Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Lord Kenneth&JackLynch

Also, look what kind of dirty tricks Jack pulls out: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Conflicts_between_users&oldid=2237479#JDR_(User:Lord_Kenneth) Compared to: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Conflicts_between_users&oldid=2246246 He turned my own complaint against someone into a complaint against me! He deserves arbitration! - Lord Kenneth 02:18, Jan 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * For a second time I place a complaint about User:Lord Kenneth Jack 08:56, 18 Jan 2004 (UTC)
 * Anthere's answer snipped by Anthere
 * Comment snipped by Jack himself. Anthere (sorry, you can read the page history for it, but I no longer wanted to represent myself by what I had said, so I removed it from hereJack 09:26, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC))
 * sannse's reply snipped by sannse -- sannse 10:21, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)
 * LOL. Shall we delete the whole paragraph Jack ? Anthere
 * Well, I am still requesting mediation with kenneth.. Jack 13:22, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)
 * I've left him a further message with a little more explanation of the process. -- sannse 18:19, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)
 * How long will we wait? Jack 10:02, 27 Jan 2004 (UTC)
 * He replied yesterday with a request for more information. I've replied and we should give him a little more time to consider.  I'll update again tomorrow. -- sannse 18:34, 27 Jan 2004 (UTC)
 * What's there to mediate on? Jack is entirely in the wrong, there is no room for compromise when it comes to the truth. - Lord Kenneth 18:37, Jan 27, 2004 (UTC)
 * Perhaps there is room for understanding others perception of truth? And I believe there is always a possibility of compromise in the way we react to our perception of truth. But if you don't feel there is any possibility of compromise then I don't think we should draw this out any longer. Do I understand correctly from this that you are declining the offer of mediation in this instance? -- sannse 22:28, 27 Jan 2004 (UTC)
 * Oh, I know where Jack is coming from, and he's wrong. I'm not even sure what the issue is now, if it's Atheism then I don't know why I'm the one singled out when it's others who are currently pursuing this more than I am.  There's no possibility of a compromise with Jack.  I've already discovered that, at best, he's a lost cause, and at worst, he's a troll. - Lord Kenneth 02:06, Jan 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * The issue is your consistant ad hominem attacks, inability to debate logically, and the "wall of shame" on your user page. I will of course be seeking binding arbitration. Jack 03:29, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
 * Ad hominem does not mean personal attack, it means personal attack to discredit someone. *MY* ability to debate logically? Your actions I posted above in the links are a strong enough indication of [people's views of you].  I'm not scared of your threats. - Lord Kenneth 03:43, Jan 28, 2004 (UTC) Removed personal attacks.

I would just like to confirm that I did indeed decline mediation because no mediation is needed. It seems Jack is trying to do nothing more than gag me on changing his POV edits. As Jack is the troll and problem user, mediation cannot exist. - Lord Kenneth 20:33, Jan 31, 2004 (UTC)