Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/FRCP11 and Whitfield Larrabee

FRCP11 and Whitfield Larrabee
There's a revert war on the Bill Frist page. Two RFCs resulted in a 3-1 consensus, but a single editor, User:Whitfield Larrabee, alone in the minority, is inappropriately reverting the agreed-upon rewrites to his preferred characterizations; refusing to address criticism on the talk page; insulting those who disagree with his edits as "sock puppets" and "censors" and "pushing an agenda", and inappropriately placing NPOV tags. -- FRCP11 03:47, 5 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I'll have Sasquatch look over this... R  e  dwolf24  (talk) 03:55, 5 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Yup, I think this is a valid request and will be glad to see what we can do.  Sasquatch  t|c 03:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)--Whitfield Larrabee 21:50, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Mediation will begin pending Witfield Larrabee's acceptance. R  e  dwolf24  (talk) 04:08, 5 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I would agree to mediate the matter. I do not know how one begins a mediation.  --Whitfield Larrabee 21:28, 5 October 2005 (UTC).

Options from here on in
Well, right now we can continue mediation on the talk page of this sub page or we can move it over to a private channel such as e-mail of IRC. Let's decide on that quickly before we clog up the page over here. Seening the nature of the dispute, I would suggest we just move it over to the talk page as to avoid clogging up WP:RFM (as I have done). If either of you feels more comfortable with e-mail, I think it is a viable option as well.  Sasquatch  t|c 23:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Mediation has closed pending User:Whitfield Larrabee and User:FRCP11 agreement in that they will put this issue past them and that Mr. Larrabee will take more policy into consideration as well as FRCP11 possibly re-evaluating if the phrases really affect POV that much even if they are fact (I think). Hence, hopefully, these two will get along better in the future =)  Sasquatch  t|c 05:26, 9 October 2005 (UTC)