Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 July 2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RyanJBenson/Mint_Julep_%28film%29#Cast
Any help would be appreciated! This is my first page. Thank you much.

RyanJBenson (talk) 01:06, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello there! I think you're off to a good start. You've got references provided, which is good. It would be best though if you could use inline citing of your references. It's not hard to do, and I would recommend reading References for beginners to get the coding for it. Once you get that taken care of, I think you can go ahead and publish the article. Hope this helps. :) Pianotech (talk) 01:25, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Your article is very well-written. It is good that you introduce the actors/actresses and their roles and explain the film. The only thing I found that you could improve is your references. They should be numbered, and if applicable you need a title, date, and author for each page. Jsayre64

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_R_Price
This guy has written several very influential books is responsible for the publication of a whole genre of books and a renaissance in the western martial arts community. Does he meet the threshold for notability?

75.43.16.235 (talk) 02:22, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello! Notability is determined by the existence of independent, verifiable references. I would think that if you can provide at least three such references, you could state a case for notability. Notability isn't related to popularity, but to the fact that others who are not connected are writing about the person or subject. Hope that helps. :) Pianotech (talk) 03:33, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * See WP:BIO and WP:GNG for the notability criteria. - Reconsider !  09:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triago
Please review article so that "new unreviewed article" template can be removed

Lanchner (talk) 09:19, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello Lanchner- You've got a good article going, but see if you can find more information. If not, you can leave the article how it is and it will still be a great article. Jsayre64
 * Yeah, the article could do with a bit of expansion. However, you could leave it as it is - it could be a stub instead. Chevy  monte  carlo  09:00, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Bekkersdal_Marathon I need this article to be reviewed
Eccohomo (talk) 09:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC) You've got the right idea. You look like you know what you're doing. But try to fix that formatting error with the dotted-line box and the abnormal text font, and, even if you used it multiple times, you only have to list that reference once. Jsayre64
 * I corrected the first error Jsayre64 commented on - it's caused by leaving a space at the start of a sentence,

like this.
 * Other than that I think you need to try and find more Categories to add to the article as well as additional reliable references, if possible. At the moment the whole article really only has one reference. Chevy  monte  carlo  09:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infosurv_Concept_Exchange
The Infosurv Concept Exchange (iCE) is a patented prediction market created by Infosurv, a global market research firm. It's the only prediction market specifically designed for market research purposes, namely predicting the commercial success of new products or advertisements.

Jaredheyman (talk) 15:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Wiler
Please have a look and tell me what more is needed to make this article suitable for wikipedia - I created it in 2010 January and it was on wikipedia for about 6 months and then somehow it got tossed back into my workspace. Do I have enough sources?

A Google search for Jack Willer gives 118,000 hits.

Thanks for any and all help and pointers.

Cheers!

Opusiv (talk) 16:14, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You need to add some more useful names to the references, such as |Apple website . Also, you might want to add an infobox to the article, such as this template, which you can use. I hope this is helpful! Chevy  monte  carlo  16:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Tgennert/Nolan Gasser
We need to know if this will be accepted. Also any notes on the format

Tgennert (talk) 16:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I think the article needs an infobox if possible, I recommend maybe Template:Infobox person or something like that. Also please try and use inline citations to display the references correctly. I will post an example on your talk page to help you out. I hope you understand this. For more information please either contact me, ask at the help desk or take a look at WP:CITE. Chevy  monte  carlo  16:48, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ScreenDaddy/Malcolm_Grear
article written about Malcolm Grear, an American graphic designer

ScreenDaddy (talk) 20:05, 2 July 2010 (UTC) Good article with four fairly solid references, so I think it's ready to go. An infobox would add a nice touch, though I think you can publish the article the way it is. If you do decide to add an infobox, a good one to use for people is Template:Infobox person. Good luck with the article. :) Pianotech (talk) 20:25, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jsayre64/Oregon_Community_Credit_Union
Is my article well-written with reliable sources and a good amount of interesting information?

Jsayre64 (talk) 22:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but that is not at all the way footnotes are formed in Wikipedia. Please check out WP:CITE and footnotes. Referencing can trip up new editors. If the links aren't making sense to you, let me know and I can fix one for you as an illustration, but you can also look at just about any other article in Wikipedia to see how it is done.-- SPhilbrick  T  22:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridge_Music
Article unreviewed over a month. Would appreciate someone taking a look. Thanks

em2 on wikipedia (talk) 22:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC) Very good article! Just add a title, date, and author for each webpage in your references and continue the numbering system in the references. Good job! Jsayre64


 * Looks pretty good, I removed the unreviewed template. A couple things should be done; I'll do the first:
 * Looks like you created your own hatnote. I'll convert to use the usual template.
 * You have a number of well-formed references (e.g. [2]). However, you have some bare links embedded (.e.g josephbertolozzi.com link), which should be in proper format
 * In the reference section, you have a number of bulleted items. These belong int he external links section, unless they are being used as references, in which case they should be properly formatted like the others.


 * It is clear you know how to do references, properly, but check out WP:CITE and footnotes is if you have any questions, or just ask me.-- SPhilbrick  T  22:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Vu_de_l'extérieur
Hey, just wrote an article of the Serge Gainsbourg album Vu de l'extérieur. Surely anything by Gainsbourg is worthy of inclusion? Especially due to his longstanding legendary status in France. Any advice appreciated.

Perry (talk) 23:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi there. I'm sure it is 'worthy', but the requirement for a Wikipedia article is, some references to independent reliable sources, such as newspaper reviews or something. It needs to be verifiable and "notable" in Wikipedia terms - see WP:VRS.


 * The information you've put about his health, etc, is very interesting - but, you need to say where it comes from - provide a reference that the reader can check for themselves. See WP:CITE.  Chzz  ► 15:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)