Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 October 3

Starbase Indy needs review for removal of new unreviewed article template
Hello, I've worked on this article and received some advice on sources and inline references. I think I've moved it correctly to live space. I would appreciate someone reviewing it to see if the "new unreviewed article template" can be removed. Thanks in advance for your help!

Janeway1701 (talk) 00:29, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks quite good! The template seems to have been removed, however, I've patrolled it just in case. Happy editing! THENEW M O NO   03:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Yes, someone beat you to it, but I appreciate your taking the time to patrol it, just to be sure nothing was missing. Thanks again! Janeway 1701 Janeway1701 (talk) 15:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Lisa Pelikan/Simon Levy
I'm just checking to see if article is ok.

Lisa Pelikan (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Your article needs sources; it will be deleted if they are not provided. This guide should help you out. Post here if you need help. THENEW M O NO   03:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Nannou7/Caratheodory Dimension Structure
Wanted to ask if there was anything else to add/change before I made this stub live.

Nannou7 (talk) 12:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I think the article needs to be made more simplified, so the average reader can understand. You can do this by adding more links or adding more descriptive/summarising text. I hope you understand this :) Chevy  monte  carlo  - alt 18:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Question
Can a baby born from a Spanish father and a greek Mother in the UK, hold more than one passport when an adult?

86.156.160.63 (talk) 17:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * This page is for article feedback. Please try the reference desk.  Chzz  ► 20:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Narasimhanator/Anokha Amrita
It is a new page. Please tell me how i can improve the quality. It is a stub but i expect a few more people to contribute. The "this article is a stub" box can be added if necessary.

Anirudh Ranganath 19:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * It needs at least some references to independent, reliable sources (e.g. newspapers) to be made a live article, otherwise it might be deleted. See WP:VRS, WP:GNG.  Chzz  ► 20:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Bradhfeldman/EyeWiki
Does this look like an adequate topic and beginning for a new wiki page?

Bradhfeldman (talk) 22:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * It would require references, to independent reliable sources.

launched in July 2010 by a group of ophthalmologists working with support from the American Academy of Ophthalmology

...and so on.


 * For how to add them, see WP:CITE.


 * The list of external links is not appropriate, see WP:EL.


 * Please review WP:FIRST. Articles must show why the subject is notable, with appropriate references.  Chzz  ► 20:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Rob Wolchek
Kmea (talk) 01:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The links to the referenced articles should be part of the reference itself - I've had a go at adding some, so please look at this edit, and see if they're the right links, and if you can fix others.


 * The format for an external links is, for example, Google - which appears as:

Google


 * Therefore, a reference can be e.g....

 Benefits will be cut from 2013.


 * I hope that helps.  Chzz  ► 21:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC)