Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/jun hong lu

jun hong lu

 * Editors involved in this dispute
 * 1) – filing party


 * Articles affected by this dispute


 * Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
 * User_talk:NeilN

Issues to be mediated

 * Primary issues (added by the filing party)
 * 1) other editors put biassed and untrue contents based on un-reliable source, not genuinely interested making the page more informative but simply broke the link and reference


 * 1) other editors are deleting valid information without any consultation. If they are able to suggest evidences that suggests the information is not true,I can remove the information.


 * Additional issues (added by other parties)
 * Additional issue 1
 * Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

 * 1) Agree. Zyw333 (talk) 23:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) agree ccctttttt

Decision of the Mediation Committee

 * Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite to mediation #4, "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute ... and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice". While there has been a bit of discussion at the talk page listed above it can hardly be said to be "extensive". This request would almost certainly, moreover, have been rejected under prerequisite #9 even if there had been enough discussion. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 10:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC) (Chairperson)