Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Morocco

Morocco
 view edit delete watch Filed: 21:38, October 16 2006 (UTC)

Involved parties

 * Several other parties involved at different points and to different extents, including but not limited to:
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Several other parties involved at different points and to different extents, including but not limited to:
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.
 * Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.

Articles involved

 * Morocco

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

 * RfC made on Politics, discussion started and continued at length.
 * Informal mediation carried on at talk, with no resolution between the parties. Editor suggested seeking mediation.

Issues to be mediated

 * Should the map at the article Morocco include Western Sahara?
 * If so, in which way should this be depicted?


 * Comment - I don't know why i was invited to mediate on an issue which was sorted out by a double concensus ( current revision reached concensus twice - see 1st and and 2nd time within 4 months) declared by the majority of the wikipedians listed above! All i know is that the claiming part-Justin (koavf) who hasn't agreed yet that there was a concensus is the one to go file a report at the ArbCom. I mean mediation about what? -- Szvest 22:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The topic of the mediation has been agreed by consensus.
 * This mediation clearly goes against it
 * In my eyes it is non relevant
 * More importantly there is a much broader request from Jalil, myself and surely other people and which I hope I will formalise any time soon: clean out the Western Sahara related topics from all the POVs and propaganda and balance the information.
 * Thanks - wikima 18:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Parties' agreement to mediate

 * All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.


 * Agree.
 * -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 21:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * -- Asterion talk 21:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Aussie King Pin 07:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * --A Jalil 22:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * --wikima 19:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * --WilliamThweatt 21:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Proposal We go forward from here; other parties are not currently editing Wikipedia (e.g. Yasser).

Decision of the Mediation Committee

 * Accept
 * For the Mediation Committee, ^ demon [yell at me] 19:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I'll take on this case as your mediator. From here on out, let's use the talk page for mediation. Thanks. - ^  demon [yell at me] 02:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)