Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 187

Draft:Holly Payne
''I, OliverHeaviside, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' OliverHeaviside (talk) 19:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

I apologize for the delay. I was busy on other projects, and also doing more research for this article. I got the reminder but did not log on quick enough. Sorry! Please restore.

OliverHeaviside (talk) 19:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:IdeaSpace Foundation
49.147.47.78 (talk) 09:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IDLC Finance
Itrathossain (talk) 11:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:IDLC Finance. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

12/12/12 (film)
Page was apparently deleted due to the poor quality of the film, which should not be relevant to the existence of the page. -TheGhostWolfe (talk) 14:17, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The reason stated oon the PROD was "The film exists and that's all that can be said about it" - i.e., not that it was a bad film, but that the lack of independent sources about it make its notability doubtful. Maybe you can add some. JohnCD (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Eldorado, Ontario
''I, 99.253.63.194, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Eldorado is the largest community in the Township of Madoc and should have its own page. -99.253.63.194 (talk) 14:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ - the page has not been deleted. Deletion was being considered because it has not been submitted for review, or edited at all, for six months. If you now make any edit, immediate deletion will not happen. Read WP:Your first article for advice and, when it is ready, click the "Submit" button to send it for review. JohnCD (talk) 16:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Grup Vitamin
I, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD A7. Please restore the page; because Grup Vitamin is notable. de:Grup_Vitamin, tr:Grup_Vitamin -Logom (talk) 17:32, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please add references to show how they meet WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 20:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Massalat
I am in the process of creating a page for the Massalat language, a nearly extinct dialect of the language Masalit. I am new to Wikipedia, so it took me a while to gather all of my information to input. Please do not delete the page again, for I am creating/editing it for a University project. Thank you. -Mlm427RU (talk) 20:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The article had no content, nothing to restore. Please re-create the article in your sandbox (there is a link to your sandbox at the top of any page after you log in). In this way you can take your time working on a draft without worrying about someone coming along and deleting it. When you are finished, you can move it to main space, or ask me for help. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Jim Walters (theological ethicist)
''I, 151.112.110.53, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 151.112.110.53 (talk) 21:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Kylie Jenner
Page was deleted and redirected even though there's a consensus not to see Talk:Kylie Jenner -Naue7 (talk) 21:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello. I see little in the way of consensus at that small discussion. The page was not deleted and redirected, it was only redirected. The fact that it has not been deleted can be seen by it having an intact page history. The redirection can thus be reverted by anyone. Additional consensus can also be sought by drawing more people to the discussion, but I don't see much point to that as ultimately this should be expanded (definitely not by me) – because Kylie Jenner is massively, inarguably notable, being written about in detail i thousands and thousands of reliable secondary sources. That is, if someone is willing to take the time to do so properly for this BLP, which requires high quality sourcing. The people at the talk page discussion are confused. They appear to be substituting some idea of gravitas with notability, and making assessments from what appears in the article rather than what appears in the world. The objective standard is met so completely here, that there's little to discuss about it (there are 132 news articles mentioning her found through Google News that were posted over the last 24 hours; of course we require substantive coverage, but I am just giving that statistic to set the stage for just how absurd is the idea that there is any notability question here). This is also notwithstanding the 2015 AfD discussion, which is an apparent incredible failure of anyone to actually look to evidence.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Johnny Lynch (Producer)
''I, Lynch Johnny, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Lynch Johnny (talk) 20:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

I have some new links to get verified -Lynch Johnny (talk) 20:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Johnny Lynch (Producer). Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Also, please read Autobiography JohnCD (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Rich_Quick&action=edit&redlink=1
would like to try again Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Lmrcollins74 (talk) 17:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * For future reference, the page title will do, not the whole URL. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 17:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Sonia Natra
''I, Lustgarten gabi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Lustgarten gabi (talk) 06:36, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 17:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This needs source information. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen/Archive
This page should not have been deleted and rather should have been marked as historical. Now, archiving is done on Cut and paste move repair holding pen, now called Requests for history merge. I am planning to create an archive of the content that was removed from the page before archiving began (through the page history). (See Wikipedia talk:SPLICE) This page might be useful for doing that. -103.6.156.167 (talk) 06:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't have an issue with this, although I would recommend that you sign up with an account if you're planning on doing this since I'd prefer to userfy the content. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your consideration. Please restore the page to User:DL9C/SPLICE Archive. (I own the account.) Thanks, 103.6.156.167 (talk) 18:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Eastern News Agency
Please undelete. OTRS permission. Ticket#2015050410008377 - Wil ly  Wea zley  14:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * From the website's footer: © 2015 Copyright Eastern News Agency All Rights reserved except Wikipedia - I don't believe that's acceptable, because it would be comparable to the owner of an image uploading to Commons and saying "it can only be used here". No one would be then able to re-use the text in the article. But I'll let a more knowledgeable editor make a call on that. The bigger problem here is the obvious COI and the disruptive re-creation of the article under multiple titles. It's not even clear that the company meets WP:CORP to begin with. I'd recommend not restoring and have them go through AFC so someone can spot check the material. The idea that we can't write an article about a company without pasting in half their website is rather specious. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * "Wikipedia-only" is not an accepted license, fullstop. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * FTR, I had cut Enanews down to a stub without any of the copyrighted and promotional text, just before it was deleted - not sure if that's something that could be restored without the copyvios in the history. (I think the company is probably notable.) --bonadea contributions talk 21:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not aware about the website. They released the content under cc-by-sa-3.0 at the OTRS Channel.  Wil ly  Wea zley  22:23, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Is the ticket confirmed? There's a bit of concern at ANI over whether or not the ticket can be confirmed. I have no problem with restoring Bonadea's most recent edit at Enanews, though. If he's removed the promotional and (potentially) copyvio material then there's really not much to be worried about with that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Of course, I confirmed. You can ask another OTRS member besides me at the noticeboard too.  Wil ly  Wea zley  16:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The ticket does say that they released the content under CC-BY-SA 3.0 but it also says that they have exempted Wikipedia from their copyright as published on their website, that appears to be the copyright notice on the bottom of their website that still says All Rights Reserved except Wikipedia.  That is not the same as CC-BY-SA 3.0.  The OTRS ticket contradicts itself.  -- GB fan 19:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Commons allows image files from Flickr which are licensed as All Rights Reserved at flickr.com, and release at OTRS as CC-BY-SA. But anyway, since aparently it won't be restored, I'll reject the permission. I'll tell the original editor that he might create the page using their content as reference, not a full text. Kind regards.  Wil ly  Wea zley  20:05, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I am in no way an expert on permissions. I just went to look at the ticket and reported back here what I saw.  If it is permissible to use then someone can undelete it.  The OTRS ticket looks very ambiguous what they actually mean because it says two seperate things in the same ticket.  CC-BY-SA 3.0 and what it says on the website all rights reserved except for Wikipedia.  -- GB fan 20:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I've looked at some of the material. It's pretty promotional in nature, so it's a Yes check.svg Done for that alone. I've left some notes on the user's page about all of this and I've recommended that they create this in AfC from scratch. The reason for that is that they really didn't see how the original material was seen as promotional, so I firmly believe that they'd inadvertently leave promotional material in the article. I have no problem with the non-promotional, non-copyvio version being restored, but I would rather let the editor use this as a learning experience. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:31, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Dube
''I, Skinsnap, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Skinsnap (talk) 20:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will find it at Draft:Bruce Dube. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

elimelech biderman
I'm thoroughly disappointed by the deletion of the biography of one of the most world renowned Jewish Orthodox Rabbi's in todays generation! After seeing it was deleted by CactusWriter, I understand a little more. He obviously has ZERO knowledge of the Jewish Rabbis, and thus felt its his "obligation" to delete my article. Well, I ask him, before he goes all easy on the delete button, he should do some minimal research if the article is accurate or not. In my case, its %100 accurate!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bfgny (talk • contribs) 17:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)


 * You should comment on content, not other users- being an admin, I'm sure they know when an article doesn't meet Wikipedia criteria. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. We do NOT require admins to be omnidisciplinary, on the grounds that this is impossible to enforce or cause. And just because an article is "%100 accurate" [sic] does not mean it is immune to a G11 (advertising) deletion, which is more about tone than content. — Jeremy   v^_^v  Bori! 17:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I also have to note that being known within one's religion does not automatically mean that someone passes Wikipedia's notability guidelines for people, which is incredibly strict. Being known and/or respected doesn't translate into notability because ultimately you can only prove notability via coverage in independent and reliable sources per WP:RS. Sometimes this can make it more likely that coverage will exist, but it's never a guarantee. Case in point: I used to take classes under a Jewish Rabbi (Jack Spiro) that is incredibly well thought of, holds a high position within the college, and has published multiple works. However at the same time he just barely falls short of notability guidelines because there just isn't any coverage of him out there and his position at VCU isn't considered the type that would fall under WP:ACADEMIC. (I may doublecheck this just in case, but offhand there really isn't that much out there.) Offhand I'll give you the same advice someone gave me: since you clearly hold a strong emotional tie to this person you may not be the best person to write an article about the individual because you will be more likely to insert positive, promotional material in the article and you may see more notability than there actually is. When you have a conflict of interest it can also be extremely easy to take the article's rejection personally. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I suggest that you start with finding sources that others have written. If there are none then that is time to stop. If there are references then write a draft based on that information. Draft:Elimelech Biderman. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, please write in a more neutral and encyclopedic tone. Language like "his purity, beautiful delivery and vast knowledge of the Torah" is not appropriate here - see WP:PEACOCK. JohnCD (talk) 11:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Get It Up (Aerosmith song)
Aerosmith single release. All other single releases by this notable hard rock band are included. Article was deleted for missing references, which can easily be added. Would be a lot easier to work within the template of the original article than to create a new one from scratch. Thanks -Abog (talk) 17:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Leo Zogmayer
I have set some cite notes which was the reason for the proposed for undeletion tag. Furthermore I have written the same article in German, and it is online. So I hope now my article will be approved. -Dieter Willim (talk) 16:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Nishka Lulla
She is a celebrity and we handle her account -120.63.63.143 (talk) 11:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg. I am declining your request for the moment. Six minutes after posting this, you created a draft on her at the prior title that had been deleted Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nishka Lulla. That has now been deleted by me as a blatant copyright infringement of the content from here. On a slightly ironic note, had you simply made your request without this recreation, I would have undeleted the original draft, uncontroversially (which was not AFAICT a copyright violation). However, now that you posted what you did you have indicated by your actions that you might do the same if this was undeleted. So, please acknowledge that you understand that you cannot copy and paste other's writing like you did here, and that if we do undelete it, you will only add content in your own words.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Shivprasad Koirala
I was working on the article and was published accidentally in stead of moving to my user area. This article is a biography about an Author and trainer who has lots of contribution in technical field. Please revert the deletion process to my user area so that I can work on it and submit.

Prithvi Raj Bhatt || http://www.pyarb.com 12:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Pyarb/Shivprasad Koirala. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Sujit Meher
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Quickjazz (talk) 11:06, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ A number of users and IPs have battled over what speedy delete tag to use and whether the page should be blanked or not. So this needs a discussion before restoring.  Use WP:DRV as the venue. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

sameer jamjam
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Md.sameerjamjam (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC) i need to recover my user and all its deleted by mistake
 * G3 speedy deletions are not restored here, and Wikipedia is not a substitute for a blog or social media. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ The problem here is that your user page was moved around a couple of times. Your user page should stay at User:Sameerjamjam.  What you have there is already better than the article and talk page you moved it to. Do not attempt to write an article about yourself. If you do want to write an article I suggest you use WP:AFC to start off. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HARVEY AVERNE
''I, Ernest Alvarez, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ernest Alvarez (talk) 00:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Monty  845  02:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Anal Gestapo
There was a valuable information about this band that is still active. -2001:4170:2000:1:21A:64FF:FECA:D930 (talk) 02:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:27, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quilla
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Michi44 (talk) 20:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

I meant to finish editing this entry and would like to do it as soon as possible — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michi44 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please note that this is the last time we restore this if you abandon it again. The last time you edited it you removed the submission banner at the top, which you shouldn't do. Wikipedia does not host drafts indefinitely. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Bralalalala
Two time Award winning singer, first ever transgender award winning singer in the US, who recently prevailed in sexual assault, libel and malicious prosecution lawsuits versus the Amazing Spider Man et al supervising art director over $1 deleted article, it's a title that has been protected from creation. Please contact the administrator who protected it million. There is no reason for protected mode here. The people in wiki have been making bigoted comments about this highly rated artist. "Save page" button below -Ontheright001 (talk) 21:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This is not a (5 years ago), and ask them to unprotect. If you receive no response, please use WP:RFPP instead. I assume there's a very good reason for that being protected. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 21:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I reckon a quick search in OTRS might reveal all you need to know. I'm amazed that this "brand new user" managed to make this request as his very first edit. Guy (Help!) 22:26, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeed, thanks. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done And you know exactly why. § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Grass chloride
Because I need to add more information in it. -78.96.214.173 (talk) 12:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I have blocked your IP address for creating and now asking for this blatant hoax joke article to be undeleted.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sieben Linden Ecovillage
''I, Herbst77regen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Herbst77regen (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * @Herbst77regen:  Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Timothy Hanson
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -70.181.75.43 (talk) 04:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Recently discovered that an internet troll had this page deleted. I have attached the content relevant to prove the articles authenticity.

Timothy Hanson is a Visual Effects Supervisor currently at Zoic Studios in Los Angeles, CA best known for his work in Avengers: Age of Ultron. He has previously worked for studios like Bad Robot, MPC, Mirada , The Mill , Method Studios, and Google to name a few. In addition to his numerous awards and nominations, Tim's work has also been featured in 3D Artist Magazine.

Tim founded the popular VFX blog "Maxdepth" in 2014, and the site has been featured in numerous issues of 3D Artist Magazine.


 * I don't see definite evidence this person passes WP:GNG, also calling Wikipedia users trolls is not assuming good faith. Also, doesn't need undeleting since they created an identical new draft, Draft:Timothy Hanson. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. I will decline your new draft, as there is no point having two parallel versions. Please update the actual article, but check out WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people), noting that the references required are those which show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Of those you list, some do no mention him at all, one has his name in a long list, and the last few are all about the same interview. Beware of WP:BOMBARDMENT. The article may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 17:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Every link refers to Tim directly, be sure to look in the "Credits" as each of these links were intended to verify the statements of this article which is the point of the  tag no? As for the final few you mentioned as being about the same article this is an incorrect statement. Each ref was for a different issue of the magazine containing his work proving the assertion "numerous articles" as his work has appeared in 6 issues to be exact. As for names in a long list, that is how the visual effects industry works. There are hundreds of people that work to make a single film or television show, there are only a handful that achieve supervisor status much less on a film such as The Avengers one of the top grossing films of all time. I would think IMDB a site that has their content submitted by the studio would be a trusted source, but you can also go see the movie and look for his name in the credits.

User:GoodnessGreatnessHighness/sandbox
''I, 209.107.108.224, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 209.107.108.224 (talk) 11:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. It would be a disservice to you to undelete here and thereby indicate that there is any way this content could ever be acceptable as an encyclopedia article, thus leading you down a path of wasting your valuable time in attempting to modify it and resubmit it, when it will never pass muster. I will, however, gladly email it to you if there is an issue of you not having a copy of what you wrote. (You would need to log in to your account and then enable you email at Special:Preferences.) In short, Wikipedia does not contain original research, and it does not normally have articles on words as words, and never on words made up by an article's creator.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * For more explanation, see Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 17:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

The Substance Group
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Angie Camara (talk) 00:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This page hasn't been deleted yet, only nominated for deletion. Also, it's up for deletion under A7 and G11, so isn't eligible under this process. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ Pure advertising from start to finish. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Turnberry Isle Miami
Not sure why this long-standing page was speedy deleted as "advertising", likely some COI spammer attacked the topic prior to deletion. One of the biggest and most well-known mixed use developments in Florida's history with a long history of controversy with plenty of reliable sources to back it up, reason why Aventura, Florida became incorporated. Needs cleanup, not deletion. Relevant redirects should also be undeleted. -71.196.20.1 (talk) 04:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The article had indeed been thoroughly spammed-up, and I will ping the deleting administrator, to see whether s/he would be willing to restore the version of 20 August 2014, before the spammer got to work. If restored, it could do with more independent references. JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, done. I should have looked further.  Mind you, I won't be unblocking the spammer. Deb (talk) 17:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Qishen Yiqi
require content for personal research only -OntarioBoy 17:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it)! Are you sure that the page's title is correct, including the namespace prefixes (User:, Wikipedia talk:, etc.)? — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't find it either, and (after googling) I have tried QiShen YiQi and Qi-Shen-Yi-Qi as well. If you don't know the exact title, do you know the username of the account that created the page? JohnCD (talk) 19:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

razaziel
I would like to reqdd the rest of this article. I found it one day on wiki and only read the first paragraph then the next day it was deleted. id like the article restored. it hurts no one and is interesting to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:b85f:85f0:81e5:c5a8:b53a:c06b (talk • contribs)
 * what is the exact title of the page you mean? There has never been a page called "Razaziel". JohnCD (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Rab da Vaasta
No copyright infringement, none whatsoever. All rights belong to the writer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:0:7f00:f190:d8d2:1c6c:84e3:bd3 (talk • contribs)
 * ❌. The text can be seen on an IMDb page clearly labelled "Copyright © 1990-2015 IMDb.com, Inc." Wikipedia can't accept it on the basis of an assertion from someone on the end of a wire that the rights belong to him. The way to make a copyright release is described at WP:Donating copyrighted materials, but it would be simpler to rewrite in your own words. JohnCD (talk) 14:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/X X
''I, Noel7777, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Noel7777 (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pawn_%28programming_language%29
This scripting language exists and is perfectly valid. It is used everyday for multiple purposes. There was zero reason to delete it, except to discredit the achievements of its creator and those who use it everyday in a variety of ways. It is even one of the formats / syntaxes supported and recognized by GitHub. The language is fully documented on its own website at http://www.compuphase.com/pawn/pawn.htm -151.224.180.83 (talk) 00:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. No one denies it exists, the discussion merely came to the conclusion that it is not notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:57, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kathy Unger
''I, Capitanplanetita, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Capitanplanetita (talk) 23:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done The contents of the article were followed by a recommendation to search the internet. Please start over, especially since the submission was missing the submit banner at the top. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 00:59, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Seth Davis Drumming
Seth Davis Drumming is a non-biased, factually based article, with references -DrumHistorian12811 (talk) 23:11, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * @DrumHistorian12811:  X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Seth Davis Drumming, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:23, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * My fault, I led him here inappropriately. Sorry about that, all. --jpgordon:==( o ) 01:17, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SaferMarkets.org
''I, 71.198.241.144, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 71.198.241.144 (talk) 02:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done The page was fairly promotional in how it was written and once that content is removed the only part left was this: "SafeMarkets.org is a website with information on toxics in cosmetics,  BPA, flame retardants, PVC, phthalates, building materials, and other products, with links out to the various groups leading data collection, policy work, and general info on toxic chemicals in products. It was put together by the National Work Group for Safe Markets, a work group of the Coming Clean environmental health collaborative." You can create a new AfC draft, but this was too promotional to really restore. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PromptCloud
115.99.39.39 (talk) 11:25, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:PromptCloud. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:33, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Articles for creation: Small and Growing Business
''I, Alexpan77, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' There is a significant amount of new materials which use this term which I would like to references. The term has become more established in the past year and is no longer a neologisim which was the previous issue with the page -Alexpan77 (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Foremost Currency Group
''I, Simon Bardsley, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Simon Bardsley (talk) 13:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Family tree of Fateh Din Shah Jahania
I have to improve this page and link some references as there is less information online in Pakistan i am trying to improve it therefore restore this page so that research goes on. -Shahenshahkillz (talk) 19:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:13, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Online film and television association
It contains enough referencing to meet the criteria to be included, and fixes many red links. -Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC) Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Online Film & Television Association, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Articles for creation/The Prairie View Co-eds
''I, Musc302, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' I want to work on it more Musc302 (talk) 02:32, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * @Musc302:  X mark.svg Not done. You already created this article in the mainspace at Prairie View Co-eds, with the identical content that was in the draft. For that reason I'm not sure what the reason is for your request, unless you lost track of the fact you did this.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Juan Eligio Olvera Rabiela
We believe that delegating the page was a mistake. The subject is an eminent professor, researcher and Mexican scientist that passed away in 2011, therefore, it cannot be a page for self promotion as stated by the gentleman that deleated the page. Many articles, scientific works, biographies published on the Internet may testify to this effect by typing "Olvera Rabiela". We believe that Dr. olvera deserves a page as before and would be thankful if you restore it to public view. and then click the "Save page" button below -Cronistaeditor (talk) 04:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done A page with that title doesn't seem to have ever existed here, or on the Spanish Wikipedia (which I also checked). Unless you can point to the specific location where it was, we cannot help you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I did manage to find a page at es:Juan Eligio Olvera Rabiela, which looks to have had promotional issues. In order to restore this they would need to go to the Spanish language Wikipedia and request undeletion there. I can't see where this page was ever created on the English Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, it was deleted on May 9th for "promotional" content present for a month. I guess that's the es.wp equivalent to PROD? I didn't even bother clicking on the redlink. § FreeRangeFrog croak 07:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * each Wikipedia is separate. You should take this up with the administrator who deleted the page on the Spanish Wikipedia. You can see his name and a link to his talk page in the deletion notice at es:Juan Eligio Olvera Rabiela. JohnCD (talk) 09:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you all. I appreciate the help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cronistaeditor (talk • contribs) 12:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adams & Adams Attorneys
''I, Fuulido, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Fuulido (talk) 07:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. Besides that this was deleted at promotional under CSD G11, and not on a basis that would be uncontroversial to undelete, this appears to have been a copyright violation of the content found at this page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Salapungan National High School
''I, AnthonyNuarin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' AnthonyNuarin (talk) 14:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines for advice. JohnCD (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Nicky Greenwall
''I, StangerManor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' StangerManor (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Advocacy ducks
Advocacy Ducks was a essay on a new subject. The essay was deleted CSD G4, but a essay on a diffrent subject should not have been deleted under that rule. The essay that was deleted by discussion was COI Ducks, a different essay on a different subject. COI Ducks dealt with COI not advocacy, and Advocacy Ducks does not deal with COI. If the nominator believed this essay should be deleted there should be a new deletion discussion for the new article. A section on the talk page of this essay has started over this deletion  AlbinoFerret  21:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

The admin who deleted it restored it, this section is moot. AlbinoFerret 22:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Tags can be contested but not removed. QuackGuru ( talk ) 22:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ I undeleted it. When I deleted it, I had followed the link provided on the WP:G4 tag and saw an overwhelming consensus to delete, but did not go any further in comparing the versions.  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 22:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Cantillation melodies
Following files were transfered to Commons, then speedily deleted at en:wp per WP:F8, and subsequently deleted at Commons (more about this below) with the result that a couple of files are now gone (example): The transfered files at Commons were mass-deleted in a sock-puppet case (see here and here for more information) which is unrelated to the user who uploaded the original files at en:wp. As it currently stands, it appears best to restore these files at en:wp. These files were originally uploaded by Xyz7890. Please check in the deleted contributions of this user if I have overlooked one of these files. Thanks, AFBorchert (talk) 22:16, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done There were no other deleted files like this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2015 (UTC)