Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/block threat

block threat

 * Editors involved in this dispute
 * 1) – filing party
 * 2) – injuring party


 * Articles affected by this dispute
 * 1) User is making a spurilous claim that cannabis is a concensus term without supporting the same.  User incorrectly warned me that I will be blocked if I edit the page but use allows other warring party to continue to deface and rename (without reference) an article.  User is showing favoritism because user believes, as does original abuser, that a term has reached consensus even though there is little to no evidence of the same.


 * Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

Issues to be mediated

 * Primary issues (added by the filing party)
 * 1) Agree = I agree that potguru was unjustly warned.
 * 2) Disagree1 = I think that both parties should be warned.
 * 3) Disagree2 = I think that only Viriditas should be warned.


 * Additional issues (added by other parties)
 * Additional issue 1
 * Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

 * 1) Agree. Potguru (talk) 22:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

 * Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite to mediation #3, "The dispute is not exclusively about the behaviour of a Wikipedia editor". For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 22:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC) (Chairperson)