Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 103

User:Ohconfucius/Common Terms test page
Page that was in my userspace. I feel that I now need the list of common words to improve the working of my common terms script -  Ohc  ¡digame!¿que pasa? 03:40, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 09:42, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Suhail A Galadari
reasoning -Suhail A Galadari (talk) 15:16, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Dear Sir/Madam ,

please accept my highest regards and the compliments at the out set and submit that we are still writting and the text and refrencess will be done soon kindly consider the request and do not delete the page would be highly appreciable .. we never meant or promoting any company agency or brand just want to add some..links but we are still writting about my self acivements and all if you please consider and donot delete this page Please let me further work on the article

This article should not be deleted as Khaleej Times is the prominent newspaper in the country and he is one of the most renowned personalities of the country. The decision to delete the article will not be in line with the essence of Wikipedia and would only create restrictions in promoting the right information. Therefore it is requested that your team is able to extract more information from the sources in United Arab Emirates about the above personality.

thanking you in anticipation, kindly consider the request and please do not delete we will provide the writeup

Basudeb Deb
reasoning -Pushan Deb 18:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC) Please allow userification of my article on poet Basudeb Deb I am trying to improve the quality, citation & narration style. I need your help

Alveda is well known as Greek record company in Greece
reasoning -Lolstars (talk) 22:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. Your article said only "Alveda Music is an independent record label in Greece, found in 2011-2012 approximately." You need to explain why it is important or significant, and to show references to significant coverage in reliable, independent sources to establish Notability. See WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 10:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Lucas Lessio
Hockey player who is on NHL roster with Phoenix Coyotes -Dolovis (talk) 02:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. Please update to show how he meets WP:NHOCKEY. JohnCD (talk) 11:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Ganoderma tsugae var jannieae
reasoning -Anndylian (talk) 06:22, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

This is a new species. Search online please.
 * ❌. this was deleted after Articles for deletion/Ganoderma tsugae var jannieae, so will not be restored here. I have already explained on your talk page what you should do if you think that decision was wrong: first, discuss with the administrator who closed the discussion, user ; then, if not satisfied, go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:31, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

PRiNCLiA
reasoning -Princlia (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC) Why My Article Named https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRiNCLiA Is Deleted ?


 * Please see Notability and Conflict of interest.  Mlpearc  ( powwow ) 16:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 11:34, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Jason steed
reasoning -Oliver Spy Fan (talk) 18:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

This has been deleted twice over the last 4 years. However since the very first deletion in 2009 many more articles have been written about the book. Many in major publications such as UK's Daily Mail average daily circulation of 1,991,275 copies http://www.dailymail.co.uk/article/ Prince Williams favorite list and Now Magazine Total circulation, 344,000 http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk More recent 2013 Beverly Hills book awards it won the juvenile fiction section. The Jason Steed novels book 1 Fledgling and book 2 revenge have both been reviewed by Kirkus Reviews. This is ignoring all internet reviews and smaller newspaper mentions of the novel. Jason Steed is now a series since the first deletion, according to the authors website book 3 is released November 2013. Oliver Spy Fan (talk) 18:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC) Your suspicions that the Daily Mail article are based on a dubious press release is wrong. The Prince mentioned it on a TV interview in 2011. The Daily Mail has a readership of over 1.9 million daily. Lets stick to facts not opinions. The facts about significance it has won various awards, it has been noted in two major publications. It has been reviewed by Kirkus. Prince William is seen holding the book in the Daily mail. The book will be part of "Silly Internet' stories it's target audience is 11-14 year olds who now doubt made many up including videos on the book on you tube. Just because a novel was deleted years ago does not take its prominence away today. It would be nice to see how the author feels knowing his novel has been targeted and almost banned from Wikipedia? When I scroll through the many pages of over young adult books I have edited, very few have won so many awards, had a kirkus review, been mention in the Daily Mail, Now Magazine, or had so many articles written about them. Yet they survive. Is it the author is he a republican or an enemy of Wikipedia? Why does one novel have so much to prove? Oliver Spy Fan (talk) 17:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * A bit of history to this here I think it's more than a couple of discussions on this over the years. "Now" magazine cheerfully declaring this to be the princes favourite childhood book - the prince was born in 1982, this book wasn't (self) published until 2008, making him 25/26 at the time, so much for "childhood" book, and so much for any pretense of any fact checking. I would suspect the DailyMail article to be based on a similar very dubious press release, which given the history of astroturfing type activity of this book should be of little surprise - a few internet searches of the title brings up many such silly stories on web forums, including apparently the imminent film (as it has been for years now) also apparently featuring the Prince. Regardless notability is about in depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, not trivial mentions associating to celebrities as a "favourite" - last I could tell Prince William hasn't been recognized as any sort of authority on literature. --86.5.93.42 (talk) 22:40, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Some additional here. I see the article has recently been deleted as a G4 by one of our more inclusionist admins. The kirkus review was discussed in the most recent deletion discussion as not being enough on it's own. The Beverly Hills book awards appear to be a fairly recent (The 2013 awards were the first, don't have a wikipedia article) whose primary focus for would be entrants appears to be promotional - . It doesn't name the judging panel, so it's pretty difficult to show at this stage that the awards have any particular significance. Last but not least of course the purpose of WP:REFUND is quite clear, that it isn't to undo deletion discussions, something this material has had more than it's fair share of. --86.5.93.42 (talk) 07:07, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Now as above and carefully not responded to by you above reckons it was a childhood favourite, despite it being published many years after he left childhood - see WP:RS the sources are reliable if they have a reputation for fact checking, such a clear and obvious lack of fact checking hardly counts. Regardless the mail and No coverage are absolutely trivial. The Kirkus review was discussed and rejected in the last AFD. But all of this is irrelevant, read the page this is being posted on the nice banner at the top in big bold letters "Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions ", read on. This page isn't to overturn community consensus AFD discussions, which this had. --86.5.93.42 (talk) 19:47, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Bingham Willis
Page is now accurate with content and references. The article was originally scheduled for deletion because of a lack of content but that has now been rectified. -Demus811 (talk) 04:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Don't You Dare
reasoning -Hemmo360 (talk) 09:02, 1 October 2013 (UTC) Please for the love of God don't delete The Three Delfinos, they throw snobby tissues at me and call me horrible names.
 * ❌. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself and your friends - see Wikipedia is not about YOU. Try Myspace. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fundoodata.com
reasoning -Shivanifundoo (talk) 09:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:01, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Onyx solar


Bonjour

Helpme

je pense que mon article a une valeur ajoutée (قيمة مضافة. Valor añadido) dans le sens de diminué les pollutions, (Go Green), je veux que vous me guidez jusqu’à que mon article devient bien, surtout dans ce domaine de l’énergie renouvelable, on a beaucoup de sources surtout avec ce lien http://www.onyxsolar.com/press-clipping/press-clipping.html mais j’ai besoin d’aide pour réussir,et je crois que sont suffisant pour [[notoriété]] et [[admissibilité]] de cet article

Cordialement -AutomatGES (talk) 10:34, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Premierement, l'article etait en francais, pas en anglais. Les criteres d'admissibilite sont tres stricte sur le Wikipedia en anglais - svp voir WP:NCORP pout le notabilite des organizations.  C'est aussi important de noter que les "press clippings" ne sont pas des sources utilisables ici.  Now, back to English ... first, the article was in French not English.  The criteria for articles is much more strict on the English Wikipedia, see WP:NCORP.  Also note that press clippings are not considered to be reliable sources  ES  &#38;L  11:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Anatoliy Lesnikov
Important Russian cinematographer -E Guano (talk) 12:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page if required, and submit it as soon as convenient; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of unsubmitted material. See WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 10:19, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Essential Magic Conference
reasoning -AMASQ (talk) 13:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

I would like to contest deleting the essential magic conference page.

This is a page to inform and educate people about magic and one of it's major events in history.

Best regards,

Ana Queiroz
 * ✔️ see User:AMASQ /Essential Magic Conference Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Chennai Express promotions.jpg
The file is not a violation of copyright. It is being used on many websites. -AniceMathew (talk) 14:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌ at the moment this is not deleted. But just because it is used bu others does not mean that it is freely licensed for use at Wikipedia or actually free for every use.  Also there is no justification for fair use either.  So expect this to be deleted within a week. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:47, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Nikhil Chandwani
reasoning -NIkhil Chandwani (talk) 14:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC) Nikhil is an international best selling author, a national award winning poet and a columnist of leading international magazines.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. it looked as if the references had improved, and then I found they were self published. However I agree that this should not ahve been deleted with G4 as the new article was compl;etely different to the piece of junk deleted at the AFD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Corm Capital
I did everything you told me to do regarding undeleting YOUR deletion of the Corm Capital article (including signing my posts!). Of course, YOU have all the right to delete it if it violates Wikipedia's guidelines. The fact is: you didn't even give me the time to correct the article to Wiki's guidelines which I am well aware of. You just swooped down (Darkwind!) and deleted the whole thing, erasing and losing my corrections and in the most UN-WIKIPEDIA manner and Gestapo worthy way! That, my friend, is not acceptable! You could have at least warned me or given me 30 minutes (!) to make the necessary corrections!

Anyway, after spending the day surfing Wikipedia, it specifies that I must take up the issue with the ADMIN who deleted my page. And that person is you M. Darthwind! Corm Capital is backed by dozens of reputable online authorities and I gave you a few (the S&P endorsement alone, the fruit of 3 months of research into my company and all its subsidiaries (!), should have been enough.

So for the last time, please undelete the page so that I can make the necessary corrections.

Again, PLEASE don't turn Wikipedia into Facebook! You are killing one of the rare pockets of online freedom remaining on the web.

THANK YOU MIGHTY DARKWIND!

Charles Corm -Charlescorm (talk) 16:45, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm reviewing this draft, and if you submitted anything that looked like that as an article, it's quite understandable why it was deleted. First - you agreed to not to write about yourself, or entities that you're involved in.  Second, peacock phrases such as "of further interest due to the caliber of its management" detract from the message, and turn it all facebook-like.  Third, claims of Ford being "the only car maker in the world" are outright false, and anyone reading that sentence would automatically wonder how much of the rest of the article was false.  Fourthly, it's completely promotional.  Finally (for now), I see nothing that makes it meet notability requirements.  This really looks like nothing but poorly-considered self-promotion  ES  &#38;L  10:32, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stacy Nelson
 RobDoggie286 (talk) 00:25, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:29, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Kurt Baron
This page is about a real person, but this person is a real martial artist, including winning national tournaments, and an author (see http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18170835-1000-ways-to-freak-people-out?from_search=true for about one of his books) -WilliamSherlockScottHolmes (talk) 03:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. I cannot find anything about the tournament in reliable sources.  Blogs and twitter are not usually counted as reliable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:17, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Could not find specific results, but here is the official website for the U.S. Open National Taekwondo Hanmadang: http://www.usopentkd.com/
 * And what about the fact that Mr. Baron is an author? Please see the goodreads website.
 * http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/7164317.Kurt_Baron
 * Kurt Baron is also politically involved and has been featured in the Local Gazette: http://gazette.com/lamborn-slated-for-fox-news-on-sunday/article/147503

Elizabeth villaroman
she is an unheralded hero -Pk555pk (talk) 07:26, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. You say unheralded, however that suggests that no one has written about here, but we report on what others have written. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Edgo Group
need to retrieve details in the deleted page -Ruedebille (talk) 13:33, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/H-Clef
I, Littleturley, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Littleturley (talk) 14:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. I looked at it, but there is nothing there - you submitted a blank page. If you have an idea for an article you would like someone else to write, the place to suggest it is WP:Requested articles. If you would like to write an article, read WP:Your first article and then try the WP:Article wizard. JohnCD (talk) 15:54, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Sansmaran
I, Manish0680, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. G13, Six months old, this article has significance w.r.t television and social cultural history. Manish0680 (talk) 04:20, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:35, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and Drink/Newsletter October 2013
This page was deleted and a new page was created at WikiProject Food and drink/Newsletter October 2013, which is fine in terms of the new formatting. However, the new version lacks all of the data that was present in the deleted version. Therefore, requesting userfication of Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and Drink/Newsletter October 2013 to transfer the content to the new version. -Northamerica1000(talk) 09:18, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Northamerica1000/Newsletter. Mr.Z-man 14:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Jason steed
originally deleted 2009, has since been written about in Major publications and TV interview of Prince William -Oliver Spy Fan (talk) 17:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk//article-

http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk Oliver Spy Fan (talk) 17:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Note this is the same person listing again what they already listed, presumably to get away from the comment there. This process is not for trying to get previous community consensus discussions overturned. This is hardly uncontroversial - see A brief history for the many discussions of the many recreations at different places and titles. The sources listed here are pretty much the definition of trivial, not to mention the Now coverage indicating the princes childhood favourite of a book published in his mid twenties - WP:RS anyone? --86.5.93.42 (talk) 19:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Regardless of the vitriol of the IP above, since the definition of notable is being included in "non-trivial sources" and the article with William is a veritable list of trivia about the Prince, X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles_for_deletion/Jason_Steed, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ES  &#38;L  11:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Also discussed at Articles for deletion/Jason Steed (Young adult novels) which was more recent than Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Steed. --bonadea contributions talk 11:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dean Harris Rubine
I, 110.147.157.112, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 110.147.157.112 (talk) 19:30, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

still working on it -110.147.157.112 (talk) 19:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thr Motivational Speaker owes Child Support
I, 69.47.213.59, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 69.47.213.59 (talk) 11:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done; this page was not deleted under criterion G13 but under G10, as an attack page that defamed, threatened or insulted its subject. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  12:39, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Peach Day
This article was written and supposedly taken down by the user or wikipedia. I was given an Assignment from my Current School to try and get a copy of this page. If it is possible i could get a copy or have the page undeleted, That would be wonderful -68.147.53.102 (talk) 12:49, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * can you give us any other guess at what the exact title might have been? We have never had an article at Peach Day or Peach day or Asian Peach Day (which you asked about a couple of weeks ago) or Asian peach day. I'm afraid we can't help unless you can give us some other clue to what the exact title of the article might have been, or the username of the account that created it. JohnCD (talk)

Mustard TV
reasoning -Pkmornington (talk) 07:32, 5 October 2013 (UTC) It is a new public service broadcaster along with 19 other local tv stations. The page was not promotional. http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/tv-broadcast-licences/local/awards/
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Pkmornington/Mustard TV. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. It may be too soon for an article - if this new station does not begin to broadcast until next year, it is unlikely yet to have attracted the significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources necessary to have an article. Wikipedia is not a place to announce new ventures. JohnCD (talk) 09:26, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Melanie Hughes
 46.65.72.22 (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 08:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Omega Crosby (rapper)
reasoning -Omegatheofficial (talk) 10:17, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. - see also WP:COI and WP:PROMO  ES  &#38;L  11:03, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

365scores
I would like to have the change to re write the article, there are a lot of information about apps that is missing in wikipedia. -Nadiarivas1987 (talk) 12:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Well the A7 criterion does not apply to software, and I expect you could write it in a less promotional way. So try again. You can ask the deleting admin User talk:RHaworth to reconsider. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:35, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Paul Dumol
the article was deleted through PROD. One can find references on the net about Paul Dumol. By googling you can find site like Rotary, PCCED, etc. -Lafem (talk) 02:24, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I have added a single source to avoid prompt deletion under WP:BLPPROD, however in its current state the page could still be considered for deletion. Please add references to reliable sources in order to verify the information in the article. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  12:46, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * OK I have added two references. Lafem (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

David Rhodes (musician)
This looks like it was deleted because the text was the same as on the website www.davidrhodes.org. That's because I created and maintain that website and I wrote the Wikipedia article years ago. Since the bio I had already written for the site seemed like a good Wiki entry, that's what I used. Please advise what I can do to verify that I wrote/posted both pieces to eliminate any questions about plagiarism and to restore David's Wikipedia entry. Thanks in advance for any help you can give me! -Staciedee9 (talk) 07:04, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The simple way to do this is to attach a copyright statement to the web site that has the same license as for Wikipedia ie CC-BY-SA-3.0. You could do this by putting it on the page http://www.davidrhodes.org/copyright.html for example. This will prove that you are the same person that owns the web site material. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Griffen881
It was just starting out and I believe it has potential and that one day it'll become great like other wikis -Griffen881 (talk) 02:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * well here we wait for ti to become great first and then some other people write about it, and then someone writes a Wikipedia article. So ❌ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:00, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

New R. S. J. Public School Senior Secondary
my page was deleted due to speedy deletion. My intention was not to promote my page. I promise that i will not do so again. So, please undelete my page. -Pratham 09:11, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. That was much too promotional in tone - it was an advertisement, the sort of thing the school might write to promote itself and say how wonderful it is. Wikipedia does not allow promotional stuff like that anywhere, so it will not be restored, and I have deleted the copy of it in your sandbox. An encyclopedia article needs to have a neutral point of view. If you are connected with the school, read the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. In any case, if you want to try again, read Your first article and then use Articles for creation, so that an experienced user can check it. JohnCD (talk) 10:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Restaurant Kokkeriet
I would like to change the article, so it is more informative like true encyclopedic content should be, and not promotional. My article was deleted because of a G11 statement -Franksdatter86 (talk) 11:41, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I think there's more than "a [single] G11 statement" - the "article" looks like it belongs on Wikitravel, not in an encyclopedia of notable subjects. Very few restaurants belong on Wikipedia - its existence doesn't guarantee inclusion.  See WP:NCORP  ES  &#38;L  11:59, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

- the article doesn't appear to be salvageable. If you have any association with this restaurant, please read WP:COI and use WP:AFC to submit the article for review instead of publishing it to main article space directly. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Several G4 image undeletions needed
Hello, I'm on the road and only have a few minutes; I'd like to undelete some images that I deleted a few days ago, but I don't have time to find them. Please look for images that I've recently deleted that were uploaded by Beast from da East; you can check my talk page for links as well as checking for some deleted contributions from Stefan2 — Beast uploaded them, Stefan tagged them as G4, and I deleted them, but the "Various boxing posters" section of Deletion review/Log/2013 October 6 reveals that they probably shouldn't have been deleted. If you're queasy about undeleting these images at my request, just please remember that you're effectively doing the self-revert that I'd do if I could. Nyttend (talk) 17:11, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. I shall keep any credit, but refer all complaints to you. JohnCD (talk) 13:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * : -) Thanks for the work.  Nyttend (talk) 14:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles for creation/Official Kels
 Officialkels (talk) 22:02, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:MUSICBIO and WP:AUTO. JohnCD (talk) 10:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Purest Spiritual Pigs
I, Helenadt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Helenadt (talk) 02:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. I looked at it, but there is nothing there - you submitted a blank page. If you have an idea for an article you would like someone else to write, the place to suggest it is WP:Requested articles. If you would like to write an article, read WP:Your first article and then try the WP:Article wizard. JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Valerie Loo
Hi there, it has come to my attention that you have deleted the page Valerie Loo and I would like to request for you to undo the deletion. Valerie is a young and budding Singaporean artiste and she has a growing influence among Singaporeans after her involvement in the television program Campus SuperStar (season 4). It is vital for her to have a wiki page for people to find out more about her. Some of the other contestants do have articles about themselves as well thus we see no reason as to why her page was marked for deletion even though it has even more adequate references cited about her. Please do consider undoing the deletion. It seems that it has been marked for deletion as it wasn't clearly stated enough about her significance in the Singapore music and online industry. We will be happy to make any changes to the article after the undoing of the deletion so as to improve the article. Thank you -Winstonbegone (talk) 03:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Sorry, but Wikipedia doesn't cover the up-and-coming, only those who have already arrived. Check out WP:MUSICBIO - Youtube and coming 7th in a competition is not nearly enough. JohnCD (talk) 10:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mhddfs
I, Havsorli, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Havsorli (talk) 05:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metabolics
reasoning -Futonic 07:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC) The page requested has been live for a long time and is in no way different from pages such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moz_(marketing_software) or even https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everest_(company). There was no one item on the page that could be seen as being promotional and was all factual based on our companies history. I don't understand why this page seem to be unfairly targeted, when there are much worse "company pages" like the ones above which seem to live on... Any advice how we can make remain on Wikipedia would be gratefully received. (The page is now redirect to a page covering the subject of Metabolism.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Futonic (talk • contribs) 07:58, 8 October 2013‎
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.


 * That's the boiler-plate answer, but I will explain a little more, since we do not explain clearly enough to new users the important fact that Wikipedia is not a place for companies or people to tell the world about themselves. Please read the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.


 * The argument What about those other articles is not generally accepted, but I will point out that the two you reference differ from yours in giving a large number of independent references which show notability, whereas yours had only your website and your founder's LinkedIn, plus one which did not mention Metabolics; also, if you look at them, the Everest article was very obviously not written by the company's PR department, and the talk page of Moz contains considerable argument with the company's representatives. JohnCD (talk) 22:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Article Incubator/List of female video game characters by role
Please userfy to my user space. I was intermitently working on it and had plans to rework some of its content to make it suitable for inclusion (possibly as part of Category:Video games featuring female protagonists and its related pages), but it was deleted from the incubator without notifying me (as I requested it to be incubated). I want to keep a copy at my space, with the full history for attribution to the other authors, to continue working on it at my pace. -Diego (talk) 11:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ to User:Diego Moya/List of female video game characters by role. Check with, the deleting admin from the MfD, before moving this back to the main space. JohnCD (talk) 08:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Important of lead aVR in identifying high risk patients with coronary artery disease
 82.114.178.184 (talk) 13:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * we have not had an article, or an AfC submission, with that exact title (nor with "Importance" in place of "Important"). To help us find the page you mean, can you give its exact title (capitalization is important), or alternatively the name of the account or IP which submitted it, or was notified of its deletion? JohnCD (talk) 13:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Abubacker
reasoning -Johnadamsmithh (talk) 14:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Why the article deleted often. I want to create article about famous notable person in south India. His name K.A.M. Mohammed Abubacker( The State general secretary of IUML in Tamil Nadu ).

Reference :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Union_Muslim_League#IUML_in_Tamil_Nadu

http://indianunionmuslimleague.in/taxonomy/term/58/0

So am requesting to not delete this article named Abubacker. Now the page was protected. Please enable this article.
 * ❌. This title, and K. A. M. Muhammed Abubacker, have been protected because unacceptable articles were repeatedly created by user . Writing about oneself is strongly discouraged in Wikipedia, for reasons explained in WP:Autobiography. The first few versions were in Tamil; the last was in English but was sourced only to a blog and seemed to be a personal manifesto, listing his objectives. An encyclopedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves.


 * If you want to write an article about Mr Abubacker, you should start from scratch. Read WP:Your first article and note the WP:Verifiability policy and the need to establish notability by references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Click on Help:Userspace draft and fill in the title; that will make a draft page for you to work on. Make sure to maintain a WP:Neutral point of view and do not try to promote. When it is ready, approach user, the administrator who protected the title, for permission to post it. JohnCD (talk) 22:01, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Opal Tree
I, 68.42.199.216, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 68.42.199.216 (talk) 14:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. I looked at it, but there is nothing there - what was submitted was a blank page, with only the title and a link to Jack Rubinacci, nothing more, no actual content. If you have an idea for an article you would like someone else to write, the place to suggest it is WP:Requested articles. If you would like to write an article, read WP:Your first article and then try the WP:Article wizard. JohnCD (talk) 19:01, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

AdGear
this is a real company page, purpose of it will be descriptive in nature only and will contain references to display media articles -Hholod (talk) 16:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:04, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Richard Aguirre
person is noteworthy, I just need to get help editing a better article. -Wikimikesd (talk) 18:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Article was deleted because "postdlf" said " It has repeatedly been established that Aguirre is just another wealthy businessperson running for office" This seems very biased, untrue, and not wikipedia standard. Please undelete and I will have someone who is more versed in the wiki guidelines create the article. thank you, Mike Wikimikesd (talk) 18:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * As per the WP:POLITICIAN side of our Wikipedia standards, "Just being...an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion" ES  &#38;L  18:46, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

I am sure that Richard Aguirre will meet the primary notability criterion. I just did not know what these were when I created the article. I will have my friend write the article because he is proficient in the wikipedia standards and criteria.Wikimikesd (talk) 19:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC)


 * ❌. This Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Mr Aguirre has been the subject of no less than four deletion discussions: 1, 2, 3, 4, so the title has been protected against re-creation and the article will not be undeleted here. if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the most recent discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 22:20, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeffrey Fisher
reasoning -TrishaHoffman (talk) 19:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. What has actually been deleted is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeff Fisher. I have not restored that, because there is a much better draft article at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeffrey Fisher. This has not yet been deleted, but is liable for deletion because it has not been touched for over six months, but if you now make any edit, even a trivial one, that will avoid immediate deletion. However, you are encouraged to edit it to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

White Dwarf (film)
1995 US Sci-Fi film deleted because it did not show up with much discussion in a Google UK search in 2010. -12.167.75.11 (talk) 20:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it. Unless the article is drastically improved, with more substance and with references to show how it meets WP:Notability (films), it will certainly be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 21:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

The_Singhs
Meets criterion #1 on [] : "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself." Since the original Wikipedia article was published, additional reviews, interviews and articles about the band have been published in multiple credible/non-trivial sources, including The Boston Herald (major metro daily newspaper) Jam Magazine, Diffuser.fm, the Popdose blog and the Vinyl District blog. Band leader Jeet Singh has also been invited to join the board of directors of Berklee College of Music in Boston, relevant for notability criterion #7. -Andreakremer 21:20, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/The Singhs, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 21:46, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

User:Highwildyoung
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Highwildyoung (talk • contribs) 22:26, 9 October 2013‎
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia user pages are not for advertising or promotion. See WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 11:28, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Sagicor Financial Corporation
This is the Caribbean's leading financial services company with a history dating back to 1840. -Caribbeanbio (talk) 21:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Caribbeanbio/Sagicor Financial Corporation. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 11:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Naqvi Orientation
Article "Naqvi Orientation" in fact a research based content material. Writer attempted its improvement to remove the personal style, as observed by Admns. Its appearance style, references and gallery may be modified or improved. But taking advantage of speedy deletion this article has been deleted. It is requested that it may kindly be restored and deletion logs stopped. - Nannadeem (talk) 22:56, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg This page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD, and the box at the top of the page, for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. JohnCD (talk) 11:24, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Edgar Perez
Renowned author's page deleted -24.46.224.175 (talk) 03:16, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify IP user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 13:56, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Eleni Ikoniadou
page refers to noted academic in critical theory in the UK who is a prominent employee at Kingston University and member of The London Graduate School. Page set up with a view to adding more information, and list of publications in future. -Erin K Stapleton (talk) 10:57, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. This page cannot be restored for copyright reasons, because it is a close paraphrase of http://fass.kingston.ac.uk/faculty/staff/cv.php?staffnum=754. Please read Copy-paste and Close paraphrasing. Also, references to staff websites and lists of publications are not enough for a Wikipedia article, which requires references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to demonstrate WP:Notability. For academics, the (quite demanding) standard is explained at Notability (academics). JohnCD (talk) 13:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

New Aristocrats
reasoning -Freestyle music (talk) 19:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC) The article New Aristocrats was deleted, but meets Wikipedia reguirements for a music act to be in Wikipedia. The New Aristocrats, active today, and are both Knight Time (Vendetta Records/A&M Records) and Knight and Day (Rhino Records), which are the same and on major labels with a Billboard dance hit and have the main song in a Hollywood movie Assault of the Killer Bimbos. These acts are back on the scene under the name New Aristocrats. People want to know that. Thank you for considering to undelete the article about the New Aristocrats unless, of course, someone can improve the article. That would even be better actually.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 13:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Rings of Saturn (band)
All information on the Rings of Saturn (band) wiki page was correct. Lucas Mann, creator of the band, read through article thoroughly and found no errors. He, his band, and Rings of Saturn fans alike would highly appreciate if you put this page back up. I hope you can restore the page, there is a great amount of information that benefits the band and its broad and ever-growing fan base. Thank you. (original deletion message) This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 08:30, 10 October 2013 GiantSnowman (talk -2601:9:7A80:368:E2F8:47FF:FE23:9870 (talk) 03:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

M.I.R.T.- Major Incident Reconstruction Technologies
reasoning -Oscar cruz mirt (talk) 07:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * since I deleted this article, I will leave it to another administrator to make the formal reply; but please read the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about their own companies. JohnCD (talk) 13:41, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Rent My Vacation Home USA


I was adding references when all of a sudden it is deleted while I was doing it why ?

NEW INFO:
 * Rent Reviews and Variable Rents by D.N. Clarke & J.E. Adams (1 December 1984) p.38
 * Perpetual Income: How-to Generate Cash Flow from Low-End House Investments by Bryan Wittenmyer (1 July 1999)

Why would you delete this when I was working on it with references. Someone does not want this on here. 98.122.39.11 (talk) 02:04, 13 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment from a participant in Articles for deletion/Rent My Vacation Home USA: Even though the closing admin didn't say so in his closing remarks, the AFD was closed after only 4 days instead of 7.  This is permissible if there is WP:SNOW but otherwise not.  As to whether there was more than a snowballs chance in Hades of this article being able to demonstrate that the company was notable before the 7 days were up, well, if you are an admin (I am not), you have access to both the AFD and the full article history so you can judge it fairly.  Given dates on the books above pre-date this company, I very much doubt they can aide in demonstrating that this company meets WP:Notability.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  02:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)


 * And another: David is right but it doesn't really matter. This facility is for reversing deletions by uncontroversial PROD. This article was deleted as the result of a deletion discussion - Articles for deletion/Rent My Vacation Home USA - and so the only appropriate place for review is the talk page of the deleting admin and then WP:DRV. Stalwart 111  03:04, 13 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Oops, slap me with a fish. My bad.  I should've pointed him to WP:Deletion review straight away.  However, I very much doubt that the AFD will be overturned. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  03:40, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Rent My Vacation Home USA, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:11, 13 October 2013 (UTC)