Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Argentine history on Wikipedia

Argentine history on Wikipedia

 * Users involved in dispute
 * , filing party


 * Articles concerned in this dispute


 * Other steps of dispute resolution that have been attempted
 * Talk:Juan Manuel de Rosas (for a general view)
 * Talk:Juan Manuel de Rosas (WP:3O)
 * Talk:Juan Manuel de Rosas (RfC)
 * Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard
 * Requests for mediation/Juan Manuel de Rosas (failed mediation)
 * Arbitration/Requests/Case

Issues to be mediated

 * Primary issues
 * Are Argentine Nationalist/Revisionist authors acceptable as sources on Wikipedia?
 * If yes, on what proportion should their views be presented?


 * Additional issues (added by other parties)
 * Additional issue 1
 * Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation
''All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.''
 * 1) Agree. Lecen (talk) 11:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Decline. See Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Argentine history on Wikipedia. Best regards.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 12:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Decline. There is an ongoing Arbitration Request on this same topic at Arbitration/Requests/Case. Lecen should not haven open this request yet, both cases would overlap. If the Arbcom closes the case instructing for a mediation, then this mediation may be requested again. Cambalachero (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Decline. There is an ongoing Arbitration Request on this same topic at Arbitration/Requests/Case. Lecen should not haven open this request yet, both cases would overlap. If the Arbcom closes the case instructing for a mediation, then this mediation may be requested again. Cambalachero (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee
''A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.''
 * Considering the majority of editors have declined, this is an obvious reject. Also, the ArbCom request mentioned by Cambalachero has been accepted. PhilKnight (talk) 02:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)