Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Juris Doctor

Juris Doctor
request links: view edit delete watch

Filed: 13:38, March 1 2009 (UTC)

Involved parties

 * , filing party


 * : you must serve all of these editors with notifications. See here for instructions.

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted

 * Talk:Juris_Doctor link 1.
 * WP:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_18 link 2.
 * Talk:Juris_Doctor/Archive_2 link 3.
 * Talk:Juris_Doctor/Archive_3


 * : Please ensure you have fully read this guide before filing.''

Issues to be mediated

 * The party filing this request uses this section to list the issues for mediation. Other parties can list additional issues in the section below.


 * Three editors agree to an major change in the article. One (Zoticogrillo) disagrees and refuses to allow the change. Evidence from the past suggests that Zoticogrillo will engage in an editing war until opposing editors give up and go away.
 * Whether the article should state that the J.D. is a doctorate and how to organize conflicting information on the topic.

Additional issues to be mediated

 * Other parties can use this section to list any others issues they wish to include in the mediation. Please do not modify or remove any other party's listing. Please sign all additions to this section if there are more than two parties involved in this case.


 * Whether there has been editor misconduct, and whether there should be administrative action to limit editing to the page.
 * Additional issue 2.

Parties' agreement to mediate

 * All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign within seven days, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "Agree" or "Disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed, but can be made at the talk page.


 * 1) Agree. Wikiant (talk) 13:38, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Agree. JJL (talk) 16:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Agree. Zoticogrillo (talk) 20:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Agree. Nicholas Jackson (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

 * A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section ; all comments should go on the talk page, unless a party is specifically requested to reply here by a Committee member.
 * Accept.
 * For the Mediation Committee, Daniel (talk) 06:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * For the Mediation Committee, Daniel (talk) 06:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)