Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/AMG Chemmani

Allegations of mass graves at Chemmani
 view edit delete watch Filed: 00:25, May 21 2007 (UTC)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

 * Did a lot of discussing on the talk page (initiated by different users), here,
 * Got a third opinion here.

Issues to be mediated

 * Should the article be included in Category:Mass graves?
 * Should the article be renamed from "Allegations of mass graves at Chemmani" to "Mass graves at Chemmani"?

Additional issues to be mediated
None at this time

Parties' agreement to mediate

 * All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.


 * 1) Agree Watchdogb 00:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Agree Taprobanus 11:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Agree Lustead 15:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Agree --snowolfD4( talk /  @ ) 20:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Agree Shunpiker 22:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Agree -- ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪   walkie-talkie  11:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Agree Iwazaki  会話. 討論 13:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Parties' agreement to Tariqabjotu's offer
, an experienced administrator and user, has expressed an offer to take this case as a possible lead-up to a nomination to join the Mediation Committee. However, as Tariqabjotu is not a member of the Committee at present, it is a generally accepted practice that the parties must consent to a non-Committee member mediating a RfM.

As such, can I ask that all parties to the mediation please list whether they "agree" or "disagree" to Tariqabjotu mediating below, in much the same format as the initial agreement above. Voting will last seven days, from June 10 (ie. closes on June 17).

I apologise for the delay in action on this case. Due to absences by a number of the members of the Committee, there has been a backlog. Please note that if consent isn't given by all parties above within seven days, then you will have to wait for a Committee mediator, which could take a fair while at the present rate. On all accounts, I encourage you to take Tariqabjotu's offer, however the choice is, of course, yours.


 * For the Mediation Committee,  Daniel  04:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) Agree Watchdogb 15:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Agree -- ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪  walkie-talkie  16:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Agree snowolfD4( talk / @</b> ) 20:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Agree -- Shunpiker 22:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Agree -- Lustead 12:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Agree --Taprobanus 13:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Agree --Iwazaki 10:01, June 20, 2007 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee
''A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.''
 * Accepted.
 * For the Mediation Committee,  Daniel  04:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 20:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)