Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Chan Khong

Chan Khong

 * Editors involved in this dispute
 * 1) – filing party (for some reason, they give two ways to write my name here, I do not know why, the correct way is given in the following example, so this is one and the same person)

[]
 * Articles affected by this dispute


 * Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
 * Talk:otaku00

Issues to be mediated

 * Primary issues (added by the filing party)
 * 1) Point of view (neutrality not given)
 * 2) Published, reliable source given to counterpoint quotes from books of the portrayed person (Chan Khong) herself.Otaku00 (talk) 04:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Additional issues (added by other parties)
 * Additional issue 1
 * Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

 * 1) Agree. Otaku00 (talk) 04:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) No. Otaku00 has tried repeatedly to add their interpretation to articles using primary sources. No matter how many times I have explained WP:OR, they continue. Then they tried getting a ruling in their favor from WP:DRN. It was denied. Now they are here. This is forum shopping and it is pointless. WP:OR is very clear and Otaku continues to violate it and vainly search for someone to agree with them anyway. Helpsome (talk) 21:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The ruling was only denied because we did not have enough discussion - which we now have. I have applied for ruling again. But this is about ANOTHER topic, not this one (which I have just seen). Again, you mix two discussions up. Please treat them separately.

--Otaku00 (talk) 08:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

 * Reject Fails to meet Prerequisite for Mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation." For the Committee, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 22:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC) (Chairperson)