Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 125

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_Sheen
Hello I am new to Wiki so please accept my apologies if I have connected via the wrong means. As the actual actor Lucy Sheen seeing my "page" deleted and not being connected to the very first professional acting job I was cast in and one that I am immensely proud of I'd like that corrected. If you wish for proof of who I am am and that Lucy Sheen page should exist then I can supply the following links IMBd, My agents website , my entry in Spotlight. As I am still alive and breathing I'd like to be reinstated if possible. My website is I am now also a published author  and  writing under my Chinese name Lucy Chau Lai-Tuen Sheen my last major Theatrical appearances were in 2010 Hungry Ghosts by Tim Luscombe at The Orange Tree Theatre  and Plenty by David Hare directed by BAFTA winning Thea Sharrock. My solo theatre piece was recently performed at The King's Head Theatre London  As well as developing my own written works, I am also one of the founding members of The British East Asian Artist group which lobbies for equal rights and job opportunities in the arts for East Asian artists  born out of the RSC casting controversy for their production of The Orphan Of Zhao at the Swan 2012 If you still need a poster for the film PING PONG I do posses a digital copy of the Westend poster release, when it played at the Metro Cinema. I also have a copy of the VHS cover when the movie was released in the US and a couple of on location stills which I am prepared to make available if wanted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.184.230.232 (talk • contribs) 10:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

(not my request, I just fixed the template for the user) -bonadea contributions talk 13:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done. That wasn't an article, it was an unambiguously promotional personal bio more appropriate for your own web site, written by you, your agent, or your associate. If someone with no connection to you wants to re-write it, there is nothing preventing them from doing so. If you or your associates want to publish the article, please re-submit it using the process described at Articles for creation, which is where anyone with a conflict of interest should submit articles. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Veerendra Senar (4)
this article is realizable source by profession person as in film industry -Mahesh1985 (talk) 12:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. Articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD cannot be undeleted by request on this page, as has been explained to you repeatedly already. Your repeated requests have crossed the line into WP:DISRUPTIVE territory. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SBHIS - Health & Insurance Services (2)

 * - Violeta-sdim (talk) 21:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Notability. JohnCD (talk) 22:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Tribeca_Grand_Hotel
I, 68.175.95.196, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.68.175.95.196 (talk) 12:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Since he seems to have forgotten to follow up here, Yes check.svg Done by . — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * @Jéské Couriano:  Thanks Jéské. I actually didn't forget, but there's no way you would have know to look lower on this page to see that this (or the other) is a duplicate request, probably by the same person, one while logged in and one as an IP. (I had no idea either until seeing this post and looking as I remembered responding.) By the way, there must be something about the interface that causes people to make multiple duplicate requests because it happens so often on this page, unlike any other, but I have not figured out what it is.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rose Hartman

 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] This was requested by, but the request was malformed. I am merely restoring it on their behalf and have no opinion one way or another on the merits of the request. 19:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Allégresse
I, Designojek, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Designojek (talk) 03:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:36, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OTA
I, 97.64.183.178, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 97.64.183.178 (talk) 02:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

I would at least like an opportunity to save the code in a separate document and try to fix it again at a later date if I'm not able to get it fixed correctly immediately. I believe I'm close with it, but haven't been able to get it right yet. I know I can't save it on here indefinitely, so I'd love to copy and paste it into a document so I don't lose all of the work I had put into it. If that won't work, I understand. I'd just appreciate the opportunity if it's possible. I apologize if I'm handling it wrong. Wikipedia isn't my strong suit (obviously). -97.64.183.178 (talk) 02:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * OTA is a disambiguation page, so I'm sure you're not referring to that. Unfortunately your contributions don't give me an idea of which article you're asking about. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Didn't notice the duplicate submission. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:39, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Suzy Cohen
request that deleted content be userfied -Haim Berman (talk) 16:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * This article was deleted as a sticky proposed deletion. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Haim Berman/Suzy Cohen. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:45, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Michael Newton (hypnotist)
request that deleted content be userfied -Haim Berman (talk) 16:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * i did not request an overturn of the deletion,
 * my request is to userfy.
 * "content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, ///—may in some cases be provided to you"
 * —Haim Berman (talk) 06:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edward Nathaniel Moore
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Keepfittildesley (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done -  @Keepfittildesley:   as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/poornima university
Enter your Shall edit the page again as per wikipedia norms here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rahul Singhi 07:22, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done.  @Singhir:   Hi Rahul. This cannot be undeleted. It was a blatant copyright violation of multiple different sources. When you were working on it you copied entire passages of text from various sites like this one and pasted them into the article as its content. I see that you cited the sources you cadged the text from, which indicates to me that you were unaware you could not do this. Please understand that we cite source to show where we get information from, not the words used, which must be your own (except for limited quotations, marked as quotations by the use of quotation marks). Much of this content was, in any event, unsuitably promotional in content and tone. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:15, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wegilant
I, Toshendra2006, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Toshendra2006 (talk) 06:43, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done.  @Toshendra2006:   This cannot be undeleted as it infringed on copyrighted text by copying and pasting the extremely promotional and unsuitable content for use here from the company's website.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Lokalizacja archeologiczna Ivinj i kościół św. Marcina
I, Karolina555, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Karolina555 (talk) 15:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Do we restore AFC submissions in languages other than English? Don't think I've seen one before. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:52, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done.  @FreeRangeFrog, Karolina555:   In general I don't think we should because all of the content is unsuitable and a placeholder, though emailing to the person with a notes to please translate before recreating would seem appropriate, but this was an unattributed copy of pl:Lokalizacja archeologiczna Ivinj i kościół św. Marcina and so it was a copyright violation.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:48, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

TEACH CHILDREN BUILD INDIA
It is not spam, it is a civil non-profit initiative and movement It is relevant because the initiative is innovative and can be useful in many countries in the third world. It is academic because it shows how the implication of all society in education develops democracy and improves education. It is interesting because it is not a political or educational program, but a program for inclusion of minorities. -Keonjhar (talk) 16:18, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The article was not deleted because it was spam; the article was deleted because it failed to assert that the movement is a significant or important organization. —C.Fred (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Untitled Magazine
I, Esoteric999, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This article was initially rejected although I am still working on it we were trying to obtain various more reliable sources - in order to update the page which will be ready for revision and potentially accepted after we revised the sources of content -Esoteric999 (talk) 13:54, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please read the reviewer's comments: very large numbers of trivial, irrelevant or non-independent sources do not help. What is required to show WP:Notability is independent sources that discuss the actual subject of the article in some depth, see WP:42 and WP:BOMBARDMENT. JohnCD (talk) 17:06, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Drunken Prayer
 Christa Joy (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See WP:Your first article for advice, and WP:BAND for the WP:Notability standard for bands. JohnCD (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Fist (Canadian band)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -205.200.66.12 (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC) The BAND named FIST is a CANADIAN BAND.... there is no copywrite violation as citedd by the persons responsible for the deletion. http://www.myofist.com/#!discography/cyez

there is a second band name FIST from the UK who didn't check registries for either names FIST or Axe which they both violated..
 * X mark.svg Not done. How can we possibly know that? And even if we did it would be useless. It should be self-evident why we cannot use an anonymous assertion of authority over copyright. But you also have to understand that what we need is not permission of the copyright owner to use their material here, but a release by them to the world of the copyright under a suitable free copyright license. The procedures for a verifiable release of content are explained to an extent at Donating copyrighted materials. However, you should also understand that much of this copyrighted material is not written in a manner suitable for an encyclopedia article and even if release was properly obtained, would have to be substantially cut back and rewritten, and reliable sources found and cited to support it (if such sources exist).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:33, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Worms
I, BrooklynBen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BrooklynBen (talk) 18:21, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:20, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Robert Rippberger
The page was deleted before it had adequate time to be created. There was nothing controversial or wrong with the formatting. -204.110.121.35 (talk) 23:14, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello. The deletion of the articles for creation draft had nothing to do with controversy or formatting. It's just that we don't keep draft articles indefinitely because the only target of having them is that they will make it into the encyclopedia mainspace and six months is deemed long enough; in my view more than "adequate time to be created". However, we also undelete them if someone is indicating they are willing to work on the draft further to address the reason moving it into the mainspace was declined. I take this thread as just such a request and so will undelete now. Yes check.svg Done. If it gets deleted again, in six months (or less) undeletion will be less likely. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:30, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Baraha (Indie Film)
The page should not be deleted its because it only discuss or focus on the plot of a film not on detailed matters and we only select the anything category thank you po "Save page" button below -Reinarvega (talk) 23:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ Listed here before it was deleted, and now deleted under several criteria, including attacks on people or organizations. Please see WP:NFILMS before you attempt to re-create it. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Kadima_Conservatory_of_Music
I want to add a reference to a newspaper articel about this organization -KadimaConservatory (talk) 02:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. This page is solely for requesting deleted articles, not for asking to add sources. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 05:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 * ❌ The submission was never deleted, you received only a warning that it was going to be deleted unless it was worked on. I have however blocked your account for being in contravention of the username policy; you are welcome to create a new account that doesn't have the same problem, and continue working on the submission. Articles are not tied to accounts in any way. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Amazing Discoveries
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Simbagraphix (talk) 09:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC) I was working on the page to bring up the article to standards and it was deleted.Simbagraphix (talk) 09:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amazing_Discoveries&action=edit&redlink=1
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Amazing Discoveries (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. D  P  11:29, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Center of Government
The page "Center of Government" was deleted because it was argued that it duplicated the page "Government". As the many references included in the page showed, this is a separate concept, as it refers to a separate "thing" (not the government in general, but only those institutions that provide direct support to the Chief Executive -i.e., Office of the Prime Minister, Ministry of the Presidency, etc.). There is a bunch of academic literature on this topic (cited in the deleted page), and many international organizations (OECD, World Bank, IADB, etc.) have projects about it (they were also linked in the page). The page had almost 20 external sources about this topic, so I'm not sure what additional sources could be included to show that "Center of Government" and "Government" are, in fact, different things. Moreover, the content of the page was completely different than for Government. Mistakenly I recreated the page, leading to another deletion; please excuse this, and thanks in advance for reviewing this request. -DrinkTheKoolAid (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Your first step should be to contact the deleting administrator and explain the situation to him. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I explained this to but he suggested that I brought this to requests for undeletion. So, how should I proceed? -DrinkTheKoolAid
 * I believe that wp:a10 was not correctly applied to this article. I have asked RHaworth to undelete. -- Y not? 20:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * It`s already at User:DrinkTheKoolAid/Center of Government, why is this "discussion" still active? D  P  20:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. How should I take it from User:DrinkTheKoolAid/Center of Government and place it in the proper page? (Center of Government). I don't want to just copy/paste it as the last time because it led to another deletion... Thanks for the guidance. -DrinkTheKoolAid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.14.228 (talk) 00:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

How Far Our Bodies Go
I don't think the page for the album "How Far Our Bodies Go" by Fake Problems met the criteria for deletion. The reason given was "No assertion of importance/significance". The following articles provide evidence that this album did have importance within it's genre:
 * http://www.absolutepunk.net/showthread.php?t=241021
 * http://www.punknews.org/review/6266/fake-problems-how-far-our-bodies-go

Can this article be restored with it's original content? I came to this page looking for the track list, year, and album art. It's unfortunate to have to search for this content on other sites when someone took the trouble to add the content on Wikipedia. Thanks. -24.240.73.152 (talk) 06:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. Hello. It did meet the A7 criterion because it did not  indicate  importance or significance. Note that I did not say (and the criterion does not speak to) whether a subject  is  important or significant. The speedy deletion criteria as a rule do not address the merits of a topic, but simply what is written about it. So a page on the most worthy topic in the world may be deleted if it is a copyright violation or the writing is gibberish, or if it does not provide sufficient context to understand what it is about, or if, as here, it says nothing indicating importance or significance. The article had one line saying it was an album by the band, followed by the names of the songs and nothing else. What this also means is that since such deletion does not address the worthiness of the topic to merit an article, an article on the topic with proper content can still be created; this just wasn't it. But please also be aware that by separate processes, we also examine whether a topic warrants an article and I don't know that this album can meet our inclusion guidelines. See generally WP:NALBUMS, and please note that I don't know that either of the sites you point to above are sufficiently reliable sources to sustain the notability of that prospective article. Indeed the first at least is clearly a self-published source. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:41, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Kalpesh kevat
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Kalpeshkevat (talk) 06:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Content, which defines the scope of the encyclopedia and the material that is suitable for it Conduct, which describes how editors can successfully collaborate and what behavior is acceptable Deletion, which explains the processes by which pages, revisions, and logs may be deleted Enforcement, which accounts for various means by which standards may be enforced Legal, which includes rules influenced by legal considerations, and remedies for their misuse Procedural, which documents various processes by which the English Wikipedia operates
 * X mark.svg Not done Hello Kalpesh. Please don't continue to try to create an autobiography on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a platform for self-promotion and articles should not be created by people who are self-interested in the topic. You've created this four times and none of the versions contained any indication you would meet our notability guidelines (as it true of most people on the earth including me – worthy, unique people, but not the proper subject of treatment in an encyclopedia). Meanwhile, the text above does not provide any reasoning supporting undeletion, but is rather simply a copy and paste of the preamble to Wikipedia:List of policies.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Needle Writing
I, 180.215.205.79, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 180.215.205.79 (talk) 04:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Phoenix Legion
 Zohaibhhz (talk) 17:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Nate Daniels
I was not finished with the article, and it showed why he was significant, because he was a pianist and a composer. -Thepianoman12 (talk) 02:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * @Thepianoman12:  X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7.  If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 18:06, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Ruben de Noronha
This is a wiki page that explains what I do and I want more people to contact me and know about what I do — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruben2018 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Wikipedia is not an ad board, and we routinely block users attempting to use it as such. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a social-networking site for people to write about themselves and look for contacts. See Wikipedia is not about YOU and Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 21:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Huw & Tony Williams
The page was abandoned through inconsistent guidance from the various reviewers and no obvious way forward - apart from the stylisitc objections, whilst my initial impression was that small changes would allow it to be published, a lack of awareness of who Huw & Tony are was an apparent obstacle to all the reviewers. I have now made contact with someone local who has published whole Wiki pages and has offered advice and guidance to tidy up the page for publication. -N1geD (talk) 19:45, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kim john roquim
Kimy001 (talk) 21:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ - there is nothing worth restoring, the deleted page contained only a repetition of the name. If you want to write an article with some actual content, read WP:Your first article for advice, and then use the WP:Article wizard to help you; but if you are Kim john roquim, please note that Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves. That is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

VyTCDC Technology Career Development Center
Our organization shows original content about our services. Dont Delete this page -Mageshvysystems (talk) 10:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  Please review about conflict of interest, inappropriate role usernames and promo before editing any further on this project  D  P  10:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anna Vexa
I, JennaFox, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JennaFox (talk) 08:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please review WP:NBAND carefully  D  P  10:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sonya O'Shea
87.115.57.88 (talk) 23:18, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and WP:NACTOR for the WP:Notability standard for actors. JohnCD (talk) 10:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Texas Iron Spikes
I am not too sure why the page was initially deleted. We are certainly a student registered organization through the university of Texas at Austin, and such can be seen on the student organization website. If we need to link our page to our organizations website or the Universities student organization website we can do that. I believe this page was falsely deleted for an unknown reason. -Alevine93 (talk) 13:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The issues with the article are (a) it is written in a promotional tone, but Wikipedia is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves, and (b) Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, which is called WP:Notability, requires references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See WP:UNIGUIDE. JohnCD (talk) 17:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Helmut Kraft
This page should not be speedily deleted because Helmut Kraft is amoung artists as Muse, The Naked and Famous, Bastille etc.. who has composed tracks for one of the biggest game in the world 'Need For Speed Rivals" by EA Games. Helmut Kraft track "Manoir III" has been taken for the world promotion campaign.

This is an exemple of a trailer whith Helmut Kraft music "Manoir III" : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFxe3tkm99E

The movie "Need For Speed" from DreamWorks studio is inspired of the game and is releasing April 12th. -Needforspeedrivals (talk) 13:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 17:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Troy Schwab
Please restore edit history for this re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 14:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ JohnCD (talk) 17:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Vernon High School (Florida)
I would like to create an article on this subject, but I see that something was there and was speedily deleted. I would like it restored so I can work from it unless it was absolute rubbish. Thanks. -Candleabracadabra (talk) 19:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. It contained only a list of ten "Vernon High School beliefs" and a mission statement, apparently copied from the school website, though the link no longer works. You would do better starting from a clean sheet. JohnCD (talk) 19:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charta XXI Movement for Reconciliation and Cooperation
I, Zseb1baba12, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zseb1baba12 (talk) 20:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done -  @Zseb1baba12:    as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Fusion120
Fusion120 does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion.It is newly founded website for free advertising of second hand goods. it not violates any copyright contant. -D.kpatel2612 (talk) 19:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Hi D.kpatel2612. I think you've mistaken Wikipedia for some other kind of website. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. The content you've been attempting to post (in addition to being a copyright violation) is unsuitable for an encyclopedia. Your post here even confirms that, because Wikipedia is not for newly founded anything, except for rare exceptions that have already been written about out in the wider world by reliable sources, which is not true of this website. There are many places to advertize on the Internet, Please find a different site. Thanks--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pattenrai!! ~ Minami no Shima no Mizu Monogatari
I, Brutannica, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Brutannica (talk) 19:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done -  @Brutannica:   as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

skivington
fairness transparency openness right thru wrongs "Save page" button below -81.147.85.172 (talk) 03:10, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done I am not sure what you are trying to say, but Wikipedia is not the place to say it. See WP:Alternative outlets for some ideas. JohnCD (talk) 09:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

DJ Shawn
No Violation (1980's & 90's Hip-Hop Pioneer) and then click the "Save page" button below -Scheatham (talk) 02:10, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 09:50, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

The Travel Technology Association
Can I get it back to retool? -PhilipJMinardi (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * This has been protected against re-creation - please ask the deleting administrator, user . He may be willing to email you the text. I see, though, that you have submitted it via WP:Articles for creation, and that is a better way to proceed, as you will get advice from experienced editors, and can develop the article rather than see it deleted.


 * Please understand that Wikipedia is not a place like Facebook or Myspace for organizations to "tell the world" about themselves. You may find User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard useful for background, and if you are connected with the TTA you should also read the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 10:15, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Windows 2000
Microsoft deleted this several years ago, I demand it back! See also: Microsoft:Operating systems for deletion/Windows XP davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  03:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ - be careful what you wish for - you might get Windows Vista! JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Ravishankar Thakur (3)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rajarajeswar (talk) 08:14, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * You have already been told this page will not be restored as it was an A7 speedy-deletion. We will not entertain repeated requests for an article that will not be restored via REFUND. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 09:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreed. X mark.svg Not done. This is bordering on disruptive. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

2014 Shinhwa 16th Anniversary concert-HERE
Only for reference of event -124.13.69.86 (talk) 17:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * this article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Articles for deletion/2014 Shinhwa 16th Anniversary concert-HERE, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:Notability and WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk) 17:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Breck Alan
Still Valid and legitimate voice specialist, musician, producer and member of society -Mood shifter (talk) 23:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Deleted 3 years ago as a PROD - the "article" had zero references, and thus cannot remain on Wikipedia as a WP:BLP. Unfortunately as well, the "article" did not support any of your statements above - failed WP:NMUSIC  D  P  23:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Petteri Lindbohm
Please restore edit history for this recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 04:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅  @Dolovis:   Restored. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 04:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jason Ryan (filmmaker)
I, 128.208.35.175, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 128.208.35.175 (talk) 01:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Howell Movement
I, Rchillyard, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Beowulf (talk) 20:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scott Haining.
I, Gomez1993, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Found new links to prove imformaion is correct -Gomez1993 (talk) 09:06, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. The added fullstop at the end made the link read to the wrong page; I've also merged the section that was below with this one. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 09:35, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jim Lawrence
I, 82.71.241.173, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.71.241.173 (talk) 08:10, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done I will defer to another administrator if they believe I'm wrong, but the article (which is technically a biography that contains no references whatsoever) has been abandoned and deleted twice already. It was never submitted for review the second time around. Wikipedia is not the place to indefinitely host this type of material. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

First Protestant Reformed Church in Grand Rapids
Its an important church adenomination was founded there, it pastored notable theologians like Herman Hoeksema -Calvingabor (talk) 06:06, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. See my explanation at . — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 09:49, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 05:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Reformed Church of Aargau
An important cantonal Reformed church in Aargau, its significant -Calvingabor (talk) 05:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. An A7 speedy doesn't mean the subject isn't notable, it means that the article doesn't explain why it's notable. Since the explanation is the core of any article, A7 speedy deletions cannot be overturned here because they need to be completely rewritten. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 09:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 05:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Dairy Derivatives
This page highlights one of the key financial markets in New Zealand. The NZ Dairy Industry makes a significant contribution to the world and New Zealand exports approximately 95% of all dairy commodities produced. As part of this significant market there is a need for risk management tools and this page is designed to educate on that.

Example: Throughout 2013 over 900,000 tonne of dairy commodities were sold on Fonterra's GDT platform. This equates to an estimated US$4-US$5 billion. If the price of these commodities were to rise or fall by just US$100/tonne, this would have a significant impact not only on the New Zealand Economy, but also the global dairy industry.

One of the fundamental issues is the lack of understanding of financial instruments and how they can effectively be used to manage risk. This page was designed at assisting in building that knowledge in the hope that dairy industry participants become wiser in business, not to promote a product. We need participants in the dairy industry to start thinking about how to effectively operate as a business and dairy derivatives provide ideal tools for this. -Harryj2014 (talk) 08:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We look very dimly on those who seem to only be able to communicate in buzzwords, corporate memoranda, and Dilbertisms, largely because it's a very clear sign they're not here to build an encyclopedia. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 09:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done This was an ad for a company under a misleading title. If you wish to create an article about a subject you have a conflict of interest with, please use Articles for Creation instead. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Master Mena
I, Gibooks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gibooks (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)