Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Somaliland map

Somaliland map

 * Editors involved in this dispute
 * 1) – filing party


 * Articles affected by this dispute
 * 1) Somaliland
 * 2) Puntland


 * Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
 * Talk:Somaliland

Issues to be mediated
which one of these three maps should we use for Somaliland Republic ???
 * Primary issues (added by the filing party)
 * 1) [[image:LocationBrSomaliland.png|thumb]]
 * 2) [[image:LocationSomaliland3.png|thumb]]
 * 3) [[image:Map_of_Somaliland_within_Somalia.png|thumb]]


 * Additional issues (added by other parties)
 * Additional issue 1
 * Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

 * 1) Agree. Dandaawi (talk) 23:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Nope. This could have easly been resolved on the talk page but the user opted to make numerous personal attacks instead (see here where I list several of them: ). Oddly enough, he denied making any while he continued to make more. More importantly, there already is a consensus with three other users, but Dandaawi continues to deny it existence. AcidSnow (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I did not not deny any thing. Only you and me commented in the talk page and the other guy whose comments where removed for unknown reason. He too did not agree with you. I tried my best to seek solution. But you did not respond my requests responsibly. How can we resolve dispute when you are avoiding to understand my points ? i suggested that we should use one of the above red colored images (look right). Especially the middle one to display the disputed area without Fabricating any thing or hiding Somalilang location in the global map. Dandaawi (talk) 20:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I already explained this before: Hadraa was a sock of the banned user Muktar allebbey making his inputs worthless. Though, he was already a disruptive user anyways which further devalued his input. His comments weren't removed for some "unknown reason" but rather per WP:SOCKHELP. More importantly, you did deny the already existing consensus. This didn't occur just once but numerous times: "All i see is you against the world. i see no consnsus". As for denying the attacks see here: "I did not attack you personally". Dude, you said I have a "wanlweyn attitude" right after that.... Anyways, I haven't avoided any of your points, let alone failed to understand them. AcidSnow (talk) 23:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

 * Reject. Failed to satisfy Prerequisite to mediation #5 "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation." For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 13:13, 29 June 2015 (UTC) (Chairperson)