Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Drini and Rktect

Acceptance
User Rktect keeps pushing the same POV content with regard egyptians as he did on the measurement related entries. His basic claim is the use of analytic geometry by Egyptians, which is a fals satatement since analytic geometry was unknown at that time. Moreover, he keeps adding unsubstantiated claims about some architect. I've posted a long rebuttal on the talk but he fails to address my concerns: when asking for simple and concise explanations he starts a long (and repeating) rant about it. Moreover he uses misleading summaries (marking edits as minor (stating he's only adding a few links while in true he adds longg chunks of text), he has done several personal attacks on my persons, has lied about myself in order to get me sanctioned (accusing me of 3RR after just 2 reverts over a day, the evidence is on the talk page) and misleadingly adding headers into a single discussion to make it look as if they were different. Therefore I request mediation before the issue escalates -- ( &#x263A; drini &#x266B; | &#x260E; ) 00:01, 24 September 2005 (UTC)


 * As wikipedia's newest mediator, I will try and take on this case, provided that Rktect accepts. R  e  dwolf24  (talk) 22:24, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

I will accept Rktect 22:58, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Abandonment
Rktect has edited the page against my will, and when reverted he said to leave it be, thus, I can not run a mediation without some cooperation, and I urge that this be used in the evidence against Rktect. Why agree to take a mediation and ignore the mediator entirely? :-/ And kudos to drini, for keeping up his side of the bargain. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 22:26, 26 September 2005 (UTC)