Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 193

File:Younkers.jpg
Need old page version from edit history: When Younkers.jpg was moved to Commons, it was separated into two files on Commons: File:Des Moines Younkers 1.jpg (older) and File:Des Moines Younkers 2.jpg (newer). I suspect that the older File:Des Moines Younkers 1.jpg accidentally got some of the information from the replacement, and should have a different location description that isn't in the upload log but might be in the English Wikipedia edit history. -Closeapple (talk) 04:31, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * First version (19 Dec 2004) is the same as File:Des Moines Younkers 1.jpg. Description: "Photo of the Younkers store at Jordan Creek Town Center in West Des Moines, Iowa, taken by User:Iowahwyman in November 2004. GFDL"
 * Second version (11 Mar 2007) is the same as File:Des Moines Younkers 2.jpg. Description: "Photo of the original Younkers store in downtown Des Moines, Iowa, taken by User:Iowahwyman on March 10, 2007. GFDL-self"
 * JohnCD (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Based on this and User talk:Iowahwyman, I've renamed File:Des Moines Younkers 1.jpg to File:Younkers entrance Jordan Creek Town Center 2004.jpg and corrected its information, and strengthened the date line on File:Des Moines Younkers 2.jpg.  Does this count as "done"? --Closeapple (talk) 04:57, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Based on this and User talk:Iowahwyman, I've renamed File:Des Moines Younkers 1.jpg to File:Younkers entrance Jordan Creek Town Center 2004.jpg and corrected its information, and strengthened the date line on File:Des Moines Younkers 2.jpg.  Does this count as "done"? --Closeapple (talk) 04:57, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:James Compton House
''I, Hgblad, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Hgblad (talk) 13:28, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

gregorii
I have reliable sources and references to add to the page. It is not propaganda or promotion, but a page about an artist who is creating a new artistic process involving light that is changing the way digital art is viewed. please allow me to update the article with the sources. I intend to work on the page to make sure it is deserving of a wiki page -Tangerinecircus (talk) 14:15, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 14:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Irene Jewel Dellon
there is no material copied any longer from the irenedellon.com website Justael2 (talk) 15:51, 23 June 2015 (UTC) -Justael2 (talk) 15:51, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G12. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 15:55, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Maxwell Chase
''I, Movingalong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Movingalong (talk) 19:31, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * @Movingalong:  Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:43, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Always Be My Baby (Mariah Carey single - cover art).jpg
It was used in "Always Be My Baby" until it was unjustly removed by a user, who is now blocked as a sockpuppet. -George Ho (talk) 21:15, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ - it's identical with File:Always Be My Baby Mariah Carey.png which is in the article now, except that it's only 200 x 200 while the current one is 280 x 280. Am I missing something? JohnCD (talk) 21:49, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * @JohnCD: The PNG image was uploaded by a sockpuppet. --George Ho (talk) 07:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, ✅. JohnCD (talk) 08:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Mcbutterfly.jpg
An authentic cover art, unjustly replaced by a digitally-made copy of cover art, uploaded by banned sockpuppet. Previously used in Butterfly (Mariah Carey album). -George Ho (talk) 21:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done restored and the other one deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zibby Allen
''I, Mallen22, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mallen22 (talk) 21:55, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

I have not been able to work on this article for creation for some months and it was just deleted about 1 or 2 weeks ago. I intend to work on it now and submit it for potentially becoming an article. -Mallen22 (talk) 21:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 22:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TRBOnet.
''I, 71.123.32.130, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 71.123.32.130 (talk) 04:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Festival One (NZ)
''I, Bewildered NZ, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Dan (talk) 05:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Dan, This was somewhat promotional in nature, specifically the points where you told people where they could purchase tickets. I'll e-mail you a copy of the page, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

File:M Butterfly.jpg
JPG image was replaced by a PNG image, which was uploaded by a sockpuppet. Previously used in Butterfly (Mariah Carey song). -George Ho (talk) 07:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ and replaced in article, and deleted File:Butterfly (single) Mariah Carey.png in accordance with WP:CSD. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:CAV Aerospace, Inc.
''I, Jetsarefast, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jetsarefast (talk) 15:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Would like to add more information from various sources and keep it open for more contributions to the article. -Jetsarefast (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Scott Disick
Request to restore edit history for this re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 18:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * . Just because it was recreated doesn't mean it's to be kept. As far as I can tell, the current article does not address the concerns raised in the previous 3 AFDs. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Now at WP:Articles for deletion/Scott Disick (4th nomination). JohnCD (talk) 19:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Why keep the past edits hidden? Now that it has been listed at AfD, it would be very useful if the previous edits could be restored so we can have a full and proper look at the article that is being discussed. Dolovis (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The past edits were already deleted as a result of previous AFDs. Restoring them is equivalent to overriding those AFD decisions. The mere existence of a new version that doesn't address prior concerns doesn't invalidate the prior AFDs, therefore restoration is not possible. The present article must stand or fall on its own merits. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The AfD is not decided on the article's contents. Per WP:CONTN: “Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If the subject has not been covered outside of Wikipedia, no amount of improvements to the Wikipedia content will suddenly make the subject notable. Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability.” If the AfD succeeds, then all the previous edits will once again be deleted from the user's view, but until then, we should see what has been shown before. Dolovis (talk) 23:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Which is pointless as such edits are irrelevant to the present AfD. The only reason they would be relevant is if the article got a declined G4 speedy (which it didn't). The AfD is based on the article as it was most recently, and so undeletion of revisions previously deleted via AfD isn't useful. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 03:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cody Stauber
''I, SophieandLewis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' SophieandLewis (talk) 19:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Cody Stauber. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I was just about to decline this until the username concern is addressed, but no harm done. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * My plan was to restore and then raise the username concern. Your way would have been better, to get their attention. I will keep an eye. JohnCD (talk) 20:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Mariah Carey - Without You (Artwork).jpg
Previously used in Without You (Badfinger song). Unjustly replaced by File:Without You Mariah Carey.png, which was uploaded by a banned sockpuppet. -George Ho (talk) 21:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅, original image restored and sockpuppet version deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Muse (novel)
''I, Allan Jackson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Allan Jackson (talk) 01:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:41, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Star-Spangled Banner Centennial Monument
''I, 73.188.17.187, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 73.188.17.187 (talk) 04:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Venkat International Public School
I am creating a page after some day my page is deleting and then click the "Save page" button below -106.51.138.82 (talk) 07:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ Page is not deleted. If you want to discuss text added or deleted from the article, then please use Talk:Venkat International Public School

Odoo
please can it be userfied or emailed to me for further editing -Alanbelllibertus (talk) 08:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Olamuyiwa Eleyele Abdulazeez
The requested reference for verification has been provided -Olamuyiwa Eleyele Abdulazeez (talk) 09:38, 25 June 2015 (UTC) --Olamuyiwa Eleyele Abdulazeez (talk) 09:38, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ THis page is not deleted yet. You are going to have to find several substantial independent references. State your case for keeping the page at Articles for deletion/Olamuyiwa Eleyele Abdulazeez. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * And as I told you above, you need to read WP:Conflict of interest if you are Mr. Abdulazeez. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 17:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ismail Kemal Ciftcioglu
I had not had time to make requested changes for it to be published and when I had time, it was deleted. However now I can able to change it into the proper format and edit the body of the wiki title. -Wanderer eterna (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Sweetwater Zen Center
Made some edits in the last 60 days - and in any case intend to keep working with the page and comments until I get an acceptable page - thanks -Annew43 (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator instead. That said, it wouldn't be outside the realm of possibility for it to be restored to draft for you to work on. — Jeremy   v^_^v  Bori! 17:39, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Probably referring to Draft:Sweetwater Zen Center, a much more recent edition, deleted per G13 mere hours ago whereas the original was speedied in 2010. -- Finngall  talk  18:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Finngall, I'm sure that's it. actually, the history shows that you have not edited it since November; but never mind, I have restored Draft:Sweetwater Zen Center for you to work on. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references, both to verify what the article says, and because Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, Notability, looks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." When the draft is ready, click the green "Submit" button to send it for review. JohnCD (talk) 19:30, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Global Hope Network International
''I, 71.53.230.137, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 71.53.230.137 (talk) 18:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Merchandising Inventives
This page was created using the same structure as ULINE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uline. However Merchandising Inventives has importance in the Point of Sale industry as being the creator of the 'Display Mobile' the first hanging free-motion displays ever used in retail stores. http://www.popon.net/classic-point-of-purchase-displays-series-one.asp In addition Sol Berger the founder of Merchandising Inventives was inducted into the Point Of Purchase hall of fame in 1999 for the invention. http://www.nytimes.com/1999/01/27/business/the-media-business-advertising-addenda-three-honored-for-display-work.html Please let me know what we need to do in order to restore this page. Thank you. -Merchinv (talk) 20:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done The article was deleted under the A7 criteria, which does not qualify for restoration by request here. Regardless of that, your account has been blocked. I suggest you review this and more importantly this and then follow the instructions left in your talk page. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OSSCube
''I, 128.177.95.50, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.It was deleted because it wasn't edited for 6 months. I would like to edit the submission and try to re-submit it. Thanks'' 128.177.95.50 (talk) 18:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Nothing to do, the submission is at Draft:OSSCube. Not sure why it was moved to a template, but it hasn't been deleted. § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:32, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Rajk Purohit
Please help me with retaining the article posted by us Named as Rajk Purohit. This is a biographic data of a Film Actor in India. No copyright has been violated by us. We have taken consent from both the Actor and the allaboutbelgaum.com website.

Please retain the article and let us know if you need any additional documentation to do this.

Thanks,

Shashikumar -3iglobalinc (talk) 08:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I deleted this. What you will have to do is publish a statement on the allaboutbelgaum.com website to say that that page is available under a CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL license.  Otherwise look at WP:PERMIT. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Even if they give it up as fair use the material is still pretty unambiguously promotional to the point where it'd be speedied as promotional, with phrasing like "We are talking about our very own and uniquely talented Raj K Purohit." Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:19, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University's School of Professional Education and Executive Development (PolyU SPEED)
Polyuspeed (talk) 09:14, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This was very, very unambiguously promotional in tone, enough to where it can't even be restored at AfC. Sentences like "PolyU SPEED offers a diversity of quality top-up Bachelor's degree programmes leading to PolyU-SPEED and PolyU awards, including honours degree programmes, in full-time and part-time study modes" are unambiguously promotional and not acceptable on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:28, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I've also blocked you for a promotional username, although I will say that I do not have any objection to you seeking a new username and beginning a new draft. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:29, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shirley Gnome
''I, Ashleyrobyn, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ashleyrobyn (talk) 07:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

I had addressed the last of the concerns brought up, and something went awry when I saved it (or so it would seem, as the edits didn't register). This was a while back. I got the email today saying it was going to be deleted, only to see that the article was deleted within hours of it being sent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashleyrobyn (talk • contribs) 07:33, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Achraf Baznani
meet the GNG and the Notability (people)/creative people guidelines. -105.154.86.9 (talk) 14:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. — Jeremy   v^_^v  Bori! 17:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion g11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. And my guess is the only reason you're requesting this is because the title is protected. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 19:25, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandeep_Salwan
sandeep salwan is a new delhi based performer and voice actor and has been featured in national news channel here is the links of his performance for IndiaNews A National news channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPjt6ZEq5tU&feature=youtu.be&t=20m9s and he has performed with famous indian personalities like smriti irani,baba ramdev, deepak chaurasia -120.56.194.50 (talk) 14:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Sandeep Salwan, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. However since TParis has retired you can take this directly to Deletion Review.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Santosh Kumar Bagla
Santosh Kumar Bagla is Well known & is a great personality in India, workin for Peace & Humanity. Mr. Claes Nobel has also awarded him for his job. -Seofaiyaz (talk) 11:37, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ Page is not deleted.  If you want to discuss text added or deleted from the article, then please use Talk:Santosh Kumar Bagla- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Kate-Margret
Request for undelete of page or new page resubmit. As page was deleted with our a good reason so. All content is real and honest. And the singer is very active in her career and exposure around the world. Please provide us with options and how to move to the next step, as this is very important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kate-Margret (talk • contribs) 19:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Page was deleted per Articles for deletion/Kate-Margret. Article author was also blocked for sockpuppetry and undisclosed paid editing.  Undeletion was also previously requested here and declined for similar reasons.  -- Finngall  talk  19:15, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done Not only was that deleted after a discussion, the article has a history of having been created by spammers with multiple accounts, against the Wikipedia terms of use. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:19, 26 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Do you think we should run this account through SPI? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I thought about it and stopped due to the tone and username. Perhaps this is the actual subject, come to try and fix things after paying the spammers didn't pan out. § FreeRangeFrog croak 15:18, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The use of the pronoun "us" and the declaration that "this is very important" suggests a blockable account to me. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:03, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Colin White (ice hockey, born 1997)
Request to restore edit history for this re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 13:59, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Jake Brigham
This article, which I created some time back, was deleted in December 2014. I failed to notice the AfD as it was going on. The subject was then of dubious notability, but now is unquestionably notable, due to his promotion to Major League Baseball. I think there was more content than what another editor has recreated. I'm just looking for an "undeletion" of those older edits to restore the edit history and deleted info, if that's possible. -– Muboshgu (talk) 19:24, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 20:47, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you! – Muboshgu (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fakoor Meghnatis Spadana (FMS)
Fmsco (talk) 06:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Dear madam/sir

It is a wonder why the page I am creating is being deleted every so often. it does not violate any rules and has not been copied from any website or digital place it is presenting our company and will be updated and reorganized gradually over time. but every so often someone comes to delete the page! I wonder if these guys are paid to delete a page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmsco (talk • contribs) 06:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Fmsco, it looks like you previously requested that the AfC draft get restored back on December 1, 2014. It was restored and no edits were made other than an attempt to remove the speedy tag once it was placed. You also created a version of the article in the mainspace on December 9, about a week after the AfC version was restored. It was deleted as WP:G11 (promotion) and WP:A7 (notability). We cannot restore the mainspace article because it's G11 and A7. I'm going to decline the AfC article as well since that was also promotional in tone. I will e-mail you a copy of the article, but you are not allowed to post this back in the mainspace. You are instead encouraged to create a new, neutral version of the article at WP:AfC and submit that. However I am going to block you for a promotional username, so you will need to either open up a new account (make sure to read over WP:COI and make sure that your affiliation to the company is known) or request an unblock and seek a username change. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:35, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Hi Babit
''I, SteveChervitzTrutane, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' SteveChervitzTrutane (talk) 23:56, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/K.P.P. Nambiar
107.107.60.68 (talk) 11:44, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. This was a blatant copyright violation of his résumé, from this site and so it cannot be undeleted.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

World Photography Awards
Original article was PROD deleted after 5 days in 2008. I stumbled upon it as I was about to create a redirect under the same title and was wondering if the previous article could be saved or would be useful to be incorporated into the World Photography Organisation article, after all, (S)WPA was very new in 2008, but is an established photography awards meanwhile. Therefore please undelete. -Matthiaspaul (talk) 11:26, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. Hey Matthiaspaul. The page was a blatant copyright violation of this site, and so cannot be undeleted.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for checking. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 13:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Missionary Lutheran Church
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -James Walter Clifton (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2015 (UTC) We have made changes hopefully to your satisfaction. We hope we have shown the relevance and how our denominational body differs from those who are judgmental and who at times can be cruel to the disenfranchised and marginalized by not showing Christian love and compassion. Thank you for your time.

Sincerely yours,

James CliftonJames Walter Clifton (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. I will note that the article is also a bit promotional/informal in tone. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * To show notability of the topic, find some substantial independent references, such as newspaper articles that talk about it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Oof - that page is very, very unambiguously promotional. It looks like it was tagged as such, but James Walter Clifton removed the tags. James, the problem with the page is that ultimately you appeared to be using it as a WP:SOAPBOX to promote your church and your religion. Listing the statements of belief is seen as promotional and what you need to do is basically write it in a neutral fashion, akin to things like this church's entry. However I do need to point out that the main reason that the Cathedral of the Sacred Heart has an entry is because its building is a historical landmark. You have to show where your specific church has received coverage in independent and reliable sources. I know that in the talk page you said that you stylized this after Lutheran Orthodox Church and Independent Lutheran Diocese, but I note that both pages have issues with tone and sourcing. I've nominated the first for speedy deletion for those issues and it looks like the second one will likely be put up for deletion in some form or fashion as well since I'm also seeing notability and tone issues with that article. The problem with saying that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is that the mentioned articles may not necessarily fit within policy either and might need to be deleted as well. It could also be that they would pass notability guidelines, but in most cases it's usually that the other pages don't pass guidelines either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Since it has now been deleted, this is a X mark.svg Not done on my part. I'm not against the idea of you making an article, but I will say that I'd prefer that you make this at WP:AfC rather than in the mainspace since that would allow you more time to work on the article and you'd also have an opportunity to have an uninvolved editor look over your work. I will warn you: most churches will not pass notability guidelines since most churches will never gain anything beyond coverage in their local newspapers at best. It's fairly rare for one to stand out since there are hundreds of churches in any given area. In all fairness, my old church would likely fail notability guidelines as well and it was established in 1949. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Atheist_Freethinkers
''I, PAR1138, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' PAR1138 (talk) 13:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * @PAR1138:  Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Appium
Initial deletion was based on subject being too new. Currently Appium is an accepted method of implementing mobile test automation on different platforms. -Rahul Srinivasan Aurora 16:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Komandhur. Well yes, in a sense. The core issue at Articles for deletion/Appium was that it appeared there did not exist sufficient reliable, secondary and independent sources publishing substantive material about the topic, in order to show that the it topic was notable. Its "newness" was not in any way a direct basis for deletion, but only cited as the probable reason those sources did not yet exist. Anyway, there is no impediment to the article being re-created. However, it must substantially address the basis for deletion by citing the types of sources I mentioned. If it does not, then the article is likely to be quickly deleted under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion as a substantially identical repost of a topic previously deleted on the merits and after discussion. That already occurred once and while it looked a bit different than the prior content, the sourcing was about as poor. Anyway, we do not undelete topics deleted after discussion here, as stated prominently at the top of the page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

HB Tune
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Gualtier Maldè 21:14, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:26, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Sho Kobudo
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -David Moriarty70 (talk) 21:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. — Jeremy   v^_^v  Bori! 22:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done  is pretty much the sum of the article. If you feel the topic meets this (at least) and you can actually prove it via secondary sources, then I suggest submitting a draft here. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 22:40, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Langkawi Auto Express
''I, Kctan75, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Kctan75 (talk) 05:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Kctan75, portions of this article were fairly promotional in tone. An example of this would be the sentence " LFS ensures Fast, Efficient and comfortable ferry services to our customers at all times." I'll email you a copy of the article, but you will need to re-write this to remove anything promotional before you submit a new AfC draft. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 

K.P.P. Nambiar
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mrinalininair (talk) 01:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * This is borderline promotional in places, so you will need to edit this some. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

TEN PIN ALLI
Due to my extremely busy schedule I was unable to work on this article for a period of about six months. I now have the time to work on the article and improve it, thus, I would like to request that this article be undeleted. -Ashton Wolf (talk) 18:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This was a copyright violation of various pages including here, here, and its Facebook page. Since you appear to be the musical's director, you may own the copyright to this content. If that is the case, please understand that you cannot license material for one-time use at Wikipedia but rather the copyright would have to be released to the world, under a suitably free copyright license. This is because we promise our end users – our readers, that the content they see is free for them to take and use, even for commercial purposes. You can read about the methods for donating the material at Donating copyrighted materials. If you were to do this in a verifiable manner, then the Volunteer Response Team may undelete the draft, or post a ticket to request it – I'm not exactly sure how they manage that end of matters, but they're the ones who would deal with the copyright release.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:19, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * It's also pretty promotional, so that'd have to be dealt with even if they filed a ticket through ORTS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TEN PIN ALLI
''I, Ashton Wolf, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ashton Wolf (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This was pretty unambiguously promotional in many places and it's also partially a WP:COPYVIO from the official website. I don't mind e-mailing you a copy of the article, Ashton Wolf, and I've done just that, but I can't restore this to the draftspace with those issues. You can use the email version I sent you to re-write the article to remove the copyright violation and the promotional tone. It was pretty much the lead paragraphs that were the biggest problem with promotion and copyvio offhand, so those are the ones that need the most attention. (Although on a side note you will also need to source the material in the article as a whole with independent and reliable sources since most of it was not sourced or had WP:PRIMARY sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You were also told about the copyright issues here, so please do not request this again. Just work on removing the copyvio from the version I sent you and make a fresh new AfC draft. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edouard A. Wattez
''I, Etienne Saint-Lubin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Etienne Saint-Lubin (talk) 21:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:51, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Pan European ICT & eBusiness Network for SME
I will add more independent sources. PIN SME is the biggest organisation for SME. Most of the members have Wikipedia articles in their own country/language (https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bascom, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundesverband_IT-Mittelstand, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupement_professionnel_national_de_l'informatique...) Please undelete the article and I will add more relevant information and independent sources. -Anpa80 (talk) 11:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

liko smith
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Justinburrows7 (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

i apologize fro the other pages i made i new to wiki, i dint not know in sandbox you could test things out, please do not delete my latest posted article everthing that im putting on there is real and credible


 * Since the article has not been deleted yet, this isn't really the correct place for this request. Perhaps the article could be moved to this user's userspace if it does get deleted, if that occurs? Just a suggestion. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare  ‖ 18:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


 * It looks like it was WP:G11'd by SuperMarioMan and offhand it does look to be pretty promotional. I'm pinging him in this conversation. He may be willing to send you a copy via e-mail that you can clean up. I'd suggest that he submit this via WP:AfC if he does try to re-add this to Wikipedia once he removes the promotional stuff. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done per above - Justinburrows7, you can ask SuperMarioMan to send you a copy but this can't be restored through here since it was a G11 deletion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:56, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stanley F. Buchthal
Nomut (talk) 09:51, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

MHPlayme1/Sandbox
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mhplayme1 (talk) 02:48, 30 June 2015 (UTC) - My apologies -- I've been slow to edit a final version of my article for submission and let it go too many months without finishing. I would now like to make final edits and re-submit it for consideration and promise to do so quickly. Thank you very much.
 * Mhplayme1, there is no article in your sandbox history, nor is there any record of you having had any article deleted. I see that there is a draft article at Draft:Arthur Lawrence "Art" Hellyer, Jr. and some information at your userpage, but nothing really elsewhere. I will say that you should probably move the stuff in your userpage to your sandbox though, as the userpage could come across as a WP:NOTWEBHOST issue to an unaware editor. It's not immediately apparent that this is your workspace for the Hellyer draft and as such, kind of unintentionally comes across as a resume at first glance. I'm not trying to be accusatory or anything, just that this happens so much with userspaces that people tend to get a little trigger happy with anything that doesn't look like the typical userpage. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:45, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done, nothing deleted, nothing to restore. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Deep Obsession
Incorrect personal involvement assumed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Franky Diamond (talk • contribs) 09:59, 30 June 2015‎
 * X mark.svg Not done Franky Diamond, this was deleted by Deb for WP:G11, Unambiguous advertising or promotion. I took a look and the page really did contain some fairly promotional tones because of phrases like "Another song available on YouTube for your listening pleasure" and "Zara's distinctive voice is captivating and with Charlie's solid support vocals this is a delicious blend." There are some parts of the history that aren't as promotional so you may be able to request that Deb restore those portions. However if it is restored then you will need to add sources to the article since the last non-blatantly promotional version of the page lacked sources to show notability. There were none on the page at all. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Strangely, the creator of the Zara Clark article has now requested deletion of that article as well. Deb (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * It looks like there was a rash of IP edits that added the promotional content, which might have been the same person that did the Zara Clark article. It's the same writing style from what I can see. I'm not entirely sure what they're trying to accomplish since the edits only made the page worse rather than better. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

TheHistoric Hill of Ave
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Alidezh1559 (talk) 12:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC) 1=The Historic Hill of Ave 2=hi,the article is actually very well translated to English and is edited carefully.It is categorized an is neat.please reconsider.


 * The article wasn't deleted, it was moved to Ave (hill). User:Alidezh1559 actually edited it there moments before posting this request for undeletion. --McGeddon (talk) 12:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Looks like Ave (hill) has since been erroneously speedied under A7 ("individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events"), despite being none of these. It is a hill. --McGeddon (talk) 16:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Shreya Ghoshal
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ysaurabh059 (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2015 (UTC) as the information i published was totally correct and sensible
 * , nothing to do. why are you posting here? The page is not deleted, and isn't even being considered for deletion. If you have a dispute with another editor about the content of that article, take it up on Talk:Shreya Ghoshal. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Furthermore, the information you added was not "totally correct an sensible". It was unverifiable, unsourced, and filled with non-neutral peacock terms. In other words, not sensible at all, and completely inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not to be used for promotion, and that's what you were doing. I have reverted the article back to the version of 29 June. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:22, 30 June 2015 (UTC)