Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/The Hunger Project

Involved parties


Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request: Provide diffs showing where RFMF was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and RFM-Request was placed on the talk pages of the other parties.


 * Article talk pages:
 * Talk:The Hunger Project


 * User talk pages:
 * User talk:Jcoonrod
 * User talk:Smeelgova
 * User talk:Descendall
 * User talk:Enkido
 * User talk:Pedant17

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

 * Discussion at The Hunger Project
 * Discussion at Joan Holmes
 * Request for arbitration filed on 23 June 2006

Issues to be mediated

 * Structure for the article that is not inherently biased or misleading
 * Equal balance of positive and negative perspectives
 * NPOV content in presentation of criticism, and negative/positive commentary

Additional issues to be mediated

 * Determination of what constitutes relevant links
 * Allowance for equally weighted positive/negatively balanced links

Parties' agreement to mediate

 * All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.


 * Agree. Descendall 01:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree. Smeelgova 02:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree. Jcoonrod 07:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree - Pedant17 00:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree. --Enkido 17:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Please note: "Agree" or "disagree" only in this section. If there are issues that need to be raised, like inclusion or exclusion of parties, please ask on the talk page. Essjay ( Talk  • Connect  ) 22:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

 * Accept.
 * For the Mediation Committee, Essjay ( Talk  • Connect  ) 07:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC)