Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 118

Gerald Duff
According to the editor, the page was deleted for Reason A7: not important. Gerald Duff is a noted author with 13 Books currently available on Amazon. I wrote the Wikipedia article with an attempt to be humorous in Duff's style. Perhaps this put the reviewer off. -Jread 21205 (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Number of books available on Amazon doesn't automatically confer notability; whether the author has been written about or their books have achieved critical acclaim or a movie deal does. Also, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so I do somewhat agree with your suspicion that the levity was inappropriate, but it wouldn't have, in and of itself, triggered a speedy. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 17:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * if you click on the "redlink" Gerald Duff again, you will see that the A7 deletion was in 2006; that article was about an American lawyer. Your article is still at User:Jread 21205/Sandbox where you wrote it, and has not been submitted for publication. (Mistake - see below.) I have added a User sandbox template at the top which has a link for you to submit the article, when it is ready, to WP:Articles for creation, where an experienced user will review it and either accept it or give you feedback. Before you submit it, though:
 * Read WP:Your first article for general advice.
 * Rewrite it to remove the "jokey" tone. This is a serious encyclopedia.
 * Add references (a) to verify what the article says and (b) to establish Notability, which requires evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:AUTHOR.
 * JohnCD (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The article in question was Gerald duff with a small d. It was deleted as blatant advertising (G11), but I think A7 would have been possibly more appropriate. Opinions vary. Peridon (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * BTW being available on Amazon merely indicates existence. They'll list almost anything so long as it's available on demand and they don't have to buy in a stock. I've seen a 20 page book on there with an asking price of £97. I don't know how many it sold... Peridon (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * (Self-trout). I saw the sandbox in the user's contributions, assumed that was the explanation, and didn't look in his deleted contributions. Regardless, I think his best plan is to revise the sandbox article and submit it via AfC as I suggested, so as to get it checked and get feedback. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SF-7x Super Fruit
I, Superfruit1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Unlike six months ago when there weren't legitimate outside sources for information regarding SF-7x and its Super Fruit products (i.e., the reason the page was turned down in the first place), currently, those outside sources are in place. Superfruit1 (talk) 19:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: in its present form the draft is hopelessly promotional and needs a complete rewrite. Wikipedia is not a platform for free advertising, and anything like that is liable to speedy deletion. If, as your username suggests, you are connected with the company, please read the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. 23:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)JohnCD (talk)

The skill full person on online
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Vijayannamalai.wiki (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. We have never had a page with that name. If you mean Vijayannamalai the master of online internet service provider the answer is no, because Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like Facebook, Twitter and all the others where you have made yourself accounts. Those are all places for people to write about themselves, but Wikipedia is quite different - a project to build an encyclopedia. Read the WP:Welcome page, the WP:Introduction and Wikipedia is not about YOU to find out more about it. JohnCD (talk) 09:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

outpsyjah
This psytrance project needs its wiki article undeleted so that it can be referenced in coordination with other projects from Australian artist Tom Vallance, who is responsible for numerous unsigned music projects -Tomahawk333 (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.


 * You would do best to start by making an article about Vallance, with references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to show how he meets the WP:Notability standard of WP:MUSICBIO. Individual projects will also need to show their own WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

An article on Tom Vallance http://western-riverina-arts.blogspot.com.au/2014/01/tom-vallance-rides-again.html, http://www.irrigator.com.au/story/199937/art-space-a-dream-for-artist/ (Australian artist) can be addressed in coordination with the outpsyjah article. The outpsyjah mixes comprise a saga, which is a notable feat in itself - also, they are not signed to any label and no revenue is being gained from the music, so to label this as advertising or promotion is to misinterpret the importance of outpsyjah's music — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomahawk333 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

I can link you to a number of external sources that reference the works of Tom Vallance ^^^ - if that information will be seen to legitimize the existence of this article.

And there are multiple sources of information on the outpsyjah psytrance project, which cite its importance; https://soundcloud.com/outpsyjah, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr64G9k1jUA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomahawk333 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not for any kind of promotion, even of non-commercial enterprises - see Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. The inclusion criterion is called WP:Notability, and requires evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Blogs, Twitter, Youtube, Soundcloud etc don't count as reliable, because anyone can post anything there. See WP:Notability (summary). The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it important or significant enough to write substantial comment about? More detail at WP:MUSICBIO and WP:CREATIVE. Once other people have written about these projects, Wikipedia can summarise what they say, but an encyclopedia is not the place to announce new things. JohnCD (talk) 09:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Grupo de Capoeira Beribazu
I, 115.187.228.108, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 115.187.228.108 (talk) 10:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Geva Salerno (Geva Ledezma Salerno)
I, 70.193.196.24, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 70.193.196.24 (talk) 18:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Jeffrey Baek
This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. We also don't need the whole of the article posting here, please. Peridon (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * It is deleted now as blatant advertising per WP:CSD, and will not be restored. Talk to the deleting administrator. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

sydney alliance, again
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -101.170.85.80 (talk) 22:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Already ✅ two days ago, see WP:REFUND about twenty items above this. JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Platform505
This entry needs revision. Platform505 exists. I did not get any notice of it being deleted by wikipedia - just an email on Feb 9 after it had been deleted on Feb 8. Please reinstate it. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icecream53 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Terranigma box.jpg
This image was replaced by the PNG version in Terranigma. However, the PNG is smaller than the JPEG version, and I'm sure that (per WP:IUP) JPEG can display better colors than PNG, despite JPEG's lossy compression and PNG's lossless quality. Also, 300px JPEG's 300-pixel display of image may be more superior to 250px PNG image's 300-pixel display. -George Ho (talk) 03:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sheikh Tariq Al Qassimi
I, Rak Holding, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rak Holding (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read Your first article for advice, and note particularly the need for references to reliable sources to verify what the article says and establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Kcal Healthy Fast Food
No real reason why it has been deleted, follows closely to macdonalds and other fast food chain wikipedia pages -AzizaComm (talk) 06:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ~Amatulić (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Addendum: User AzizaComm is apparently Aziza Communications, a PR firm editing to promote clients. The account is now blocked for promotion and username policy violation. ~Amatulić (talk) 10:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * ...aaand, sockpuppet account recreated the article, and is also now blocked. ~Amatulić (talk) 10:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

R.a.G.e
This page was deleted via WP:Prod on 21 September 2006. It has breviously been nominated for deletion at Articles for deletion/R.a.G.e. Per WP:PROD, PROD should only be used for articles previously discussed on AfD and hence PROD should not have been used here. N.B. I checked the version of WP:PROD in force at the time of deletion and it said the same thing then. -Op47 (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You're right that PROD should not be used on articles that have been to AfD, even if the result was keep or no consensus. However, if this is restored, it is very likely to get sent straight to AfD again. If you are intending to work on it, it can be restored into your user space. Peridon (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I think your post should read "not previously discussed on AfD". Peridon (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The PROD vs AFD policies were very different in 2006 when this article was deleted. That, and for temporal reasons alone (I mean seriously - you want an article undeleted that was deleted 8 years ago??) this is unwise to undelete (except for possibly to a draft somewhere)  D  P  10:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Performance Nissan
I, FbachmanII, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FbachmanII (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC) The dealership sold to the public company for reportedly the highest multiple of earnings in the history of United States Nissan dealerships, after it was started from scratch. Please advise as to what else would make it notable, as it WAS a record-breaking breaking one-price dealership for Nissan before it was sold. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FbachmanII (talk • contribs)
 * User:FbachmanII, although we're typically more lenient with G13's, it's not "references" that are the issue - it's notability. It was a car dealer ... they're not notable enough for an encyclopedia entry.  Is there something somewhere that grants any inkling of notability???  D  P  17:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you have a valid, third party reference for that claim? "Highest earnings for a Nissan dealership" seems pretty specialized and non-notable overall when considering that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of notable topics  D  P  10:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Teon
re-edit -Ottofung (talk) 05:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Annakshetra
 Anitaagarwal (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * what is the name of the page you want undeleted? JohnCD (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I see you have now re-created this and submitted it. I have added the name above, for anyone else interested. It looks better than the previously-deleted version, so no action required here. JohnCD (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stockopedia
I, 94.193.160.185, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 94.193.160.185 (talk) 08:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Taxila Business School
 180.215.198.77 (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * 

This is for the benifit of general public as this is information about top ranked aicte govt of india approved business school -180.215.198.77 (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done This was a blatant copyright violation of the school's website and so cannot be undeleted and must not be recreated with copyright infringing content. Note also that, as is normally the case with such pages copying an organization's promotional material, the content was absolutely unsuitable for an encyclopedia article. Note that I have also deleted what I presume is your userpage, which also infringed on the school's copyrighted material.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Jason Brock
I, 50.136.245.219, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I would like to update this page without creating a new one entirely. Jason Brock is a famous SF artist who gained popularity in the show X-Factor. He is a notable advocate for gay rights.50.136.245.219 (talk) 07:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, note the need for references, and cut out promotional language like "humble, yet extravagant style... highly talented... extremely likeable..." An encyclopedia article should not contain your personal opinions, only facts, neutrally stated and cited to reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 17:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Alliance LARP
The organization's page was deleted for not being notable. The organization was featured on G4 Television, in local newspapers, and on numerous other websites. This was ignored by the people in the deletion discussion when the links were posted there, as a rewrite for the page was in progress. -Brujah7783 (talk) 02:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. Now that this article has been deleted after the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Alliance LARP, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KGLR FM
Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Article not abandoned, follow up research into KGLR is taking longer than expected. This article is important for tracking independent radio in CO, and for documenting social movements that reform consolidation of media and demand freedom of speech in the United States. -Rcolbert80 (talk) 20:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Buenvenida
I, 112.207.158.121, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 112.207.158.121 (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

List Of Notable Yu-Gi-Oh! Cards
I participated and requested for the deletion of the above topic but would like the contents of the article placed here please: User:titusfox/LONYGOC  —Preceding undated comment added 16:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you want ? the List of notable Yu-Gi-Oh! cards was only a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes Thank you! Regards, Titus  Fox  13:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Undelete screwed up twice, but I think its now all done. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Billy Kristanto
We know that wikipedia is the most popular encyclopedia which effort to note detail reliable information in every aspects of living. Well-known with the open-handed of true information had given by volunteers, which is not able to cover it. Hopefully helping all people who are needy on good information as much as possible based on the 5 pillars.

I have rather a good information, but reliable one. I wrote the article about Billy Kristanto, as a one potential man who build-up the classical and baroque music which people hardly to find, especially in Indonesia. A person who had dual doctoral degree (Ph.D. and Th.D.) from Germany within about 5 year. he also has been held a key role in Stephen Tong's Orchestra, who dealt with Symphony Hall in Jakarta (Aula Simfonia Jakarta), which is one great and International standart concert hall in Indonesia.

I've got this article under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because of insignificant. Meanwhile, i was watching many porn stars and pop figures talked by wikipedia about their history and fad information, even in detail, passing from insignificancy. Well..., if one good information is scarcely acceptable, rather than just the opposite. How might wikipedia will be?

I just a volunteer, if this cause is going on, this is really discouraging me to support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Candi003 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Userfied. We are all just volunteers, but Wikipedia is quite selective about subjects for articles. The test for inclusion is called Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:Notability (people) and WP:Notability (summary). The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it important or significant enough to write substantial content about? In regard to other articles, there are many unsatisfactory ones, but see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.


 * I have restored the article for you to User:Candi003/Billy Kristanto where you can work on it, but check with the deleting admin, user, before you return it to the main encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Sreekala Sasidharan
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -117.201.248.26 (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Article is at AFD right now. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * this article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Articles for deletion/Sreekala Sasidharan, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk) 18:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wyshwood Location Recording
I, Wyshwood, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyshwood (talk • contribs) 15:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Bliss Wishes
The page seems to have been deleted due to lack of proper citation. I have corrected that issue and the page is as well cited now as many other pages which are simply comprised of an album listing. I am unsure of how to repost the page with corrections being that I have to go through a process of undeletion so I apologize if this is the wrong place. Any advice or guidance is appreciated. I've created a tentative page with corrections at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Etrangere/Bliss_Wishes -Etrangere (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * - that was deleted after Articles for deletion/L. Cedeño, so you should ask user, the administrator who closed that discussion. Unfortunately, there are many unsatisfactory album articles, but see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, also WP:NALBUMS. Your four references are really only two - the first and third are the same, and so are the second and fourth. JohnCD (talk) 11:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I can't say I really remember this AFD from four years ago, but as I was pinged here I went ahead and took a look at it. First, as John notes above, there are really only two references, the other two are duplicates. The urls may be different but they redirect to the exact same content. (I am trying to assume good faith but this seems very odd, either you knew this and did it anyway or you added links without actually looking at them, neither of those is a good indicator)


 * One of those two references is the same one that was found to be insufficient as a sole reference in the previous deletion discussion, the other is from a site that appears to accept user-generated content and is therefore probably not a reliable source. That being the case, if this was reposted to article space I expect it would be speedy deleted again. So, as you clearly have a copy of the deleted article and your new version adds one sentence and one unreliable reference, I can't see any reason to consider undeletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Ok. I understand. I don't have a copy of the original, but in looking at other albums on Wikipedia it seems that a sentence stating what the album is, and who it is by is all that is normally posted. With regard to the references. I'm not sure how to make two sentences that are referring to the same citation show up as one citation. Will look into that. Anyway, thank you for taking a look and the information.  Seems like this one simply may not make it as it isn't notable enough.  Thanks again - Etrangere

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Langue (Language)
Matthewdfr (talk) 12:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done The deleted "draft article" consisted of a single word and appears to be some sort of vandalism. If there is a legitimate topic here (which I doubt) you are now autoconfirmed and do not need to use the AFC process. Obviously, if you re-create this article as it was before it will simply be deleted again, and you may be blocked, so please either write a real article on this language, if it really exists, or let it go. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

fairfx page deletion
Hi there, I have gone back and forth with an administrator at Wikipedia, regarding "promotion" on the FairFX page. We actually based the content of this page on our competitors pages, as a result of our content being removed several times... and we have sincerely tried to appease this administrator with the correct content. So with this in mind, our content had more factual references and less "sales-y" information than the following: Transferwise, WorldFirst, CaxtonFX, MoneyCorp, HiFX, Western Union, ICE International Currency Exchange, MoneyCorp, Currencies Direct - to name a few. I really appreciate what you guys do, and have spent half my life on this encyclopedia due to personal curiosity, but it's very frustrating to have our page deleted when our competitors (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TransferWise) have a lot more contentious information - Wikipedia should have one rule for everyone... I would like to have our page undeleted, or at least enter a discussion as to why this has happened, or alternatively have the content of the above pages removed as we all feel this is unfair practice - especially as market leaders in this industry. Thank you. -2A00:1D40:1012:0:5400:48BE:E741:6E (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is the exact thing for you to be reading. That said, a company such as Western Union has far more other reasons where they meet WP:NCORP - there IS one single policy for all  ES  &#38;L  17:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/FairFX, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
 * As ES&L stated above, there is one rule for all, and that rule is WP:CORP. FairFX does not meet the inclusion criteria. You can't have a Wikipedia article if you're up-and-coming. You must have already arrived. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Storewars Business Simulation
The page "Storewars Business Simulation" gives and information about an unique business iproving progect that runs in form of 3days simulation. -SW International (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. ... but it should be deleted and stay deleted  ES  &#38;L  12:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * . The requester's account has also been re-blocked for block evasion; article was previously created by blocked account . ~Amatulić (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Emil Polit
Emil Polit is a well known Polish painter, with quite a few collectors in the US and other English speaking countries. Please note a rich set of searchable results. His Website is built with an extensive English version. English speakers are a significant segment of the artist's following. Please restore this page. -IndyPete (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * @IndyPete:  Yes check.svg Done. Hey IndyPete. As a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please note what the major issue with this article and the reason it was proposed for deletion is that it does not have sufficient third party citations to reliable sources that are unconnected to the artist. This is what's needed as a basis expand the article from, to verify its content and to show notability. It appears those sources exist, but have not yet been tapped. You might find some of those sources through the results here. The reasons you've given for undeletion mostly don't speak at all to why it was deleted or what we care about as an encyclopedia. Though in practice it's much easier to find sources in English if you only speak that language, whether his following was only in Mongolia; the only sources on him were in Mongolian; and no one who speaks English had ever heard of him would be fine, as long as his notability was shown through those reliable independent sources – evidence that the world has taken note of him by writing about him substantively and providing verification of the content.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

David Lloyd Glover
No reasoning given. -~Amatulić (talk) 05:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayear (talk • contribs) 23:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done for the main space version - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/David Lloyd Glover, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.


 * That said, I have restored the WP:AFC version. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Goose house
Goose house should have its own page considering it is a rather well-known Japanese music group on Youtube. (Currently 600,000+ subs) The group is the one who sung the ending theme song of the anime Silver Spoon. This group is also one of the artists who sung for YUI's tribute album. They also have their own Wikipedia page in Japanese.

I was in the midst of editing it and adding more info when it was deleted. I'm planning on translating the content from its JP wiki and posting it here, so can you please undelete the article? -Triksyness (talk) 22:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.


 * Please see WP:BAND for the criteria a band must meet before it merits an article on the English Wikipedia. What the Japanese or any other Wikipedia chooses to publish has no bearing on the editorial criteria of the English Wikipedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

International Surety Association
Dear sir, madam,

We are writing to you with regards to the Wikipedia page of the International Surety Association (ISA) which has recently been deleted by Wikipedia due to possible copyright infringements.

We of course value the importance of Wikipedia with regards to copyright, and therefore we would like to ask your assistance on how we can reinstate this page in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines?

I would like to inform that we are highly surprised Wikipedia decided that the International Surety Association (ISA) is not relevant enough to have his own Wikipedia article. And kindly ask if you could inform us who to contact to amend this remarkable decision?

Herewith I would like to inform that the International Credit Insurance & Surety Association (ICISA) is one of the members of the International Surety Association and authorized to maintain the website of ISA and to create a Wikipedia page for the International Surety Association (ISA).

ICISA can be verified as contact for ISA under ‘Contact’ on the ISA website - www.suretyinternational.org

The International Surety Association is an official partner organisation of ICISA. I refer to: www.icisa.org/partners/1545/

I would herewith like to clarify the relevance of the International Surety Association (ISA) briefly:

The management board of ISA comprises of the following officers:
 * President for 2013-2014: CEO of Nationale Borg
 * Vice President for 2013-2014: Group General Manager Credit & Surety of QBE
 * Executive Director 2013-2014: Executive Director of the International Credit Insurance & Surety Association (ICISA)

Members of International Surety Association Membership is reserved to National or Regional Associations and organisations which are truly representative of Insurance Companies specialising in direct surety or guarantee underwriting.

Members of the International Surety Association are: -	International Credit Insurance & Surety Association (ICISA) - www.icisa.org -	Surety & Fidelity Association of America (SFAA) - www.surety.org -	Australian Surety Association (ASA) - www.australiansurety.com.au -	Surety Association of Canada (SAC)- www.surety-canada.com -	Surety Association of Mexico (SAM) - www.afianza.com.mx

Roughly the member associations of ISA represent together over 80% of the global surety business.

Website of ISA - www.suretyinternational.org

The object of ISA The object of ISA is to promote the common interests of its Members and the globalization of the surety business.

Background of International Surety Association (ISA) ISA was set up to promote surety bonds and in particular the uniform rules for contract bonds and to increase efficiency in advocacy initiatives:

- by dividing the world into regions for which each ISA member association is responsible it allows every member to focus in its region, by attending meetings and conferences, on behalf of other members, eliminating expenses and benefiting from local knowledge and experience.

- by combining forces ISA is a more relevant partner when talking to regulators and other influential making ISA a truly global surety representative body for advocacy purposes. The Association aims to intensify the co-operation between its members and to enhance efficiency in their respective businesses.

Looking forward to your response and suggestions for allowing ISA to have its own page on Wikipedia. -Meme1815 (talk) 10:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Please do not copy/paste contents here - admins have the ability to view the deleted text. There appear to be 2 issues: first, copyright violation, and second notability.  There was nothing that even hinted that this is a notable organization.  These are usually found in significant mentions in significant third party publications (note: press releases from the organization or similar things do not count).  Indeed, the references for this article were non-existent.  None of the officers are notable by Wikipedia standards, and although the org is a noble cause, it currently fails to meet encyclopedic requirements.  You may wish to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT or use the WP:AFC process, however, do not include copyrighted materials at any time  D  P  10:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Flyway Film Festival
I was working on the article on a film screened at this festival, and created a red-link to it. Following that red-link I saw an article on the topic had been PRODded. I am going to request userification. If, after looking at the article, I conclude it really isn't notable I'll apply a db-u1. Geo Swan (talk) 08:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 08:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Geo_Swan/Flyway_Film_Festival. D  P  10:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benitec Bipharma
I, Snrichards, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Snrichards (talk) 08:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. A very strong proviso: the primary reason it was deleted was NOT because it was an abandoned draft or too long, but because it was highly-promotional "article" - which is not permitted.  Please review the history of the draft, and edit accordingly before clicking "save"  D  P  11:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Neeta Singhal
The page was deleted by Speedy Deletion dur to importance/content and I didn't get a chance to update content and add citations, please reinstate the page and I will update content and add the more citations as required -NeetajisRRST (talk) 08:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  D  P  11:05, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas A Law
I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. It was deleted as editors were discussing it at the Help Desk. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. D  P  11:06, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Perception Software
Perception was originally removed because the content was not covered by third party sources. We are prepared and willing to update and add additional sources. This article provides information about a company and the industry of enterprise search. -Darrylpsw (talk) 22:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  On top of this, linking to LinkedIn profiles in the article?  Seriously?   D  P  11:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Weathergage capital
I, Sgwallis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sgwallis (talk) 15:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:29, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Sgwallis/sandbox
I, Sgwallis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sgwallis (talk) 15:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ - see entry above. This sandbox page was moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Weathergage capital, which has been restored, and you can work on it there. JohnCD (talk) 17:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Samuel Mensah
The reason given for deleting this article was "concern was: not proved to have played in a fully professional league". I gave a lot of references that Samuel Mensah played in Superettan and will now play in Allsvenskan. Both of those leagues are professional leagues; the two leagues together comprise the organisation "Swedish Elite Football" (http://www.svenskelitfotboll.se/), which itself is a member of European Professional Football Leagues (http://www.epfl-europeanleagues.com/member_leagues.htm). I didn't even know I had to prove that Superettan is a professional league on the page for Samuel Mensah, I thought that was an obvious fact. Thanks for your time.

Pomelotree (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC) -Pomelotree (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * . Nothing to do. The article is not deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OCEANOGENIC POWER
I, 190.141.188.55, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 190.141.188.55 (talk) 11:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This draft has never been submitted for review: please edit it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. Also, if you are connected with the company, read the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Camp Lambec - Lambec Lake
I, Evrik, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page to User talk:DougCEPE/Camp Lambec, Springfield, Pennsylvania as I intend to work on it. --evrik (talk) 20:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request, to its AfC location rather than your sandbox, which will make it more convenient to progress. The title can be adjusted when it is accepted. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earth Law Center
No reasoning given. -Grantstanleywilson (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Potential Inertia (2)
This film, while not secured in distribution has well-known people attached to it, and will be released this year. -Onefishfilms1 (talk) 22:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You only need one request. And if you're affiliated with the company producing the film, I suggest you read our conflict of interest policy. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 23:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done -  @Onefishfilms1:   as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Radius Books
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Tullyr1985 (talk) 21:41, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 22:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done as the page was a blatant copyright violation of Radius Books' website. Please note that if you own the copyright to that text (even if it was suitable for the content of an article, which it was not), we could not use it by permission for our use but would require the copyright to be released by a verifiable method.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Lataif-e-sitta
Complete deletion of this entry seems to me entirely unwarranted. I especially don't understand how the person who deleted this entry can justify calling the subject of little importance. . . when there are other Wikipedia entries that reference it (as anyone can see) and a google search for it produces 30,000 results. In my opinion, this is a significant topic within the practice of virtually every branch of Sufism. There should be some entry in Wikipedia for it. If the existing entry was inadequate in some respect, an effort should be made to correct it. . . -2601:D:E80:356:A076:D220:61F3:85B9 (Malcolm) 02:39, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Rabbit's Foot Meadery
This company is relevant because it is a leader in the growing mead industry. It is a founding member of several industry organizations. It is recognized by its peers as the largest in the industry, and is the oldest producer in the USA. Many articles have been written about the company and its founder and has been featured in news articles and on national television many times in the past twenty years and has served as a speaker at UC Davis Viticulture and Enonology department. It is no less relevant than [Sierra Nevada Brewing Company] or [Gordon Biersch Brewing Company]. It is also listed in several books on the subject. If the page is undeleted I will ensure that the references are added to make it comply withstandards. -173.8.178.225 (talk) 21:29, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:56, 13 February 2014 (UTC)