Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 157

7 Angels 7 Plagues
Requesting that page be Userfied. This went through a not-very-thorough AfD recently, and I have located additional sources (e.g., and ) that may be useful for rewriting the article to pass WP:MUSIC. -Chubbles (talk) 01:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. No objection in principle, but that really needs agreement from the closing admin, who I will ping - . JohnCD (talk) 14:09, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Just a note, Mr. Decker has not edited in 6 days. Is his permission necessary? There is another AfD, for an album of the band's, which may hang in the balance based on whether I can salvage the band article. Chubbles (talk) 17:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Not to be a bother, but time is somewhat of the essence on my ability to rework this article, if I wish to influence the pending AfD. If it is possible to userfy the article soon, I'd be appreciative. Chubbles (talk) 20:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, ✅ to User:Chubbles/7 Angels 7 Plagues, but check with Joe Decker, or go through WP:DRV, before you restore it to mainspace. JohnCD (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Language on Vacation: An Olio of Orthographical Oddities
This article about a book was deleted via PROD due to lack of sources establishing notability. Please restore the article, Language on Vacation: An Olio of Orthographical Oddities, and its redirect, Language on Vacation, as I've located several reliable sources for this book. These include contemporary reviews in TIME and Kirkus Reviews, a retrospective review in Word Ways, and several mentions in popular and academic non-fiction literature attesting to the book's historical significance. I'll add these references to the article once it's restored. -Psychonaut (talk) 08:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 13:20, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Owais Bhat
This Page Was A True Biography Of An Artist Who Is Representing The Country India At Many Places In The World. Kindly Bring That Back On Wikipedia So That I Can Continue Editing That Page -Owaisbhat (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not for self-promotion, or any kind of promotion, and writing about yourself here is very strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at WP:Autobiography and WP:Conflict of interest. Please use only one account, in order to avoid suspicion of sockpuppetry. JohnCD (talk) 13:38, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Meguey Baker
 Smokebomb (talk) 15:32, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

AtheistTV
The 'notability' of this television station was 'asserted' and referenced in the article (with references); it is a subsidiary of the American Atheists. Thanks. -THE PROMENADER  16:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅, restored. The article was never proposed or nominated for deletion, and I see no speedy deletion criterion that would apply here, and none are cited in the deletion log. You are correct, it does make a credible claim of significance, contradicting the deletion log reason. I am not sure why it would have been deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Secaucus Home News
To see what was submitted prior and to add content so its not deleted again for (A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). -Thenewsboss (talk) 18:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I have restored this to Draft:Secaucus Home News. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:08, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Libre
Useful knowledge lost. The page has become a disambiguation page but the original page is not listed. The original history has been replaced (so is also lost). Reason for deletion in deletion log: "2014-10-12T19:02:51 Frank (talk contribs) deleted page Libre (G6: Deleted to make way for move)". Where was it moved to? I suggest reinstating the page Libre as it was with all its history and talk before the deletion, and creating a page called "Libre (disambiguation)" for the current content. In that page, link to the reinstated page "Libre" with a note something like "(common usage)" or "(usage in free culture)". Alternatively, move the deleted page (and all its history) into one of those two names - i.e. into "Libre (common usage)" or "Libre (usage in free culture)". Thanks - kt (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC) -kt (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Done - I have userfied it to User:KTucker/Libre. I do have to say that this AFD is hardly binding on the status of this article. It was a non-admin closure with two !votes for delete and one for merge. I fully agree that there needs to be an article there ... if we have Gratis versus libre, it makes sense to have articles on those two topics. --B (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * It was deleted basically as a result of Articles_for_deletion/Libre. The original decision was to redirect the page to a disambiguation page but someone noticed that "Libre" is a better title, so the content of the disambiguation page was moved over the original article. Protonk (talk) 00:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to get a copy of the page just before it was deleted?
 * I am interested in the content, history (for attribution purposes) and external links that were on the page (especially the references), and might (if I have time) work on it to make it worthy of being reinstated, perhaps under some other name or elsewhere (Wikiversity, WikiEducator, ...), and/or to make sure that nothing important has been lost (i.e. not covered in related articles). - kt (talk) 22:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Many thanks B. Knowing how much work went into the page, especially by User:Sanglorian in 2012, and the reasons for making the effort, it is good to have a version with history somewhere. Personally, I would vote to have the page re-instated alongside a separate "Libre (disambiguation)" page, then more people will find it and help improve the article. - K (talk) 10:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Discussion initiated here to improve the article, starting with points addressing the reasons for deletion and in support of undeletion. --K (talk) 07:45, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Gnuismail/sandbox
I, Gnuismail, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gnuismail (talk) 07:00, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done There really isn't anything to restore there, not really. It's ultimately a request for other people to create an article on someone called AAAAA, "a human & alien life form, living more than 6000 years from the birth on the earth". The rest of the page looked like it was all pure original research and I honestly can't see where it could be turned into a workable article for Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tha Boogiewoogie Man
 76.219.224.195 (talk) 18:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I restored Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tha Boogiewoogie Man back in December, but you did not touch it. What to you want to change in it? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done As we've had no response to this, I'm going to go ahead and mark this as "not done". Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:41, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Sarah J Price
is a Welsh Playwright, film maker TV, Film and West End actor, reality star, musician, sports journalist, comedy writer and stand up performer, (Edinburgh festival, NYC Comedy club) and regular international radio and TV guest. the page was originally merged with two other Sarah Price's in an act of vandalism, the swimmer was separated, but the two 'film' Sarah Price's remained as one, my attempt to get the page back up and running on its own was removed, the main reason given for its deletion being "I found lots of Sarah Prices, but not this one" the problem being because of Ms Price's varied career a fair few of the 'lots of Sarah Price's' were indeed her, she has also worked under several stage names since she began her career in early childhood. her recent output as an actor I feel merits the page to be reinstated and updated. -Jasperxj (talk) 04:00, 4 October 2014 (UTC) Jasperxj (talk)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Sarah J Price, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * This ran through AfD and since you're saying that there were other sources and that she was merged with other Prices as an act of vandalism, this really should run through WP:DR. It's supposed to run through DR anyway, but in this case it'd be best to make sure that it goes through the proper channels. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for you help Tokyogirl179 (｡◕‿◕｡) Jasperxj (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 01:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi can anyone help me is there another Admin other than I can make my request to? they don't seem to have been active for a while now, the deletion review page states talking to an Admin should be tried first, and my further investigation it seems that at one point 7 Sarah Prices had been emerged and at the same time Sarah J Price was deleted the American film maker Sarah Price was also proposed for deletion, but someone argued for her case, and her page stayed. however information about the welsh Sarah Price now links to her - I was in Afghanistan at the time of deletion so unable to state a case to keep the page, we are talking someone who's graced the West End stage and been in a films in the USA -thanks again Jasperxj (talk) 01:22, 11 October 2014 (UTC)  (｡◕‿◕｡) 

Hi again, still getting no reply from or help from anyone else i have found there is a page in someones sandbox (User:Toyahfan) which merged with the original page which was deleted and the new information now available about Sarah Price a 'more' valued entry could be created, I could start again, but fear it would be deleted as a matter of course. Please someone help! Cheers Jasperxj (talk) 03:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)


 * If Addshore isn't responding, then it's time to take the case to WP:DRV. The deleted article is about football writer, musician, and comedian. Is that the same person? If not, it would be best to start from scratch. Or, I could restore the article to your user space for you to improve. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:29, 17 October 2014 (UTC)


 * , Userfying it would probably be a good idea, although I'd still recommend maybe running it through DRV just to be safe, since there were a few people who brought up that these were all different Prices. I'm just slightly worried that someone might speedy it thinking that this would be the case (that they're all separate) and that the deletion rationale hadn't been resolved. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Mumbai Monthly Meet (MMM)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -MahavirjainIITB (talk) 13:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

The program has been organized by my alma mater since 1996. It is an education institution of international importance and the program has helped alumni connect with the institute holistically for many noble causes. Hope you will reinstate the article. Regards, Mahavir Sohanlal Jain
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:32, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Kushal thakkar
I'll redite all thing and want to create a new one pls help me and pls undelete it -Kushal7t (talk) 14:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


 * . The page is ineligible for restoration by request here, because it was not only deleted in accordance with WP:CSD (the subject is not notable), but also WP:CSD (it was unambiguously promotional).
 * Also, read Autobiography and Conflict of interest. You should not be writing about yourself on Wikipedia. If you are truly notable, someone will eventually create an article about you. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Air Spray Aviation Ltd.
May not have written the page properly. Would like to try again. The page has information that contributes to the understanding of the topic. -Electra2013 (talk) 16:42, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zhong
I, Truecollision, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Truecollision (talk) 21:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tonic International
I, Arno66, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Arno66 (talk) 05:20, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. you still need to supply reliable independent sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Nadya Fatira
this article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the biography and all the news about Nadya Fatira are listed on many Indonesian media -Nadya Fatira (talk) 14:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
 * Also, please read Autobiography and Conflict of interest. You should not write about yourself on Wikipedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The article, in Indonesian, is a short biography of a singer-songwriter without apparent assertion or demonstration of notability. If the community wishes it to be undeleted I shall not fight over it. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

German Heart Center in Berlin
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hasanovrf (talk) 17:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC) Please restore this page as i intend to work on it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hasanovrf (talk • contribs) 17:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. That was not an encyclopedia article, it was an advertisement, written in the first person, the DHZB addressing potential customers: "If you wish to be treated at the DHZB, our specialists will first review your medical history... Unlike many institutions, we have our own guest-house... the hotels offer special discount rates for our patients... " etc. That is not what an encyclopedia is for. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Berlin Heart Center
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hasanovrf (talk) 17:35, 19 October 2014 (UTC) Please make a redirect from page Berlin Heart Center to page German Heart Center in Berlin So our patients can find the official pages of our center! Thank you!
 * ❌. The target page has been deleted as a blatant advertisement. Wikipedia is not a place for your centre to post "official pages". As you are connected with the centre, you should not write about it here - please read the guideline Conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

R. BALACHANDAR
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Balacr3 (talk) 20:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC) I am same author for http://cumincad.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/caadria2009_161.content.pdf link.In this pdf see the author name R.Balachandar who is same person.

Oral presentation was given by me on the research paper titled : ‘ DIGITAL DESIGN ENGINE BASED ON VEDIC SCIENCE’ for the international conference - CAADRIA 2009,YUNTECH UNIVERSITY, Yunlin, Taiwan, also the same has been published in the CAADRIA 2009 year book.

I am R.BALACHANDAR fROM Tamil nadu ,India. I am the Author for both papers.

CUMINCAD doesnt have copyright because i am author for that article. i have the proof if need i will submit.
 * If you think that means this gives you the ability to use them as the text of a Wikipedia article, you are wrong. Per the Berne Convention, all works are fully copyrighted regardless of who authored them, unless explicitly disclaimed otherwise. We cannot accept the text even if you're the author, unless you explicitly release it under a free license (See WP:Donating copyrighted materials), and even then that is not a guarantee that it will be used. Also, [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a A7. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We will never undelete G12 deletions here, either. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Jeremy you are wrong here, as if the claim for copyright infringement was in error, it can be undeleted. In this case there is a possibility as the author may release it under a free license. However the content is already under an AFD discussion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ I assume that you are talking about Astro Vedic Architecture, which is nominated for deletion. You must discuss this at Articles for deletion/Astro Vedic Architecture. I am deleting the page R.BALACHANDAR as it is a duplicate of your request above, and not an article. The older edition of this and your user page are all duplicated of Astro Vedic Architecture, which is a better name for your topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:52, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Soft Solutions
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -AA5577 (talk) 21:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC) Please note that no promotion or any advertisement is intendant for the article about Soft Solutions that is well know company in Europe and North America. Checking the citation and the brief company business field are objective and from a neutral point of view.

Please note also that the content does not violate any copyrights and can be published after your verification and approval.
 * Promotion isn't entirely about intent as it is about wording. However, with two G11s, an A7, and an AfD, it's incredibly unlikely this page will be restored. (Note that this page has never been deleted on the basis of copyright (G12).) — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:21, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Even the most recent version was an incredibly blatant advertisement, showing no understanding of the problems raised earlier.  DGG ( talk ) 22:20, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

balacr3
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Balacr3 (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2014 (UTC) I am same author for http://cumincad.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/caadria2009_161.content.pdf link. In this pdf see the author name R.BALACHANDAR who is same person. Oral presentation was given by me on the research paper titled : ‘ DIGITAL DESIGN ENGINE BASED ON VEDIC SCIENCE’ for the international conference - CAADRIA 2009,YUNTECH UNIVERSITY, Yunlin, Taiwan, also the same has been published in the CAADRIA 2009 year book. I am R.BALACHANDAR from Tamil nadu ,India. I am the Author for both papers. Cumin Cad & no one doesn’t claim copyright for this because i am the author for that if need i can produce the proof.

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Balacr3 (talk) 21:00, 19 October 2014 (UTC) I am same author for http://cumincad.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/caadria2009_161.content.pdf link. In this pdf see the author name R.BALACHANDAR who is same person. Oral presentation was given by me on the research paper titled : ‘ DIGITAL DESIGN ENGINE BASED ON VEDIC SCIENCE’ for the international conference - CAADRIA 2009,YUNTECH UNIVERSITY, Yunlin, Taiwan, also the same has been published in the CAADRIA 2009 year book. I am R.BALACHANDAR from Tamil nadu ,India. I am the Author for both papers. Cumin Cad & no one doesn’t claim copyright for this because i am the author for that if need i can produce the proof.
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done I've linked these both together because ultimately these are asking for the same thing to be restored. I'm sorry, but this will not be restored and there are several reasons for this. The first is that there is a concern about copyright. If you want to run a ticket through WP:ORTS showing that you have the copyright and want to give up permission for its use then that's one thing but you cannot just say that you are the author and that you can give us permission. We cannot verify that you are the author just because you said so and there's also another issue: if this was published anywhere then there is an additional problem over who actually owns the paper. I've seen some places require that the author give up all material copyrights to the journal/publisher. You'd have to show ORTS that you own the rights to the material as well. Now even with that issue solved, there is still a big issue over the overall notability of the subject of Astro Vedic Architecture. I cannot see where anyone is talking about this topic other than the author himself, so that is reason in and of itself for me (and other admins) to not want to restore the article. To make matters worse, there are concerns that you may be using Wikipedia as a place to promote this subject, which is also something that would warrant deletion- as is the case at User:Balacr3. I'm not even going to get into the potential WP:SOCKPUPPETRY going on since you appear to be editing from this account and User:RBalachandar without openly stating that you are the same person and giving your reasons for opening two accounts. I'm sorry, but I will not restore this and to be honest there just doesn't seem to be enough notability to warrant a page any time soon. The best place to submit your work would be various journals, not Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I also have to give you fair warning: repeatedly adding this to Wikipedia can be seen as spam, which can lead to you getting temporarily or permanently blocked from editing. I would also recommend against requesting that this get restored to the mainspace via this board. You've already been declined once on here and on your talk page- asking repeatedly is very unlikely to get a different response in this situation and could also be seen as spamming. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jaguza
 41.138.212.92 (talk) 07:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done I'm sorry, but the entire article was so promotional in tone that you would have to re-write the entire article from scratch in order to remove the promotional material. You can write a new submission at Draft:Jaguza, but it must be neutral in tone and be sourced with independent and reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Lumbini Eye Institute
this page is not self advertisement. I am not involved in this organization at all. My only aim is to recognize this GOVERNMENT organization which has been doing good work for the public. -nirmal (talk) 08:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Lumbini Eye Institute, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * As this was originally deleted at AfD, you'd have to ask either User:Michig or User:Jimfbleak if they would restore the article, although deletion review is always an option. The article did have content that could be seen as potentially promotional in tone, plus I did not see where you addressed the issues brought up at AfD of notability. The LEI does seem to exist and they do seem to do very, very good and noble work, but these elements do not automatically mean notability on Wikipedia. You'd have to show that the institute has received coverage in reliable sources like newspapers and the like. These sources do not have to be in English and I would also suggest asking for help at WP:INDIA as far as source location goes, as they can give some very good tips for where to go for sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xtreme Chaotix
I, SG Ultima, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SG Ultima (talk) 01:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Still Work in Progress, attempting to address issues impeding publication on wikipedia. -SG Ultima (talk) 01:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I notice that you requested that this get restored back in April, but you did not touch the submission at all. I'd like to have some reassurance that you will edit the article this go round rather than for it to sit and stagnate for another six months and then get deleted again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Please give me some indication that you will edit this by responding to this post! The problem is that I'm afraid that this will only sit around again and as Wikipedia is not a WP:WEBHOST to indefinitely host material, I'd like some reassurance that you will work on this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Since you have not responded to two attempts to ask for reassurance, I have no choice but to assume that you have abandoned your request and would likely not edit the article at all. I'm sorry, but we cannot indefinitely host material on Wikipedia and we'd need at least some assurance that you would edit the article and make it appropriate to add to the mainspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   11:01, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Product Family Master Plan
I, 77.72.50.12, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 77.72.50.12 (talk) 09:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done There was no content to restore. The entire article is comprised of a header entitled "Product Family Master Plan" and the sentence "A PFMP is an ...", and there are no sources or anything else that would make it worth restoring. Feel free to create a new AfC article if you so wish. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * You will have to add some content and submit it to proceed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Zivorad M. Slavinski
I, Vlad.stojakovic, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vlad.stojakovic (talk) 11:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. For advice, read WP:Your first article and WP:Verifiability. JohnCD (talk) 14:32, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

liquiproof
I'm sorry if you felt I broke the guidelines, it wasn't my intention. Can this page be restored and placed in sandbox please. I wish to ask other non-biased contributors to edit the page etc. Thank you -CanerVeli (talk) 11:40, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:CanerVeli/Liquiproof. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:54, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Hell in a Bucket
would like the previous page version from June please. -Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * There isn't any revision from June. Here's a snippet of the deletion contributions on that page:
 * 20:16, 17 August 2014 . . Hell in a Bucket (14,048 bytes (Requesting speedy deletion (CSD U1). (TW))
 * 19:02, 25 July 2014 . . Hell in a Bucket (14,033 bytes) (Articles I started and others expanded)
 * 13:55, 16 April 2014 . . Hell in a Bucket (14,091 bytes) (change wording so it doesn't look like I'm sayin I'm admin)
 * Want me to just restore one those from the history, so you can examine it? I can also restore the entire page history if you want. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:40, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks the first one would be fine without the other history, 17 August 2014 Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅. You'll now see it as the earliest revision of that page. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:58, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Ben Perry
Its a reasonable article and shows good importance and should be undeleted asap. -Hulkster1 (talk) 19:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  the panda ₯’  19:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Original 13th Amendment
I, GLOOG1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. GLOOG1 (talk) 19:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Unless someone else here disagrees and they're willing to do it. The submission has been deleted three times already, and as far as I can tell it's an opinionated essay based solely on synthesis and original research, plus material apparently only found on your website. The chances of this actually making it out of AFC are essentially zero. Wikipedia is not the place to promote your theories, nor do we indefinitely host material for people. That's what their own websites or blogs are for. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:03, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
I, Mamad15, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mamad15 (talk) 14:12, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PEPPOL (Pan‐European Public Procurement Online)
I, Clancger, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Clancger (talk) 16:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Want to edit and resubmit article for publication -Clancger (talk) 16:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia; but I have doubts whether this can be made acceptable - it reads as the project telling the world about itself, based entirely on its own documents and website, but an encyclopedia article should largely summarise what has been written about the subject independently; hence the WP:Notability requirement for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 20:16, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Type 2 Translate (2)
I, Tolui123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tolui123 (talk) 18:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:19, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Loughman
I, 1405jay1405, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 1405jay1405 (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

I wish to have the article undeleted as I still want to access the information I had saved in the draft article, as I intended to retrieve it at a later date, I was just obviously too late in editing it, but would also then like to amend the information to eventually resubmit the article for publishing -1405jay1405 (talk) 17:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. As well as responding to the notability concerns, I would advise dropping the entire "BAE Audio" section, which is a blatant advertisement full of promotional fluff: "proud heritage of producing the highest-quality Neve replications available... meticulous attention to detail and superior craftsmanship... highest quality components... decidedly progressive view... unique point of integration... " etc. Nothing remotely like that will ever be accepted for Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MC Rockwale
I, Daniyel22, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Daniyel22 (talk) 20:08, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Jennivro/sandbox
I, Jennivro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jennivro (talk) 03:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

I would like to continue working on this article as I have time now -Jennivro (talk) 03:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * In keeping with our naming/location conventions for AfC articles, I've moved it to Draft:Penny Wise Budoff. I've left the redirect behind so you can find it a little easier. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

EDMI Limited
The deletion discussions were ongoing and the reply from the person who voted against was pending. Apart from that only one person has voted against it. -Anee jose (talk) 09:59, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Userfied: the closing administrator, user, closed WP:Articles for deletion/EDMI Limited as a WP:SOFTDELETE, so I have restored it to User:Anee jose/EDMI Limited where you can work on it. Please get permission from Secret before you restore it to the main encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Charlotte North Rotary Club
I, Sxgautam, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sxgautam (talk) 10:27, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Kochrob42
BeanKD (talk) 14:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC) This page was created as a brief editing assignment in my social cognition course at University at Buffalo. I asked students to create brief biographical sketches which included at least two headings, one of which must include two subheadings. They were also asked to link to additional wikipedia pages and include at least one citation. This assignment was so that students could get experience in this user environment prior to editing pages related to course content. The pages are not meant to be up long-term, unless a student wants them to be and they conform to wikipedia guidelines. However, this one was not even up long enough for me to see (and therefore evaluate) it. -BeanKD (talk) 14:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC) BeanKD (talk) 14:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)BeanKD
 * ✅ - restored. Sorry about that: the formatting and the use of the third person gave a New Page Patroller the impression that it was an attempt to produce an autobiographical article, but it should not have been deleted.


 * The main Wikipedia user page for each account is intended for the contributor to say something about themself and their Wikipedia work, and we do have some trouble with people whose only purpose here is to create an elaborate Facebook-style userpage. Limited biographical information like this is acceptable; but it would be a good idea to advise your students to write in the first person. See WP:User pages for more information. If you move on to more elaborate exercises, they would be better done in sandbox pages.
 * Have a look at WP:SUP, which contains links to useful advice about using Wikipedia in an educational setting. JohnCD (talk) 16:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Fluxdave/Floify
I, Fluxdave, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fluxdave (talk) 13:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Atomic Hydrogen Power
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -HACNY (talk) 19:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC) Someone wants to delete my article or has on Atomic Hydrogen Power. Otherwise, there is no such article explaining much about the atomic hydrogen welding machine either, or the concepts involved in developing it in the 1920s by GE. My article is composed of mostly quotes from science and trade articles from the creators of atomic hydrogen power including Nobel Prize winner Dr. Langmuir credited with its creation in 1911. The workers that used the atomic hydrogen welder in the 1920s and later, were made to wear heavy equipment and photographic film to measure radiation levels from the technology. Dr. Langmuir is credited with breaking the hydrogen atom in 1911. I am trying to contribute a look at early clean energy technology, and the confusion is why Dr. Langmuir broke the hydrogen atom, and Wikipedia does not want to have an article about that. HACNY (talk) 19:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * . You wrote the article in the context of welding, and we already have an article atomic hydrogen welding, which you could have expanded and improved instead of creating a subject fork. That is the only reason why it was deleted. The deletion has nothing to do with your assertion that Wikipedia "does not want to have an article" about what you wrote. The reality is, Wikipedia doesn't want to have two separate articles about essentially the same subject. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

- My article on Atomic Hydrogen Power was more detailed with how the atomic hydrogen welder was developed by GE and the scientists involved, as well as by General Electric I wrote for an encyclopedia not a dictionary. It was not a duplicate and the atomic hydrogen welder was just one of the stomic hydrogen products discussed. I had several sections regarding Atomic Hydrogen Power and some of the scientists involved with quotes and more than eight pages of material. It is quite possible that my Atomic Hydrogen Power article was way too advanced for Wikipedia, but that does not give Wikipedia the right to be unkind and try to make my Atomic Hydrogen Power article look like a duplicate. How come Wikipedia does not have any in depth articles on clean energy technology before 1930? No one at Wikipedia has answered this. I want my Atomic Hydrogen Power article put back up. HACNY (talk) 17:54, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Union County Schools, South Carolina
I, TheEnglishTeacher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TheEnglishTeacher (talk) 17:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Atomic Hydrogen Power (2nd request)
My Atomic Hydrogen Power (1911-1945) was deleted by VQuakr (talk) even though no one seemed to complain about it while it was up. The Atomic Hydrogen Power article is mainly a discussion of early Atomic Hydrogen Power scientists with mainly quotes and more than 25 sources including Nobel Prize winning scientists such as Dr. Irving Langmuir. Further, I discuss General Electric's involvement in it as development of an Atomic Hydrogen Power machine prior to 1930, the current General Electric article on Wikipedia by someone else does not mention much about GE until after 1940, or their involvement in trying to create clean energy. I believe that VQuakr (talk) is overstepping himself, or there is some bias involved in his deleting my Atomic Hydrogen Power article for what he considers verbiage. Nobel scientists called it "atomic hydrogen" and that seems correct according to their own writings. HACNY (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Sections combined as they are about the same topic, but do not have the same text. Note also the current request higher on this page, here--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:57, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

I have not received a straight forward answer as to why my Atomic Hydrogen Power article was deleted. It was accurate, and not a duplicate, had several sections on different Atomic Hydrogen Power topics, and was more than eight pages with quotes from notable scientists including Nobel Prize winner Dr. Irving Langmuir and others, with more than 25 sources. So far, I have been given unacceptable responses that have no bearing on the reality of what my Atomic Hydrogen Power article conveys, nor about its contribution as an article to early clean energy technology development prior to 1930, and its discussion about General Electric prior to 1930 and the scientists involved in its development. HACNY (talk) 18:02, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done You already received an answer to this same request yesterday. Repeatedly posting the same thing is not going to get you anywhere. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Mr. Lee (producer)
This is a informational Page for Multi Platinum Producer Mr lee. This is not being used as a promotional item. wiki is using our image for a incorrect page titled Mr. Lee (rapper). if we need to file a infringement to take this down we will do so lets get this resolved as its been years with this incorrect image damaging and causing misinterpretation online thank you "Save page" button below -68.116.154.104 (talk) 10:35, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The article Mr. Lee (producer), about Leroy Williams Jr., has not been deleted, and is not proposed for deletion. The image in it is labelled "Multi-platinum producer", so presumably it is the correct Mr. Lee. The other article Mr. Lee (rapper), about a different person called Lee Haggard, has no image. So I don't understand what your problem is, or what you want us to do - please explain? JohnCD (talk) 13:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Looking again at the rather complicated history, I see that the first article had in fact been deleted, but was restored before I saw this request. JohnCD (talk) 19:26, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/By the sea recovery sober living
I, 2602:306:c576:5dd0:a4cd:7e88:b0df:2607, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:306:c576:5dd0:a4cd:7e88:b0df:2607 (talk) 19:10, 21 October 2014
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Wm256/George Coleridge-Taylor
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Wm256 (talk) 20:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:41, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lisa Tener
I, Jeanietask, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jeanietask (talk) 22:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)