Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 111

Buddha Bar
This article was deleted in 2011 for lack of notability (see Articles for deletion/Buddha Bar). I have dug around and found a few sources which I believe do establish notability for the establishment/series of compilation records that it has put out. Specifically, I cite:
 * Wolfgang Spahr, "The Year in Music 2001 - Critic's Choice", Billboard (December 29, 2001), Vol. 113, No. 52, p. 39:


 * Anthony D'Andrea, Global Nomads: Techno and New Age as Transnational Countercultures in Ibiza and Goa (2007), p. 93:

bd2412 T 16:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Buddha Bar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ES  &#38;L  00:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/IKACHE
 Joemachi (talk) 23:31, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I have restored history of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/IKACHE&action=history Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:15, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harriet Jones
I, Hoofs, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Hoofs (talk) 00:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:18, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

adva potaznik
reasoning -Adibut (talk) 09:59, 28 December 2013 (UTC) Hi I would like to ask do not delete this page on "Adva Potaznik" because the page is about a woman and her occupation is very important to many people. While it still has no articles or books about this woman. But I think it is important to have a Wikipedia page, and I'll write and expand its object. And in the future will put more links on "Adva Potaznik".
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Celebrities
reasoning -Ideas+ 17:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code (replacing   with the name of the page you wish to have restored and   with the reason for your request). ~Amatulić (talk) 17:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Looking at their talk page I think they want Chong Mun Chung refunded - which was deleted as an A7 and is thus ineligible. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Fade In
I, Screenwriter88, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Screenwriter88 (talk) 22:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

editing and resubmission -Screenwriter88 (talk) 22:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It was actually Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fade In. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:17, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julian Khou
 Libbykhou (talk) 16:13, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This stands no chance of becoming an article. There has to be a reason for someone to appear in the encyclopedia. Let me know if you need a copy of your writing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

"David Landis (public relations executive)"
I would like to write a new article about David Landis, who is a business executive and major mover and shaker in the San Francisco non-profit world. He has also been a good friend to the LGBT community. A previous article about Mr. Landis was deleted because of "unambiguous advertising or promotion." I do not know Mr. Landis and have not met him, but he's a positive and high-profile force in my corner of the world, and so I wish to create an article. I have no connection with the deleted article and I have neither read, nor care to read or amend the deleted article. I don't know how old the article was when it was deleted. I'm sure that I'm approaching a new article about Mr. Landis from a very different angle. Please let me know if I may submit a new article and how to go about it. Thanks in advance. -Bbmusicman (talk) 23:29, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You don't need the blessing of administrators here to create a new article, but I would suggest you do it at Articles for creation so that it won't as readily be deleted if it turns out to be noncompliant. As for wanting the text of the old article, admins won't restore unambiguous adverts, but I'm certain one could send you the text of the article at time of deletion if you want to see where the last try went wrong. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 23:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Muhammad Zeeshan
This is a popular personality -Zeeshankhan1996 (talk) 11:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Although it has not yet been deleted, it soon will be - X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  ES  &#38;L  11:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

The First Line
The First Line is one of the longest-running quarterly literary journals in the United States. The Wikipedia page was an informational site used by reviewers and interviewers, as well as writers, who are interested in finding out more about the literary journal. -71.96.122.170 (talk) 00:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Michele MacNeill
There was a discussion at Articles for deletion/Martin MacNeill that was started first and relisted, and I thought our comments related to the article about Michele, too.

I request to have the Michele MacNeill article posted onto my user space: User:CaroleHenson/Michele MacNeill so that I can pull some of the information for the Martin MacNeill article. That would be much appreciated! - CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 05:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ by Lankiveil. JohnCD (talk) 12:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Satmass media
This is a new term in the field of mass communication and has become an important aspect for many scholars around the world, who are carrying out their research on new media studies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.195.194.85 (talk) 14:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. Wikipedia is not a place to announce the term you have invented or to promote your book. See WP:NAD and WP:No original research, which includes:

"'If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery.'"
 * JohnCD (talk) 16:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Alexys Nycole Sanchez
Alexys is an up-coming actress. She deserves recognition from the 2 feature films she has been in, Grown Ups and the sequel, Grown Ups 2. She has also won an MTV Movie Award -theworldgymnast1 (talk) 17:43, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment from deleting admin - you don't get a Wikipedia article if you're "up and coming". You must have already arrived. Exactly what part of WP:ACTORBIO does this person meet? Except for the MTV award for "best line" the other awards listed are for the shows, not for the actress. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Well that award is a claim of importance so it should not have been deleted with A7. However "up and coming" is a trigger for non-restoral. ❌ either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I suspect that award is also awarded to the show, not the person who uttered the "best line". ~Amatulić (talk) 17:06, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Bekele Gerba
I had provided three sources seconds after receiving the Deletion Proposal notice. The page was deleted even though I had provided sources. -LencaOromo (talk) 03:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The other critoerion applied was A7, which also can't be REFUNDed. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

HX (record producer)
reasoning -Senasot (talk) 17:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC) This article gets speedily deleted for a next reason: "lack of importance" I'm here to prove HX is a significant artist and why he deserves to be on Wikipedia. He is a key figure in underground hip hop and he worked with rap stars such as Aceyalone, Ben Z, Dialectactics and more. He's well known in hip hop community, I don't understand what's the reason of deletion if all sources are listed.--Senasot (talk) 17:45, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:43, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌ Since it is recreated we have no need to restore. At least the statement of "most influent producers" needs an independent reference to convince the reader.  Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Gregory Nichols
I feel that the articles deleted for the deletion process, seeking a restoration. I feel that the article was handled improperly and that the circumstances have changed, please contact the administrator who deleted it. If your article was deleted through the articles for deletion process, then a request here is not the way to seek restoration. I feel that such concerns are not addressed by the deleting administrator, you may seek redress at deletion review. 02:02, 30 December 2013 Bbb23 (talk -Gregory Nichols (talk) 03:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Deletion review is at WP:DRV not so much here. However if there is referenced claims of importance, you can rewrite it in a non promotional way. However I advise you not to write about yourself. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

national federation of sports medicine
I would like more time to edit the page and and valuable information as to why it is important. I would like to keep it private on my account instead of having it public until I've completed the edits. Please undelete and add to my sandbox at TBlank72 or allow me to copy and paste the info into my sandbox -TBlank72 (talk) 22:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If a page is visible anywhere on Wikipedia, it can be edited by *anyone*. If you want to keep it private, you will need to write it in a .txt file and save it to your computer. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 23:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done speedy delete had already been declined. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Chatah.jpg
since assassination of subject, rationale for photo/copyright status can be made. note I am not the uploader. -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * So why this particular picture? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It was in the article previously. Is it weird or something?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌ but don't worry. We don't need to restore it because it is on commons already at commons:File:Chatah.JPG.  I have added it to the article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Gregory Nichols
It has no advertising or promotion and would like it undeleted -Gregory Nichols (talk) 02:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. For the claim that he won the Pritzker Architecture Prize, this instead seems to be awarded to Thom Mayne, so the only claim looks to be wrong. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd like to add a couple of things in case is still reading this. First, I misread the article. I thought it said that Nichols had won the Pritzker award, which, of course, is not true. Actually, it said that Nichols studied with Mayne and that Mayne won the award, which is true. I apologize for my implication that Nichols was making a false claim. That said, if I had read it correctly, I would still have deleted it per A7. Second, the article is not music-related. Not sure where that comes from, perhaps from the architecture firm whose name is Morphosis, which, to this untutored user, sounds like the name of a band. :-)--Bbb23 (talk) 15:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Bonnie Zindel
reasoning -TahitiBlue (talk) 18:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

sony ericsson k500
will try to update this page as soon as possible -Tandon21 (talk) 07:51, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I've also pointed the template at the correct title; page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * . Nothing to do. Article was deleted via WP:PROD, then re-created. Nothing wrong here. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

WEBIZZ NORDIC GROUP
This article help people around the world to find Finland IT and AD company easly. Please let me know anything i can change to complite the acception about this article by Mati Puusepp - founder "Webizz Nordic Group" -Webizz (talk) 07:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * . The article Webizz did exist, and was deleted. User/author is now indef blocked for spam and username violation. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tim Shields
I, Babelfisher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Babelfisher (talk) 20:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * . Nothing to do. That AFC submission has not been deleted. Simply improve it as you wish. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Shadow Strategy Organization
The initial article was deleted because I as the leader of the organization wrote it. Also, I did not prove how it was of any importance to be included in an encyclopedia. I would like the information so I may update it and use it on other websites, or possibly this one if it is updated to cover your constraints. -Seraph of Flame (talk) 21:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The original article was only a paragraph; as the leader of the organization, surely you can rewrite it. So...
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Antoine Lami
the couldn't wait two days to add in the wiki the references -217.21.155.117 (talk) 23:20, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 23:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * , for multiple reasons:
 * This was the subject of a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Antoine Lami
 * It was deleted under WP:CSD, so this isn't the proper venue for requesting undeletion; either ask the admin User:Secret who deleted it, or if you have done so, take it to WP:DRV.
 * This is a music related biography that failed to meet the criteria spelled out in WP:MUSICBIO.
 * I recommend, if you have contacted the admin already, you go through the WP:AFC process to submit this article again so that it gets proper review before being accepted to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Taylor Gray
Article was deleted under reason 'prod' for no legitimate explanation. Taylor Gray is a working actor with recent roles on Nickelodeon and the Warner Bros. motion picture 'Thunderstruck' in addition to a major upcoming project. -68.36.17.166 (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paul Kinsella "PK"

 * This was requested by, but the request was malformed. I am merely restoring it on their behalf and have no opinion one way or another on the merits of the request. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:49, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. sorry for the late notice. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. sorry for the late notice. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Odyssey of Persistence (2011 film)
I, 14.195.41.186, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 14.195.41.186 (talk) 05:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Montage Hotels & Resorts
Mboothmontage (talk) 19:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't be writing about a subject you're tied to. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:29, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Non-admin AFC reviewer here: AFC is the one place where editors with a conflict of interest can "create" whole articles.  Part of the job of the reviewer is to make sure the article is suitable for Wikipedia.  There is a strong consensus in the AFC community that submissions which are deleted through G13 should be restored upon request unless another speedy-deletion criteria applies or (possibly) that it would be pointless to restore the submission because either an article exists and there is nothing worth copying over, or the topic or submission is hopelessly unsuitable.  Unless one of these conditions apply, please restore the page.  Please add an afc comment to the top section stating that  appears to have a conflict of interest.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  03:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Davidwr, I'm not an admin, and even with AfC space it's still very difficult for an editor writing about something he's connected to to write a neutral article. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hopefully our requester will tone down the promotional language. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Tnagenesis2005.jpg
Okay, I've been inactive for several months now and wasn't aware this file was deleted along with several several others that had been removed from their articles. To give a long explanation, I am the only editor of TNA PPV articles. There are minor editors who do things but I am the only one who expands them and takes them to GA. I've been working on expanding Genesis (2005) in a subpage. It currently exists only as a redirect with a list of results in the main article TNA Genesis. There are several events that have the same format as they don't establish notability as just a list of results. Each had a PPV with a rationale attached for the article. A user removed each one citing fair-use not to be used in lists. It appears after they were removed, they were deleted as routine maintenance, as far as I can tell. Well there isn't exactly replacements for these images that I am aware of that can be used under the fair-use rationale. These images came from In Demand or TNA for the most part. Seeing as I'm expanding the article for which this poster belongs, I need it to be reinstated if possible. The rest of the images can wait for now, though it would be nice if they were all reinstated as well. I can provide a list if needed. - Will C  13:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I have a list of files that have been deleted for the same reason as above. I'd like this image reinstated by the first if possible as that is when I will have Genesis done in my subpage.-- Will C  09:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please use within a week otherwise it will get the chop again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll have it in the article by tonight. Thanks, I couldn't find a replacement for the life of me.-- Will C  12:19, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Lake Erie Monsters.svg
This SVG file (see duplicate at ) was previously used in the article Lake Erie Monsters, until it was replaced with a lesser-quality logo without explanation (not SVG, has a black background, etc.). Ideally I'd like to replace the current logo in the Lake Erie Monsters article with this deleted one. Thanks, -~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 04:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please us it with in week to aaoid redeletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Done, thanks! ~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 20:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christopher Tsai
I, ContinueWithCaution, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. C(u)w(t)C(c) 18:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Requesting undeletion to assist in the investigation of potential sock puppetry. Cheers, C(u)w(t)C(c) 18:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. Please re-tag as appropriate when you have what you need. JohnCD (talk) 10:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ian Cooling
I, Jpcooling, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jpcooling (talk) 15:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Your first article and note the need for references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Judge Charles "Chuck" Floyd, Jr.
I, Smgoodspeed, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I would like to work on the sourcing and increase the contents validity and credibility according to the Wiki reviewers' requests. Smgoodspeed (talk) 15:15, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. This looks promising if you can find some more references - one of the present two is a deadlink. JohnCD (talk) 10:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Irregular algorithm
I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. A discussion at Wikiproject Computer science recommended moving this to mainspace and changing it to a redirect to Automatic parallelization, but in the meantime it was deleted. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 02:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 10:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cem Ersoy
I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. An opinion from Wikiproject Education confirms that this person passes WP:PROF. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 03:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 10:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Car Testers
It is important for ck's fans on youtube -Cks4205 (talk) 18:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The other speedy is a G11, which likewise won't be restored here. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about websites. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning websites will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 10:58, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Gavin Patterson
reasoning -Russ McLean (talk) 11:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia have a HOLE in their reference work.

FACT: Wikipedia LIST the Company ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BT_Group

FACT: Wikipedia LIST the Chairman ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Rake

So PLEASE can someone explain what is wrong with filling in the missing bit?

You have a dead-red link for the CEO. All I was trying to do was start the appropriate page up.

The New CEO of BT Group plc is ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gavin_Patterson&action=edit&redlink=1

Wikipedia even had a page for the OLD CEO of BT Group plc ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Livingston

IN FACT WIKIPEDIA HAVE IAN LIVINGSTON WRONGLY LISTED AS THE CURRENT CEO OF BT GROUP PLC. IAN LIVINGSTON RETIRED BACK IN SEPTEMBER 2013 WHEN HE WAS MADE A LORD.

It seems that there are too many Editors and not enough Contributors.

Wikipedia is losing it's way.


 * The previous CEO had other parts of their background that when combined with becoming CEO of BT, he was then sufficiently notable for an article. This is why the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is very dangerous - you cannot compare apples to kiwis.  You are, correct, that someday in the future he may be notable enough for an article.  I would suspect that userfication might be appropriate so that you can build the article as more comes out over the next half-year or so, but you would have to ensure that you a) don't treat it like a live article, and b) don't move it into articlespace until you have checked with a couple of editors who are well-versed in notability and biographies  ES  &#38;L  12:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ms. Naughty
Intended to edit the piece and add new information about published work. Article deleted over Christmas/New Year period when I was offline -Lukerevolution (talk) 22:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Jenn_Shelton
The page was removed in error -- the notability requirements are satisfiable. The subject is an athlete written about in ESPN, appears in non-fiction, and is the fastest female 100 mile winner. Even a cursory google search will yield results for her ranging from news stories, to race results, to Patagonia brand endorsements. -Hearthstrider (talk) 23:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 09:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/L.G.B. Brass
I, Trumpetblast, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Trumpetblast (talk) 00:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please edit it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Move Your Feet Before You Eat!® Foundation
reasoning - The organization Move Your Feet Before You Eat!@ Foundation wants to create awareness of the importance of physical fitness. The organization donates money to the local schools through events like The O'side Turkey Trot. The O'side Turkey Trot raises thousands of dollars through entry fee and a portion of these funds go to area schools as proven through documentation. A significant amount of money has been given back to the schools over the years. Thank you! Remarkablebeauty (talk) 22:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * See the notes I have added to your talkpage about WP:NOBLECAUSE ES  &#38;L  11:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Yunshui  雲 &zwj; 水  11:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NADCA
I, Lantzra, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Please restore the previously deleted submission so that I can edit and bring it into compliance with Wikipedia standards. Sorry for the delay in editing, thanks for your consideration. Richard Lantz Board of Directors National Air Duct Cleaners Association Lantzra (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ because this submission was substantially copied from NADCA's 20th Anniversary Book. Wikipedia cannot host copied material, even in an AfC page, unless a formal copyright release has first been made. No doubt you could make such a release, but there would be no point because this material is quite unsuitable for an encyclopedia article - Wikipedia is not a noticeboard for organizations to tell the world about themselves, and that Anniversary Book is NADCA positively beating its chest to tell the world how great it is. That is fine for your book or your website, but an encyclopedia article would be nothing like that. You need to start with a clean sheet of paper. More advice on your talk page in a day or two: start by reading the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and the guide to writing WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

EasyAntiCheat
I'd like to create a neutral version of the page, documenting the software similarly to how e.g. PunkBuster is documented. -Slashrower (talk) 15:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

InventHelp’s INPEX Invention Trade Show
the article was reposted as per suggestions of, I believe it should be given a fair and neutral review. -Mr RD (talk) 13:12, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Have you pointed this out to the deleting admin, ? ~Amatulić (talk) 19:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The page was already deleted before my seeing it. Also the page was nominated for deletion due to suspicion of paid editing by me. I have already explained myself here and also I am not the original creator of the page, I just reposted the article as I know the event personally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr RD (talk • contribs) 17:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * In any case, you really need to take this up with the deleting admin. Explain as you have already done, and point out this conversation. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Abigail Ratchford
This article was reinstated after being deleted, following the specific instructions of person who deleted it. then it was once again deleted by someone that will not give answers as to why it was deleted, or suggestions of how to edit the article to fit this person's standards -Scoocher16 (talk) 20:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. That is not what the record shows. The only edit you made to the userfied article before re-posting it was to add more promotional language like "she burst onto the scene" and "back by popular demand". Wikipedia is not a place for you to promote your client. As you are "part of Miss Ratchford's management team" you should not be writing about here here - read WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Once she is more than an "aspiring actress", someone not connected with her will no doubt write an article. JohnCD (talk) 12:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Utterly ridiculous. I edited the entire opening paragraph, as per request by original deleter, and the article was reinstated. How do you come to the conclusion the the following terms are "promotional" ... "she burst onto the scene" and "back by popular demand"??

Scoocher16 (talk) 18:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * We call that WP:PUFFERY. Nothing in the third party reliable sources stated that she was "back by popular demand" or that she "burst onto the scene" - those are phrases reserved for use by either promotional departments or sensationalist news.  Hey, she may become notable this year - ask for it to be userfied, work on it for a few months, touch base with a few trusted senior editors who understand the type of writing needed for an encyclopedia, and when one of those editors says "I thnk it's ready" they'll help you to move it back into articlespace  ES  &#38;L  19:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Scoocher16, if you really can't see how those phrases are promotional and don't belong in an encyclopedia, you really shouldn't be editing Wikipedia beyond posting suggestions for changes on article talk pages. That's why we have the WP:COI guide, and why PR people are generally unwelcome, because too often they are blind to their own conflict of interest. Wikipedia does not exist for your publicity purposes. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Rolf adventure.png
Fair use image deleted after redirecting of the article. No reasoning or discussion preceeded redirecting, added a source and some additional details to address the unsourced tag. -ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What article? ~Amatulić (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Arora Bearing Corporation
reasoning -Raghavarora53 (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC) this is the only most popular firm in amritsar that is the only authorised dealer of skf, and people also have interest to know about it. this is the only reason i want to post it on wikipedia.. i ensure you that i will update information time to time
 * I tried the "Aurora" spelling as well, as well as tried AfC space. No dice. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:39, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If in doubt, try capitalisation: it was Arora bearing corporation, but X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Paul Conrad, Chain Reaction.JPG
This file was deleted in Commons because of sculpture's copyright. Therefore, it should be undeleted as unfree and then reinserted to Chain Reaction (sculpture). -George Ho (talk) 07:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * , image exists, nothing to do. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ - George, I leave you to place it in the article and add any necessary FUR tags. JohnCD (talk) 22:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Battle Of Dorod Sayoh, Kampung Jagoi Duyoh
I, Alimonavie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Alimonavie (talk) 01:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Please read WP:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", WP:Your first article and WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 22:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Video Quality in Public Safety Working Group
I, Mejbp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mejbp (talk) 03:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. This submission is substantially copied from http://www.pscr.gov/projects/video_quality/vqips/vqips.php, so for copyright reasons it cannot be restored, even temporarily, without a formal copyright release. No doubt such a release could be arranged, but there would be no point: Wikipedia is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves, and copying an organization's own website is not the way to make an acceptable encyclopedia article. See User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard for more background. JohnCD (talk) 23:13, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Ward J. M. Hagemeijer
I noticed this guy near the top of the Special:WantedPages as of its last gasp December 13. This is because the birds wikiproject spammed a mention of his article (and a bunch of other bluelinks) to 16,000 pages. (uggh, I know, but it's irrelevant anyway) I haven't read the article and have no idea if he's notable or not, but he's authored some number of books and seems like a perfect candidate for a Draft:Ward J. M. Hagemeijer even if full undeletion seems inappropriate. -Wnt (talk) 03:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. As this was a PROD deletion, it can be restored directly but, as you can see, it is an extremely basic stub. I will notify who PRODded it, but link to this conversation so that s/he can see you are interested in expanding it. JohnCD (talk) 09:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Student Bank
reasoning -203.223.94.77 (talk) 03:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Studen t Bank is a bank for student. Any student can join student bank. This bank is in Bangladesh. This is a school bank.
 * please give the exact title of the page you mean. There has never been an article Student Bank or Student bank, either in the main encyclopedia or in WP:Articles for creation. JohnCD (talk) 09:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timeline for Germany 1918-45
89.241.152.9 (talk) 07:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/StopCartel
I, Lestrad, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Lestrad (talk) 11:21, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. This submission was copied from the organization's website, so for copyright reasons it cannot be restored, even temporarily, without a formal copyright release as described in WP:DCM. No doubt such a release could be arranged, but Wikipedia is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves, and copying an organization's own promotional material is not the way to make an acceptable encyclopedia article. See WP:Your first article for advice, and User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard for more background. JohnCD (talk) 09:45, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Boku No Ohime Sama
Hello, that is my own comic page, it does not involve any entity. Please dont delete my page, it just a page for my fans in school to view at. Thank You!! -Thamweijie 10:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines.  Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information.  ES  &#38;L  10:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

To Aru Kurayami No Mahou Tsukai
Hello, that is my own comic page, it does not involve any entity. Please dont delete my page, it just a page for my fans in school to view at. Thank You!! -Thamweijie 10:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines.  Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information.  ES  &#38;L  10:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

EasyAntiCheat (2)
Removed for advertising while the page was entirely factual. How is something like the Punkbuster page then not considered as advertising?? -Slashrower (talk) 15:47, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done See above - making a similar request, and using WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS arguments that do not address the root problem that prevents undeletion will not be successful ES  &#38;L  15:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Gordan Zdravkov
Known Macedonian football player -Jolicnikola (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:41, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: the article is about a football coach with a long string of managerial positions One seems to be at FK Rabotnički, a Macedonian first league club. He's also asserted to have played for two first league clubs. There are unfortunately no references to show any of this. I'm not sure it's an A7, but it may not meet our notability standards and in any case it can't be accepted without references.  DGG ( talk ) 17:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - I have restored the page to User:Jolicnikola/Gordan Zdravkov where you can work on it. Please note DGG's comment just above: Wikipedia's WP:Verifiability policy requires that "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source". JohnCD (talk) 18:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Håvar Mjeltevik
The reason is that the article isn't finished. -Norwaytrader (talk) 03:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Norwaytrader/Håvar Mjeltevik. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Burst Brothers
Songwaves (talk) 16:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Burst Brothers, again
I, Songwaves, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Please un-delete The Burst Brothers article. Thank youSongwaves (talk) 20:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Already ✅ - see reply just above, and message on your user talk page. Click on the blue-link of the article name to see it. JohnCD (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)