Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/A Voice for Men

A Voice for Men

 * Editors involved in this dispute
 * 1) – filing party


 * Articles affected by this dispute


 * Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
 * Talk:A_Voice_for_Men

Issues to be mediated

 * Primary issues (added by the filing party)
 * 1) Properly summarizing the views about this web site which have been expressed in various references listed on the page.

After expanding the detail of the references, I investigated the claim that they made statements about the site being controversial or misogynist. These claims were false. In https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=636485329 expanded the references by including quotes from the articles where statements about the web site were made. I then summarized those, based on the references.

This got mass-reverted which I think was very inappropriate. A concern was raised regarding the interpretation of -collegial- so I am co-operating by describing that article statement in more detail, but I do not sense good intentions from the editor here. --Ranze (talk) 18:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Additional issues (added by other parties)
 * Additional issue 1
 * Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

 * 1) Agree. Ranze (talk) 18:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) This content dispute is less than half an hour old. Request should be declined and filer served WP:TROUT. PearlSt82 (talk) 18:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

 * Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite for mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation." For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 20:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC) (Chairperson)