Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Prem Rawat 6

{| class="collapsible collapsed" style="width:100%;font-size:90%;background: transparent; text-align: left; padding: 0.5em; border: 2px solid grey; margin-top: 0.2em;" ! style="background-color: #AAA; font-size: 110%; padding: 2px;" | Click 'show' to view full details of the closed case
 * style="text-align:center; font-style:italic;" | The actual mediation proceedings are on the talk page attached to this request. Please do not modify those discussions or this page.
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; font-size:112%;" |
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; font-size:112%;" |
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; font-size:112%;" |

Prem Rawat

 * Users involved in dispute
 * , filing party


 * Articles concerned in this dispute


 * Other steps of dispute resolution that have been attempted
 * 1) The two sections on the talk page that discuss it are here and here
 * 2) An RFC that provided no comments other than involved editors, here
 * 3) A discussion at WP:DRN, here

Issues to be mediated
''All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on .''


 * Primary issues
 * Is there confusion over whether or not Rawat claimed to be God in the past, either directly, or indirectly, and how has that changed since the 1980s?
 * Was there controversy about this?


 * Additional issues (added by other parties)
 * Additional issue 1
 * Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation
''All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.''
 * 1) Agree. Mael e fique (t a lk) 23:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Agree. --Rainer P. (talk) 10:41, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Agree. Sylviecyn (talk) 16:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Agree.Momento (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Agree. Surdas (talk) 06:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Agree.PatW (talk) 08:36, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee
''A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.''
 * Accept. A mediator will be assigned shortly. For the Mediation Committee, Lord Roem (talk) 18:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * }