Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 112

Keiko Wakita
Greetings! It is hard to translate this article from Japanese to English.However, I am willing to understand our beloved Wikipedia readers (in behalf of my fellow Wikipedians) that is why I ask my request to undeleted this page unless to review again.I hope you should appreciate my request for undeletion.Thank you!--RenRen070193 10:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RenRen070193 (talk • contribs)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 10:26, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Marie Okada
It is hard to translate this article from Japanese to English.However, I am willing to understand our beloved Wikipedia readers (in behalf of my fellow Wikipedians) that is why I ask my request to undeleted this page unless to review again.I hope you should appreciate my request for undeletion.Thank you!--Chantaru (talk) 10:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
 * Please note that the English Wikipedia has quite demanding standards for WP:Notability. For a reporter/journalist/broadcaster, see WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENTERTAINER. JohnCD (talk) 10:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Demetria McKinney
Reason the team is not sure why Ms. McKinney's page was deleted she is an American actress if you could please put it back on this site. -74.190.249.84 (talk) 02:28, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I must ask: Who is "the team"? ~Amatulić (talk) 05:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article needs more references to independent sources to verify what it says. JohnCD (talk) 11:53, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Roger Evans (actor)
There are know numerous links and credits to film and theatre relating to the actor via other people's pages. Svengali the movie, Kubricks produced by Alan McGee. A bit of Tom Jones are films in which he plays leads and they have cult status. Also numerous references to the Royal Court Theatre the Globe and the Donmar Warehose. Including information pertaining to the actor on IMDB where he has had significant roles in many films and television programmes. -86.145.241.49 (talk) 10:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please update the article with references to reliable sources to show how he meets the notability standard of WP:NACTOR. JohnCD (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Mica and Ahmet Ertegun Graduate Scholarship Programme in the Humanities
81.174.240.47 (talk) 00:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Looks like a bog-standard G13. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 07:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (Thanks, Jeremy) Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:08, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Erich Šefčík

 * — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 22:38, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Krishna Bhandari
I am a renowned flautist from Pune- Indiaand senior disciple of Pt Raghunath Seth and performer at All India Radio and TV for the last 25 years> I am also a Panel Artist of Indian Council for Cultural Ralations(ICCR) under ministry of external Affairs} I have been giving public performances. My web site is [snip] -— Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 22:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kvbhandari (talk • contribs) 22:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I also removed your website from this report, and I strongly suggest you read our policies on autobiographies and conflict of interest. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 22:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Note: article was speedily deleted (by me) under WP:CSD but the author re-created it anyway. I have re-tagged it with G11 (unambiguous promotion) as well as A7 (some claims of significance but the promotional fluff makes them non-credible). Suggest salting if deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not a place for self-promotion. There are many sites like Facebook, LinkedIn, Myspace where you can write about yourself, but Wikipedia is different. JohnCD (talk) 12:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Shefki Arifovski
Worked at Serbian Superleague club -Jolicnikola (talk) 12:28, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * This was deleted because it was a biography of a living person that had no sources whatsoever. I would be willing to consider restoring this if you had some sources. Non-English ones are fine as long as they are independent, substantial and third party. Thanks. Spartaz Humbug! 13:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Cam Banks
reasoning -AusJeb (talk) 15:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC) Please undelete the page for Cam Banks. This page is for a published author and game designer. Links were provided to pages for his published works on Wikipedia.
 * Note that if the article is restored, or moved to User: or Draft: space, I have a source to add a little bit of information for him. BOZ (talk) 18:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Also the speedy deletion was under wp:A7. Links to multiple works with independent reviews (and awards) is not just a claim to importance, but one of notability under wp:AUTHOR, making wp:A7 inappropriate.  Neonchameleon (talk) 13:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. The article as deleted said nothing about awards - only that he had worked on various games and written a novel. The only references were his self-profile on Goodreads and his employer's blog, which didn't mention him. That is far short of WP:AUTHOR and, in my view, a proper A7 deletion. However, since several people are interested in improving the article, I have restored it to the new Draft namespace at Draft:Cam Banks, where you can work on it and add references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 14:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Paul Foreman
I have ill and wasn't able to work on it. -184.3.203.25 (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I will remove the other, more malformed request. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I see that you re-created the article. I have merged the histories so that the earlier versions are visible, and added the "AfC unsubmitted draft" template at the top which has a link for you to submit the page for review when you are ready. JohnCD (talk) 14:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Little powerpire
reasoning -Adiuni7 (talk) 08:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done Sorry, but Wikipedia is not for that sort of thing. Read Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 10:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Drake (miniature wargame)
I, 207.6.209.248, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 207.6.209.248 (talk) 19:08, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:37, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Vinnie Richichi aka New York Vinnie
72.95.213.92 (talk) 09:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please edit it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Notability, see also WP:ENTERTAINER. JohnCD (talk) 10:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cha Cha Malone
I, Koreamgmt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Koreamgmt (talk) 19:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ - there is no point undeleting the AfC submission, because the article exists in the main encyclopedia at Cha Cha Malone. JohnCD (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SUPERIOR Magazine
I, Artofstyle, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Artofstyle (talk) 11:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ - there is no point undeleting this AfC submission, because the actual article exists at SUPERIOR Magazine. JohnCD (talk) 17:37, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Coyoteism
This page shouldn't be deleted because we are writing about a real religion and I'm feeling offended when you delete it like our religion is fake! i wasn't done with the page when you deleted it i just saved it because i wanted to see how it looked for other people, I'm going to add that it is a religion and more, when I'm done with the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coyoteism (talk • contribs)
 * X mark.svg Not done - Wikipedia isn't for things you've made up.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Since the article creator asserts this is a real religion it may or may not fall under WP:NOTMADEUP -- unable to see the article I have no way of knowing. However, in the spirit of WP:DONTBITE I will offer to the user that his/her personal involvement in the religion ("...our religion...") makes his/her creation of this article problematic due to a personal conflict of interest (see WP:COI). I strongly suggest the user request assistance for creating this article from the Article for Creation team, BUT ONLY AFTER CAREFULLY STUDYING the fundamentals of article creation (see WP:Simpleintro and WP:YFA). There is no guarantee that the article can be created, especially if reliable sources cannot be provided, but if the user fails to study and understand "the basics" then his/her article will definitely not get created at all. F6697  FORMERLY   66.97.209.215 TALK 19:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Steel Core
Page was deleted with the nominator and ONE PERSON voting. The one person voting suggested that the page be moved to the Transformers wiki, but the article is not about a Transformers character, so I doubt he read or understood the article. The creator of the page was not notified of the proposed deletion, which is usually standard procedure. -Mathewignash (talk) 20:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - This article was deleted at AfD, and as such, may not be restored here. Consider taking the article to deletion review, but please consult with the deleting administrator first before doing so. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 02:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - The opening sentence of this page read: "Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages... in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator." - As stated the nominator and one person (who didn't even know what the article was about!) were the only people in the AFD, and the nominator didn't follow proper procedure in notifying the article creator that the article was up for deletion. The nominator has even been warned to notify the creator of articles when he AFDs them, it's on his talk page. The failure to follow proper procedure, and lack of any real feedback on the AFD clearly negates the AFDs validity. I believe it can be undeleted here for these reasons. Mathewignash (talk) 03:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Good point - truly forgot 'bout that, sorry (I've been accustomed to seeing AFD'ed articles getting thrown about to DRV that I didn't realise REFUND applied to discussions with participations that only derived from one other participant). Still, having looked at the subject on a G-search, there are relatively few hits regarding the subject. If you can point to a number of reliable sources containing significant coverage of the subject, this may give cause for undeletion. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 10:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That can be easily overlooked, and can also be easily discarded when one reviews the "caliber" of those involved in the discussion. I can understand userfication here, but not undeletion into articlespace  ES  &#38;L  12:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The circumstances of this AFD CLEARLY put it within the range of an undeletion request. I'd prefer the article get undeleted, and if the nominator wishes to have a PROPER deletion nomination, let it be his burden to prove it's not a worthy article. The article itself has sources from a half dozen toy news podcasts, and several stories cited from toy new web sites which have been deemed as reliable in other AFDs, like Entertainment News International. Mathewignash (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, in your opinion. Now, with the arguments you're placing, you've just pushed yourself into DRV mode.  Good luck there.  Cheers  ES  &#38;L  16:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you doubt notability by reliable third party sources, perhaps you should read Transforming Collections by Philip Reed, who is the editor for Steve Jackson Games, who devoted two pages of his book to Steel Core.Mathewignash (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Two points:
 * Matthew, you wrote above "the article is not about a Transformers character, so I doubt he read or understood the article", but the article itself said "Steel Core is an original third party Transformer character"
 * The first port of call if you disagree with the outcome of an AfD should always be the closing admin, in this case . Have you consulted him? I suggest you ask him if he is willing to userfy the article for you to work on.
 * JohnCD (talk) 17:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I came here because the circumstance followed exactly what was stated in the opening sentence of this page. I will edit the page to be more accurate than calling it a "third part Transformer" once it's restored. Mathewignash (talk) 17:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Just a word, if this comes to DRV you will get nowhere by attacking other users as it will get summarily closed. If you make a nomination stick to sources and policy. Thanks. Spartaz Humbug! 20:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nair & Co.
I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I was editing this to remove promotional content when it was deleted. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 20:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ JohnCD (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jim Dow
I, Saucemon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate.

Please undelete the page so I can revisit my research and solve the issues related to citing the material. However, I believe you need to reconsider allowing me to use the Guggenheim as a source for it's fellowship recipients. It is a world renown institution that houses fine art and awards fellowships every year in multiple categories. I would have used the already existing Wikipedia page, "List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1974" for an already published source, but when you click the hyperlink to Jim Dow, it brings you to another Jim Dow, who was not a photographer, and died two years before the award was given. Please understand, I am trying to be completely accurate. This man deserves a complete page, for he is an incredibly inspirational exhibiting artist who is the forefront of hybrid photographic methods. Please help me with this. Please undelete my work thus far. -Saucemon (talk) 19:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ - there is no point undeleting this AfC submission, because there is already an article about him at Jim Dow. You are welcome to improve that. JohnCD (talk) 20:43, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Afterthought - if you would like access to your material, I can email you a copy. JohnCD (talk) 20:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Egon Ranshofen-Wertheimer Award
reasoning -Nwoak (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC) I would like to rewrite this article but can't create it, as it has been deleted in 2008.
 * Yes check.svg Userfied. The title was salted - protected against creation - because in 2007/8 it was repeatedly created without any evidence of notability. I have restored it to User:Nwoak/Egon Ranshofen-Wertheimer Award where you can work on it. I will re-protect the title, so you should submit it via Articles for Creation, by clicking the "Submit the page" link in the box at the top when it is ready. What you have to show is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Raymond Suchy
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Arpistria (talk • contribs) 20:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:34, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Tim Shields
The initial article was deleted because the subject of the article did not appear to have sufficient notoriety due to an incomplete article. The notoriety of the article's subject has increased dramatically since the article's initial submission. Also, additional enhancements to the original article will be submitted that will be compliant with Wikipedia's policies. -Babelfisher (talk) 20:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * . Nothing to undelete. That article has never existed in main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * However, you are welcome to continue improving the version sitting as a rejected AfC submission found here: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tim Shields. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  03:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

1965 – Through the Looking Glass
Notability. I don't know what userfy is but you may need to attach me as the author - I certainly authored the original article, but may not have been logged in when I did that. -Sa cooke (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you! After 6 years away a lot of my articles have been deleted, so I'll be back asking for more undeletions in due course. Sa cooke (talk) 03:57, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Planixs
I, 92.25.180.205, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 92.25.180.205 (talk) 03:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done The submission is written like an advertisement and meets speedy deletion criteria G11. I suggest you start from scratch if you wish to write an article on this topic. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ewa Domzala (Ewa Lilla Domżała)

 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] This was requested by, but the request was malformed. I am merely restoring it on their behalf and have no opinion one way or another on the merits of the request. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 02:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:06, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:06, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Randy Rolfe
I, Rayevsky, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Rayevsky (talk) 23:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Spirit DSP
The article was deleted due to "lack of notability". We spotted that it was proposed for deletion too late, and didn't have a chance to improve it. Please get it back and we will have it editted properly within a week. Thanks in advance! -91.226.161.173 (talk) 10:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  10:33, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Escargot Brothers
I, GeeBeeY, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. GeeBeeY (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  15:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mobile Monitoring
I, Jschweizer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jschweizer (talk) 11:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Table Of The Sun
I, 71.21.155.91, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Still researching this subject for additional citations and references 71.21.155.91 (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Album_Network_Expando_Tuneup_24
Notability - This is one of a number of compilation albums The Stairs contributed songs to. During my 6 year absence from Wikipedia it was deleted. I contest the justification. -Sa cooke (talk) 04:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Album Network Expando Tuneup 24, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  04:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you had read the discussion you will have seen I was not part of that. You might call tht a discussion, but to discuss without any input from the original author seems not to be a discussion at all. I want to take part in it now as I was not informed at the time either of the discussion nor of the impending deletion. I have not logged in to Wikipedia in over six years. Sa cooke (talk) 05:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I understand, however, Wikipedia articles don't have authors. You may have initially created the page but it was available to be worked on by everyone, and other users contributed to the article prior to its deletion; for this reason, there is no requirement for an AfD discussion to involve any of the contributors to the article being discussed, and the page creator is as often involved in the discussion as he is not. At the present time, the community's consensus (as it emerged from the discussion linked above) is that there should not be an article on this topic, and this Requests for undeletion page specifically cannot go against the community's consensus and restore pages deleted following a discussion. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  05:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * In any case, it consisted entirely of an infobox and a track listing, without a single reference, so there is really no significant content to be restored. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  05:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Understood; however, how can I tell who deleted the article? it's deleted, along with the talk page. And don't tell me it's Cirt, as he is no longer an admin. And why is that not significant content? I don't want to waste my time typing content again when it's within your (or another admin's) power to restore. Sa cooke (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Cirt was indeed the one who closed the AfD and deleted the article, and he indeed isn't an administrator anymore. I agree that you should not waste your time typing the same content again, because your recreation of the article would make it elegible for speedy deletion under criterion G4, which covers the recreation of material against the previously established community's consensus. If you disagree with the consensus that emerged from the discussion linked above, which demonstrates the community's belief that the subject of the article is not notable, then you need to submit it for deletion review, saying why you believe the consensus is incorrect. The only other option for you is to create a new article, supported by significant coverage in reliable, independent sources in order to demonstrate its notability. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  05:21, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Belligerence, sarcasm, and rudeness is not needed thank you very much. You need to consider what you say to people buddy. And how that might be interpreted. Ok, I'll take the issue up elsewhere as you suggest. The article will be restored, and I will then have the opportunity to expand it. Sa cooke (talk) 05:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I... I frankly have no idea what to reply. I've started to type 3 replies and deleted them while blankly gaping at my monitor. If you genuinely think my above reply was belligerent, sarcastic and rude, you're in for quite a surprise in your future Wikipedia communications. Good luck! ;) ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  05:30, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Sa cooke, I don't think Salvidrim!'s reply was rude. He/she clearly pointed out the two possible paths: (1) write a new, differently worded article, and (2) ask for a review of the deletion, pointing out new sources of information that may change the consensus.  This reply may have saved you from wasting your time with another approach, so it was actually helpful, and I hope that you will reinterpret.  &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 16:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I just want to note for the sake of archival that this has now been opened at DRV. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  17:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Foley Belsaw
I am continuing to research -Wvamark (talk) 17:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It's actually Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Foley Belsaw.
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  17:45, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GamedayHousing.com
2602:306:BC52:DF20:CA2A:14FF:FE31:25AF (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Theodoros Moschonas
reasoning -Manos H. Scorer (talk) 20:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC) The player made professional debut with his new team. I have accurate links for that.
 * ✅. Please update it quickly with links to show how he now meets WP:NFOOTY, or it is likely to be deleted again. JohnCD (talk) 22:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_SMS_gateways
reasoning -108.33.151.18 (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC) The list of all US and Canada SMS gateways was removed please find and replace. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_SMS_gateways
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/List of SMS gateways, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Dolma Lhakang
Hi! I note that the article I was watching, 'Dolma Lhakang' was speedily deleted. I believe that it shouldn't have been, but that is just my personal opinion. Since the deletion, further references have come up. I would be grateful if there was some way of 'restoring' this article to my own namespace (so it doesn't appear in Wikipedia), so that I can update the content and make it worth of Wikipedia inclusion. Please let me know how I should go about this, and if there is any more information I should give. Thank you (and Happy New Year!) :) ). Buckethed (talk) 06:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code (replacing   with the name of the page you wish to have restored and   with the reason for your request).  ES  &#38;L  10:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Allegaeon
I, Heath24green, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Heath24green (talk) 09:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:13, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Walter Orr
I, 172.12.173.119, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 172.12.173.119 (talk) 22:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anchor Managed Hosting
Admin executing the CSD cites unambigous advertising or promotion as their reasion for deletion. It has been the custom to give more leeway in the Articles for creation space with respect to G11 and to only use that method when the submission is hopelessly advertising and to a much higher standard than the main article namespace. Admin who deleted the page is retired and is in a potential catch-22 situation currently. They can't use their admin privileges because they were accused of misusing them, but to not use them denies a anonymous editor the privilege of an appeal and time to improve the submission (User_talk:Kafziel). I request that either the page be restored to it's original location so that the anonymous editor can work on improving the article or a explanation of how bad the advertising/spam is on the draft. -Hasteur (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request.


 * I agree that this is not bad enough to qualify for speedy deletion from AfC space, but it is not an acceptable article: is very clearly the company using Wikipedia to "tell the world" about itself and its services: "their US support team allow them to provide 24x7 support... provides a range of services including... Anchor's infrastructure is highly scalable... a complete hands off solution... " etc.


 * I have advised the author, user, to change username (not that an individual username will remove the clear conflict of interest here), and suggest following the excellent advice of a very experienced Wikipedian at User:Uncle G/On notability:

"'When writing about subjects that are close to you, don't use your own personal knowledge of the subject, and don't cite yourself, your web site, or the subject's web site. Instead, use what is written about the subject by other people, independently, as your sources. Cite those sources in your very first edit.  If you don't have such sources, don't write.'"
 * JohnCD (talk) 12:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

QSI_International_School_of_Phuket
I, 180.180.124.181, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 180.180.124.181 (talk) 03:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. The AfC submission Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/QSI International School of Phuket has not been deleted, though as it has not been touched since May 2013 it may be deleted soon. If you make any edit to it, that will prevent immediate deletion.
 * However an actual article has today been posted at QSI International School of Phuket and you may like to improve that, otherwise it may well be nominated for deletion. It needs references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. Read WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 13:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Rousseau Metal
NB: The user making the request below reverted the page to a version from November, when she had asked the first time, and I reverted that change - I am now reinstating her two requests on her behalf. --bonadea contributions talk 16:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

As discussed with Mark Arsten I updated the page with new links and references. Thank you. -Isabellelf (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

It's been over a month, I see that other people received some kind of answer, I didn't. Can you please let me know the status of this request? Thank you Isabellelf (talk) 14:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I am sorry that you have got rather lost in our complicated system, and I do not know why your first request here was overlooked. This is in fact not the right place to ask for the result of an AfD discussion to be reversed: Mark Arsten actually said: "Ok, now you can apply for undeletion at WP:DRV" - Deletion review, a different forum. By way of amends, I have now made the necessary entry there for you - see Deletion review/Log/2014 January 7. You are welcome to make any additional comment there. JohnCD (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your help is very much appreciated. 206.162.159.82 Isabellelf (talk) 19:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 19:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Jersey Syndicate (2)
 Kaylanicole (talk) 04:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CART-WHEEL.org
I, CARTWHEEL1000, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. staff member managing the request left organisation and was not replaced for 11 months. Now have staff to manage this process. CARTWHEEL1000 (talk) 07:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Reekrit Serai
Based on available sources of third-party reliable sources, all information in the article is not unsourced. I request a clean-up of the article, with only sourced information being presented. We should not discourage young people. I will be created more pages on young artists within the following few weeks. -Radzee (talk) 17:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Reekrit Serai, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.


 * One comment in reply to yours: Wikipedia is not here to encourage the "up and coming". As an encyclopedia, it covers only those who have already arrived, and whomeet the notability standard of WP:ARTIST. JohnCD (talk) 20:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

King of Europe Series
reasoning -Mprocureur (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Foley Belsaw
I, Wvamark, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Wvamark (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sixtiers
I, Etolpygo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Etolpygo (talk) 20:41, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. There is no point undeleting this AfC draft, because an article exists in the main encyclopedia at Sixtiers. You are welcome to improve that. JohnCD (talk) 21:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Han Bangqing
I, 69.203.71.100, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 69.203.71.100 (talk) 20:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Tin Lizzy's Cantina
reasoning -Msbmla (talk) 21:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quilla
Michi44 (talk) 19:17, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:46, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/John_Albert_Matthes
 76.77.121.224 (talk) 01:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:58, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

The Unauthorized Autobiography of Samantha Brown
I am interested in this musical and want to learn about it, but there are no sites to find it on. Originally deleted through PROD. -66.30.84.204 (talk) 04:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. This may well be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion unless more references can be added showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. The only references are from the authors and the venue where the musical was performed. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Steve Phillips
I, 99.65.240.112, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 99.65.240.112 (talk) 05:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please edit it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. "I know Steve Phillips" is not enough as a reference - if the article is to be accepted, you will need to add at least one reference to a reliable, published source to verify what the article says and confirm that he meets the notability standard of WP:NHOCKEY. JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Telekomunikasi_Indonesia_International_(TL)_S.A.
I already edited the article follow the guidance but still deleted? what is the problem. Please consider again. Thanks -Wharyadi (talk) 08:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ...and I already see that you have recreated it, which means it will soon be deleted again. Wikipedia is not a business directory, it is an encyclopedia of notable topics, see especially the notability guidelines for businesses.  Wikipedia will at no time accept anything that looks like promotion  ES  &#38;L  10:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

How to delete an Article manually?

H. V. Kumar
Please undelete this article, I've some updates from credit worthy articles. Thanks -Aarganesh (talk) 05:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/H. V. Kumar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ES  &#38;L  10:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

List of corporations with a major presence in Birmingham, Alabama
Although somewhat outdated, this list is quite useful. -160.109.27.16 (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)