Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Hooke's Law

{| class="collapsible collapsed" style="width:100%;font-size:90%;background: transparent; text-align: left; padding: 0.5em; border: 2px solid grey; margin-top: 0.2em;" ! style="background-color: #AAA; font-size: 110%; padding: 2px;" | Click 'show' to view full details of the closed case
 * style="text-align:center; font-style:italic;" | The actual mediation proceedings are on the talk page attached to this request. Please do not modify those discussions or this page.
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; font-size:112%;" |
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; font-size:112%;" |
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; font-size:112%;" |

Hooke's Law

 * User filing report
 * 1) User:PhySusie


 * Users involved in dispute
 * 1)  as well as other very similar ip addresses
 * 1)  as well as other very similar ip addresses


 * Articles concerned in this dispute
 * Hooke's Law


 * Other steps of dispute resolution that have been attempted
 * Talk:Hooke's law

Issues to be mediated
''All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on .''
 * That link links to Talk:Requests for mediation/Hooke's Law. Should it be to Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Hooke's Law? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Primary issues
 * Issue 1: these two editors have been edit warring, they've reverted each other more than 20 times over the last few days and have shown that they don't intend to stop

Parties' agreement to mediation
''All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.''
 * 1) Agree. PhySusie (talk) 12:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) I was notified of this case in error, as you should have notified User:Stephen G. Brown. --Stephen 01:42, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Agree. —Stephen (talk) 07:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee
''A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.''
 * Accept. This is a rather simple case, but the MedCom does not have a heavy caseload at the moment so we can probably help here. The IP address was barely involved and has probably been re-assigned to another user, so I am ignoring his involvement as a party. For the Mediation Committee, AGK  [&bull; ] 10:19, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I've agreed to take this case. Sunray (talk) 00:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * }