Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Shooting of Michael brown

Shooting of Michael brown

 * Editors involved in this dispute
 * 1) – filing party


 * Articles affected by this dispute


 * Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
 * Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown
 * Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown
 * Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown
 * Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown
 * Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown

Issues to be mediated

 * Primary issues (added by the filing party)
 * 1) Whether attribution to an individual is required for statements of fact concerning the operation of a United States grand jury.
 * 2) Whether or not a specific criticism by a non-expert requires a full attribution, equivalent balance against experts in the field and a full quotation from a commentator's opinion that was not the conclusion or focus of an editorial.


 * Additional issues (added by other parties)
 * Additional issue 1
 * Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

 * 1) Agree. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Decline. There are several other parties not included. If all parties involved are included I may re-consider.-   Cwobeel   (talk)  21:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

 * Chairperson's note: I would ordinarily reject this case at this point under prerequisite for mediation #5, as a majority of the parties have not agreed to mediation, but I'm going to allow a few days — let's say until Sunday, January 4, at 11:59 UTC — for both parties to add additional parties in light of Cwobeel's comments, above. Either currently-listed party may add additional parties and the maintenance bot will notify them. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 07:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC) (chairperson)
 * Reject. No additional parties added, no agreement from majority of listed parties. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 20:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)