Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 13

Transformice
 wasn't reviewed. -Willpower101 (talk) 12:31, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * As I said to you in reply to your message on my talk page, if the article does not assert importance or significance, it gets deleted - the burden is on you to demonstrate that this is an appropriate topic for an article. The best way to do that is by having reliable sources of information external to the subject.  If you would like for it to be restored to your user space where you may work on it in peace, please feel free to ask. --B (talk) 12:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Fairfield Country Day School
page deleted by Paster Theo -Shaydonfcds (talk) 14:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done The deleting admin has been banned and it looks like a rather bad deletion (he should have reverted to a prior non-spam version rather than simply deleting), so I have restored it.  Please note that it needs to have reliable sources and needs to establish that this is a notable topic.  Please see Notability (high schools) for the relevant notability guideline.  As it stands now, the article likely would not survive a nomination for deletion. --B (talk) 15:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Bentley Jones
 The 2nd discussion regarding the deletion of the article lacks any opposition, based solely on the unanimous uninformedness of the partakers of said discussion. My argument is parallel to that of DolphinBlueUK's in the initial deletion nomination, in that Bentley Jones does indeed possess a vast presence in many online communities, and is exceedingly successful in Japan. Moreover, a source cleanup should be in order, as the fact that the sources are primarily to his blog is understandably an issue. -24.16.165.217 (talk) 17:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Bentley Jones (2nd nomination). If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 18:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

pn game on t v espn
reasoning -99.62.215.136 (talk) 22:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done I'm sorry, but there is not enough information from what you said to know what you are talking about. We need to know the exact name of the article. --B (talk) 00:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Xyzmo SIGNificant Group
 It is written the same way as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARX_(Algorithmic_Research) which I used as an orientation for creating the entry as it is also a company like ARX or EchoSign (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EchoSign) in the digital signature industry. -Markush8 (talk) 07:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --B (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Desmond Tardy
reasoning -128.210.2.34 (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Specific inconsistencies need to be rectified...

This article was linked to by several other articles such as from Ryan Baker (American football) and various Purdue Football season log/history articles (for which most of the links have since been removed). The primary link of concern is from Mr. Football Award (Indiana) for which several of the other players listed as recipients of that honor, who have no greater notability, have not had their respective articles deleted. If Desmond Tardy must remain permanently deleted then several of the other Mr. Football Award (Indiana) recipients should also be deleted for consistency in the application of the Notability in Wikipedia policies. Either restore this article and the subsequent links, or delete the respective articles of the other recipients of the award such as Morgan Newton and/or Darren Evans who have no greater notability than Desmond Tardy. There were no external article references listed on the original wikipedia article for Desmond Tardy outside of the Purdue Player Bio since the online articles for the award from that year (and previous years for that matter) have since been taken down from the newspaper's website, namely The Indianapolis Star that is the primary sponsor of the award. NOTE: The MR. Football award is the highest award for a single player in Indiana High School Football as it is voted on by all Indiana high school football coaches.

Either restore this article or delete the other equally notable/unnotable articles concerning the recipients of the Mr. Football award. (Some of the other recipients of the award are of greater notability and should NOT be deleted though!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.210.2.34 (talk • contribs)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Desmond Tardy. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Though I agree with you that this individual is likely notable, it was deleted because it was completely unsourced.  Articles that do not have multiple reliable sources independent of the subject are usually deleted. --B (talk) 14:20, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Mstr Jonathan Matthew Melllor
Because Mstr Jonathan Matthew Mellor is a real english actor and has huge contacts within the television & media plus known for his acting on TV & Theatre and wikipedia won't get alot of views if you delete it... -Jonathanmmellor (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --B (talk) 16:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Carl Yankowski
reasoning -69.102.93.188 (talk) 13:40, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Article was accurate and easily verifiable
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --B (talk) 14:05, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Col. Archibald Dennison Scott III
 I believe this article has some significant historical value. This man a very important figure in military history and is well known by many other historical and current figures that you have listed in articles. The references were not copied but written by me and endorsed by Military.com who maintain the page. This is not an obituary page. Theres a link of Col. Scott in THE ILLUMINATI - SEMPER FIDELIS (THE STORY OF COLONEL JAMES E. SABOW)This is an informative page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtsflorida (talk • contribs)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done for several reasons. (1) From your edit summary, you seem to be saying you copied it from military.com.  Wikipedia does not accept content copied from other sources. (2) Wikipedia is not an obituary.  This individual's notability needs to be demonstrated by providing one or more reliable sources of information independent of the subject. --B (talk) 14:02, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Alison "Nugget" Matasi
No reasoning given''. -robfromvan 00:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC) since it hasn't been deleted yet there is nothing for us to do but as an unsourced biography our policy requires this to be properly sourced or it will be deleted. Spartaz Humbug! 02:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Orange Caramel
There are no reason to delete that article, Orange Caramel is a real and famous south korean girls group. -87.4.46.237 (talk) 11:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or bands will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --B (talk) 12:46, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Aryan
The article was abouta notable musician, My proposed article had good sources ,My submission was neutral, established notability, and was not copy-pasteded from anywhere else and I have no relation to the artist -Marcaryan (talk) 19:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --B (talk) 21:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

List of National Speech and Debate Tournament Champions
There is no reason to delete the informative page that allows individuals to view former national champions in high school speech/debate events. -24.15.2.252 (talk) 20:21, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --B (talk) 21:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

world congress of philosophy
reasoning -Oleolson7 (talk) 00:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Please undelete page for [Alan Olson] so that it can be further developed.
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done. If you are asking for  to be restored, this was deleted as a copyright violation.  There is no bar against creating a sourced, neutral article about him that does not violate copyrights provided that it complies with the guideline on notability of people.  If you are asking for World Congress of Philosophy, it already exists. --B (talk) 10:28, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Shaytards
 This family have become a national institution. There following on youtube is now in excess of 28,000 and more information about this family should be readily available. Any family who throw themselves into the public environment has to expect a certain ammount of interest, but of course elements of privacy are essential - especially as there are small children within the family. A public page with suitable information is a way of achieving this. -86.154.9.142 (talk) 06:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done and will not be done. Please see the deletion review of this topic at Deletion review/Log/2010 June 9. --B (talk) 10:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6minutes
The entry about our website/newsletter was deleted for reason A7 (Article about a web site, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) I would like to add details to clarify its significance, ie as the first and still most successful medical e-newsletter for doctors in Australia. Our newsletter has revently been cited in the Australian Senate in discussions on the Labor government's health reforms. -203.51.125.174 (talk) 08:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ Imho, the deletion was incorrect anyway (the original already claimed significance) but you should add reliable sources, otherwise the article may still be deleted again. Regards  So Why  09:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Epilepsy York Region
 this page gives vital information about a service that is provided in York Region, the first time it was deleated was because it was almost the same as their website, but i have gone back and reworded everything ( just kept the mission statement) into my own words, then the next time it was significance and i thought it was self explaintory that this orginization provides information and services to the comminunity, but i have gone into further details and explinations about what this NPO does. Epilepsy York Region provides a great service for those with epilepsy and informs the public, they should be more known and wiki is the place to do it -Purpleepilepsy (talk) 13:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Please, read WP:NOBLECAUSE. Wikipedia (not wiki; a "wiki" is a type of software) is not "the place to do it" when you are attempting to publicise an organization. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  13:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

 i dont understand why this page is any different than any other Non Profit orginization that is up on wikipedia, my goal is not to publicise... it is just facts maybe my wording of " place to do it was wrong". Wikipeida is a great data base and has many NPOs on it and this is just another one that should be on the list -Purpleepilepsy (talk) 14:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Because EYR is not a notable organization; simple as that. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

DJ T. Lewis
I have tons of sources to prove that my article is geared toward a real person. Maybe I am entering they codes wrong. Exactly what would you suggest me do to keep my client's page valid? We can not afford to have this page deleted, especially with the associations that he has. He is about to sign a major deal and with his page gone, he is inexistent to the public eye. -Iamspaceage (talk) 16:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:COI. Wikipedia is not free advertising. Spartaz Humbug! 18:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Neda_Agha-Soltan
Neda Agha-Soltan was a real person and her death was just ONE aspect of her life. I request that the original Neda Agha-Soltan page be reinstated as most users will not search for "death of", furthermore, its been a year and people search for Neda, not her death, as she is now a symbolic historical figure -Wahica (talk) 17:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This was redirected and merged after a community discussion at Articles for deletion/Neda Agha-Soltan. You need to use the article talk page to get a consensus to move it back. Spartaz Humbug! 18:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

The Vietnamization of New Jersey
 I think the notability concerns can be addressed by including some of the reliable sources that discuss the play, including a 2007 New York Times review. I'll be happy to add these to the article if restored. -28bytes (talk) 23:14, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:28, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! References have been added. 28bytes (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

wearsie
I respectfully do not understand why this page has been deleted. It is a word that has been around for 6+ years that is urban slang. Does wikipedia not allow urban slang? Or have I misunderstood something. Any help is most appreciated. -Chellefeet (talk) 23:44, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No, actually, it doesn't. Wikipedia is not a dictionary of any kind: slang or otherwise, urban or rural or suburban. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

--- Thanks for the clarification. I'm afraid that I don't understand then how the phrase "go postal" is permissable in wikipedia using this logic. I apologize - not trying to violate anything, just trying to better understand. Thank you (talk)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Wearsie. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --B (talk) 10:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Annette Jimerson
 I was about to do an update on this person, and found out it was deleted, I don't understand why it was deleted, Annette Jimerson is a real person, and she has been in several museums and galleries and newspapers as well. She is a moderately famous artist- which is why I don't understand why her page was deleted. Please consider restoring it.. -68.6.140.226 (talk) 00:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. --B (talk) 10:39, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It was at . &mdash;Korath (Talk) 11:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --B (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Alex Cantrall
Hi there, My name is Ivy Seablom, and I work for Alex Cantrall. The other day I set up a wikipedia page for Alex Cantrall with his biography, and just as I was about to add his discography, I noticed that the page was deleted. I'm looking to find out why it was deleted, as well as what I can do to get the page back up. I'm Alex's A&R Talent Executive, and I handle his Myspace, Twitter, Facebook, and Email, and I was hoping to add this to his sites to be found on. Please let me know as soon as possible what is to be done to make this happen. My boss was very displeased seeing that it was deleted. Thanks! Ivy Seablom -69.199.60.93 (talk)


 * I can't find a record of this page, have you spelled it properly? If you work for the gentleman, you should probably review our conflict of interests guidelines before continuing to edit at his behest. Does he meet the criteria outlined at WP:MUSICBIO? Did the article demonstrate that? – xeno talk 19:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Is it ? The reason the deleting admin gave was "blatant hoax".  Probably the deleting admin looked at the first sentence (he was born and raised in "Future World") and stopped reading.  The article as it stands is not appropriate for Wikipedia for a number of reasons - it's way too heavy on name dropping.  If the claims it makes are true, he would seem to be notable, but this article would need to be rewritten from scratch, not created by his press agent.  Please see our conflicts of interest guideline. --B (talk) 19:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * After reviewing the page, I concur with User:B. It may be best to visit WP:AFC and submit your sources there for someone without a conflict of interests to create the page (if subject meets inclusion criteria). – xeno talk 19:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Ken Buck
It is clearly time to allow this article to exist. Ken Buck is leading against his Republican opponent Jane Norton and the Democratic candidates in theoretical matchups. I was rather surprised to find that this article didn't exist when attempting to do research on Ken Buck who now appears regularly in Colorado news. I accidentally created the page Ken buck (lower case last name) this morning and I believe that would serve as a good start for the real article.-Littlecruiser (talk) 02:09, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Ken Buck. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Based on the availability of reliable sources independent of the subject, I'm inclined to agree.  He seems more than notable just from his time as a DA  even if you ignore the media attention to the Senate primary.  However, there was an AFD and so the article would need to go through DRV to be restored.  --B (talk) 04:18, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Flying_Saucer_Films
This is a production company that is much like any other that is currently listed on wikipedia. It provides an interesting look at which movies and shows are produced by whom. Please let me know what else I need to do to get this one published in wikipedia. It is located here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Julesdylan/Flying_Saucer_Films

Thanks for your help. -Julesdylan (talk) 16:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Julesdylan (talk) 16:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You've done nothing since October 2009 to make it an actual article about an allegedly-notable company, with actual references and a non-promotional tone. Why would we restore it? -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

User:User name one/Capitalization
I need to archive this so that I can put this clause on our wikiproject's MOS page. - -- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --B (talk) 20:23, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Jonathan Kane: The Protector
The Wikipedian who had tagged deletion for copyright problem had showed that only one section of the article broke the copyright policy.It is also on discussion at Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents.I think that only one article should be removed which had copyright problem.The article is stub yet gives information about the game.So,The article should be undeleted except the section which had copyright problem. - Max Viwe |  Wanna chat with me?  09:00, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied. I have done a copy/paste restore.  Since you are the only one with edits other than vandalism, reverting vandalism, or tagging, there is no need for GFDL or CC purposes to preserve the edit history.  I have restored it to your user space, without the infringing section. The page is at User:themaxviwe/Jonathan Kane: The Protector.  You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted.  Enjoy. --B (talk) 12:35, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Nikolas Schreck
he is well-known as a niche performer, through his band in California in the 80's.  -70.19.231.165 (talk) 12:46, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * This deletion was only done after a discussion at Articles for deletion/Nikolas Schreck. If you feel that the deletion was in error, you must request a deletion review. -- Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  13:05, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Michael Gonzales
significant changes to film credits and Production Company information based in Beverly Hills. Also information used for academic reference as a quick link to bio. Michael Gonzales is an award-winning film director/producer, directs commercials as well as corporate videos. Ph.D. and US Embassy/American Documentary Showcase film expert to Ecuador. Needed to update information and add photo, surprised page was removed because person listed was deemed insignificant. Appealed twice to editor who deleted page, no response. -Lavalamp302 (talk) 07:28, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done This article is a copy/paste of his IMDB bio.  It is not an encyclopedia article.  Wikipedia articles should be sourced and not promotional literature.  Submissions of copyrighted material from other sources are not permitted - Wikipedia submissions must be content that you own the copyright to and are willing to license under the GFDL and Creative Commons attribution licenses. --B (talk) 18:09, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Happy John Uvwiefenigwere
article includes written and pictorial evidence of living persons in Nigeria which may be confirmed by the Federal Ministry of Sports in Nigeria. Additional reference to the World Karate Federation will be introduced upon undeletion -Tokeda (talk) 09:33, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --B (talk) 18:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

User:AngChenrui/Userboxes
 I proposed for deletion some of my user pages, however I did not request for the abovementioned page to be deleted; I don't recall including it, and it could have possibly been personal oversight. Thanks. -AngChenrui (talk) 16:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Were any of your user pages userboxes or otherwise transcluded into this page?  Please note that if you add a speedy deletion tag to a template or another page that is transcluded into another, you need to surround it with noinclude tags, otherwise every page that transcludes it gets added to CAT:CSD. --B (talk) 18:12, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Easyask
EasyAsk is a natural language search company that provides e-commerce and business intelligence products. The company has been in business since the 1990s, has real customers and is profitable. All of EasyAsk's competitors are listed, including Endeca, SLI System, etc. Please let me know how we can fix the page, so that it's acceptable wikipedia content. -Robynforman (talk) 18:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted both because it was written like an advertisement and because it did not make any claim that the company is important enough to be in an encyclopedia. I'd suggest you take a few minutes to read WP:COI -- as humans, we have an incredibly difficult time writing unbiased articles about companies we are closely connected to, which is why writing such articles is strongly discouraged.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  19:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Indian Evangelical Team
The article was deleted with the reason Expired PROD, concern was: Non-notable organisation with little coverage in reliable sources. Johnstone, Patrick; Schirrmacher, Thomas (2003). Gebet für die Welt. Hänssler. p. 405 ISBN 978-0813342757. states it has 200,000 members in India. -Sarcelles (talk) 18:55, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  19:23, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Cache,associative-read.dia
Vector source for png image, from F10 (deleted as not an image, but it is image source) -a5b (talk) 03:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Done

File:Cache,basic.dia
Vector source for png image, from F10 (deleted as not an image, but it is image source) -a5b (talk) 03:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Done

List of wars in the Muslim world
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive_24#List_of_wars_in_the_Muslim_world http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_in_the_Muslim_world

Hi Admin, I am writing to you in regards to the deleted page List_of_wars_in_the_Muslim_world, which was present till last year, and it was really interesting. However on searching for it recently, I was shcoked that it was deleted. So I read the discussion and reasoning behind this in this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_wars_in_the_Muslim_world and I found that you took the discion according to discussion. However the reasoning that was given in support for deletion was that the definition of Muslim world is ambiguos and can't be defined, which I don't know if it is true or false. However I do know one thing: Consistency. which means it is wither to delete all pages talking about Muslim world, cause according to the forementioned discussion that this world doesn't exist and that such term is not present like: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_world, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in_medieval_Islam, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age and all these pages talking about Muslim world. Or the other option is to restore the deleted page List_of_wars_in_the_Muslim_world as a part of the history of this Muslim world. Wikipedia can't be so biased that it only speak nice about muslim world, yet deleting the bloody history claiming that such world doesn't exist!. Thank you

to summarize why the article was originally deleted: there is nothing called muslims world as it can't be defined

this claim is biased because several other WP articles keep talking about the same so called muslim world

I would suggest: either delete all muslim world pages, or restore that list of wars articles

thank you-Kushsinghmd (talk) 02:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/List of wars in the Muslim world. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Nearu
on articles for deletion page, I noticed the reason the article had been deleted was because the requester had thought that NEARU Martial Art is the same as KATEDA. but that is not correct. NEARU is not KATEDA, and is not related to KATEDA Martial Art organization. Amir Lotfi Azad, the grand master who created NEARU was a grand master in KATEDA many years ago, but they are different styles, and they have different organizations and federations. There are some similarities in some practices, but such similarities are very common among many martial arts. for example NEARU has many trainings in common with Chinese Tai Chi Chuan. NEARU is registered as a martial arts organizations and a descriptive page in Wikipedia could help others to know a little more about this style. -Farzad Ghanei (talk) 11:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - please read the deletion discussion again. The basis (in fact, the rationale of every single person who participated) was lack of notability and verifiability because "A search for reliable sources has failed to support the subject's notability"; "I find no independent sources that indicate this art is notable"; etc. Also please note that articles deleted via deletion discussions are not undeleted through this page, ever. This page is only for uncontroversial undeletions (and userfying content); articles deleted via discussion can only be undeleted by requesting it of the administrator who deleted the page, and if that is unavailing, through deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:50, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Climbing to New Lows
this page was pretty much the only information on this album i could find, i have managed to find other scraps of info, which substanciated this page, now i want to see it you've deleted it! it seems stupid that because it's a demo album you've deleted information on it, i thought wikipedia wanted to be an information database, not a selective information database... -90.197.211.130 (talk) 13:37, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

also if you check http://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/the_management/climbing_to_new_lows/ for one there is info on it to substanciate this page,
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Climbing to New Lows. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

s saki
reasoning -Mamta007 (talk) 14:56, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Kindly dont delete this page because i couldnt gather same material for the page
 * The page has already been deleted. Are you asking to have its text emailed to you for future reference.  Please see WP:BIO for our notability standards for inclusion of biographies.  This article does not seem to meet those standards and, in any event, needs cite reliable sources external to the subject in order to not be deleted. --B (talk) 17:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Damien Olsen
i own the copyrights of this text -74.72.122.243 (talk) 13:31, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Article was deleted because of a text written by me found in a website:http://damienolsenelectronica.com/bio I wrote this text and i designed the website and i own the copyrights.

thanks
 * Wikipedia generally considers a topic to be notable if there are multiple reliable sources of information about the topic, which are independent of the subject itself. Has Daniel Olsen received any media coverage?  If not, he likely does not meet our guideline for inclusion of articles about musicians. --B (talk) 14:19, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, regarding the first deletion as a copyright violation, even if he is notable, and even if the text from the external website was suitable for verbatim use here, the copyright would have to be released into the public domain or under Wikipedia's free licenses: the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, for you to use this text here. Please see Donating copyrighted materials. The upshot is that for us to use the material—which means allowing our users to use it and modify it even for commercial purposes—we have to have a verified release of the material—not just an assertion by you that you own it and are freely licensing it. Please look specifically at the section of the page I linked entitled Granting us permission to copy material already online.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Ulisses Gama de Moraes
reasoning -MoniqueChrstRoest (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

You want to be a free encyclopedia, but when somebody start a biography you censure it by deleting it What is there free on, it looks more like dictatorship
 * Ah, you missed the part about this being an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is a privately owned encyclopedia project. It is free to read and to use but it is not a democracy, or an anarchy, or an experiment in free speech; it is not many other things. We most certainly do restrict freedom and openness where they interfere with creating an encyclopedia. The policies and guidelines we have developed to foster that goal keep us from being a blog, a web forum, or a place where anyone can post anything, regardless of its encyclopedic merit. Some of these core policies and guidelines include verifiability, no original research, neutral point of view, and notability and so that we are not overwhelmed with articles that do not meet these and other policies, we have criteria for speedy deletion, and especially relevant here, section A7 of that page. If you want an article to stick, post it with, at the least, one reliable source that verifies its content. Note also that you have an obvious conflict of interest in writing articles about yourself and those you are associated with, and I personally would be ashamed to be here protesting over "censorship" when I was attempting self-aggrandizement.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Monique Christn Roest
reasoning -MoniqueChrstRoest (talk) 20:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC) You want to be a free encyclopedia, but when somebody start a biography you censure it by deleting it What is there free on, it looks more like dictatorship
 * See my response to you immediately above.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Habar Yoonis
Its the history of my tribe -Fatimamadar (talk) 20:17, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 
 * What exactly is it that you are seeking here? The article has not been deleted and is not marked for speedy deletion.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The original article was redirected to Isaaq, huge glob of unsourced text. The edits this editor is making are copyright violations, since they're taking the previous unsourced text and copying it into articles with no attributions as to the edit histories.  Decline.  Everard Proudfoot (talk) 20:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Laura Massey
On June 14th Laura was the keynote speaker at the 2010 E3 Xbox 360 Media Briefing for Microsoft debuting a revolutionary motion controlled video chat system named Kinect chat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinect Laura appears in this video at 02:03 http://cnettv.cnet.com/e3-2010-microsoft-kinect-xbox-360/9742-1_53-50088986.htmln -Bawitdaba1337 (talk) 20:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Laura Massey. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:53, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Caprivi-escort.jpg
According to the transfered image on Commons there was some geolocation on this image. Can someone have a look if there is such coord information and copy it or write it here? Thanks, --Martin H. (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC) -Martin H. (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ The most recent version of the page had --B (talk) 00:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, transfered. --Martin H. (talk) 01:01, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Abhishek Indoria
It appears that you have deleted an article I wrote about the chairman of Square-Point corp.That particular article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abhishek_Indoria was a part (or you can say, short info) about the chairman of Square-Point corporation and was necessary to give a background information. It was, I assure, not intended as any kind of spam or advertisement. It was linked to : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square-Point .Can you please review it and restore it? I will, if you suggest, make necessary changes to it according to the rules. Thanks,Alexelesten (talk) 23:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC) -Alexelesten (talk) 23:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --B (talk) 00:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Isai Scheinberg
added reference -RFKFREAK (talk) 01:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You added an external link to a self-published source that is not reliable. Now, go find a reliable, independent, third-party published source and actually cite' it in the article. By the way, this forum, where deleted article are sought to be undeleted, is not the right place for your post.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Jörg Guido Hülsmann
Deletion was done prematurely without any responses to the following:(1) comparision of Robert Skidelksy's Scopus h index with JGH's (2) No response to the argument that the Harzing h index is more appropriate to use in this case rather than the Scopus h index (3) No response to the point that using the Scopus h index is inappropriate and misleading given that JGH is a literary biographer and ethicist, as well as an academic economist. It is completely inappropriate to cut off this debate when no one addressed any of these issues. The article should never have been deleted until these issues were adequately addressed. -PtAuAg (talk) 09:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Jörg Guido Hülsmann. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 10:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Shahab Sattar
I referenced it, also I am a close relative of the person talked about in the page, hence I am a source myself -AkbarSattar1 (talk) 10:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.  Also, please see Wikipedia's policy about reliable sources.  Sources of information need to be published, not just something you know because you are a family member.  Another page to check out is Wikipedia's guideline on conflicts of interest.  It is normally not recommended for you to create articles about yourself, your family, your employer, etc. --B (talk) 14:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Exelstocks
We have been deleted of the following reason: his page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 08:09, 12 January 2010 Zzyzx11 (talk -83.45.237.10 (talk) 12:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The deletion message is "Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.exelstocks.com/pages/index/who-we-are", which in line with the more verbose explanation and links placed on User talk:Fredrik vip (the editor who created the page). I just checked the deleted page and the given ref, and concur that they are substantially identical and so the speedy-deletion for copyvio is valid. DMacks (talk) 12:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

One Semi-Automated Forces
temporary review -JovianV (talk) 02:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The above article was originally deleted under G11: Blatant Advertising. The original user who deleted this article has in his profile that he is off Wikipedia for an unspecified period. If I understand the Wikipedia processes correctly, I can request a temporary undeletion to review the article. I currently work on the project that is the subject of this Wikipedia article. After review, I might consider corrections or rewrite of the article.

Thank you.
 * If this request is carried out, I would strongly suggest reading over our guidelines on editing with a conflict of interest since you are affiliated with the article's subject.  Them From  Space  03:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:JovianV/One Semi-Automated Forces. The text is a copy/paste from a US government (thus public domain) website.  You can review it there and edit it if you like.  If you decide you no longer want it, please tag it for speedy deletion so that another admin can delete it. --B (talk) 14:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Colours in the Dark (Young People Digital Media)
The page can be edited to demonstrate its importance and significance if undeleted. The page is considerably significant, and can be expanded to detail this, with credible and appropriate references. -93.158.79.103 (talk) 20:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --B (talk) 14:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Pokémon Super Wallets
Pokemon Super Wallets are very rare and low print run sets that were only made for the Australian market. I own sets 1 thru 8 and can supply pictures if needed. This page was nice for research to find certain episodes. I could update it thru sets 7 & 8. I believe 9 & 10 were never published. I had them on preorder. -67.162.95.42 (talk) 21:24, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines.  Wikipedia does not accept original research or articles for which there do not exist reliable sources of information. This contained no references, no sources, and no evidence that the subject matter was in any remote way notable. Wikipedia is not a directory of every commercial product ever sold. -- Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  14:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Bill Justis
reasoning -Broogar (talk) 19:45, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

I deleted most of the page by mistake. I was only trying to ADD a sentence near the end of the Bill Justis bio...regarding several years in the 60's that he spent in Los Angeles. (This is (obviously) my first attempt to do this, and I'll not be trying again.)  Bill Justis was a friend, and I just want him to get his due. Sorry for the trouble!
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Malformed Request - please use (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request).   Mr. R00t    Talk  19:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ I have reverted your edit to that page.  You or anyone else can access previous versions of a page using the "View history" tab at the top of the page.  For more information, please see Help:Reverting. --B (talk) 19:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Keith Garner
 We are most confused. My page was put up for further discussion as to whether it should be deleted. I was told this was for seven days and it was deleted before the close of seven days. Someone picked up the fact that my wife was editing this - I think assuming she was a paid member of staff which of course she is not, but she does have a Wesley Mission Address as the provide my computer and line etc. We had considered asking an independent person who offered to do this - and that is where we are at present. We had not thought it would be deleted and certainly not when we had been told there was a time factor (which was contravened by yourselves). Consensus is something that we in the Uniting Church know something about - and the talk page may show a simple majority but hardly a consensus, especially as one person not known to me talked about the newspaper, television and radio publicity somewhere in the recent past. Can you please reconsider this issue, bearing in mind that alterations are likely in the near future? It would at least help my extreme disappointment at this decision. So many people use the entry when trying to find out information and it is most helpful to have the entry in Wikipedia. We are not experts at this and are simply trying to find a way of meeting your requirements. When I contacted the person for re-listing it, he simply pointed me to articles and told me it would be relisted for seven days from last Monday. It was deleted on Thursday night. Thank you for your attention to this. -WorthingtonJones (talk) 02:53, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Keith Garner, and cannot be undeleted through this process. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --B (talk) 03:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

WHYFM
i think WHYFM should not be deleted Because People in my area love this band and would love to hear more about the band. This would make a lot of people happy in my are and expand the band. -Tylercarroll1992 (talk) 23:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - this page has not been deleted; it is being considered for deletion here. VQuakr (talk) 23:17, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * , article not presently deleted and is undergoing AFD. – xeno talk 18:52, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Fateh Ullah Khan Kundi
Fateh Ullah Khan Kundi is a very notable personality in Pakistan, he has won several speech & Scientific compititions on provincial level.He is also the author of two urdu novels, Main Pehli Baar Roya and Hum Bewafa Har giz Na The.He is really the right person to have his own wikipedia page,so that people can find him easily on wikipedia.Thanks Wikipedia -Mr Kundi (talk) 13:54, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --B (talk) 14:12, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Boonaa Mohammed
The Article was deleted in 2006, the performer ahs made great strides since then and has rised considerably in the past 4 years. -41.199.177.121 (talk) 16:56, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There is nothing worthwhile in the deleted text, just an unsourced essay that was clearly original research. The page isn't locked against creation and there is absolutely no reason why you can't register an account and write a new page. Spartaz Humbug! 17:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * (ec) I basically said the same thing Spartaz did.  If this person meets our notability guidelines, then there is no prohibition against creating a neutral and well-sourced article about him, however this deleted article is a completely unsourced promotional piece about a living person.  If you desire to create an article about him, it needs to be started from scratch.  I strongly suggest reading the policies and guidelines I have linked in this message - articles that do not demonstrate the notability of their subject or which promote a person or entity will be deleted. --B (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

List of National Speech and Debate Tournament Champions
This article was successfully restored based on the reasoning that these individuals are national champions in the largest academic competition in the world, and wikipedia provides the best resource on their information. However, it was redeleted based upon the same reasoning that was overruled when the article was restored. These students are masters of their collective craft and deserve recognition and a frame of reference for other individuals to observe their competition and predecessors. -24.15.2.252 (talk) 18:33, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done and will not be done Following a discussion there was a clear consensus to delete this. This therefore falls outside the purview of REFUND: Before you go any further you have to find some sources that discuss the subjected individually and in a way that addresses their whole life and works otherwise the article/list will fall foul of our inclusion criteria and Biography of Living Persons Policy. If you think you can address these concerns your need to speak to the closing admin. Spartaz Humbug! 18:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Nitto Records
this was speedied without discussion or attempts to salvage. It is not my article, but one I stumbled across two weeks ago in my research, actually filled a gap. That it's been here a couple of years means it doesn't qualify to have been speedied. Put it up for AfD if you want to generate a discussion about it, but historic recording and publishing companies are inherently notable, it just needs better sourcing. Please restore with talkpage, thank you. -Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 13:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Kintetsubuffalo/Nitto Records. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --B (talk) 14:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you, can I have the talkpage too?--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 17:09, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Nothing there ... just a bot addition of --B (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Update-it has been saved and improved greatly, thank you!--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 10:32, 10 July 2010 (UTC)