Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Syrian Civil War 2

Syrian Civil War 2

 * Editors involved in this dispute
 * 1) – filing party


 * Articles affected by this dispute


 * Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
 * Syrian Civil War (dropping my edits-small mortars and rockets (actual version))

Issues to be mediated

 * Primary issues (added by the filing party)
 * 1) Intervening edits are not encyclopedic, sources are not WP:RS, and tone violates WP:NPOV. (TW))?
 * 2) today I corrected his change. in addition, my sources are credible sources. this is a documentary video. this is not fiction. many authors use as sources, which are not recognized in the world media who speak well about the opposition. BUT, why can't I apply authoritative media (news release - message media+news release - a documentary film)?? the source is of translation, and a link to the translation of.


 * look. if you are against such a contribution (if you are against this editing). please. detailed answer why. in order not to initiate administrative proceedings. --Rqasd (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC) you have reverted the edit, said - Undoing pov pushing and use of unreliable sources. I changed the edits. now there is no such problem? pov? unreliable sources - it is impossible. all sources is very authoritative media, they work *news*, worldwide, many years. if you do not have a source that ITAR-TASS's a lie (specifically those articles that I used), if you have no source (*battle for Syria* it's a lie). you can't delete my edits. it is outside the rules. in addition, I give the translation. I give references are free from copyright. in addition, the recording of TV ether (news release) this is the authoritative source. this is a verifiable source. moreover, *the battle for Syria* is a documentary film. other sources (if there are sources without translation tell me and I mend). but you can't simply delete all at once. my sources have become in Wikipedia. you can read about them that is large media (news)

but! you don't have source. a source said: ИТАРР-TASS + *battle for Syria* (documentary film) it's a lie. can you just acknowledge their wrong?Rqasd (talk) 15:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Additional issues (added by other parties)
 * Additional issue 1
 * Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

 * 1) Agree. Rqasd (talk) 12:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Disagree. Mediation is not needed. Try WP:DRN or WP:RSN first.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 13:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Disagree. Mediation isn't going to be helpful in this case. -Kudzu1 (talk) 15:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Without agreement of the named parties to this dispute, we cannot proceed with formal mediation. Perhaps this should go to WP:DRN first. Sunray (talk) 19:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

 * Reject. Mediation requires the agreement of all parties. For the Mediation Committee, Sunray (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC)