that provision of WP:U still apply? 17:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's still promotional unless it's generic Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 17:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well I think that name is as generic as say a username like User:AlgebraIsFun. It is not as though the username is User:MathIsFun.com or something. Essentially what I'm getting at is sans the behavior we wouldn't be here discussing this. 17:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * So it's a company name, thats admits it has chosen the name to span wikipedia with, but you don't think the username is a problem? Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 17:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * This is a case where [potentially problematic username] + [edit history] = [promotional username]. It could be generic, but not in this instance. (In the spirit of recent MfD discussion, I am no longer expressing my opinion with !votes at RFCN). Flyguy649talkcontribs 17:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the entries talk page). No further edits should be made to this page.