Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names/Ombudsman

[view]

On August 22, after much discussion, administrator Radiant! asked Ombudsman to choose a different username, but did not issue a username block because Ombudsman had not logged in for over a week at the time. Ombudsman has now started editing again using the same username, apparently without acknowledging the existence of either the RFC discussion or of Radiant's request. --PHenry 07:20, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * This appears to be a non-issue. If this person were using an account name such as "Administrator" or "Bureaucrat", perhaps then I could see potential for confusion.  Ombudsman appears to be a valuable contributor in good standing, and it should be his/her decision to change their name.  Hall Monitor 18:03, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The consensus at the time was that it was very definitely not a non-issue. --PHenry 02:51, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I certainly think this could be problematic. N (t/c) 12:57, 26 October 2005 (UTC)