Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 199

Lawrence Vigouroux
Is a notable player in the Liverpool F.C. Reserves and Academy, has a few player profiles, and is at Swindon Town for the season to gain first team football. -Shreerajtheauthor (talk) 16:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC).
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. We do not accept sources that have any sort of social, financial, or professional association with a subject for anything but uncontroversial information, and WP:NFOOTY requires that a player play in their first fully-pro football game to be notable absent other factors. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 17:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Please create a draft, and then submit a review here once you have enough evidence the subject meets the inclusion guidelines. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:23, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * . Is it possible to restore the page, or receive an archived version so that I can use as template and not have to start from scratch. I can work on it and then submit a review for inclusion.
 * . Any update?

Saga Becker
I'm not the first (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:James086) to note that the page of this notable actress has been removed under speedy deletion A7 (lack of prominence etc). This person is prominent as any brief research amply demonstrates, even on wikipedia itself where now broken links to their page appear on at least three other pages. I will pester the deleter, James086, to let them know about my actions and to find out why this was done as it seems like an inappropriate use of speedy deletion. -EdJ343 (talk) 22:25, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * . The article consisted of a single line: "Saga Becker (born 1988) is a Swedish actress. Becker starred in the critically acclaimed film Something Must Break."
 * The article indicated only that she starred in a film that isn't even notable enough to have its own article on Wikipedia. A claim of significance is enough to invalidate an A7 deletion nomination, however, in this case the only claim of significance wasn't about the actress, but about the non-notable film she starred in.
 * . Feel free to re-create the article with more substance; there's no point in restoring a 1-liner that would quickly be deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

andy mackie
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mackmot (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC) this Page is a motor sport biography and it is used to verify previous achievements I dont understand why it has been deleted please can it be undeleted
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Alan_DeKok
''I, Denvan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Denvan (talk) 19:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The Night Runners
I, Smhnow, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G4. . Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I would like to edit the article since I have notable sources and references that constitute The Night Runners for a Wikipedia page. Thank you. --Smhnow (talk) 22:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. G4 generally does not apply to drafts, and this isn't a draft. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 22:17, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/The Night Runners, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Otherwise please start a draft with the new content and references that show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: This is likely a sockpuppet, given the comments at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:40, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Juan Carlos Herken Krauer
Matthew Chesterton (talk) 07:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC) Draft:Juan Carlos Herken Krauer

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Matthew Chesterton (talk) 07:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Further reference material for approval is now available, and ready to be edited for a final version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew Chesterton (talk • contribs) 07:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:41, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Saber Mohammed
The article Saber Mohammed was deleted following an unchallenged PROD. I request userification. I suspect it was started by User:Sherurcij, who was capable of truly excellent work, but could be uneven, and some other unchallenged PRODs from his past I found couldn't be improved. If I don't think I can improve this one, after a couple of weeks, I'll speedy the userified version myself. Geo Swan (talk) 02:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 02:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Adonnis
Artist is of significant notability, has been featured on MTV, has worked with other significant artists and has a long list of major releases -License2Kill (talk) 01:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * License2Kill, X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Adonnis, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:43, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

User:David1217
Asked for deletion as U1 before being renamed to my current username. -Conifer (talk ) 19:12, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you asking for a histmerge with your present userpage or to just restore the deleted revisions under the redirect? — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The later. I just want to restore a few elements from the old page, not all of it. Conifer  (talk ) 20:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:26, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

jaqua realtors
Jaqua Realtors is a pillar of the Southwest Michigan Community and is as recognizable as a local chain of restaurants, a famous bar or entertainment venue or another local franchise that solicits business and is famous and well-known in a regional area. -Jackieangrrr (talk) 18:17, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator . Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ There was not a claim of importance, and it was slightly promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Serhat_Tanyolacar
Proper information has been given to satisfy the biographies of living people requirements. and then click the "Save page" button below -72.186.66.53 (talk) 17:26, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Note that although the BLPProd might not stick, the article as is is promotional and therefore could be deleted on that basis. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ The reason for deletion was that the article was promotional. A clue for any rewrite, is that independent references are required, and a draft would allow you to get this fixed before deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Andrew Duplantis
a medical crisis occurred and the page was neglected. Crisis is over, and we are ready to finish the page -Williamfbailey (talk) 15:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * "We"? — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Williamfbailey - if you represent a company or person in your contributions, or are paid to write this, we expect you to make a disclosure of your interests. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:58, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Anna Jones (chef)
''I, Jess.leawilson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jess.leawilson (talk) 15:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. although the old version is restored, I see you recreated the page anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Victor Sierra
I am in the process of writing up the information on this band and had put up the holding page for me to post asap. If this is not allowed then so be it I will repost when the page is finished — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wec15 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Have you considered going through our article-drafting process? Mainspace is heavily scrutinised. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:35, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ the entire contents of the page were "Victor Sierra (band)" which is not enough to make an article. I suggest you follow Jeremy's advice and write your page at Draft:Victor Sierra and use WP:AFC. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:03, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:DirectFN
''I, 123.231.15.127, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 123.231.15.127 (talk) 09:24, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Solution Inn
''I, Wakas444, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Wakas444 (talk) 10:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:06, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Globtacs
''I, CloudPT, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' CloudPT (talk) 13:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Draft was deleted as blatantly promotional per WP:CSD. -- Finngall  talk  14:18, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually the reason it was deleted was as an abandoned draft, although it was promotional, it was not even declined for that reason. Do you wish to restore or ask for a rewrite? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Joy Swift

 * We would like to reinstate this page as the biography and original links were accurate. It has just come to our attention this was deleted. -Summerdays27 (talk) 11:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Article had been deleted per WP:BLPPROD. -- Finngall   talk  16:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * BLPPRODs are restored here on request, like any other PROD, provided the requestor promises to add sources to the article. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 01:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ please add reliable references, else this will be deleted again in another week. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:25, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * please add working and reliable references to avoid re-deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Reenter:Sarah Hudson-Pierce
The page was deleted without notifying the starting author; no one contested the prod, and it was given speedy deletion. The one requesting deletion said that the subject of the article is the author: not the case. The article is at least six years old. -Billy Hathorn (talk) 19:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC) Billy Hathorn (talk) 19:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * There was no need to notify the author, because the original author of the article has not been active since 2007. In any case, the article is restored as a contested prod. ✅. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:22, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Vijñāna Parishad of India
''I, 167.219.0.140, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 167.219.0.140 (talk) 22:19, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌. This was a pure copy and paste copyright infringement of the content from here and here and so it will not be undeleted.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:World Congress of Finno-Ugrian Peoples
''I, Marjamol34, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Marjamol34 (talk) 21:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * @Marjamol34:  Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!"--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

HMAS Brunei (L 127)
I am requesting the undeleton/recovery of the pre-July 2015 article edit history of HMAS Brunei (L 127). The edit history was accidentally overridden by the pagemove of BRP Ivatan (AT-298) (the ship's current name) to the Brunei name, after the content at the Brunei article had been merged to the Ivatan name. --- saberwyn 21:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅, history restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -- saberwyn 12:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Shut Up Weirdo
''I, TedF13, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Have new citations that relate to notablility. TedF13 (talk) 18:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:13, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Catchword Branding
The Admin NawlinWiki speedily deleted this page, citing the A7 rule, which says that the organization being written about lacked notability. I contacted the admin on their talk page to try to address the issue, but I was unable to resolve it there. I think that the reason catchword is notable, is that it was one of the first companies in the naming industry and has had a ton of press that features them, some of which is actually only about catchword. Here is a list of all the articles that feature catchword: http://catchwordbranding.com/about/press/ and this one, by the Oakland Tribune exclusively focuses on them: http://catchwordbranding.com/coverage/CatchwordProfileOaklandTribune2004.pdf This very recent radio story is also about them: http://99percentinvisible.org/episode/title-tk/ Also, consider that there are other naming companies that have wiki pages, such as A Hundred Monkeys and Lexicon Branding. -Jrendleman (talk) 21:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * So, why are you making a request on this page? We don't restore A7 deletions here. Only the deleting administrator can do that. If he won't, your next step is to open a case at Deletion review to determine if the administrator acted correctly. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Pamela Ratner
''I, Vwest, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Vwest (talk) 18:33, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AirFastTickets
''I, 38.88.236.210, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 38.88.236.210 (talk) 13:43, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note I have moved it to Draft:AirFastTickets. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Eryk Thomas
''I, SeeCGo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' SeeCGo (talk) 05:46, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

I wish to have the article restored so I can complete it. It was removed because I didn't complete it in time, I'd like to restore it and save the page to be published and approved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeeCGo (talk • contribs) 05:51, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Kidderpore Swimming Club
''I, Snehasis007, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Snehasis007 (talk) 07:41, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Snehasis007, the submission was blank so there's nothing to restore. You can still try and make a new AfC article, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Andrew McMaster (songwriter)
''I, Genspeak, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Genspeak (talk) 13:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

April 15, 2011
Restore this page and April 16, 2011, and redirect both of them to the April 2011 page, like April 9, 2011 and April 10, 2011 are. 2602:306:30AC:CAC0:588:90E7:E5E7:AB16 (talk) 18:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC) -2602:306:30AC:CAC0:588:90E7:E5E7:AB16 (talk) 18:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ since you do not care for the history, there is no reason to restore. You can create the redirect if you register, or ask at Articles for creation/Redirects if you do not want to register.  So far there are only 3 days redirected to that month, so it looks not to be a standard practice. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:01, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Telsonic Ultrasonics
The discussion that took place here did not produce enough consensus for deletion, not even close. Therefore, I request this article be speedily undeleted. -BiH (talk) 09:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Gregory Opelka
''I, 99.126.240.210, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 99.126.240.210 (talk) 00:06, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:08, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Neuralytix, Inc.
Will be updating this month due to new information -Benwoony (talk) 05:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * For your sake, this had better be the case. A third G13 will effectively be game over for this draft. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 08:20, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ OK I have restored this, your last chance to make this into an acceptable page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

World Cheerleading Championships
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -213.205.253.32 (talk) 23:26, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Deleted per Articles for deletion/World Cheerleading Championships. See also recent discussion at Requests for undeletion/Archive 198. -- Finngall   talk  23:41, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Nupur Sharma
Nupur Sharma's page was deleted for notability. But she has fought two elections, won one of them, and contested against the Chief Minister of Delhi Arvind Kejriwal. She is also a young lawyer, and one of the most prominent young faces of the ruling party in India. Her page should be reinstated. -Rajneilkamath (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Mark Velasco
I wish to address the issues that the reviewer commented on and attempt to bring the article up to standards -Markv68 (talk) 03:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Markv68, it looks like this was previously restored back in December 2014 and it was not touched. Can you give us some sort of assurance that you will edit it this time? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:55, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Doug Hull Draft
68.227.24.207 (talk) 06:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The submission can be found at Draft:Doug Hull. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Lorna McDonald (historian)
''I, Donal P McDonald, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Donal P McDonald (talk) 10:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Lorna McDonald (historian)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Donal P McDonald (talk) 10:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

My article listed historical publications, and the publishers name by Dr Lorna McDonald and the editor requested that these be "supported by reliable sources" I guess I was overwhelmed by this as I would have thought that the name and publisher was sufficient. If I can get the draft back I will seek help to get it published. I was also disappointed in the time it took for the original to be reviewed as well.
 * ✔️ Please see the previous entry. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Kibana
Kibana software is hardly non-notable - it's a significant plugin for Elasticsearch open source analytics software -2601:600:8200:1F6:9177:DFA2:AF8E:CBF9 (talk) 19:24, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * A subject is considered notable if there are multiple third-party sources with professional editorial oversight and no financial, professional, or social connection to the subject that have written about the subject at some length. Wikipedia uses a much stricter meaning of the word than the layperson. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reception Academy
''I, Pierre Runacher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Pierre Runacher (talk) 15:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

To whom it may concern,

I would like to rework on the topic I originally created in order to redo it in a format which is more encyclopedic

Please do let me know if I can retrieve my work or need to start again from scratch.

Thank you for letting me know,

Kind regards

Pierre Runacher
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Reception Academy. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice and note that references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" are required to establish Notability. Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves: the present draft reads as though it might be the company website. I haven't checked, but if it is copied from their website, you need to rewrite in your own words to avoid copyright problems, preferably based on what other people say about the company rather than what it says about itself. JohnCD (talk) 20:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

7917677990507459
I was inspired`by jimmy wales speech on wikipedia. do think it would be really useful to have wikipedia catalogue every prime number. would be sum of human knowledge (wikipedia has articles on individual numbers. its really useful nowadays with cryptography and security technology. -Williammacewen (talk) 18:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted under criterion A1, indicating an article which didn't have enough context to identify the subject of the article. I can suggest trying to write this as a draft via our article-drafting process, but A1s generally aren't overturned here, on account of there being not enough article to really work with. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:08, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌. It is a noble, but impractical, aim to have an article about every prime number; even Wikipedia does not have infinite space, so we have to be selective. See WP:Notability (numbers) for the relevant guideline. JohnCD (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Logitech Harmony Remote
I contest this PROD as the product appears to be notable now. -Gparyani (talk) 20:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Alex McCall
''I, Johnawmccall, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Johnawmccall (talk) 19:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Benzinga (company)
The Page deletetion reason is that it was deleted previously, but I created it with new content and added many reliable secondary sources. Please review and recreate the page -Slowstars (talk) 16:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: Benzinga was deleted and salted in 2012 after a discussion at Articles for deletion/Benzinga and four previous speedy deletions. -- Finngall  talk  16:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * But check the content and references when I created the page Benzinga (company) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slowstars (talk • contribs) 16:49, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not an admin and therefore can't look at deleted content--I was just noting the history for the benefit of those who can. No judgment of the most recent version was intended.  -- Finngall   talk  17:04, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Irrelevant. G4 speedy deletions are not overturned here, as they're tied to a deletion discussion. You will need to take it up with the administrator who closed the deletion discussion (assuming they're still active admins) or take it to WP:Deletion review. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * This G4 delete was clearly out of process as the content was different, with different references that may be adequate to show notability. Anyway an appeal to the deleting admin user talk:JamesBWatson is the way to proceed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Johnson K. Gao
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -2605:6001:E48A:6B00:A5D3:8B69:1B75:9F5F (talk) 21:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC) A good dictionary shall be able to find as many words as possible. A good encyclopedia shall be able to find as many as articles as possible. "Johnson K. Gao" is a research professor, who meets the academic criteria. The deleter may not read or may have no knowledge about his advanced book published in 1993 by CRC press "Polyethylene Glycol as an Embedment for Microscopy and Histochemistry" in which he used his old name "Kuixiong Gao" as the author. His chapter on solid core liposome in "Colloidal gold: Principles, methods, and applications vol. I, edited by Hayat M. A. published by Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1989; His used name "Kuixiong Gao", which was indicated in "Johnson K. Gao" title, also appears in the book: "Immunogold-Silver Staining: Principles, Methods, and Applications" as one of contributors of that book edited by Hayat M. A. How can the deleter say Johnson K. Gao does not meet academic criteria? May be the contents of his book and articles are too high to the administer to understand, so as to who did not to read them. Why the administer not refer his scientific work to more specialists, similar to peer review, to get feed back before deleting "Johnson K. Gao" article? That deletion seems un-fair and wiki will feel regret for lacking of "Johnson K. Gao" article in the future, especially he is not only a good scientist in Cell Biology and Immunocytochemistry, but also a music composer. His unique character may inspire Wiki users or young readers to develop multi-talent. The discussion action shall wait more people, such that not only 3-4 persons, but 50-100 people who read the encyclopedia. Please temporary un-delete that article.2605:6001:E48A:6B00:A5D3:8B69:1B75:9F5F (talk) 21:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Article was deleted per Articles for deletion/Johnson K. Gao. -- Finngall   talk  21:30, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Johnson K. Gao, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note the tenor of that discussion. I would sum it up as "this article is so incredibly promotional in its sprawling writing, such a panegyric, that we have to start from scratch; the subject might or might not be notable, it's not clear, but this content has to go". Keeping that in mind, your post above does not address the real issue at all.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:1Cover Travel Insurance
''I, Green1234678, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Green1234678 (talk) 03:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Green1234678, the article was fairly promotional so I'm not going to restore it, however I will e-mail you a copy of the article (once you enable your e-mail) so you can work on removing the promotional tones and put a new copy through AfC. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Once you enable your e-mail, drop me a note on my talk page to let me know so I can e-mail this to you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greeks of the Sea
Pentz.peter (talk) 03:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:John Simoudis
''I, Juliette Lauber, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Juliette Lauber (talk) 03:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Did not finish editing page and was about to add proper links and updated bio -Juliette Lauber (talk) 03:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

The Night Runners (2)
''I, Unio5, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G4. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' --Unio5 (talk) 00:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. The article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/The Night Runners, it cannot be undeleted through this process. While you have posed your request as one seeking undeletion of a page that was removed under CSD G4, that speedy deletion criterion is for reposts of consensus deleted articles after discussion, so it has no life of its own but just calls to the same articles for deletion debate. Regarding that discussion, if you believe that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion Joe Decker. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Making a procedural note - this user was blocked as a sockpuppet. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * From here on out, can we revert off any requests for this particular article and block the requestor? Only people asking for this to be undeleted are Mason8252 sockpuppets. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 05:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd say pretty much yes. § FreeRangeFrog croak 06:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Anavex_Life_Sciences
Deletion was not made on the basis of consensus. The claim that the article must follow WP:MEDRS was not found to be convincing by some, including myself, having presented articles for companies that do not do so and still exist. Yet that requirement was then considered as not needed for those articles by editors in favor of deletion in what I consider to be a very loopy logic. --Agamemnus (talk) 09:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Anavex Life Sciences, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think you are correct: or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. There was very little participation. --Agamemnus (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If no one at all supported the delete, then I would restore it here. But in this case there were at least 5 people talking. Since you disagree about the closure, you should ask about it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Gaia Foundation
{{subst:refund|1= Gaia Foundation |2=This page is a valid link from other wikipedia articles and contains relevant information on a functioning NGO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.213.41 (talk) 12:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Request for the undeletion of Elle (blogger) from her supporter.
for the reason that this person gives or contribute an enlightenment of the people who read her blog posts specially gives people views and lesson from the experiences she posts. The people who read her blog posts also get to know each other and socialize sharing information and helped with each others problems and struggles as much as she loves her blog and readers she pledge to work hard and make more blog posts from his experiences and knowledge towards some topics that the people requested. She gives people remedy from their problems through communication and talk to them even on her personal accounts to make a connection from them and to know them, upon this requests for retrieve and undeletion of the page rest assured that she will work hard and will contact her that her page is approved and will be retrieved from speedy deletion. This page is dedicated to her from her work we would like to thank her for all so please let us. We would like this to be a present for her since her debut blog was on September 22 we would like to give it as a present for her. Hoping for your kindly consideration and hoping the page won't be subject for speedy deletion. Thank you so much in advance and more power to wikipedia -DDAENT (talk) 14:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Corrected link--please remember that article titles are case-sensitive. Article had been speedily deleted per WP:A7. -- Finngall   talk  15:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * We don't need 3 requests regarding the same page, so I have deleted the 2 redundant sections. You need to read the links which were provided to you on your user talk page, particularly regarding notability. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have restored this to a draft at Draft:Elle (blogger). There will have to be more suitable references than blogs before this can go back as an article. Please use WP:AFC to request a review when it is ready. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Igor Ustinsky
KHL player meets WP:NHOCKEY -Dolovis (talk) 16:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Julien Miquel
I would like to improve the page, just missed the deadline before it got deleted -Margausone (talk) 16:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:White Ash Mine Disaster
Georgialh (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Basilisk: The Serpent King
It's on the italian wikipedia -Shentino (talk) 21:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/pardo (surname)
''I, -- -- --, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' -- -- -- 22:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * @-- -- --: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * . -- -- -- 23:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)