Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 147

File:Hullfc.png
Logo was deleted after being removed from the Hull F.C. article, but the file that replaced it is of poor quality, and appears to be a copyvio issue as it's been uploaded onto Commons -J Mo 101 (talk) 19:58, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. Restored and re-added to the article. Cheers,  TLSuda  (talk) 21:21, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Riverside Rowing Club
Wish to update again to attain approval. I only do this on a volunteer basis for Riverside Rowing Club and have not had time to complete earlier. -Star Eight (talk) 02:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * On a side note, the page does have some light copyvio here and there. I've removed one that was taken directly from the website that was also fairly promotional in tone and would need to be rewritten for Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Geoff Marslett
I, Hipstercrite, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hipstercrite (talk) 02:26, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 07:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

MONEY.CO.UK
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dickersonmoney (talk) 09:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Hi,

I my page was submitted for review and has since been deleted. Just to confirm I am trying to upload a page for money.co.uk, the UK's fifth largest comparison service. This is a genuine website which has been established for six years and has around 2.5 million visitors a month. The content of this upload is factual and informs the public of the websites origins, history, ownership, place in the market etc.

There are pages on Wikipedia for Moneysupermarket.co.uk, uSwitch.com, comparethemarket, gocompare and confused.com. I am slighly confused as to why money.co.uk's cannot be uploaded?
 * X mark.svg Not done It was very, very promotional in tone and read as an advertisement for the company. Phrases that have things like "find the best deal on everything from credit cards and mortgages to savings, energy, insurance and broadband" in them read as promotional and are not something that is allowed on Wikipedia. The problem here was predominantly that you wrote it in a way that was so overly promotional that it required immediate deletion. I have no problem with you creating a new version of the article in your userspace but this was too promotional to remain. On a side note, please do not post the content of the article here, as you are only supposed to post requests for article recreation and not the content of the article itself. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:03, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, please understand that the existence of other articles on Wikipedia does not mean that all similarly themed companies merit an article on Wikipedia. You must still show notability via reliable sources and write the article in a neutral manner. Along with that, also please understand that WP:ITSUSEFUL is not a reason to keep an article. Again, the sole reason for the article's deletion was because it was promotional in tone, but saying that the page's addition would be useful for people looking to comparison shop various websites is not a valid reason for an article to exist on here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Fermat Machinery
I, Jirikaf, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jirikaf (talk) 09:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Bibhuprasad Mohapatra
He is a notable popular science writer in Odisha state of India -Padmacharan123 (talk) 10:57, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Bibhuprasad Mohapatra, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 11:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Video game and Movie rating system
The reason why this page should not be deleted is for many reasons. To begin, First of all, the esrb video game ratings and tv parental guidelines are included to this article, the MPAA has nothing to do with it. Second, I took a long time making that article it took me like 43 minutes to develop. Finally, The TV and Esrb Are not found in the MPAA rating system there are found by their own rating makers. In Conclusion, the Esrb and tv ratings are not from the MPAA are from there regular companies and this page is not the same as the MPAA film rating system. Its different. -BasicallyIdowrk (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC) The Article is a different subject then the MPAA film rating system.
 * I'm not sure I fully understand what you're saying, but I'm not convinced at all of your argument that this is something different than the articles we already have on rating systems, since the content was essentially the existing film and video game rating logos with commentary. Simply combining the two rating systems into a single article was not appropriate. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Wow, a whole 43 minutes to develop an article with one source! A well developed Wikipedia article typically involves way more effort to develop than a high school term paper. ~Amatulić (talk) 12:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kossila Oxbow
I, Mand0002, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mand0002 (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Was trying to figure out how to add images, stopped editing and searched on web but couldn't find anything. Kept looking then decided to publish without the images but I took to long and it was deleted. and then click the "Save page" button below -Mand0002 (talk) 14:01, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You might also want to look at this tutorial, or ask for help at the Teahouse. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety
The article now meet the requirements for a valid Wikipedia-page, and should therefore not be deleted -Aninjo (talk) 15:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The article was tagged for speedy deletion but another editor declined it. You might want to read WP:ORG and also WP:PSCOI if it applies to you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:58, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/By the sea recovery sober living

 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.80.92 (talk • contribs) 13:26, 6 August 2014‎
 * That, as written, is just a one-paragraph advertisement for the organization. Topics are subject to notability guidelines that this probably does not meet, but if it does you're probably better off starting from scratch. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leopold Kessler

 * 86.26.36.153 (talk) 16:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. That looks like a very viable article but it really, really needs some citations. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sims Reed
I, ArtgalleryLLM, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ArtgalleryLLM (talk) 14:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Article was edited and the deletion template removed. It won't be deleted unless it's abandoned for another six months. However I've blocked your account based on our username policy - you are welcome to simply create another one or request that your current one be renamed. Accounts and articles are not tied in any way. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:51, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * commentI restored this as a result of an email sent to me, I didn't realize it was also in this list.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  01:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Detroit Rocks
I, InfoSaw, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. InfoSaw (talk) 20:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * You mean Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Detroit Rocks
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. A looong way to go. -- S Philbrick (Talk)  01:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adonnis
I, License2Kill, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. License2Kill (talk) 00:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  01:21, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Muïesis
 Jane Foster (talk) 16:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 17:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done Neologisms and new concepts or terms require significant secondary coverage by reliable independent sources which is not apparent here after doing a bit of research. If this term is ever actually used by people other than the creator, then you'd have a chance. Right now I don't feel that's the case, and the AFC reviewers are going to tell you the same thing. If you think I'm mistaken and you can provide examples that prove such coverage exists, please reply here and we will consider them. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 19:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard Simpkins
I, Rsimpkins74, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rsimpkins74 (talk) 18:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:30, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Euan Odd
My page was deleted due to a "PROD" the page was created by me, about me and the reason for the "PROD" was I believe because the user that deleted it did not believe that "Odd" was my last name. I am not bothered by this but I request kindly that my page be undeleted. Thank you. -Adonex (talk) 23:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. The problem wasn't the name. It was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD. Had it not been deleted for that reason, it would have been deleted in accordance with WP:CSD, because it was an unsourced biography containing no credible claim of significance. Therefore, it is not eligible for restoration by request on this page. You might try contacting the deleting administrator.
 * You should not be writing an autiobiography anyway. Please read Autobiography and Conflict of interest. If you are really a notable person, someone will get around to writing an article about you, but you are strongly discouraged against doing it yourself. If you feel you absolutely must write an autobiography, please use Articles for creation, which is the appropriate venue for creating articles with which you have a conflict of interest, which you clearly have with an article about yourself. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:38, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cowpuncher (Canadian rock band)
I, Ryankelster, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ryankelster (talk) 20:27, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  01:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I've added some sources- the biggest thing I can recommend is that the page get edited for content and style since it's such a large block of text with few breaks (some of the sentences also read as fragments) that it's a little daunting to read. Breaking it up into sections and smaller paragraphs would probably be advisable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:10, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Versatile Security
I, Thoren1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thoren1 (talk) 08:45, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:57, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Murtaza Khojami
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Niyazjan123 (talk) 10:18, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done I'd initially posted the "this isn't deleted" template, but then realized that this is the latest of a series of articles created by sockpuppets of User:Murtazakhojami. There's an open SPI at Sockpuppet investigations/Murtazakhojami. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:34, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

User:Xawj2010/sandbox
I, Jwax2011, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jwax2011 (talk) 11:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  11:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Greg W Hill
The information on this page was accurate and verifiable ther is not justification for delection — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neowizzard (talk • contribs) 03:08, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please note that it has no references, so can be deleted on sight. Please add some immediately soon .-- S Philbrick (Talk)  11:28, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I moved it to User:Neowizzard/Greg W. Hill to give you some time.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  11:31, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Venjean
I, Abacab36, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abacab36 (talk) 12:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:08, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lars Dalgaard
I, Skiracheng, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Skiracheng (talk) 20:12, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mahder Assefa
I, Danieljadon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Danieljadon (talk) 15:16, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Ryan Bourque
Please restore the edit history for this re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 22:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done, there were only four deleted edits to restore. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

The Benefits and Detriments of an Australian Bill of Rights
Could you please userfy this deleted article to my userspace so that it can be imported into our sister project Wikiversity. Following a discussion at v:Wikiversity:Colloquium, I am advised that this article must be undeleted here before it can be imported into Wikiversity. Once it has been imported into Wikiversity I will tag the copy in my userspace for speedy deletion. The article appears to be suitable for inclusion in Wikiversity because Wikiversity allows both original research and essays. -James500 (talk) 01:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Userified at User:James500/The Benefits and Detriments of an Australian Bill of Rights. § FreeRangeFrog croak 01:36, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dry Throat Five
Will work on it -Bass500 (talk) 02:40, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 13:54, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joyce Wan
 Eddragon (talk) 05:15, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 13:54, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Exotissimo
 Barang (talk) 13:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 13:54, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Edit request?
My mother's name is incorrect. It should be (Louise Howard Jones). The letter e) is left off her name. Thank you kindly. LaVern — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaVern Jones Lemons (talk • contribs) 16:00, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This is a page to request undeletion of certain types are pages. It sounds like you are asking for an edit to soem article. A better location is Help desk, but you did not identify the article, so I was unable to find it. -- S Philbrick (Talk)  17:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. user  has made the correction with this edit, and has left a message on your user talk page. JohnCD (talk) 17:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

James Marwood
Please restore previous editing history before this article was deleted. Thanks -JMHamo (talk) 15:27, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅, JohnCD (talk) 17:35, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

User:Vjhamilton/Mary Alice Downie
I, Vjhamilton, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Entry denied because she is deemed insignificant. I will add citation from Who's Who to counteract the charge of insignificance Vjhamilton (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The requirement is called WP:Notability, and is explained there and at WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 21:38, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Edmond Jean Baptiste Duesberg
Apologies for not getting round to "publishing". It comes down to a lack of confidence in taking that step.

Edmond Jean Baptiste Duesberg is certainly worthy of including in Wikipaedia. Both on the strength of his bibliography, and family relationship to other figures that are already on here.

His published plays fall out of copyright in 2015.

Rob Talbot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Histrio (talk • contribs) 23:22, 9 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:24, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Blue Bear Films
I, Arostow, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Arostow (talk) 05:39, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:15, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adrian Beerman Leeds
I, LyndaMS, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LyndaMS (talk) 14:28, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It is not close to acceptable. Have you read WP:AUTO?Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- S Philbrick  (Talk)  15:47, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Kraigher
I, 24.189.26.152, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.189.26.152 (talk) 16:55, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- S Philbrick (Talk)  00:27, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Draft:GeeFunding
Dear Roger W Haworth Please restore undelete the Article: Draft:GeeFunding

This article does not pose any advertisement or promotion. The company hired me to help write and publish this article based on their service. All information contained on the GeeFunding article are genuine

Similar Articles is here in Wiki in the same category from another company, those articles can be found at: 1). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kickstarter 2). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoFundMe 3). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiegogo

Please RESTORE the article GeeFunding for Approval. This is my first article in wiki I am a student hoping to gain more experience on writing and publish in Wiki. Please restore and Approve the Draft:GeeFunding deleted. If you have something you would like us change or remove from the article. please specify and I will be glad to fix it.

Anticipating your understanding.

Best regards, John D. McDaniel "Save page" button below -Bizking2u (talk) 18:57, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and won't ever be done. Wikipedia is not the place to promote companies or run your paid PR biz, whether in drafts or otherwise. That was a blatantly promotional "article" that belongs at best in a press release or the company's website. I'd point you to WP:PSCOI but I assume you already read it - the next thing would be to go over the inclusion guidelines (if you fail to meet those you'll never get it published anyway), start from scratch and somehow manage to write about that topic without descending into inappropriately effluvient PR copy territory. § FreeRangeFrog croak 01:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Thumbwheel
I just saw that someone PRODed Thumbwheel, a redirect to Scrollwheel. While the redirect may not be ideal, I still think it is reasonable to keep it, so that a (non-technical) reader at least gets a rough idea what a thumbwheel might be. After undeletion, we should Rcat the redirect "with possibilities" in order to indicate that it could (and should!) become an article on its own in the future. Thanks. -Matthiaspaul (talk) 03:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 04:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Dana Hermann
This article is about a real person. I will add to the content soon. This person is of interest to your audience — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danahermann (talk • contribs) 13:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like Facebook for people to write about themselves. As an encyclopedia, it is selective about subjects for articles; not every "real person" can have an article, see WP:Notability (people), and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 14:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Kindness UK
This article provides factual information on a not-for-profit organisation based in the UK and is an authority on kindness. This organisation is unbiased and neutral with the sole aim of sharing kindness and uniting people in kind acts. It seems to have been deleted because the founder has appeared on TV and is not favoured by the deleter, which does not adhere to the nature of Wikipedia. This article aims to provide facts e.g. Kindness UK held the 7th World Kindness Assembly which may be evidenced here and here and there are many examples of Kindness UK featuring in the media including BBC, ITV and articles in the Telegraph and SW Londoner (list). Emehtwiki (talk) 13:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Kindness UK, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. See also Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. JohnCD (talk) 15:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Helly Luv
Please undelete and merge complete page history (from 3 places). This is probably a job for a very experienced admin!

I'd previously asked at Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_143. On July 17, it was moved to Draft:Helly Luv2, because there was another Draft:Helly Luv created on July 12. Obviously a current popular topic.

On 2014-07-21T21:16:39, RHaworth speedy deleted a third Helly Luv yet again -- really jumping the gun on deletions!!! At this time, there is now a fairly complete page in place, ready for improved citations.

We need the combined histories for Draft:Helly Luv2, Draft:Helly Luv, and whatever RHaworth deleted. Thanks. -William Allen Simpson (talk) 01:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. Draft:Helly Luv and Draft:Helly Luv2 are both copyright violations, pretty well straight copies of her Facebook page and her own website, so they cannot be restored. I am surprised that their promotional/Facebooky tone did not alert anyone to that before. The article itself has chunks of the same copyright text, which I will strip out shortly, leaving a stub for you to work on.


 * The promotional tone is not surprising, as the article is the work of user, which is the group to whom HL is signed, and who I have username-soft-blocked but warned not to edit about her. I dare say they could make a WP:DCM copyright release, but copying Facebook puffery is not the way to make an encyclopedia article.


 * RHaworth's 21 July deletion was hardly "jumping the gun" as the whole content of that page was "Helly Luv (borned Helen Abdulla, is a Kurdish singer, living in the United States."


 * Best of luck with the article - she certainly hasn't achieved WP:MUSICBIO yet, but I guess there may be enough press coverage to satisfy WP:GNG, though it all looks rather Youtubey and like an energetic promotion campaign rather than real notability. JohnCD (talk) 14:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Aaaaarrrgh!!! The new article is also almost completely copied from her Facebook/website. When I take out the word-for-word copyvios, all that is left is the "Philanthropy" passage at the end. The best way I can think of to give you a good start at developing a proper article is to delete the old drafts, move this to Draft:Helly Luv, delete all the copyvio but leave the images, references and links. So I have done that. JohnCD (talk) 19:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KioWare
I, Lboniello, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lboniello (talk) 20:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Coléoptère
I, Lisabaird, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lisabaird (talk) 22:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Consider Me Dead
I, 174.126.225.20, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 174.126.225.20 (talk) 02:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:07, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Gene Abel
PROD deletion made by WP:SPA after speedy delete denied, should be restored and AfD'd if necessary -XeroxKleenex (talk) 07:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Flea Market Music
I, Aggie80, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 10:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fever Hut
Please restore page as I intend to work on it -77.100.157.201 (talk) 11:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Michael Harris
Michael Harris (September 10, 1994)is an American singer, songwriter, poet and also known as Harry. He is m just a kid from the Newark, NJ who is famous for writing songs and poems. His contributions to all the thing's that he have written is his own experience of his life. He is the second children of Harris family. he debuted on the professional music scene along with Michelle as a member of Sad Day for Puppets in 2008, and began his solo career in 2010 with never shout never. His distinctive songs and poems has influenced numerous.

Unknown Colors is the best album that he has written, his other solo songs Never change, Jeanette also rank among the best song's. Harry is one of the few Poets to have been inducted into best Poems. He got the first award in year 2007 for his poem called "my life". He have one CD and a single out on iTunes, which you can get to by clicking the album covers at the bottom of Unknown colors — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickslovesyou (talk • contribs) 04:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done The pages (User:Michael Harris, User:Mickslovesyou/sandbox) were both deleted under WP:U5, blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost. They were also pretty unambiguous self-promotion as well. Please understand that while you can write something about yourself on Wikipedia you should not use it as a place to promote yourself or anyone else. I'd recommend that you read over WP:COI before posting any other articles about Harris on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Johncongo
I want to create the article properly well..Pls restore it -Latertinsna 02:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:05, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Archibald Johnston, First Mayor of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
 Karen Samuels (talk) 00:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * On a side note, this reads somewhat like you took it directly from a booklet or pamphlet. I can't find anything identical out there, but if it is then please be aware that WP:COPYVIO cannot be used on Wikipedia and you will have to re-write this to remove the copyrighted material. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Sundeep Sikka
The deletion was done without discussion. The article was about one of the India's biggest mutual fund manager. It was well sourced from independent source. He is notable journalists, investment professionals and retail investors need to know about him from independent sources. The deletion process was autocratic and more like vandalism as no valid reason was given. The article can't be under unambigous advertisement because if that is so then most articles say about Donald Trump,Raghuram Rajan or even George Soros should be removed because they read like unambigous advertisement. I think the user who has removed it has some personal agenda and has removed all articles initiated by me. Regards, Mumbaimover -59.144.123.141 (talk) 08:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done There was no hidden or personal agenda, the page was very promotional in tone. Phrases like "Sundeep Sikka is passionate about educating Indian investors about various safer investment opportunities" come across as something you'd read in an advertisement or press release, as they are not written in a WP:NPOV. As far as other articles go, the content of other articles does not automatically mean that every article containing promotional material should remain. It might be that the pages in question are phrased more neutrally or just haven't been seen and fixed yet. Feel free to edit and fix any promotional content you see in those articles. As far as discussion goes, the page was nominated for a speedy deletion, which does not require that we have a discussion like you would see at WP:AfD. In any case, you are free to re-create the page but please do not use language that can be seen as promotional. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Mohamed Ezz Eldin
The page is for a living soccer player who will recently grow to be a soccer super star. He is not less than any of the highly decorated players nowadays. His name appeared in news articles in his national newspapers (available in references) and he deserves to be acknowledge for his achievements regardless of his young age -Msm benz (talk) 10:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * On a side note, not all of the sources used seem to pass WP:RS. For example, KingFut.com doesn't seem to have an editorial board that we could really verify and wouldn't be seen as a reliable source by most editors. The same thing goes for youm7.com. Also, please be aware that we have to have notability in the here and now, and we cannot keep articles based on future notability. Aside from that, there were a few things here and there that were written in a non-neutral point of view, like as an advertisement or a fan page. I'm not adverse against it being restored, but you'll have to go through User:RHaworth for it and show that he's received enough coverage to pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Sam Ghosh
This was a well sourced article about the CEO of Reliance Capital the largest Indian financial services company. I think there has been enough sources to back the article and he is a notable person. I think the material on the leadership style section is promotional which can be removed -Mumbaimover (talk) 10:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This wasn't as promotional as the other page, but it was written with a promotional enough tone that it would likely require a pretty thorough re-write in places. If User:NawlinWiki is fine with it being userfied, I'm willing to transfer this copy to your userspace. The other page you asked to be restored is too promotional to userfy, but this one is just neutral enough in places to where userfication might be an option. The only thing I would ask is that you run it through AfC and not submit it to the mainspace until another editor approves it. I'll hold off on making a final decision until NawlinWiki comes in. If they don't reply or are fine with it, I'll userfy it for you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I just noticed that you vandalized NawlinWiki's usertalk page, so this does sort of make me hesitant to restore the page for you. Blanking pages out of retribution doesn't exactly help us assume good faith on your part. Accusing them of vandalism doesn't really help give me confidence in your ability to contribute either. I'm leaning towards declining this one. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


 * 1) Dear Tokyogirl79 I am sorry and apologize for the vandalism, but I was hurt the way User:NawlinWiki removed every content I had created. Also he put everything for speedy deletion which really hurt me. I am a journalist and financial writer and wanted to create wikipages about India's financial sector in good faith. But the deletion was very harsh when I had followed all the methods of independent sourcing and notability guidelines. However, I agree somehow the language was bit promotional in some parts but I am sorry I had followed wiki articles about big American financial sector people and companies where such language was used and they were big corps and people. But I will be careful but again I think because people and companies from third world countries like India probably can be easily deleted. It hurts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mumbaimover (talk • contribs) 11:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Tokyogirl, it's fine with me if you send the content to Mumbaimover's userspace to be edited. Note that this user has only made edits relating to Reliance and its executives.  NawlinWiki (talk) 14:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Howell Movement
I, Rchillyard, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Beowulf (talk) 12:08, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do. It isn't deleted. It's been moved to Draft:Howell Movement (Contract bridge) ~Amatulić (talk) 17:35, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tim Shields
I, Babelfisher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Babelfisher (talk) 16:24, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

The creation of the article was not completed. More information is yet to be added that should fulfill the notability requirements -Babelfisher (talk) 16:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done Protonk (talk) 18:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

File:South Africans in Australia and New Zealand 1952-53.jpg
Could an admin please e-mail me the content of the file description page prior to deletion? (I don't need the file itself.) -— This, that and the other (talk) 00:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done. Check your email. § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)