Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 144

Krystal Boyd
Article was deleted for: (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). I would like access to the most recent version of the page, possibly in my userspace (as a draft), so I can work on improving the article. -( Rovine  message  ) 11:56, 18 July 2014 (UTC)


 * - Kelapstick has given the answer on his talk page.( Rovine  message  ) 12:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Imperator Online
Development history for Mythic Entertainment; Partial history with Dark Age of Camelot; proposed MMO systems that don't work -Moonchips (talk) 23:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article needs references (a) to verify what it says, and (b) to establish Notability. JohnCD (talk) 14:01, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Journal of Health Sciences
I, Pranggio, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pranggio (talk) 07:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  @Pranggio:   -- S Philbrick  (Talk)  14:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Youi Insurance
I, TrevorDev, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TrevorDev (talk) 05:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  @TrevorDev:   I have restored it, (with reservations) but please take the concerns to heart. It does not simply need a little work, it needs a major rewrite. It does have some refs, so those may be useful, but if it not substantially rewritten, it will be rejected.-- S Philbrick  (Talk)  14:46, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Nate Thomas
The article had participation and comments on whether to be deleted or not. There was not a consensus to delete. Although considered marginal whether the article meets WP:Creative and WP: Bare there were two deletes and two keeps and a strong interest in contributing to the article to improve it. Biographee has produced and directed award winning television PSAs and theatrically released films, received national commendations from FBI director Robert Mueller, and won an Emmy Award, the msot coveted award in his field. He is referenced in other Wikipedia articles, and as a tenured film professor viewed as an expert in his field having been quoted various times in major newspaer articles and journals. Biographee, upon my research, is also a member of the Board of Directors for LA36 television station and President of the California Faculty Association- the collective bargaining unit for California State University faculty. Speedy deletion of articles like this one challenges the integrity of Wikipedia. -Prease (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * This is not a speedy deletion, and we cannot restore articles deleted via AFD. You'll need to request a deletion review, or (probably better) contact the deleting admin and ask if they will userify the content to a draft for you to work on. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Enigma.io
The page was deleted citing no evidence for notability. However, such evidence exists and I request that the page be restored so that sources establishing notability can be added. Notability evidence includes a New York Times Article about the company, an interview with one of its founders on NPR, and an an article which establishes it as the winner of TechCrunch Disrupt, a large national tech startup competition. -Dandelany (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ As a contested PROD, the article has been restored. The concerns about the content are still valid, and I've notified the original PRODer  in case they feel an AFD discussion is merited. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 17:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enigma.io DGG ( talk ) 18:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Council for Adult and Experiential Learning
I, Kacno1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kacno1 (talk) 22:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ You might want to review the citation guide when you start working on this again, as well as the notability guidelines. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Ramakrishna Mission Shilpamandira Computer Centre
This page is about a very well known institute in West Bengal, please bring it back.
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a A7. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The other deletion, a G11, also can't be restored for similar reasons. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 10:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Also this had a promotional tone. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:07, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tetryonics
I, 66.66.175.157, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 66.66.175.157 (talk) 22:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Unsourced paper/essay about a fringe topic with little to no coverage in mainstream scientific sources. Not even going there. If another admin wants to give it a chance, I'm good. But I don't think it's worth it. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. See the policy No original research for further information. There is no point in restoring such content. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Msn classic sign in.png (and other MSN images)
This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC) This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC) This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC) This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done and date extended for reuse. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Katch 22
I, Mike-eastman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mike-eastman (talk) 12:43, 19 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 12:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Twelfth Planet Press
Substantial changes to the subject since deletion, including multiple notable events with significant coverage in reliable secondary sources such as mainstream media -Editormum (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done. I can't unilaterally overturn the deletion decision, however it's been 4 years and the deletion was undertaken because the article didn't make a claim as to the importance of the subject. You can recreate the article and add sourcing so it's apparent it meets the basic guidance for inclusion on wikipedia or you may start a new draft via articles for creation where you can work on it at your leisure. If you'd like me to start a draft page for you with the content that was on the page in 2010 I'd be happy to do so. Let me know here or on my talk page. Protonk (talk) 14:23, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stacy Doris
I, Wattsirod, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wattsirod (talk) 01:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

I would like to continue working on this. Can you let me access the text?
 * Yes check.svg Done It looks like it was restored back in April and there should be content currently on the page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Digital Audio Notebook
I, 98.169.107.221, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.169.107.221 (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * On a side note, you'll need to edit the article to make it more neutral and encyclopedic. It's not promotional per se, but it is written a bit more like a casual blog or news entry than would be comfortable. Just small tweaks here and there should do it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Neo-Catholic
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -208.59.156.220 (talk) 06:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Neo-Catholicism (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eclectica
I, Zoltan.devenyi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zoltan Devenyi 07:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Social_pyramid
There is a portal block for social media & this is the only red link on said box. A stub or poorly cited article makes a better placeholder than a complete blank. -23.116.49.179 (talk) 06:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: Hmm... from looking at the deleted version, part of the big rationale for its deletion was that it was written with an WP:OR tone. I can kind of see where they're coming from. I don't mind restoring it, but it will need to be improved or it will likely inevitably be deleted again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm looking for sources to see if there's anything I can throw up there, but I'm not finding a lot to show that this term is very frequently used. There are a few hits, but mostly in self-published sources and it's almost exclusively mentioned in relation to ancient Egypt in specific. I'm just concerned that if restored, it'll just be a brief reprieve before deletion. Being mentioned in the portal doesn't always mean that something should be listed there- sometimes it just means that someone added it and it needs to be removed. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:17, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * It could also be seen as a content fork of hierarchy or social class in many ways, although this article mentions intimacy. I'm just more than a little concerned that none of the sourcing I'm finding really uses this term in this specific manner and that deletion of some sort would be inevitable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Basically all I really want is some reassurance that you will try to work on the article (or get someone else to work on it) after I restore it and that there is some sort of RS out there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Albasco.com
Hi, I had added an article about Albasco.com company, an Iranian online shop. Unfortunately this article is deleted. I request for an opportunity to edit the content of that article and remove the mistakes including too many links to the company's itself that makes these misunderstandings that is an advertising or copyright infringement. I will deeply grateful if it is possible to undelete Albasco.com content. -Barish.oxtay (talk) 08:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Barish.oxtay (talk) 08:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Barish.oxtay
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted at AfD in 2010, so it has that going against it as well. I'm also concerned that the article was written in a fairly promotional manner. Sentences such as " Albasco.com is trying to introduce online shopping to Iranian people as an easy and reliable tool to purchase a variety of goods with appropriate and reasonable costs and prices" comes across as an advertisement. What I recommend is that you try creating a new version of the article at WP:AfC, our articles for creation page. It won't be in our mainspace, but you would be able to work on creating a new version of the article and you'd have more time to work on it as well. We usually only speedy AfC articles if they are abandoned (6+ months without edits to the page) or violate our guidelines so severely that it cannot remain in the article space, which is usually pretty rare. (The types that do this are usually very extreme promotional articles, threats, copyright violations, and so on.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * On a side note, coverage does not have to be in English. Even if it is in say, a foreign language newspaper, that would still count towards notability. A good place to start for looking for sources would be WikiProject Iran. Since most of the coverage would be in a foreign language, it would be best if you were to have someone who speaks/reads the language look over the sources and help show you the best places to look for coverage. You could get help at WP:RS/N, a noticeboard for reliable sources, but I have a feeling that you would inevitably be steered towards the Iran wikiproject because of the language barrier. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Montgomeryshire Society
I, Montgomeryshire, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Montgomeryshire (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Monty  845  15:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

AFC Mansfield
Club is now a notable one as has won promotion to the Northern Counties East League -Kivo (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. We likewise will not restore G4s as those are dependent on an existing XfD debate. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Thomas Rathnam (3rd request)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Robypop2014 (talk) 13:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC) "I found 'Thomas Rathnam" article is genuine one.

Please update it and re host it."

and past those article...


 * The article has been deleted after several deletion nominations; see Articles for deletion/Thomas Rathnam and Articles for deletion/Thomas Rathnam (3rd nomination). If you believe that Wikipedia should have this article, please go to deletion review instead. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * You have been told multiple times, Praisewinner, that we will not restore it and why we will not restore it. Repeatedly asking for it after having been told no repeatedly is disruption and it will get your sock and main accounts blocked. Please stop. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sfakian cross
 216.70.176.61 (talk) 21:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert Elwes Victorian Traveller Painter 1819 - 1878
I, 109.158.102.194, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 109.158.102.194 (talk) 21:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC) ,
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joe (Joseph) Brent
I, 96.250.11.12, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 96.250.11.12 (talk) 23:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:18, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Alison Valerie Hart
Content is valid -71.122.125.155 (talk) 23:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Perhaps the page User:AlisonValerieHart should be made instead as it looked very much like an autobiography. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Stevenmg/sandbox/Sheila Alexander-Reid
I, Stevenmg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stevenmg (talk) 00:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NearTree
I, Yayahjb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Yayahjb (talk) 01:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

This is an article about a heavily used package that outperforms the packages for which you already permit posts. We will be adding additional uses and citations in the hope that you will eventually accept this article. It is important. -- H. J. Bernstein

We are adding more citations and recent uses of the package -Yayahjb (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done you had this restored for 6 months at the end of last year and did not touch it. If you wish you can try to persuade us here by listing your new citations you plan to use below. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Warp Drajv
Enter your reasoning here and then click theAXAXA "Save page" button below -WarpDrajv (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Here is the entire contents of that page: "WDWQDFW" -- S Philbrick (Talk)  19:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Philbrick! Just to be pedantic, was that the G2 page PxaXAXAre or the A7 page Warp Drajv? This might be read as a request to restore either. :) Frieda Beamy (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * It's good to be pedantic, I think you are right. I haven't handled an A7 before, and am busy, so will leave it for someone else.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  19:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * We don't restore A7s, actually. At best we provide the text to the requestor. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ for Warp Drajv. We might restore if the nomination or deletion was invalid. However in this case the contents are not suitable as an encyclopedia article, it is not in English, and there is no claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

User:CD33/Zenon Software
I, CD33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CD33 (talk) 08:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

GetSmarter
Content has been updated and changed to be more encyclopedic and less promotional -KJSlack (talk) 08:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. This title has been protected against creation because of repeated re-creation. What you should do is: click on Help:Userspace draft and fill in the title. That will create a draft page in your "user space" where you can work on an improved article. When it is ready, contact the deleting administrator, user with a link to your draft. If Secret does not accept it, you can appeal at WP:Deletion review. Before you start, read WP:Notability, WP:Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 11:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

MAULANA mir baaz khan
the Historical Personality- Leading Maulavi of Deobandi Section "Save page" button below -Chimpazi (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Possibly this person is notable, but there was no clear claim of importance. All I saw was "collection of spiritual revelations" that might mean this person was important.  However if you had some references saying where your information came from it could also show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kevin Grey (silversmith)
I, Phild66, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Phild66 (talk) 19:06, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:44, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Gallery Homeland
Gallery Homeland page was flagged for speedy deletion without discussion. GH was formed in Portland Oregon over 15 years ago as a grass-roots, community based orgation. It was instrumental as an incubator for many now well-known Northwest artists. Please restore the GH page so that we can add additional content stating the significant impact that this organization has had on growing Portland Oregon into the flourishing artist community that it is now recognized for. -Nerdletta (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We do not permit shared accounts, and your writing above makes me think you've got a vested interest in the content of the article. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * ❌ But I will restore this if you can find some independent references as the deleted version had no references at all. There should be some artworks, newspapers or magazines that talk about this if it had a significant impact. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Kshitij Tarey
This page is about an artist who is doing pretty well in the feild of music, i wrote this article since i feel he should be known for his work globally. All singers have such pages therefore even he should have one. Do let me know if there is some issues with the article i wrote for him. -223.223.153.80 (talk) 13:29, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. You cannot use the existence of other articles to argue for the existence of yours. Please see WP:Notability. We also don't unilaterally overturn A7 deletions, either. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * ❌ I will declare the G11 reason invalid, but a BLP prod still applies, but if the requester, who may be the subject, can nominate two or more independent, reliable and substantial sources in publications about the subject, it could be recovered. Facebook is unsuitable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

World Class Arena
World Class Arena is an initiative devised by British Government Department of Education in 2000. It aim to assess gifted and talented children among 8-11 year olds.

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

World Class Tests
The article is useful for public -103.26.123.222 (talk) 06:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/World Class Tests
I, 103.26.123.222, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 103.26.123.222 (talk) 06:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Powermaster==

I, Sheerine, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sheerine (talk) 05:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC) , ==


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dwight Shellman
I, Sharrson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. skh 04:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Bodybagstyle Productions
The article wasn't completed yet, I saved the article so I wouldn't lose its content. It was deleted because of notable significance. Bodybagstle Productions is using technology infused in their music to create a binaural audio effect. More research is being done, but the page was deleted before it was complete. If there is any way I can keep that page while it is being edited, I can prove why it is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by D420world (talk • contribs)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. That said, admins could probably move it into a userspace draft for you. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 04:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I have moved this to a draft called Draft:Bodybagstyle Productions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Dawley Court, Middlesex in 1929.jpg
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rodolph (talk) 10:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC) copyright is ok Photograph is in a family album. I made a digital photograph copy of the 1929 image and gave it to Wikipedia. The house belonged to my great-grandfather. My father was the only son of his eldest surviving son. [Rodolph de Salis] (appointed representative of what was the Dawley estate/exors. of Cecil Fane de Salis, etc.)] [07 July 2014]
 * ❌ the photographer is still unknown, also since Wikipedia is the first publication, a suitable license will have to be granted. You could do it CC-0 or attempt to release all rights in the US (public domain) but as per the deletion discussion it does not qualify by itself to be public domain. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * it was published, public published, made public, in 1929, so Wikipedia is not the first publication.Rodolph2 (talk) 00:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * anonymous, unknown, enough years have passed for an unknown work to become public. Anyway there is a high chance that it was taken, made, published, by my great-grandparents, ergo rights, estate photo rights, passed dwon and released.00:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Where was it published in 1929? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Heiko Bleher
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -93.147.180.185 (talk) 08:17, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Dear Sirs,

I always supported, respected and used Wikipedia to inform our many contributors to your site, also on our www.aquapress-bleher.com and www.aqua-aquapress.com websites, but I just came aware that some one, for no reason I can see – WHATSOEVER – has deleted my profile page HEIKO BLEHER (there is only one in the world with this name) completely.

You state that there it has been deleted because of a copyright infringement, which is impossible, as there is none. This texts were inserted by someone who knows my life and what I have done 100% and I never saw any infringement whatsoever. Everything stated was 100% correct and in no case any violation to any copyright. You can also see this on the websites above mentioned and elsewhere on the www (ir Goggle).

I expect a immediate answer how such a thing could happen. I can only imagine, that some jealous people (jealous of my life-time work) have eliminated it, as there is nothing of an copyright infringement on my site.

Thank you in advance and see foreword to you soon answer and re-in-statement of that page,

Sincerely Heiko Bleher President of Aquapress Publishers Italy


 * I have restored Heiko Bleher as I cannot see any copying from the aquapress web site. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:33, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Black_Heart,_photo_from_CoS,_Sep_2013.jpg
I, Skylar3214, request undeletion for the file I uploaded for Black Heart (Stone Temple Pilots song) of the Articles for Creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please note that I uploaded a file for "Black Heart" by Stone Temple Pilots, and it also came from a source that was posted on the CoS website by Michael Roffman. I've worked on the article just until at 23:41, 21 July 2014. Skylar3214 7:29, 21 July 2014
 * X mark.svg This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. The file is nominated for deletion and is an issue for multiple reasons. 1) The CD cover's copyright has not been released by its owner into the public domain. If it has been release, (which would be one of the first times in the music industry) we have no evidence. 2) The file could be kept as fair-use, but it has no fair-use rationale nor the appropriate copyright tag. And the file would need to be reduced in resolution. To be kept, these things will have to be done to the file. (Basically, the file description page should look like File:Out of Time, photo from Google Play, July 2014.jpg, the file you uploaded just before. Cheers,  TLSuda  (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Now I saw where you were at with this. I've done the same thing, like I did for the last one I uploaded for Out of Time (Stone Temple Pilots song). Skylar3214 9:37, 21 July 2014
 * Good job, everything looks good now!  TLSuda  (talk) 14:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

New Jagannath Sadak
Its not a promotion page, its a map page giving information on the road and then click the "Save page" button below -Newjagannathsadak (talk) 10:05, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I have restored this to Draft:New Jagannath Sadak and removed the promotional facebook bit. Facebook is not a suitable source. By having a username the same as the page you were writing makes it also sound promotional. Anyway work on the draft, find the additional citations, and please consult me or User talk: Seraphimblade before moving this back as an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Shaoolian
I, 24.189.138.232, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.189.138.232 (talk) 13:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  21:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Tam Goossen
No reason for the page to be deleted -she is a prominent community member in Toronto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.113.230.3 (talk • contribs) 10:29, 22 July 2014
 * The reason (no importance asserted) was valid, although of course the subject might meet the notability guidelines. That said, the deletion was in 2006 and the article was completely unsourced, so either way it would qualify for a deletion as an unsourced biography. I'd recommend just recreating it, again if they meet the notability guidelines. If you are associated with the subject in any way this is required reading as well. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

The PyppöMærdah
The PyppöMærdah is an experimental music band active from 2009 to 2012 in Sardinia. We have tracks on Youtube to prove it -Bandos11 (talk) 23:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  the panda ₯’  23:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

NiCE IT Management Solutions
Enter your reasoning here Hi I would like to contest the deletion of the NiCE IT Management Solutions page because Wikipedia already has many company profiles and this company profile is no different. It was written in the same way that the Coca-Cola or Accenture pages were written for example, where they talk about the history of the company and the products/services that it offers. The NiCE IT Management Solutions page is no different. It's just a smaller company but the content therein is similar. Why not delete the Coca-Cola and Accenture pages too then? -Nonthando (talk) 09:09, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I was going to leave the standard response regarding non-notable businesses, but your wording shows that you have some fundamental misunderstandings. First, there is no such thing as a "company profile" on Wikipedia - we have encyclopedia articles about notable topics.  Wikipedia is not a business directory, it is instead an encyclopedia that includes only notable businesses.  Surely you're not compating NiCE IT to Coca-Cola or Accenture in terms of notability?  There are billions of businesses in the world, but less than 1% of them will ever meet the notability requirements, and that's intentional.  the panda ₯’  09:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Orthotropics®
Dear admins, I am writing regarding the undeletion of our wikipedia page about Orthotropics®. Orthotropics® is a treatment developed over 40 years ago by Prof. John Mew. (http://orthotropics.org/Education_and_Events/indexf.php?ACT=History_of_Orthotropics_Education )This treatment basically aims to correct the facial development and teeth alignment together with improving the facial growth (http://www.facefocused.com/bioorthotrop.html) This treatment prevents unnecessary dental extraction and major surgeries (http://www.lsfo.co.uk/orthotropics) There are three Orthotropics organizations including International Association - http://www.orthotropics.com,North American Association - http://www.orthotropics-na.org and Asian association- http://www.orthotropicsasia.com  and over 100 Orthotropics Practitioners worldwide  http://www.orthotropics.org/Discover_Orthotropics/find-an-orthotropist  & http://www.orthotropics-na.org/public/NAAFO_Find_A_Member_Map.cfm, There are also a number of published articles in the peer reviewed Dental and Orthodontic journals about Orthotropics treatment including: 1. Mew JRC. 1999. A New form of Orthodontic Treatment Tested on Identical Twins. European Journal of Orthodontics. 21: 605. 2. Mew, J.R.C. “Facial form, head posture, and the protection of the pharyngeal space” The clinical alteration of the growing face. J.A.Macnamara, K.Ribbens, R.P.Howe. Eds. Monograph 14. Crainiofacial Growth Series. Center of Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor. Michigan. 1983. (see also papers published by John Mew)

3. Mew, J.R.C. “Suggestions for forecasting and monitoring facial growth” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dento-facial Orthopedics. 104: 105-120. 1993Faces 1993. (see also papers published by John Mew)

4. Mew J R C. 2004. The Postural Basis of Malocclusion: A philosophical Overview. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. In press July or August. Finally I would like to request undeletion of this page as a it is a helpful reference for parents and practitioners considering an alternative non-extraction treatment.

Kind regards, Kian Morteza Fazeli Niaki, DMD, MClin Pros - Academic director of London School of Facial Orthotropics -86.149.175.233 (talk) 09:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. First, let me make clear that, although originally written by Prof Mew, this was not your article, it was Wikipedia's article. Wikipedia is not a "notice-board" site like Facebook for people to tell the world about their own concerns or inventions, and is extremely resistant to being used for any kind of promotion. As you are concerned with "Orthrotropics", you should read the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.


 * The article was the subject of a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Orthotropics®, although that was cut short when it was speedily deleted as an advertisement. If you disagree, you should first apprach the deleting administrator, user ; then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can make a request at WP:Deletion review.


 * Most, if not all, of the references you cite seem to be by Prof Mew, or from sources connected with the Orthotropics movement. Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, known as WP:Notability, looks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Don M. Winn
I, Sylviamerrick, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sylviamerrick (talk) 15:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Armchair Committee
I, Matthewreading, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Matthewreading (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Haden Freeman
The page was created by the company Haden Freeman and was not meant to be an advertisement. The text was copied from the website to ensure everything followed the house style. Instead, we will give a summary of the company and will list the awards and memberships the company holds as well as a brief history. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.199.228.194 (talk) 08:26, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * There are two issues: number one, this is an encyclopedia, not a business directory - the company you wrote about does not meet the strict notability requirements for an article. Second, copy/paste from a website is a WP:COPYRIGHT violation, and can never be accepted, let alone undeleted.  the panda ₯’  08:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Customer_Service_System
The administrator deleted this citing several poor reasons such as "try listing on Craigslist instead". The administrator is now no longer part of Wikipedia. This article gave good information about BT CSS, a mainframe system that runs BT Wholesales infrastructure. It is a good example of a computer mainframe system that was important for business. Instead it was deleted for being a "blatant advert". -195.95.131.65 (talk) 14:39, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It is a blatant advert, but you are welcome to make it acceptable.-- S Philbrick  (Talk)  15:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Khaleel Abdul-Jaleel
I, Broadus-YRR, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Broadus-YRR (talk) 14:06, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  15:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Phoniker/Frido Ruth
I, Phoniker, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Phoniker (talk) 08:33, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  15:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)