Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 126

Xtreme Chaotix
I, SG Ultima, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SG Ultima (talk) 14:58, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AIA Akron
I, Pavlosvalse, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pavlosvalse (talk) 17:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Various Church articles

 * Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Calvingabor (talk) 05:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Calvingabor (talk) 05:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Its an important and one of the biggest Reformed cantonal state church, it has a place in the Wiki articles, just like the Protestant state churches in Germany -Calvingabor (talk) 05:37, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Its an important and one of the biggest Reformed cantonal state church, it has a place in the Wiki articles, just like the Protestant state churches in Germany -Calvingabor (talk) 05:37, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * It is the oldest and biggest Reformed Protestant church in Switzerland founded by Ulrich Zwingli -Calvingabor (talk) 05:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * It is the oldest and biggest Reformed Protestant church in Switzerland founded by Ulrich Zwingli -Calvingabor (talk) 05:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * (A7 explanations by User:Jéské Couriano noted and appreciated but removed to combine requests)
 * X mark.svg Not done It's entirely possible these churches are notable and I think it would be worth creating articles about them if that is the case. But we cannot restore them to the article area as they are now. If you are interested, I can re-create them as drafts under your account so you can work on them at your leisure. You can drop me a line in my talk page. Let me know. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 07:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Gmailbox.org
WilyD used a "A7: No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event)". This article described a service that protects user privacy. There are a few pages in wikipedia like this: Would you mind to reconsider Gmailbox.org's page deletion? Thank you. -Gonzas (talk) 11:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mailinator
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrashMail
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spamgourmet
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  ES  &#38;L  11:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Articles_for_creation.2FKuladheivam_Rajagopal
I, Jodi.a.schneider, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 01:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I've restored what was there on good faith given your contributions, I hope you can fix it. As it stands now it's not even a viable stub. It would have been marginally better to simply re-create it from scratch. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 04:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I always find it easier to start from content -- though I agree it was ridiculously deplorable -- it helps especially when I don't know anything about the topic. There were some references at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force, so while it still needs work, it's now at least marginal. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 12:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Master Mena
I, Gibooks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. My desire is to add many reliable sources and complete de article. Gibooks (talk) 14:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I made a mistake in the original restoration, so it was tagged again. You're good for the next six months. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 16:25, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Advanced Logistics Development
I, AyeletSaciuk, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AyeletSaciuk (talk) 10:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 16:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Symbiotics
I, NewlySwiss, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NewlySwiss (talk) 07:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC) We want to rewrite our submission and resubmit. The original person working on the submission is no longer with the company. We need to see why it was refused and address the problems. -NewlySwiss (talk) 07:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I strongly suggest you read Role account (We do not allow shared accounts) and WP:Conflict of interest (We discourage employees editing about current or past employers). — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 10:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 16:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

OpenFrame
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -OakleyRobert (talk) 00:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The Article is about a commercial software product and we are researching to add some references from valid sources, I would like to be given the opportunity to review the entry I wrote to make it comply to the wikipedia guidelines. the articles we have as reference are in korean as the product is developed in South Korea. I believe that aside from the current lack of references the article is similar to ORACLE DATABASE in style - why has this not been deleted?

I would like the opportunity for open discussion of this issue, with a view to rewriting the article which was intended for information purposes.


 * X mark.svg Not done. First, who is "we"?
 * Articles exist on Wikipedia because they are encyclopedically relevent, not "for information purposes". Use your own company website, or Facebook, for that. Furthermore, you did not create the article "for information purposes". With phrases like "has been chosen as the replacement IT infrastructure for many leading companies", the intent was clearly promotional, and Wikipedia is never to be used for promotion or publicity. The fact that the style of the article may be similar to another has no bearing on anything. Each article stands or falls on its own merits regardless of what else might exist.
 * Because you apparently have a conflict of interest, please read the guideline WP:COI carefully. Your best approach to submitting an article where you have a conflict of interest is to use Articles for creation where your article can be reviewed by a neutral independent party, to give you feedback on the path to acceptance of the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi - Thanks for your reply. "We" means the people who made edits on the page - (Although that may have been another other page. I understand - "has been chosen as the replacement IT infrastructure for many leading companies" - was from company promotional material - which was referenced, it was a quote but not referenced correctly. I will follow your advice. OakleyRobert (talk) 08:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Is there any Chance the OpenFrame article can be restored to my userspace, so that I can request a wikipedian to review it? once i have removed the offending references and sentances! - thanks OakleyRobert (talk) 08:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


 * We can't restore copyright infringing content, and you admitted above that the deleted article contains it. Furthermore, you already created the draft User:OakleyRobert/Tmax OpenFrame, so I suggest you continue working on that one. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Conterra (software)
 Orienge (talk) 06:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hz. Fatima Zahra (a.s.) Specialized Library
I, 130.255.255.234, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 130.255.255.234 (talk) 15:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done. Draft article restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Confraternity of Pilgrims to Rome
I, Culverwood, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Culverwood (talk) 11:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done. Draft article has been restored for you to continue working on it. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

A Day of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Awareness
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Felecia Woodruff (talk) 20:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done. You have got to be kidding. Wikipedia does not exist for you to promote a cause. As it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD, it cannot be restored by request. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Victoria and Jacob
I, Nocode198, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nocode198 (talk) 16:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done. You may continue working on it. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adrian Norman
I, 86.181.74.222, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.181.74.222 (talk) 18:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done. Please continue working on it. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MaKami College
I, Tlrwigmore, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tlrwigmore (talk) 02:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Shi DeRu and Shi DeYang.jpg
I would like the original history restored of this file. Please refer here for my reasoning. -InferKNOX (talk) 21:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't see a reason to restore revisions that include an incorrect picture of Bruce Lee. Of the 4 deleted revisions, only one of them contains the picture of Shaolin masters. I can restore that one deleted revision if you like. I am also an OTRS volunteer, and I see no permission for that image to be used in the numerous articles where it appears (the letter permits it in "your article" implying just one), and no allowable free license specified. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/New York Outrigger
I, AukaiNYC, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AukaiNYC (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done -  @AukaiNYC:   as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OTR Global
129.77.132.105 (talk) 13:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Mallai sathya
He is well known to me as we living in a same place for 20 years. then click the "Save page" button below -RKTHELEAD (talk) 15:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. Sorry, that doesn't make him notable. See WP:42 for a basic understanding of the criteria he must meet before me merits an article here. Also articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD cannot be undeleted by request. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NO CEREMONY///
81.103.170.22 (talk) 15:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Graham Bennett "Scraper" Jones
I am unsure of why this article was deleted. Graham Jones is a artist, a singer, and a architect. He is a one of the most notable Welsh artists and has has had the most extensive surgery performed by Surgeon Norman Barrett bar nothing. I fail to see how he is not a real person also. I would be great full if you would pleaserevert it -ScrapersLazarus (talk) 20:20, 3 April 2014
 * Any biography of a living person must be well-referenced to 3rd party sources, or it cannot remain on Wikipedia. Those sources are also what prove notability - especially important for the strict requirements for musicians.  Who performs their surgery is not useful, as notability is not inherited from others  D  P  20:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

sportsbook review
Sportsbook Review is an institution within the sports gambling industry that since 1999 has rated the majority of online sportsbooks and as helped in mediation and disputes between clients and sportsbooks. The article was taken down because of lack of citations but we are an authority among the top sportsbooks in the industry and have been quoted on many articles released industry experts. We have been an industry watchdog since 1999 and a trusted source for industry news. -Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.176.6.230 (talk) 19:38, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Sportsbookreview.com, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. D  P  20:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Marion Sheret
Marion Sheret was the artist, Ettore (Ted) DeGrazia's, wife. The reason this article was originally deleted was because I did not initially add enough information when I began working on her page yesterday. The reason Wikipedia gave me was (A3: Article that has no meaningful substantive content). I had merrily just begun creating it, so it did not have a sufficient amount of information on her page. She was not only a poet and sculptor, but she also is the main reason Ted DeGrazia was able to build and maintain his Gallery In the Sun, in Tucson, Arizona. I would like to add a short page on her, since she was such an important figure for the museum, and for Ted DeGrazia. Without Marion, Ted DeGrazia's museum and legacy would not be here today. Marion was born 1905 in Albion New York, and died 2002 in Tucson, Arizona. If you have further questions regarding the legitimacy of this page name, please notify me. I believe Marion deserves the right to have her own page name, since she spent her entire life in the shadow of her famous husband- even though she herself was a very talented and dedicated artist. THANK YOU -Sonoflightning (talk) 19:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  D  P  20:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vinod Daroz
I, Foliate08, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Foliate08 (talk) 17:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1966) et al.

 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1966)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1967)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1968)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1969)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1970)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1971)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1972)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1973)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1974)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Export & Technology (Combined) (1975)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Innovation (Technology) (1966)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Innovation (Technology) (1967)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Innovation (Technology) (1968)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Innovation (Technology) (1969)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Innovation (Technology) (1970)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Innovation (Technology) (1971)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Innovation (Technology) (1972)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Innovation (Technology) (1973)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Innovation (Technology) (1974)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Innovation (Technology) (1975)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (1966)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (1967)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (1968)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (1969)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (1970)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (1971)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (1972)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (1973)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (1974)
 * The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (1975)

Please userfy these pages. They were deleted because the titles were "wrong", technically only one award existed, though it was always awarded "for export and technology" "for export" or "for technology". Subsequent to the later reorganisation separate awards existed corresponding exactly to these previous designations. These pages will be merged into one-per year.


 * All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 22:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC).


 * Many thanks! All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 23:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC).


 * ✅. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  23:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Alibaba Akporobome
G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://totallyalibaba.com/?page_id=207) -Tundealuko (talk) 22:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page is a copyright violation. We don't ever restore that type of material. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Mitacs Inc.
Hello. The Wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitacs_inc. was recently deleted by user Bbb23 with the reason given: (A7: No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event): G11) Can you please advise how to appeal this deletion? Mitacs is a national, not-for-profit research organization which administers research internships for graduate postdoctoral scholars across Canada. We are funded by national and provincial governments. The organization places a significant role in supporting research and driving innovation in Canada by connecting educational institutions with industry partners. Please advise how this decision can be appealed. -Danesvenson (talk) 22:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ A7/G11 material is not usually restored. And as you seem to have a conflict of interest, the best approach is to use the Articles for Creation service instead. The text was essentially a brochure for the organization, sourced entirely to the organization's website. Please see WP:ORG for the type of notability requirements subjects like these must meet. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 23:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * None of what you wrote is a reason to undelete the article. Because it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD, the article cannot be restored by request. You may appeal to the blocking administrator. But since you have a conflict of interest, your best approach would be to submit your article via Articles for creation, where you can have it evaluated by a neutral reviewer before it is accepted in main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Josh Gets Grounded The Movie: Series of Events
No reasoning given. -Testfailer (talk) 23:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

I mean, if you delete any more pages from me, I will leave Wikipedia forever so please un-delete my page,


 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done Wikipedia is not the place to promote yourself or "inform your fans". In any case, the article was deleted under the A7 criteria, which excludes it from the types of articles that can be restored here. I suggest you put up a website and add all that there instead. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Vernon Rieta
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -98.150.169.253 (talk) 08:16, 4 April 2014 (UTC) My Bio as a Stuntman is valid biography about myself. The film project are all correct and have been a member of the Screen Actors Guild since 1983. Please inform me of the reason the bio was deleted, if the information was incorrect please let me know what I can do to reinstate my Biography. Any question or copyright can be edited. Thank you for your time. Vernon Rieta
 * X mark.svg Not done. This article was deleted after a discussion at Articles for deletion/Vernon Rieta, so it cannot be undeleted here. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.


 * Mr Rieta, please read Wikipedia is not about YOU and Autobiography and understand that Wikipedia is not a site like LinkedIn or Facebook for people to post their own biographies. JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/M. K. K. Nair
I, Vikian, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. vikian 07:23, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Perfect Symphonies Of Electro-Dub
this is the first page that I create here, and is very complicated, if someone could help me ... -EroKnoT (talk) 23:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is actually quite choosy about subjects for articles. The inclusion criterion is called Notability and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." For musical performers, there is a guide to what is required at WP:MUSICBIO, and for albums at WP:NALBUMS. If the artist is not notable, it is unlikely that his album is, so I suggest you read WP:Your first article and then, if you can find independent references about INShocks, use Articles for creation to guide you though the process of making an article. JohnCD (talk) 12:22, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

INShocks
this is the first page that I create here, and is very complicated, if someone could help me ... -EroKnoT (talk) 00:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ - see reply just above. JohnCD (talk) 12:23, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

About the article "Sharaf Qaisar", Which no more exists, despite it being reviewed/revised.
The article Sharaf Qaisar which, I agree, was a re-post. But the deficiencies it consist previously, which indeed were discussed in Articles for deletion/Sharaf Qaisar too, were completely removed. These made the article in accordance with proposed guidelines of Wikipedia. Article doesn't had, even an indication, of promotion or advertisement. Still, wiki administration deleted it. I condemn! Syed Jamal Ahsan (talk) 08:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC) -Syed Jamal Ahsan (talk) 08:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. G4s will not be entertained for the same reason, since G4 is only valid if the new article is substantially identical to the previously-deleted article. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 10:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done. You need to read the deletion debate more carefully, The heart of it is that the topic did not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements "WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO"; that "they lack significant coverage in reliable sources..." It was also noted that there was promotional language. You removed a few sentences (though it still read as promotional) but the real issue is that you added no reliable, independent, secondary sources at all (and the article contained not even one such source). Please understand that no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The article Sharaf Qaisar may lack notability etc... but the artist don't. I intended to write it again, more accurately, with more refrences & reliable sources, so that it can meet Wikipedia's notability requirements: "WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG". Please, guide me when I'll able to publish it again? Syed Jamal Ahsan (talk) 04:21, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Rama: The Rise of Dharma
Was meant to add the details with references but at the time didn't have it ready. -82.11.184.125 (talk) 17:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. I've also merged both of these sections together. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Keycon (Canadian Science Fiction Convention)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Johnthebearwpg (talk) 18:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

The governing body of this convention wishes to resume work on the article; the previous 'editors' have left.
 * We do not permit shared accounts under any circumstances. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅  @Johnthebearwpg:   Please note the content has been moved here: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Keycon (Canadian Science Fiction Convention), which is the correct location for AFC submissions. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 05:05, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

ACT Children & Young People Commissioner
Earthling001 (talk) 09:52, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. This submission appears to be largely a copyright violation from the ACT HRC website. Wikipedia cannot accept copyright material without a formal copyright release; but in any case, simply copying a website does not make an encyclopedia article: Wikipedia is not here as a noticeboard for organizations to tell the world about themselves. See WP:Your first article and User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard for advice, and note in particular that, to be accepted, an article would need references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Ved Prakash Sharma


Reason : Actually one of the most popular Hindi pulp fiction writer with hundreds of novels pulished, owned a publishing house at one time, sold millions of copies of few of his superhit novels(. The name is very very common in Hindi speaking Indian regions and also all his work is in Hindi language hence returning multiple/confusing results on google which lead to conclusion that this was a hoax as seen in deletion discussion. Request to reinstate the page. Here are a few references establishing the notability:
 * | “I stopped counting after 1.5 million.” Sharma is talking about his bestselling novel, Wardi Wala Gunda(Hooligan in Uniform), which is treated as a classic in the Hindi pulp fiction genre.,
 * http://books.google.co.in/books/about/Vardi_wala_gunda.html?id=7jROHQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y, * http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/meerut-emerges-as-epicentre-of-roaring-trade-in-hindi-pulp-fiction/1/307564.html,
 * http://www.sunday-guardian.com/artbeat/the-sad-demise-of-hindi-pulp-fiction,
 * http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/newdelhi/the-return-of-indian-superheroes/article1-508873.aspx--Manoj Khurana (talk) 17:23, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Ved Prakash Sharma, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

JAMS (alternative dispute resolution)
Article does meet notability. JAMS and its policies (especially about consumer arbitration) have been discussed in numerous reliable sources. The CFPB preliminary report on arbitration describes JAMS as one of the two major consumer arbitration providers in the United States (alongside the American Arbitration Association), p. 60, note 136 ("There is general agreement that the AAA and JAMS are the leading consumer arbitration administrators"). Further sources demonstrating notability can be found the reference section of consumer arbitration (especially Berner & Grow, Sternlight ["Mandatory Binding Arbitration Clauses"], Gilles, Kaplinsky & Levin ["Is JAMS in a Jam"], Cole, and Malin). - RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 17:09, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. You will see that the article currently lacks any independent references, and is sprinkled with tags. JohnCD (talk) 18:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

VKC Group
VKC Group is one of the reputed manufacturing company from Calicut, Kerala Also the Market leader in South India, The sources ae relevant one. -Grsh90 (talk) 11:57, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The page has also been salted to prevent recreation due to the extremely rapid pace with which you kept posting it. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Chapel-en-le-Frith Primary School
Hardly unremarkable as likely to be the first forced church school academy conversion. Just writing the history -Lancesdavis (talk) 20:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Basra Memorial
Beyond the fact that content was cited the deleting editor made no attempt to provide opportunity to make corrections. For whatever reason, I did not see a deletion notice. Requesting undelete so issues can be addressed. -Labattblueboy (talk) 04:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G12. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Copyright violations have the potential to get the Wikimedia Foundation and/or individual editors in legal trouble, and so they are removed upon discovery. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:32, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I have removed the close paraphrase text about the location. Please completely rewrite this in your own words before readding. Although not a copyright violation to add this to Wikipedia, it is outside our policy as others cannot use this text freely. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:05, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

School of the Annunciation
The reason for deletion was given as "A7: No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event): with the understanding that this place does not qualify as an "educational institution"

Hence since this IS an educational institution, if I understand correctly, no explanation of significance is necessary. This article defines what an educational institution is: Educational Institution and, from what I understand, the school would fall under the "Further & Higher Education - Specialized schools or institutes of higher education" category (the school has their own and charity & company number - see the bottom of their webpage: http://schooloftheannunciation.com/)

The page was flagged for deletion and I didn't make it in time to comment before an admin removed it. -Supadog (talk) 17:19, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done It appears this may have contained text copied from the school's web site, which I did not restore though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:13, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Kanu
Ocherome (talk) 21:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Schengen Cloud
The concept of a Schengen Cloud is real and is a highly important one. The article is a valuable reference point. -Escape42 (talk) 15:17, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We don't care that it exists, we care that others have taken note of it. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Article was out of scope for db-web so restored. But please add more references to show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hui Cambrelen
 68.174.7.19 (talk) 14:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done did have a claim of importance, you will have to find out where to put the inline citations and put in more independent references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Josh Gets Grounded: Series of Events (Movie)
This is not spam! This is an official article about the movie! I DARE YOU NOT TO CALL IT SPAM! By the way, every movie needs an article! If this is spam, then LOOK at all the other articles that contain information about the movie and the article is important so that people can read up on the movie and decide if they like it or not and this is not spam! It said it was labeled "spam" so I need to tell you that it's not spam and is not intended for promotion of any kind! It might have gotten picked up by Wikipedia's spam filter. If it was not done by robots, then PLEASE CONSIDER DELETING EVERY MOVIE ARTICLE ON THE SITE IF THIS ISN'T LABELED "DONE"! This is very ungrateful and I wasn't promoting, trying to get YouTube views, nor was I trying to raise DVD purchases! I needed to inform people what was in the movie and all the information and even though I said it wasn't spam, ADMIT YOUR MISTAKE AND ALLOW PEOPLE TO MAKE ARTICLES! YOUR RULES DON'T MAKE YOU COOL! THE ONLY THING IS, YOU ARE NOT ME AND YOU DON'T KNOW IF IT IS PROMOTING! REVERT MY ARTICLE AND NEXT TIME, REMOVE YOUR FREAKING SPAM POLICY AS I AM FED UP WITH THIS CRAP! I NEEDED TO TELL PEOPLE IT WASN'T SPAM SO THAT IT WON'T BE DELETED AND BELIEVE IT OR NOT, YOUR WEBSITE IS A PIECE OF UNWANTED CRAP BECAUSE YOU HATE MY ARTICLE SO YOU WON'T GIVE IT BACK! THAT THING IS OFFICIAL! IF ANYONE TAMPERS WITH ANY OF THOSE ARTICLES, I KNOW THAT YOU HATE MY ARTICLE SO THAT'S WHY YOU DELETED IT! END OF CONVERSATION! GIVE ME MY ARTICLE BACK! ARE YOU SAYING THAT BECAUSE I AM THE USER THAT CREATED THE MOVIE, I CAN'T CREATE MY OWN ARTICLE ABOUT IT?! Now are you crying? I so hope you are!!!!!!!!! - Pnffan (talk) 00:31, 5 April 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Yes, it was spam. With a lengthy second-person introduction explaining all the ways "you" can find this movie online, with an overly detailed synopsis, and a disclaimer at the bottom, it was clearly an advertisement. Your WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS argument about other articles is irrelevant; each article stands or falls on its own merits.


 * I strongly suggest you use WP:AFC for submitting articles from now on. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit: I have deleted all promotional content and only added types of content other movie articles would have thanks to somebody leaving a message on my talk page, I figured out some of the rules. - Pnffan (talk) 03:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Note. User has recreated the article, and it is about a YouTube "movie" that fails WP:WEB. It's currently tagged for speedy deletion under criterion A7. —C.Fred (talk) 03:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yep. Actually recreated more than just this time, and by multiple usernames. See . Both are now salted.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm trying to find a way to make it an acceptable article. I hate that people really love your rules. - Wikiarticleslover (talk) 01:47, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Oh, and now you think it is an advertisement even though I clearly state that it is not!? You are not me and you do not know what the page was. Okay, I get why every other movie article was different. It wasn't an advertisement, though it looks advertising! So, the ways to watch the movie is not okay, yeah I know how to remove that. But stating it wasn't an advertisement and you not being me? This is so unacceptable that I can rage in the street! Okay, this wasn't an advertisement and you saying it was just because it looks so suspicious? Dude, trying to get that article covered and people love that it's tagged for speedy deletion?! Nobody likes me here?! Okay, then I'll just find a different way I can prove you wrong! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiarticleslover (talk • contribs) 02:05, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * "It wasn't an advertisement, though it looks [like] advertising!" You have a pretty obvious conflict of interest, and wouldn't see and/or care about the biases in your own writing on the topic. If you literally cannot see how your writing is advertising (and with advertising, appearance matters more than intent) then you should not be editing about the subject. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 06:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selerant‎
The Company is still on business and there is no reason to delete the articleNcolombo (talk) 03:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC) -Ncolombo (talk) 03:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia isn't an ad board. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 06:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  D  P  08:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ Apple Users' Society of Melbourne
I, Gmdgmd, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gmdgmd (talk) 23:05, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:05, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carlos Conceição
I, MaryPoppers, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MaryPoppers (talk) 09:03, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Al Rajhi Soft
Please restore the page as I intend to work on it -MaherBaker (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2014 (UTC) --MaherBaker (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ too promotional. However since this was a speedy delete it can be recreated in a non-promotional form.  If it looks like an advert it will quickly get the axe. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

University of Georgia College of Education
UGA's College of Education is a significant program. It is a nationally ranked program with notable faculty and alumni. The page should be restored so that the page can be updated with current rankings, program information, and other significant facts. Thank you! -Ugagirl2331 (talk) 14:34, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. This article was merged to University of Georgia as a result of a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/University of Georgia College of Education, so we cannot restore it here. If you believe that discussion was wrongly decided, or you have more information, you should first approach the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After that, if your concerns are not addressed, you can apply at WP:Deletion review.
 * Individual colleges within a university are not often able to show the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" necessary to establish WP:Notability - see College and university article guidelines, particularly the section "Faculties and academic colleges". JohnCD (talk) 15:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Martha Chapa
I forgot to put the references, thats why you erase it, it is an important artist and you should be ashamed -Fabianbarthe (talk) 17:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. The standard wikilink double-braces ( foo ) break templates. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done &mdash; no, you should be ashamed, for trying to use Wikipedia for promotion or publicity purposes. The lack of sources was a problem but not the reason for deletion. Please try submitting articles through WP:AFC next time, instead of directly to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2014 (UTC)