Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 February 25

Eliot Pearson Awards
I would like to submit my article for review, since this is my first Wikipedia article. I welcome your feedback and suggestions.

Sfleischmann (talk) 01:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a good start but I think there are perhaps some notability and tone/neutrality issues with the article. You have some good, reliable references but it seems to rely a lot on IMDB, which isn't really considered that much of a reliable reference for a Wikipedia article, so you might want to look for more reliable, third-party sources for the article. Chevy  monte  carlo  17:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Kyriasabin/Ron Fletcher
Please review this page and post with any issues. I appreciate any input that will help to facilitate the addition of this page to Wikipedia.

Kyriasabin (talk) 07:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Pressure Jump
Please review the new article about Pressure Jump. I am intending to tidy up the maths to make it look more presentable. Any other suggestions gratefully received.

Dave Pearson (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * You might want to consider adding sections and maybe some web-based references, but really I think the article is good as it is. Really nice job. Chevy  monte  carlo  17:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Smoke'n'Soul
An article about a reggae band from Serbia. Any comments before I remove "unreviewed" template?

RockyMM (talk) 13:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Telmar (software)
Hi, looking for help on this article, I have edited it several times and it still has the advertising flag. Can someone take a look and let me know what needs changed? Also, the name is Telmar which also happens to be a place in Narnia, is putting (software) adequate for disambiguation? Thanks!Brom479 (talk) 14:04, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It looks OK now. There isn't an advertising tag on it now, and there shouldn't be. Yes the article name is fine. It looks like the company is notable enough. Everything looks OK. Herostratus (talk) 16:45, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Forcedobscurity/Androidport
The wikipedia page for Androidport serves as a medium to inform readers about what is happening in the Android development world; through ports to different handsets and modifications of firmware, this page specifically targets the Samsung Wave. Its significance is relevant to many people interested in the growing Android market and allows for a simple, supportive place where users can discuss Android matters and help each other through the process of working with Android. It is not an advertisement for Androidport, and does not intend to lure users to the site, but simply allow them to be a part of the incredible development process involved in Android. Feel free to suggest any changes, and I will do my best to write it to meet the expectations.

Forcedobscurity (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Permeable reactive barrier
This is my first page. It is on the uses of permeable reactive barriers in groundwater remediation. Would someone be able to look it over for general suggestions?

Abraham Schulte (talk) 17:39, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Talk:Permeable reactive barrier. Thanks for contributing! Jesanj (talk) 22:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I second Jesanj - this is an outstanding contribution! Thanks very much, it's much appreciated. It looks like a quite good article to me, I don't have anything to add to Jesanj's comments. As to categorization, I added it to one category, "Water filters" (which is a subcategory of "Water treatement"). It may need other categories, but I'm not sure which ones. But if you look at the categories applied to the article Groundwater remediation, maybe some of those would be appropriate. Herostratus (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Linneaelynn/This Great Society
Please check notability. Thank you.

Linneaelynn (talk) 17:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Notability isn't a term describing some inherent quality of a subject, A rule of thumb test for notability is "has anyone taken notice of it". Usually we see that through references to articles consisting of the notice that was taken. But here there are no links to such articles. If it's just a good monthly, but nobody has written about it yet, you will probably have to wait until that kind of "notability" has been established. Tkotc (talk) 07:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

WinHex
Flmcse (talk) 18:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The article consists of a link to a CNET site where one can download a crippled version of what is apparently commercial software. There is no indication of any other notability. I'd be surprised if it isnt deleted. Tkotc (talk) 08:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

User:RVMK/Welfare Association
RVMK (talk) 19:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Jmearley/simonyouthfoundation
This article is about the Simon Youth Foundation, a national non-profit foundation for alternative education. Please check for tone/objectivity and offer any constructive criticism you might have! (Thank you in advance!). Because it is a separate entity from Simon Property Group (financially, organizationally, etc), I would argue its notable to stand alone and would be confusing otherwise.

je (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

User:SaundersCW/Magnolia House Bed and Breakfast
My first attempt at an article. Looking for comments on how I can make this better for posting live. The article is about the history of the Magnolia House and the historical importance of the home and original family.

SaundersCW (talk) 22:29, 25 February 2011 (UTC)