Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 168

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/W.H. Bagshaw Company
I, 95.93.88.72, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 95.93.88.72 (talk) 07:17, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ the article is a copyright violation of http://www.whbagshaw.com/the-oldest-pin-manufacturer-in-usa/ -- GB fan 12:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

umesh upadhyay
The reason was deletion states that unverifiable sources were provided. However, the information on the article was correctly sourced with the individual mentioned in numerous leading newspapers articles in India. He is presently the President News of Network 18, India's largest news network and certainly a notable figure in the Indian media. -14.141.31.228 (talk) 06:36, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. -- GB fan 12:17, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Willy Monfret
I would wish to have Willy Monfret undeleted because i believe that the last year he got more noticeable for Wikipedia. He played the lead role in Nicki Minaj's short movie The Pinkprint Movie, which led to him being known worldwide. His fans are searching him online and can't find anything about him on Wikipedia. Hope this will be reconsidered and thank you in advance -Louiseenv (talk) 12:40, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Willy Monfret, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. -- GB fan 13:06, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

an insignificant harvey
The film has sufficient supported references to proof it is a full length feature film and is notable under the guidelines, as it appears to have had significant release and media coverage internationally -Vitality Media (talk) 18:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. -- GB fan 13:44, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Kuwait Financial Centre
Dear Editor,

Kindly request you to state down the advertising points associated in the article for Kuwait Financial centre. The organization in one of the reputed firm in Kuwait and supports many social economic events in the country which is now added to the article. The intention is to represent an oldest investment bank of Kuwait -Anischief (talk) 06:32, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * @Anischief:  Encyclopedia articles don't have sections on "key milestones". I was going to say that sentences like "Since its inception, Markaz has focused on the development of its human resources as an essential element of success and growth" are straight from an advertisement brochure, but then I realized in this case they literally are, since you blatantly infringed on the bank's copyright by copying and pasting the content from there. Don't copy and paste copyrighted material again.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:44, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

umesh upadhyay
The page is related to an eminent personality in the Indian media -122.177.68.236 (talk) 16:29, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. -- GB fan 13:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

CSpace
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -50.82.34.88 (talk) 17:54, 29 December 2014 (UTC) Page was deleted due to dubious notability. The service in question was recently revealed to be a top concern for the NSA as a means of providing anonymity to terrorists (as can be seen on page 20 here http://www.spiegel.de/media/media-35535.pdf which was sourced from this article here http://www.pcworld.com/article/2863972/tor-truecrypt-tails-topped-the-nsas-most-wanted-list-in-2012.html)
 * ✅ The article was restored in January of 2010 to a user space draft.  I have now moved it to the draft namespace, Draft:CSpace, so you can work on it.  -- GB fan 18:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Devil Dub
A9 after several years of existence because there was not yet a band article, now there is. -87.178.245.96 (talk) 02:43, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- GB fan 13:40, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, please also undelete File:Devildub.jpg to complete the article undeletion. 93.222.87.6 (talk) 13:56, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- GB fan 18:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tigran Maytesian
I, 95.67.102.245, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 95.67.102.245 (talk) 10:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

The subject of the article is significant as it goes about a prominent contemporary Belgian-Armenian violinist and scientist whose notability is evidenced by a lot of independent reliable sources published -95.67.102.245 (talk) 10:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 18:08, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Sobia_Khan
Please undelete my article named Sobia Khan. I will improve it by giving more information and references. Sobia Khan is a popular actress of Pakistan and has contributed so much for entertainment industry in Pakistan. She deserves a place on Wikipedia. Thanks. -Touseef1983 (talk) 18:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Darick Robertson
I own the photo and copyright to the photo and have provided reference to said image already -Darick Robertson (talk) 00:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC);
 * The image was clearly labelled as by Aaron Munter. Who owns the rights? You or him? In any case you need to email OTRS to formally confirm the license and release before we can act. We almost certainly need to hear from Aaron too. you probably should read Donating_copyrighted_materials too. Spartaz Humbug! 09:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Techmoan
Because it took me a long time to write the page and I would at least like the content back if the page cant be restored on wiki. Or could it please be returned to the draft stage so I can work on it and meet the requirements before republishing it? I do understand it my need to be rewritten for wikipedia but I would like my writing just for my own use as well, and as a starting point to re write the page. Thanks. -The barbarian of Trevor (talk) 03:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I have userfied it to User:The barbarian of Trevor/Techmoan. Work on it or take whatever content you want to go somewhere other than Wikipedia. As far as I can tell this is simply not an appropriate topic or an article, and cannot be until Techmoan gains the type of independent coverage in reliable secondary sources that are needed to show notability and allow verification of content. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

101 Ranch Oil Company
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jcmcapital (talk) 13:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC) Page Name: 101 Ranch Oil Company This is a significant article about CONOCO's first oil well and CONOCO's founders, with much of the information already provided to the CONOCO museum, Ponca City. At some point someone deleted the footnotes, and I have no idea how to restore them. I could use your help. Jim Murray (McCaskey's youngest living grandson).
 * There is nothing to undelete here. You will see that what was in the notes section is now in the references and further reading sections. see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=101_Ranch_Oil_Company&oldid=475289369 for a version before User:Yutsi made a change to split this up. Other versions can be seen in the history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem)
I, 88.203.164.1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 88.203.164.1 (talk) 09:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Welsh Local Elections 2012
I, 94.5.187.3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 94.5.187.3 (talk) 11:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

talk:Articles for creation/Bertheau's law
I, The vertigo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The vertigo (talk) 07:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bertheau's law Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harden Askenasy
I, Mdujovny, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mdujovny (talk) 07:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Clue: To show notabiliity we need what others have written about him, rather than his own writings. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

McCall College
Article was deleted before I could return to edit. I do not have a copy of all my work and would appreciate the recovery of the work so that the article can be modified. -DrLBWilliams (talk) 23:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually it is not deleted, but is here: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/McCall College Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bob Wingo
I, DonegalWinner, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DonegalWinner (talk) 15:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 15:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Virgin_Atlantic_Flight_43
Virgin Flight 43 Emergency Landing is an ongoing current event. Speedy deleting it under A7 makes no sense, please reinstate the article. People look to wikipedia for unbiased just-the-facts content for current events around the world. This is one. As time passes it's likely that this article will grow to include links to the AAIB report for the incident. Speedy Deleting it while the event is ongoing and people are looking for information about relatives etc is very unhelpful. Does popularity (views) not get considered when speedy deleting an article?
 * ❌. Please read WP:NOT. It seems very unlikely that this incident will be notable enough for an encyclopedia article - see also WP:EVENT. I do not think it even meets the lower standard of WP:AIRCRASH for mention in an airport, airline or aircraft article. You can discuss this with the deleting administrator,, and if he does not agree you can go to WP:Deletion review, but my advice is that you will be wasting your time, unless this story turns out to be more than "airliner makes emergency landing with undercarriage problem, nobody hurt". JohnCD (talk) 18:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Cultural Marxism
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -207.180.139.66 (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted and redirected to Frankfurt School after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Cultural Marxism (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 18:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phyllis McCrady
To continue editting Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Cgoodale1 (talk) 19:02, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 19:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Productions (US)
I, Bcsheehan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bcsheehan (talk) 19:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 19:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roy Oppenheim
 Sociallyfein (talk) 19:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 19:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Monroe County, Indiana
This page was deleted as an empty category, but it is no longer empty. -—Granger (talk · contribs) 21:02, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I've never restored a category before, so let me know if I borked it up. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

bagillt heritage society
Article needs further editing to improve relevance and show citations -Chrisowensbagillt (talk) 23:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 03:25, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌. Wikipedia's inclusion criterion is called Notability and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:Notability (summary). Not many local organizations like this can pass that test. If you think you can provide independent references to show notability, reply below here and I will "userfy" the article - move it into a sub-page in your "user space" where you can work on it; but if not, it would be a waste of your time. JohnCD (talk) 11:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Derwin Pereira
I would like to request an undeletion of this entry, since the entry's subject is a well-known public figure in Southeast Asia, and heavily involved in US and Indonesia's relations. The deletion was originally made because the entry was written by a banned user: I'd like to write/edit the entry from scratch, so could you please remove the ban? -10:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Mollmichaella (talk)
 * I'm somewhat leery of doing this since the sockpuppet in question (User:Mamadoutadioukone) is someone who frequently made up new ones. You're a brand new user and I'll be painfully honest: the first question on everyone's mind is whether or not you are a new sockpuppet of Mamadoutadioukone. I'm actually mildly tempted to run you through SPI just to make sure that you aren't related to this person because the socking has been fairly persistent. If you're not related then this SPI will clear you of that concern. If you are, then this would result in the new account getting blocked as a sockpuppet. What is kind of pushing me to do this is that you've created a new article (Lazada Indonesia) that is fairly promotional in how it was written. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree with Tokyogirl and, unless she gets there first, will add your account who has added your account to be checked as part of the SPI (sockpuppet investigation). If you are not connected with the Mamadoutadioukone ring of paid editors, you have nothing to fear. In any case, the existing article will not be undeleted: what you should do is, prepare a draft at Draft:Derwin Pereira and, if it is accepted, ask, the administrator who protected the title, to unprotect it so that the draft can be moved to the main encyclopedia. I am sorry if this all seems unwelcoming, but Wikipedia suffers greatly from paid promotional editing, and will become just another internet advertising site unless we can control it. JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi. I understand that you need to look into this, and I absolutely don't mind. I have no connection to the banned user, and I'd be more than happy to upload the draft as suggested. As for Lazada Indonesia, I was just writing about it as part of my interest in Indonesia, and it seemed appropriate, following many mentions of the website in the press around the festive shopping season. If you all agree it's not a suitable entry, I can start a conversation in the Talk Page regarding suggested edits.Mollmichaella (talk) 11:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:File-Tej_Narayan_Pandey.jpg
I have taken this photo from my personal camera.so i would like to request you please do not delete "Save page" button below -Ankit Tiwari (talk) 12:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It is not deleted yet, but go to File:File-Tej Narayan Pandey.jpg click edit and add some text to say that you took it yourself on your camera, when, and also decide what copyright you want to give it. I recommend CC-BY-SA-3.0. However File:Tej Narayan Pandey.jpg is a duplicate of the same problem, and the metadata does not look it came from a camera, so what else have you done to the image? It looks like it's off a web page. Perhaps taken from  http://hindi.pardaphash.com/news/--730255/730255.html or off facebook. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Angel Sessions - Would like to remove the issue and resubmit
My article was deleted for 2 reasons. First, for a reference to IMDB about a movie that Angel was in, however on the page was her bio. That was the problem. The other issue as to do with information in the "infobox" namely Singer/Songwriter. I can remove that, however I see many other article with the exact same title. Why is it an issue on my article. Angel is a Singer/Songwriter. Can I re-paste the code and start over or do I have to wait for you to undelete my article first. Thanks. Demetrius Guidry -16:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)108.251.108.176 (talk)
 * . ❌. The page Draft:Angel Sessions was deleted because it was a copyright violation, copied from IMDb. I know that IMDB article has your name on it, but copyright has serious legal implications, and it is not enough that someone on the end of a wire says he wrote it. We have to be certain that the actual copyright owner understands and agrees to the terms of Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA license, which allows any reader to copy, modify and re-use for any purpose including commercial. If you want to release this material for use in Wikipedia, the way to do that is explained at Donating copyrighted materials. JohnCD (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

CAMP: A FASD Community
CAMP: A FASD Community is an up an coming nonprofit organization affiliated with DePaul University, Northwestern University, and the American Camp Association. The sole and explicit intent of the article is to organize and concise the over 100 pages of our operations manual, and to make this information available to public. No advertising is needed given the clientele and the organizations we are partnering with. The operations manual for our organizations can be provided to entities seeking validity. -Nicholastassone (talk) 17:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about organizations and companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning organizations or companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. See also Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause.


 * I am afraid you have not understood what Wikipedia is about - not your fault, we do not explain it as well as we should to new users. It is an encyclopedia, not a notice-board site for up-and-coming organizations to tell the world about themselves. As the organization's CEO, you have a Conflict of interest and should not be writing about it here, see also the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 18:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Burt C. Hopkins draft
I, Brittany9476, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Brittany9476 (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * @Brittany9476:  Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:09, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Fandel
I, Reinkefj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. john (talk) 23:34, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:15, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Angel Sessions
I am the owner of the IMDB page. I am the person who wrote that article. Do not copy someone else's material and put it in Wiki. To prevent any controversy I will remove the reference to IMDB completely. Also how do I fix the Singer/Songwriter issue. Thanks again. Demetrius Guidry 108.251.108.176 (talk) 17:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC) -108.251.108.176 (talk) 17:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It's not a case of removing a reference to IMDb: you must either make a copyright release or write the material in different words, without copying sentences or even WP:Close paraphrasing. I don't see any "singer/songwriter issue" except that an early version which was speedy-deleted was titled "Singer/songwriter Angel Sessions." That wasn't the reason for deletion, but in fact we don't put occupations in article titles like that, the right title for an article about a person is just their name, unless something needs to be added to distinguish them from others with the same name. JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I do kind of have to warn you that there's really no true ownership of stuff on IMDb, as Huong Hoang learned to her dismay when they posted her age on her profile. Yes, they do try to make the person or company happy, but ultimately the only people who own an IMDb page... is IMDb. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Dhansheel Kumar
This page is created by myself and does not harms anyone and it is not illegal and purily created by me, so kindly restore my page -Dhansheel kumar (talk) 08:53, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * It was deleted via AfD, where it was decided that Kumar (yourself, I presume) did not pass notability guidelines. You've already been warned about re-creating an article for the film Be Quiet (which was also deleted at AfD for notability reasons), so please be aware that continually re-adding pages can lead to you being blocked. Repeatedly re-adding pages deleted at AfD and not going through the proper channels for re-creation (deletion review) can be seen as disruptive and since you appear to be editing to try to add yourself and your films to Wikipedia, it can also be seen as very promotional. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:48, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually... it looks like this is all you're trying to do, as you also appear to be trying to get around the salting and deletions at Shubham Prakash by re-creating the article at User:Gautam7jan. I hate to sound like the mean editor, but I don't see where you're here to edit about anything other than yourself, so I'm going to ask for you to be blocked. Since I started one of the AfDs I'm technically involved, but if anyone else here admin-wise wants to do it, I'd be much obliged. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:49, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done I'm going to save others the time- the article was deleted and the editor has been blocked, so restoration in any way is pretty unlikely. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Dhansheel Kumar
This is my page created by myself only and i am the administrator for the wikipedia page named Dhansheel kaumar. so, kindly restore my page as soon as possible. it's a humble request from my side -182.66.18.168 (talk) 10:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done This won't be done. It's extremely unlikely that it will be restored anytime soon and even besides that, you've been blocked for re-creating the various pages so many times. Trying to request the page get restored by posting under an IP can be seen as WP:BLOCK EVASION. I'll admit that it's extremely unlikely that you will be unblocked, but if you want to be unblocked then you need to sign back into your account and ask SuperMarioMan to unblock you, although I will warn you that any unblocking will hinge upon you not re-creating any of these pages. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * What you have not understood is that Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves - see WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 10:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I also forgot to mention that there is no ownership of pages on Wikipedia and that you are not the administrator of the page even if you are the individual or one of his representatives. All pages must pass notability guidelines in some form or fashion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   11:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

glee programming language
I am the author of this programming language and use it every day. The language is available through my website "WithGLEE.com" as a free download and has been since about 2001. I did not create the original article or contribute to it in any way. However, I did read it once and found it correct, informative, and useful to anyone making an inquiry about the language. It has recently been called to my attention that the article no longer exists (and I have confirmed that). I think the article should exist and would like to know 1) Why it was removed?; 2) What it would take to reinstate it?

GLEE is "not" a commercial venture though that should not matter (there is article about Ford I am sure). It "is" a very useful language. Since I didn't create the article (nor do I know who did) I don't think it should be considered some kind of "vanity" page. Nowhere in the article I remember reading do I remember my name mentioned and it is nowhere mentioned at WithGLEE.com.

I do believe it is a useful and important work. While development has been latent for some time, it is still in development and it has always been usable and accessible in the form described.

Your respectful attention to this inquiry is warmly requested.

Thanks .... Todd B. Marshall Creator of the GLEE programming language -WithGLEE (talk) 12:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Glee (programming language), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.


 * The criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia is called Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also WP:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2015 (UTC)


 * ❌ It looks like this was deleted 7.5 years ago see Glee (programming language) and Articles for deletion/Glee (programming language).  The last information is now over 10 years old.  So if things have changed and there are now independent references available, then it will be fair enough to recreate it, and if it is recreated and shows notability, the history can then be restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Tommy Sotomayor
I, Freddiestoner, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Freddiestoner (talk) 13:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tommy Sotomayor (2) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:10, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Mat Gleason
 Empress-of-angels (talk) 14:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * @Empress-of-angels:  Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!"--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

HegedusAndras.jpg
File was deleted as "Unused non-free media" that was only unused as removed by now blocked user. File was used on András Hegedüs and has been reinstated on article by JamesBWatson reversion here -KylieTastic (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Bangladesh Buddhist Students' Council
I am a member of Bangladesh Buddhist Students' Council. Its been 6 years we have established it. We have already our facebook group https://www.facebook.com/groups/teambbsc/. And a page https://www.facebook.com/teambbsc. we already stepped to create our own website. It needs some time. So I/We wanted to create an article of our organization 'Bangladesh Buddhist Students' Council' on Wikipedia. i was going to add our logo and events details on this morning. But i got that its been deleted. Please inform me what i need to add in this article to be on Wiki -কথন (talk) 04:23, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The issue is that ultimately there was nothing there to show how your group is ultimately notable enough to warrant an entry on Wikipedia. Just existing as a student council is not enough to pass notability guidelines- the group would have to have received coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS) that are independent of your group and in places that would be considered reliable per Wikipedia's guidelines. This usually means that your group has received in-depth coverage in newspapers and other media outlets that are not affiliated with your group or school. There was also an issue with promotion since you listed the group's goals and objectives in a manner that came across as you trying to promote the group. This may have been unintentional, but that's part of the reason why Wikipedia typically tends to recommend that people with a conflict of interest (WP:COI) not create their own page since it's so easy to make something seem promotional when that wasn't the intent. Offhand I don't know that the group would pass notability guidelines because the notability requirements on here are fairly strict (WP:ORG) and a quick search did not really bring up anything to show that the Bangladesh Buddhist Students' Council has received enough news and media coverage to prove otherwise. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:QTOBR
I, Pstaylor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pstaylor (talk) 01:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC) I have been collecting more source material to complete this article. Please let me have what I have already written. -Pstaylor (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The_Bloody_Alboz
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -TheBloodyAlboz05 (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. We will not restore A7 deletions here, either. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I've left a message on their talk page about the potential COI username and basic notability for bands/performers. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The Knowledge Steez
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -107.167.107.11 (talk) 06:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -107.167.107.11 (talk) 06:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

In my understanding, the page was deleted for wrong reasons. The page depicts the information about a portal that has gained huge popularity in India and is serving as an educational portal too. The page also mentiones its achievements as a non for profit organizations and the different initiatives it has taken to make people aware of their rights in ots best possible capacity. If even this statement of pacts turns out to be advertisement, I believe advertisement and statement of facts would be synonymous then. Kindly make a review and undelete the page. I will be highly grateful for this kindness of yours.
 * X mark.svg Not done Advertisement and statements of facts are not synonymous on Wikipedia. They are very, very different. This is where Wikipedia differs from other sites that would be considered routine database websites where you can be promotional and it's accepted, even encouraged by the webmasters. The long and short is that the page was still promotional and even then, I don't see where the organization passes notability guidelines. It doesn't matter how good their work is (WP:NOTSOAPBOX), if they haven't received coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the group and are in depth, they don't pass the notability guidelines and cannot have an article on Wikipedia. Notability is decided on coverage, not merit. Doing good things can make it more likely that someone or something will gain coverage, but sadly it is not a guarantee. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, WP:A7 articles in general are not restored through here. You can ask the deleting admins, but I think that it would be unlikely that they would restore the page given that it had promotional overtones throughout the article and would (at best) require a complete re-write to meet WP:NPOV guidelines. You could also try going through deletion review (WP:DRV) but I think that they'd probably agree that right now the organization does not appear to pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Kusumrai Anjaria
I, Rupen.anjaria, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rupen.anjaria (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The Knowledge Steez (2nd request)
In my understanding, the page was deleted for wrong reasons. The page depicts the information about a portal that has gained huge popularity in India and is serving as an educational portal too. The page also mentiones its achievements as a non for profit organizations and the different initiatives it has taken to make people aware of their rights in ots best possible capacity. If even this statement of pacts turns out to be advertisement, I believe advertisement and statement of facts would be synonymous then. Kindly make a review and undelete the page. I will be highly grateful for this kindness of yours. -Tej049 (talk) 11:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ The page was deleted as being an advertisement. If you cannot see a way to write this without promoting the topic, then I suggest that you leave the topic for someone else to write about. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Also Tej049, please see my comments at the first request as to why it's very unlikely that the page will be restored. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   14:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Terradise
I, Djhaldeman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Djhaldeman (talk) 15:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I guess you missed my reply here to your request on 9 December, which said that the article has been accepted and is now at Terradise where you are welcome to continue to develop it. JohnCD (talk) 15:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Ramdas Palsule
Pandit Ramdas Palsule is a very familiar name to the worshippers of Hindustani music, being an accomplished soloist as well as a versatile accompanist. Pandit Ramdas Palsule is a very familiar name to the worshippers of Hindustani music as an intellectual Tabla Player who has carved a niche for himself at a very young age. Ramdas has been recognized as one of the senior most disciples of the famous tabla maestro Pandit Suresh Talwalkar. Ramdas-ji being an accomplished soloist as well as a versatile accompanist has performed widely in all the eminent music festivals of India. Outside India, he has performed all over the world including countries like U.S.A., Canada, Germany, Australia, Africa and the Gulf Countries. His Tabla accompaniment ranges from distinguished vocalists to prominent instrumentalists and also to renowned Kathak dancers of the country. He has accompanied many artists, which includes Late Pandit Jeetendra Abhisheki, Pandit Jasraj, Pandit Shivkumar Sharma, Pandit Ulhas Kashalkar, Ustad Shahid Parvez, Ustad Sulatan Khan, Pandit Vishwamohan Bhatt, Pandit Tarun Bhattacharya, Dr. N. Rajam, Pandit Ronu Majoomdar, Mrs. Malini Rajurkar, Mrs. Veena Sahastrbuddhe, Mrs. Rohini Bhate, Mrs. Shama Bhate, and Smt. Shashwati Sen.

I was just adding good information in the article with right references and suddenly the article got deleted. Please Undo the page deletion....I, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted article. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Coolgama (talk) I have been collecting more source material to complete this article. Please let me have what I have already written. Thanks -Coolgama (talk) 12:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done Please add more independent references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Appreciate Graeme Bartlett. I would put my best efforts to improve the article.... Coolgama (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Makara vyuha
the reason specified for the page deletion is imaginary and the concept is discussed only in mahabaharata but isnt every religion we know about based on some or other fact that we may tag to be imaginary but that dosent mean the the thing is real or not these vyuhs discussed in mahabaharata are something that we may want to know about just because the formation was discussed only in mahabaharata dosent mean that it is imaginary and we have every right to know it if it is stated in a text as old as mahabaharata -103.226.7.190 (talk) 16:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * - please give the exact title of the deleted page you mean. We have never had an article Makara vyuha, or Makara Vyuha, or any of the variations I have tried. If you don't know the exact title, give the username of the account that created the page. JohnCD (talk) 16:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I also couldn't find anything, not at AfD or via a general search of the speedy deletion wiki. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   17:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Obviously guessing is not our job but I always take it as a fun challenge to try to track down what a user might have meant in a cryptic post like this. My stretched guess is Shakatavyuha(Cart Formation) which has "vyuha" as part of it's name, was recently deleted, and mentions mahabaharata in its text.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think so, because at Bhishma there are eight vyuhas listed, and that's a different one. I agree, it's a challenge, and that list gives new ideas for searches like Makara vyuha (crocodile formation), but I haven't found anything on those lines, either. JohnCD (talk) 21:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shook (musician)
I, Marcusmiller92, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marcusmiller92 (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tracey Whitney
I, TraceyWhitney, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TraceyWhitney (talk) 00:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I would advise you to read WP:Autobiography before continuing. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 03:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. As Jeremy says, you should read WP:Autobiography, and also WP:MUSICBIO and WP:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 16:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lois Weiss
I, Firefly51, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Firefly51 (talk) 00:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:FailCoin
I, 2.222.48.169, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2.222.48.169 (talk) 16:11, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done The draft was a blatant copyright infringement, copying and pasting the text from Failcoin's website (it was also highly inappropriate content for an encyclopedia article).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:32, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:WebPositive
A draft of changes that was created collaboratively for a pre-existing article was deleted by an admin as a duplicate. The deleted draft is requested to be undeleted or preferably merged into the master article (WebPositive). Admin is active on wikipedia, but is not responding to communication -Dlpkbr (talk) 01:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅. I was going to attend to this myself, but it appears has already taken care of it. The histories have been merged. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * (e/c) Yes check.svg Done A history merge has been performed. In the future just make edits directly. This draft was technically a copyright violation by the way (though not the type we nuke on sight). You must provide proper copyright attribution when you copy an existing page (or content from one article into another). See WP:PATT for how to provide attribution. It's much better to make such edits directly. In this case a history merge was not a problem because there was no overlapping edits but when there are, it is a problem, and then we have to just do a merge (which is different than a history merge) and messily requires the merge-from page to remain permanently somewhere because it's history is the source of the merged content (to be clear one person can copy a page to a draft, work on its there, and then if that same person makes their drafted changes to the existing article, and the draft incorporates no changes from other people, there is no copyright issue and no merge is needed).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)