Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 174

Draft:Virtuoso Guitarist Michael Laucke
I, OneMinuteContracts, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. OneMinuteContracts (talk) 12:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done: The page was deleted as a copyright violation (not under G13) because major parts were copy-pasted from here. No indication that the Wikipedia author is the copyright holder, or that the Segal Centre for Performing Arts has released that content under a free license. Even if the copyright issues were resolved, the copy-pasted text would be unduly promotional and would not make a good encyclopedia article. Huon (talk) 12:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Webrex Technologies
I am Finding more information about this topic, I create this for information purpose about topic, Please restore it according to Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13 -Sandeep8851 (talk) 09:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ This article was not deleted under WP:CSD, it was deleted (four times) under WP:CSD no indication of significance or importance, and the title was protected because repeated re-creation was wasting everyone's time. Read WP:Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:Notability (summary). What is needed is evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." List entries, Wikimapia, Youtube etc show that the company exists, but not that it is notable in Wikipedia's sense. It is quite a difficult standard, and many perfectly good companies are not notable, but Wikipedia is not a business listing directory. If you think you can show notability, use WP:Articles for creation to make a draft article for someone to review. JohnCD (talk) 19:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Resolution Capital
I, Metkoht, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Metkoht (talk) 16:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello,

Sadly I have been unable to use any online resources for the last 7 months. I am now back on line. I see that my submission for an article (captioned above) had some issues and was accelerated to deletion on the basis of a speedy decision. I am prepared to edit asd considered appropriate but need the draft recativated. Thank you for your assistance.

Met, Tallinn
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:European Resolution Capital. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harvard Laboratory for Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis
I, Mrmainelli, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. mrmainelli 18:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Harvard Laboratory for Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!"} JohnCD (talk) 20:09, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

ExpertScape
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -S.Burntout123 (talk) 22:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. A7s won't be restored as-is, but you can request the page be restored as a draft after it gets deleted. I've removed the references, as they have no bearing on this request (and are best of being used to cite the page if it is still live anyways). — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 23:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Hassan Akkouch
i intend to start this article as i haven't even started this and i have made it official by accident-A Helping Hand Here (talk) 23:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. A7s won't be restored as-is, but you can request the page be restored as a draft after it gets deleted. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 23:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

ExpertScape
Please userfy to a draft page (maybe Draft:ExpertScape) -S.Burntout123 (talk) 03:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

. We have asked the deleting editor who re-deleted the article on "ExpertScape" (despite contest) to start a discussion and evaluation with due process and to allow a healthy period of review and discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expertscape S.Burntout123 (talk) 01:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC) . The editor responded: "No, speedy deletes are just that, speedy. They don't require a discussion.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)" . This response would not qualify the action and may misrepresent the true spirit of "collaborative" nature of Wikipedia. You deleted the article on "ExpertScape" despite contest to start a discussion and evaluation with due process and despite the request to allow a healthy period of review and discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expertscape Honestly I have no idea who or what runs the ExpertScape, and I am not even sure if this is a company or enterprise or autopilot web operation. I know that "notability" is met here, since the nationally renowned medical centers and USA based medical schools refer to ExpertScape rankings. If so the Wikipedia is warranted to have a neutral reference about this. One would benefit from seeing an informative article that is not promotional but indeed critical and questions certain angles such as source of funding and other limits. . Finally, EoRdE6 suggested: "To get Expertscape back I would suggest heading over to WP:UNDELETE and asking for Expertscape to be "userfied to Draft:Expertscape. Sound good? EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 02:19, 1 February 2015 (UTC)" . Given the above mentioned significance and the deliberations, I hereby ask to un-delete the article.S.Burntout123 (talk) 03:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Significance


 * The sources listed are (1) a blog post by the company's managing partner (whatever that title means) and (2), (3) a couple of press releases. Reference (1), the blog post, doesn't even seem to support the vague and self-serving puffery given above.  This is an advertisement masquerading (poorly) as an article.  Bluntly, the text that he is asking for us to undelete is probably virtually unsalvageable; if there is an article to be written about this company it would be better to start from scratch.  (At a minimum, before undeleting this mess to anywhere on Wikipedia, Burntout123 should demonstrate there exists at least one reliable source about this company that would clear even the rather low bar of WP:CORP.) TenOfAllTrades(talk) 06:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Not an admin, so I cannot see the article, but I would point out that the deleted article Burnt-out diabetes mellitus has been in the editor's userspace (User:Burntout123/Burnt-out diabetes mellitus) since May 2010, and he hasn't done any appreciable work on it since May 2011, despite his stated intention to do so in 2013. Given this history, and the fact that Experscape has been deleted 4 times by 3 different admins for lack of notability, I suggest that userfying this article will only keep it alive on Wikipedia without resulting in any improvement which would make it suitable for mainspace. BMK (talk) 06:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I also have to ask: Why does Burntout123 need to have the deleted article userfied, when he has a version of it in his userspace at User:Burntout123/sandbox, put there on January 4, 2015? BMK (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Among other reasons, because I've just deleted that, since his edit summary creating the sandbox said right out that it was there for no other reason than to circumvent deletion. &mdash;Cryptic 08:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Looking at the deleted versions of the article, the speedy deletions look justified, and there's nothing of value worth undeleting. -- Kinu  t/c 08:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If WP:REFUND regulars are wondering why there's an unusual amount of third-party commentary here, see WP:ANI. &mdash;Cryptic 09:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Chamu Krishna Shastry


Request to un-delete this article about Chamu Krishna Shastry who is the founder of Samskrita_Bharati he is public personality of note, an educationist who has been teaching Sanskrit for 32 years. The biographical article about him was deleted under expired WP:PROD, I have found evidence of his notability here and here and intend to improve the article. Indoscope (talk) 09:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 12:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Fateha-e-Yazdaham
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -103.245.204.222 (talk) 11:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it)! Are you sure that the page's title is correct, including the namespace prefixes (User:, Wikipedia talk:, etc.)? — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * (The section title was right, but the link was mis-spelled) X mark.svg Not done - this page is a copyright violation. from http://www.banglapedia.org/HT/F_0042.htm. Wikipedia cannot accept copied material, not even temporarily. You must write in your own words - see Copy-paste. JohnCD (talk) 13:02, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Jack Warner-The American Musician
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Zongamonga (talk) 14:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)My article has been on Wikipedia for many years with no problem. I just tried to add to my music page more info about my acting career as well when suddenly the article was completely deleted. i had no choice in the matter of restoring my page which was on Wikipedia for many years with no problem. So I would like my original page restored with all the pertinent info about my professional career as a musician and a member of the Grammy as well as the different genres of music that I have created. Thanks.
 * U5 deletions won't be restored here, as Wikipedia is not a web host for material unsuitable for an encyclopedia. The only reason it hadn't gotten deleted was because an administrator had not gotten to it yet. Please use a personal website, Facebook, or a personal blog for what you wish to do. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ - Jeremy is right, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to maintain pages about themselves, see WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 13:09, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Sous Song Veacha
The article was in process of being edited, and it is very tough to find supporting citation for Cambodian artists or individuals who would substantiate the validity of the article, due to world history through genocide and social disintegration and destruction of societal institutions during the 1970's in Cambodia. For that very reason I will produce the supporting information through translation of texts in several languages and establish the necessary evidence/websites/news/academic sources for the worthiness of the article for Wikipedia. -Johnston Thach ចនសុន ថាច់ (talk) 06:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. — Jeremy   v^_^v  Bori! 09:05, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


 * I took a look at the article and it doesn't look promotional to be, but is unacceptable for other reasons (lack of references to reliable sources). If you would like to give the article another try, let me know and I'd be willing to put it in draft space for you so you can work on it without threat of quick deletion.  (It could still be deleted in the end though if you fail to prove notability. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


 * The lack of references will be produced through my own independent scholarship.I would have to rummage through French books/sites & cite those sources since the majority of the surviving books should exist in France relating to Cambodian Art History. It would be nice to have it in the draft space since I wish to continue working on it. Other than that, I have enough experience to also produce a credible multilingual news institution and website that should uphold it's notability through active research application.If other Cambodians saw the article, they would no doubt collectively add to it. Thanks ThaddeusB ;) Johnstontouch (talk)  2 February 2015 (UTC)


 * The page can now be found at Draft:Sous Song Veacha. When you feel the article is ready, hit the "submit your draft" button on that page and an independent reviewer will take a look before moving it back to mainspace (and give advice if needed).  Feel free to contact me directly on my talk page if you have questions. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Devolver Digital Films
 68.203.9.35 (talk) 18:43, 2 February 2015 (UTC) *Clerked for all the useful bits Hasteur (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Pages of note (or concern)
 * User talk:PezPoi
 * User talk:172.11.109.194
 * User talk:172.11.108.19
 * I think before we move forward, there needs to be a serious consideration of how many declines this article has racked up so quickly. Hasteur (talk) 18:51, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


 * The company looks notable. I would be willing to restore it if a promise s made to address the concerns raised before resubmitting instead of wasting volunteer time by resubmitting over and over again without improvement. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:56, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

The aambrus family
This page is to portray the group of friends who has start to raise fund in a friendly manner to support the educational need of poor peoples who cannot affort for their child's higher studies or urgent medical emergency help. Though the group is formed by group of friends, now they have already helped to fund for higher eduction for a girl child in virudhungar.
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. A7 speedy deletions will not be restored here, either. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 09:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:00, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Jordan Morgan
Morgan is now a professional basketball player, thus meeting WP:NBASKETBALL. -Arbor to SJ (talk) 23:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please add sources ASAP to comply with policies regarding living people. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:TFF Everybody Wants alt cover.jpg
History logs must be undeleted. -George Ho (talk) 19:28, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bodhtree (company)
I, Mahi kapoor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mahi kapoor (talk) 07:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Bodhtree (company). Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please read carefully the comments made by the reviewers who have now declined this five times, and do not resubmit until you have added references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 11:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Klyderaetrell/sandbox
I, Klyderaetrell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Klyderaetrell (talk) 08:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please read WP:Notability and WP:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 11:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Varduhi Aleksanyan
wikipedia page is about public figure -Tatev-22 (talk) 12:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done I have restored the page to Draft:Varduhi Aleksanyan.  Please add some sources and then either 1) submit it through article for creation by placing a  at the top of the page and following the instructions, or 2) contact me directly for review.  Thanks, ThaddeusB (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Paul Randles
Per this discussion, I am requesting to have Paul Randles restored to Draft:Paul Randles. -BOZ (talk) 15:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done The page can now be found at Draft:Paul Randles. Have fun :) --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! :) BOZ (talk) 17:11, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Contemporary Aesthetics
I, Aberleant, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aberleant (talk) 17:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * already ✅ on 7 January after this earlier request. JohnCD (talk) 18:32, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Confirmation.com
 50.59.221.154 (talk) 17:47, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done The page in question was declined as a copyright violation of . The content doesn't match the current version of that page, but I'm not sure if the incorrect link was put in the decline rationale or if that page has changed.  Either way, you would be better off starting from scratch than starting with a (probably) copyright violating page.  Let me know if you want me to retrieve the list of references for you. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Mazlish
I, Forbruce, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Forbruce (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Hasn't been deleted yet; if you edit it now, it won't be. Origamiteⓣⓒ 19:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Actually, I just restored it. I went one better and accepted it to mainspace as well. However, please do improve the article if you can Forbruce. It can now be found at Bruce Mazlish. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:26, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Alireza JJ Yadegari.jpg
Alireza JJ's article needs that image -F4R4ZHER4VI (talk) 21:48, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌. That file was deleted on Commons, which is a separate organization - see Commons:COM:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by F4R4ZHER4VI. You need to approach the Commons administrator who deleted it, whose name is shown there. For information, "Flickrwashing" means that it is suspected that Flickr did not have permission to display that image. JohnCD (talk) 22:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Francis Ngai
We have the copyright of Francis Ngai's bio. Please contact me if you need verification -Silvia Tse (talk) 02:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done You must file a ticket through WP:OTRS that gives Wikipedia permission to use the material. However I will say that it'd be much, much easier for you to just write the article in your own words. While not over-the-top promotional, the article is phrased in such a way that it does come off as promotional at times, as it does contain WP:PEACOCK phrasing. The issue with using copyrighted material is that it's almost always written to promote the person or to at least discuss them in as positive a manner as possible, meaning that even if you give permission odds are that the article would have to be re-written. With phrases like "support and nurture social innovation", re-writing this would pretty much be inevitable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:26, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Keith St John
I, Keith St John, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Keith St John (talk) 06:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * On a side note, you will need to read over the WP:COI guidelines, as writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Jessie Stricchiola
Article has continued to improve since it was originally deleted. It was enhanced after userification, I moved it back to article space, and made a small enhancement there. The subject has continued to do notable work, e.g. publishing a second edition of their book. I would like the talk page to be undeleted as well, for a unified history. -Superm401 - Talk 22:42, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I've restored the talk page. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

C3D_Labs
Before the C3D Labs company was established, C3D kernel was only used internally for KOMPAS-3D software developed by ASCON Group. However, ASCON took a decision to establish C3D Labs to develop C3D kernel as a standalone and to license it for other companies as well as a further step to challenge the French company Dassault Systèmes with its geometric kernel - Convergence Geometric Modeler - on international market. To my view the role of C3D Labs to ASCON Group is as Spatial Corp to Dassault Systèmes. -Bulava14 (talk) 21:56, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * On a side note, the existence of other articles does not automatically mean that the company is notable. It could just mean that the other articles either pass notability guidelines or haven't been deleted yet. The best way to make your case is to show where the company has received coverage in independent and reliable sources. However I do need to note that it does appear to really only be known for one product, which they did not originally create. While they may be C3D's current developers, that does not automatically mean that the company has inherited that notability. The company already has a brief mention in the main article for C3D, so odds are that this is really all that is warranted at this point in time unless you can provide coverage that focuses on the company. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Ruben Gasparyan
This information about this person is very imortant to be here "Save page" button below -MARIYANVA (talk) 08:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This page is currently up for deletion via AfD at Articles for deletion/Ruben Gasparyan and as such, cannot be kept through this page. The best way to salvage the article is to address the issue of notability by providing coverage in independent and reliable sources per WP:RS. Offhand it looks like you will have to prove that he passes WP:PROF. Simply existing as a professor is not enough - you have to provide coverage in reliable sources. I'd also like to caution you about promotional speak, as the article is filled with various WP:PEACOCK and other promotional phrases. These do not work to show notability on Wikipedia and actually runs the risk of making the person seem less notable rather than more notable since they're so typically used in spam and promotional articles for people that fail notability guidelines. This doesn't mean that this is your intent, but I'd also suggest re-writing the article to be less promotional. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Varduhi Aleksanyan, again
Enter your the artical is about living person and will be sourced after restoring and then click the "Save page" button below -Tatev-22 (talk) 09:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * You were answered yesterday, see WP:REFUND. The article is now at Draft:Varduhi Aleksanyan where you can work on it. What it needs is references to reliable sources, for two reasons: (a) the WP:Verifiability policy, summarised as "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and (b) to establish WP:Notability, which needs evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." When you have added references, put at the top of the draft page to send it for review. JohnCD (talk) 10:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

DMB_Charles
Revision and correction has been done on the article "Save page" button below -196.37.137.226 (talk) 09:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about yourself. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert Blackman
 27.99.101.46 (talk) 03:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm slightly worried about the tone in the article. It's not promotional per se, but it is written in such a casual tone that it could be interpreted as promotional or at the very least, like it was written by a friend or family member as a tribute to Blackman. Using the subject's first name is a big no-no in article for these very reasons. I'm also somewhat concerned about the overall notability, although that's not as worrisome as the article's tone. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:32, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. and please also improve the tone to make it more "encyclopedic". Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Robert Young (longevity claims researcher)


Deletion review/Log/2015 January 27 was closed by as recreation permitted. I wrote at the DRV: "Comment: If the consensus is to restore, please history merge User:CBDunkerson/Sandbox and Robert Young (longevity claims researcher). Note that the sandbox had other material prior to the 21:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC) version. Please only merge revisions from User:CBDunkerson/Sandbox on or after 21:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC). Cunard (talk) 01:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)" Would an admin implement this? Please note that this is also being discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:CBDunkerson/Sandbox. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ history merge completed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:50, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Development Alert!
I request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under G11. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it and improve it so that it will sound like a more neutral article.

Thanks you. -Dandrade.jet (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Not an AFC submission. Per G11, it was unambiguous advertising and will need to be completely rewritten in order to have it possibly have it be accepted. Hasteur (talk) 16:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Let us know if you want to put this into the draft namespace to rewrite. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paul Davis
I, Carlosbog, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Carlosbog (talk) 11:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Moulai Abadullah
'Bohra myth credits Abadullah...' "Mullah on the Mainframe" p.41
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Moulai Abadullah, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Please review.

Unicommerce
It's a company page on wikipedia designed with proper information and not for any kind of promotion at all -Lipikadevi (talk) 10:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * You sure about that? Certainly looks like a notable company to me: .  That said, the article was pretty much useless/promotional as written.  I encourage  to read WP:Your first article and try again at Draft:Unicommerce where he/she can get help from experienced users without the threat of rapid deletion.  Let me know if interested in getting the article restored to there, but as I said it is probably easier just to start over since it would have to be completely re-written anyway.  Free free to contact me directly with any questions you may have. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks like Lipikadevi has already started a draft before my comment. Good luck. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Diaman Ratio
I, Cak81, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cak81 (talk) 12:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Edwin L. "Uncle Ted" Raub
I want my draft returned so I can figure out why it was not accepted. I cannot figure out which administrator deleted it. Also, the deletion notice I received did not explain specifically which other site the 'bot said my article too strongly resembles. I would like the administrator that deleted it help me compare my draft to the alleged infringed-upon site to see what the issue is. There were many ATTRIBUTED quotes in the article and maybe I missed referencing one, but I can't fix and resubmit the article if I don't have it. I am surprised that Wikipedia would destroy a work instead of returning it to the author. I spent many many hours/days composing and researching it and would like to find my error(s) and resubmit. next time I'll save it for myself somewhere else so this doesn't happen to me again. -Jhm795 (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


 * I restored the page. It was declined by  and deleted by  as unambiguous copyright infringement.  However, if you look closely the "infringing" bit (see ) is actually two long quotes.  It might be advisable to remove the quote for other reasons (the article does reply heavily on quotes), but it isn't an "unambiguous copyright violation".  Even if it was, the vast majority of the article would still not be copyvio and the problem could simply to be fixed by removing the offending bit instead of deletion.  Please be more careful in the future Joseve & RHaworth.  --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * There are a couple phrase which do look to be close paraphrases of the original. For example, "In September 1944, Mr. Raub and some 30,000 American and British troops were flown behind enemy lines to capture eight bridges along the German-Dutch border." -> "some 30,000 American and British troops were flown behind enemy lines between September 17th and 25th in an attempt to capture eight bridges between the Dutch-German border".  If you could go through and make sure everything is original writing (i.e. not just a few words changed around/synonyms use), I would much appreciate it.  --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

User:AIDD2007/Design AIDD Architecture
I, 72.4.96.226, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 72.4.96.226 (talk) 15:23, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Next time you submit this, it may be moved to the draft space. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sales Recruitment
 PeakSales (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Sarah Stanley
I, Marilyn Nix, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marilyn Nix (talk) 17:11, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Drill Sergeant Joseph Willie
 Lostboy347 (talk) 19:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC) Clerking the request. Hasteur (talk) 19:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ This is a serious BLP violation. It looks to be written as a personal recollection rather than derived from other writings.  But if you need a copy emailed to you, you can ask for that.  Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AIM Technology
I, Mistralmtn, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mistralmtn (talk) 00:06, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Isai Alvarado
Please userfy both talk page and article to my space. - Valoem  talk   contrib  08:47, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Valoem/Isai Alvarado. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Hamilton Gray
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jamiebally (talk) 12:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator instead. — Jeremy   v^_^v  Bori! 13:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Killik & Co
I, IzzySeekings, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. IzzySeekings (talk) 11:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

chak no 16
revised -aasi jatt from civilized chak 16 13:04, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 13:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done The page can now be found at Draft:Chak No. 16.  I did some preliminary cleanup/formatting/organization work on it, but a lot of work is going to be needed to make it a viable article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Natural Retreats
I, Stevemc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stevemc (talk) 13:47, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * See also Draft:Natural Retreats. This has been CSD:G13ed wtice.  I'm really uncomfortable with it being restored again in a revolving door of G13. Hasteur (talk) 14:08, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Also pinging as the editor who requested the most recent G13. Hasteur (talk) 14:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done I restored it because the company is definitely notable. The page can be found at Draft:Natural Retreats.  Please work on the draft this time so that I am not forced to do the work myself.  Regardless, I will make sure this makes it out of draft this time.  --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Change Science
I, Change Science Institute, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Change Science Institute (talk) 15:47, 5 February 2015 (UTC) I, TSChange2015, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TSChange2015 (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
 * I've restored it and cleared out all the inappropriate HTML formatting and amazon linkspam. Frankly, this looks like a copyright violation, copied from the cited book, and if that is the case it may be quickly deleted again. This needs a lot of work establishing notability before it can be accepted for publication in main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:13, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Sheikh Motiur Rahman Madani
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sheikh Motiur Rahman Madani (talk) 20:53, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have moved the most developed page to Draft:Sheikh Motiur Rahman Madani. This was obviously an attempt to write an article, so U5 speedy delete does not apply. There are two deleted copies, a basic one at and another at .  Your writings include no references at all, and looks to be an autobiography.  Wikipedia articles are based on what others have written, so you first need to find writings about Motiur Rahman Madani, perhaps in newspapers, or magazines, or even TV programs. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:05, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:DigiPas USA LLC
I, Jing jsb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jing jsb (talk) 07:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Stifle (talk) 09:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Exposing Lies
Why are you deleting the page even when it exists on many networks and so many people know about it? -Milindsagarvashist (talk) 11:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 13:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Dr.Kutikuppala Surya Rao
''I, Bhargav 123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Bhargav 123 (talk) 15:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * @Bhargav 123:  Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!"--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:06, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Ali Channa
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -107.167.103.155 (talk) 08:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Stifle (talk) 09:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


 * If you wish to give it a try at rewriting it form scratch, you can do so at Draft: Ali Channa. However, I strongly suggest against this as the subject does not appear to be notable, so you'd just be wasting your time on something that would eventually be deleted on those grounds. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brian Eastham
I, Tracey eastham, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tracey eastham (talk) 11:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Notice the connected names. Potentially a Conflict of interest between the user requesting the page back and the subject.  I suggest you read our advice for editors who may have a conflict of interest before proceeding with this request. Hasteur (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Editing with a COI is somewhat permissible in draft space, so I will restore it if you are sure you want this done. However, Brian is unlikely to be notable so I advise you to very carefully consider not proceeding as this will likely end up in hurt feelings and no article being created in the end. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Raftaar (Singer)
This article WAS NOT an autobiography. You can search on facebook, twitter .etc Raftaar is a real singer and has sung songs in many Bollywood films too !! I dont know why this page was deleted !! I request you to please undelete the page !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raftaarbadshahm (talk • contribs)


 * X mark.svg Not done Being "a real singer" is not sufficient to justify an article.  Furthermore, the article not no content - it just said "Raftaar is an Indian singer".  If you wish to give it another try, I suggest you read WP:Your first article and then use the articles for creation process where you will have more time to develop the article before it is threatened with deletion. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

History of Mokema Homestead Ecotourism Association
Hello admin Mokema Homestead is only a community initiative that aims to improve its community livelihood in general with the use of idling natural resources; and the initiative is not profit oriented. hence, the history of the non-profit making organization is important for student in their researches about ecological tourism in general, although I have just rewritten the article and removed promotional statements in it. for this reason and the other, I am making a plea for the article not to be removed.

hope for my plea to reach your consideration with regards lelokolisanyane author — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lelokolisanyane (talk • contribs) 14:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


 * The page can now be found at Draft:Mokema Homestead Ecotourism Association. Please have a look at WP:Your first article to get an idea of our standards for articles.  The subject existing or being a good cause are not sufficient reasons for an article to exist.  If you can find reliable source coverage (for example, coverage in newspapers, books, etc.) of the subject, then it may be notable (worthy of an article).  If you find such coverage, add it to the article (see Help:Referencing for beginners) and follow the instructions at the top of the draft article page to submit it for review.  Good luck. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)