Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Gab (social network)

Gab (social network)

 * Editors involved in this dispute
 * 1) – filing party


 * Articles affected by this dispute


 * Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
 * Talk:Gab (social network)

Issues to be mediated

 * Primary issues (added by the filing party)
 * 1) Biased editors are blanket deleting a new, well-researched introduction to a controversial subject and replacing it with an inaccurate, politically charged accusation which the new introduction, drafted from WP:NPOV, contradicts, and refusing to engage substantively with the Talk page discussion on the subject. The other editors mischaracterize attempts to promote WP:NPOV as a "false balance." Consensus in this setting will be impossible and a disinterested mediator should intervene.


 * Additional issues (added by other parties)
 * Additional issue 1
 * Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

 * 1) Agree. Ginjuice4445 (talk) 01:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * 2) Decline - the request is so hopeless between personal attacks and the obvious entrenchment of the editor that this simply is a waste of everyone's time.  Ravensfire  (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

 * Question.  I cannot see where you have substantively contributed to the talk page discussion.  If mediation does not proceed, what discussion or consensus-building activity do you intend to take up?  Will you continue reverting changes to the article?   AGK  &#9632;   21:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Reject. Failed to satisfy prerequisite for mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation". For the Mediation Commitee, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 20:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC) (Chairperson)